Steelray Delay Analyzer vs Foresight
Two schedule analysis tools that look in opposite directions. Steelray Delay Analyzer is desktop software for Primavera P6 that runs an automated half-step delay analysis on past XER updates to show which changes moved the finish date, with published per-user prices. Foresight is a predictive project delivery platform that turns existing schedules into quality scores, risk assessment, machine-learning completion forecasts and executive reporting, with pricing through its sales team. Desk research from vendor pages read Oct 27, 2026; not tested, no winner.
In short: Steelray Delay Analyzer (Forensic delay & critical path analysis (Primavera P6); vendor publishes prices) vs Foresight (Predictive schedule analytics & delay risk; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Oct 27, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Steelray Delay Analyzer | Foresight |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Forensic delay & critical path analysis (Primavera P6) | Predictive schedule analytics & delay risk |
| AI role (our label) | Not AI-first | AI-first |
| What it does | Desktop delay-analysis software for Primavera P6 schedules that automates half-step analysis to find and quantify delays. Vendor says it runs a fully automated half-step analysis using the Daily Progress Method, following AACE RP 29R-03 (MIP 3.4), on any number of XER update exports, and identifies and quantifies delays that moved the finish date, including concurrent and but-for delays. Outputs listed: an Overview Report splitting delays and accelerations into progress-related changes and schedule revisions per period, Period Detail Reports naming the activities that drove impact, longest-path change analysis, a contemporaneous critical path for each window, a progress-only schedule export, near-critical thresholds, an Excel export, and a 3D Gantt where you drag the data date. Vendor says it is chosen by delay experts and expert witnesses in claims disputes (vendor claim). Steelray also sells Project Analyzer (MS Project quality), Analyzer for P6 (Steelray and DCMA checks) and Project Viewer. The site does not describe AI. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: Delay Analyzer page unchanged in substance (automated half-step / Daily Progress Method per AACE RP 29R-03 MIP 3.4 on XER updates; Overview and Period Detail reports, longest-path change analysis, contemporaneous critical path, progress-only schedule export, 3D Gantt). Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: unchanged in substance; the page also lists schedule revision summaries showing float before and after each change, delay overlays and longest-path, critical or progress filters on the 3D Gantt, a timeline view by day, week or period, selectable analysis targets (any activity or milestone, or the project finish) and a network diagram; the Steelray homepage still lists Project Analyzer, Analyzer for P6 (Steelray and DCMA quality checks) and Project Viewer. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: Delay Analyzer page unchanged in substance (fully automated half-step analysis by the Daily Progress Method per AACE RP 29R-03 MIP 3.4 on any number of XER updates; concurrent delays; Overview and Period Detail reports; schedule revision summaries; 3D Gantt that steps the data date as finely as hour by hour; Excel report with Overview, Period Detail and Longest Path Change Analysis tabs; near-critical threshold; network diagram). Training videos are on Steelray's YouTube channel. The site still does not describe AI. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: unchanged (automated half-step analysis for Primavera P6 schedules). Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: unchanged (half-step analysis by the Daily Progress Method per AACE RP 29R-03 for Primavera P6; concurrent and but-for delays). Still no AI described. | London-based "predictive project delivery" platform that turns existing schedules into risk assessment, forecasts and executive reporting. Forecasts cover completion dates. It also covers schedule-quality and change tracking and portfolio assurance. The risk page lists Quantitative Schedule Risk Analysis (QSRA), a Criticality Score and risk density, run-rate and resource analysis, and an always-updated risk register. The forecasting page says models are trained on over 1 million real-world construction activities, predicts best-case, worst-case and most-likely finish dates, generates Completion Plans (Blocking, Delaying, On Schedule, Completed), and supports what-if simulation of scope, sequencing or resource changes. Homepage claims 2x more accurate forecasts than bottom-up schedules, a 30% reduction in overruns and 40+ hours saved per month on reporting, and case studies cite Crossrail and a data-center portfolio (vendor claims, not verified). Its news lists 2026 awards for predictive AI, and a banner announces a $25M Series A led by Macquarie Capital Venture Capital (company statement). Re-read Oct 17, 2026 (evening pass): Schedule Builds & Optimization remains in the menu; homepage still says it is designed to work with your existing schedules; pricing unchanged (Talk to our team; /pricing not found). Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: homepage and forecasting page unchanged in substance (models trained on over 1 million construction activities, 2X, 30% and 40+ hour figures, the $25M Series A banner, 2026 Pinnacle and Datacloud awards). The Crossrail case study is now summarized as a 400% higher run rate and delivery more than a year faster (vendor case study, not verified). Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: homepage, risk-assessment and completion-forecasting pages unchanged in substance. The Schedule Quality & Changes page lists a schedule quality score for logic and structure (surfacing issues such as broken relationships or unrealistic durations), version change analysis including critical path shifts, and trend analysis across schedule versions. The homepage case-study list now adds a global data center portfolio and a rail operator alongside Crossrail (vendor case studies; results not used here), and the footer lists Defense among sectors. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: homepage, risk-assessment and completion-forecasting pages unchanged in substance (Criticality Score and risk density, run-rate and resource analysis, always-updated risk register and QSRA; finish-date prediction; designed to work with existing schedules; the $25M Series A banner). The case-study list now names the rail operator RailCo; case-study results and headline figures are vendor claims and not used. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (project delivery platform that turns construction schedules into executive insights, risk detection and completion forecasting; designed to work with existing schedules; Data Centers and Government sector pages; the $25M Series A banner). Forecast-accuracy, overrun and hours-saved figures, case-study results and quotes are vendor claims and not used. Re-checked Oct 27, 2026 (also read for a compare): homepage and completion-forecasting page unchanged in substance (project delivery platform turning schedules into executive insights, risk detection and completion forecasting; Schedule Builds & Optimization still in the menu; Data Centers and Government sector pages; the $25M Series A banner). Headline figures, case-study results and quotes are vendor claims and not used. |
| Who it's for | Scheduling professionals, delay analysts and claims consultants working with Primavera P6 updates (vendor wording). | Project directors, project controls teams, planners, owners, investors and contractors/EPCs on large projects; sectors highlighted include data centers and government (vendor menu). |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Per user, unlimited projects, tech support and updates included: annual subscription $3,990 per user per year, or monthly subscription $390 per user per month. (Pricing checked Oct 15, 2026; unchanged Oct 19, 2026: annual $3,990 per user per year or monthly $390 per user per month; unlimited projects, tech support and updates included.) Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: no price change (annual $3,990 per user per year or monthly $390 per user per month, both auto-renewing; unlimited projects, tech support and updates included). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: no price change (annual $3,990 per user per year or monthly $390 per user per month, both auto-renewing; unlimited projects, tech support and updates included). Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: unchanged ($3,990 per user per year annual, $390 per user per month monthly, auto-renewing). Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: unchanged ($3,990 per user per year annual, $390 per user per month monthly, both auto-renewing). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: unchanged ($3,990 per user per year annual, $390 per user per month monthly, both auto-renewing; unlimited projects, tech support and updates included). | No public prices found (checked Oct 16, 2026; unchanged Oct 17, 2026): the vendor site has no pricing or plans link in its navigation or footer, and /pricing and /plans return a not-found page. The site's calls to action include "Talk to our team". Confirm current pricing with the vendor. Earlier note (Oct 15, 2026): site routes to "Talk to our team". Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: unchanged. (/pricing still not found). Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: unchanged (Talk to our team; /pricing still not found). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged (Talk to our team; /pricing still not found). Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: unchanged (Talk to our team; /pricing still not found). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: unchanged (Talk to our team; /pricing still not found). |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 27, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Direction: Steelray says Delay Analyzer identifies and quantifies the delays that impacted the finish date, including concurrent and but-for delays, by comparing successive updates. Foresight says it predicts best-case, worst-case and most likely finish dates for every activity and milestone and runs simulations of scope, sequencing or resource changes. One is retrospective analysis of what happened; the other forecasts what may happen next.
- Method: Steelray names its method: a fully automated half-step analysis using the Daily Progress Method, following AACE RP 29R-03 (MIP 3.4), run on any number of P6 XER update exports, applying progress-related changes at the start of each period and schedule revisions at the end. Foresight says its forecasts use machine learning models trained on over 1 million real-world construction activities; its risk page lists Quantitative Schedule Risk Analysis (QSRA), a Criticality Score, risk density and run-rate analysis. Neither vendor says the other's method is built in.
- Outputs: Steelray lists an Overview Report splitting delays and accelerations into progress-related changes and schedule revisions per period, Period Detail Reports, schedule revision summaries, a contemporaneous critical path for each window, a progress-only schedule export, an Excel export and a Gantt chart where you drag the data date. Foresight lists a schedule quality score for logic and structure, version change analysis including critical path shifts, trend analysis across versions, Completion Plans (Blocking, Delaying, On Schedule, Completed), an always-updated risk register, custom reports and portfolio views.
- Users: Steelray says Delay Analyzer is the choice of professionals who conduct delay analyses and serve as expert witnesses in claims disputes (vendor statement). Foresight's menus are organized for project directors, project controls, planners, investors, owners and contractors and EPCs, with data center and government sector pages.
- AI: Foresight is tagged AI-first. Steelray Delay Analyzer is tagged Not AI-first; its page describes optimized analysis engines, not AI.
- Pricing (checked Oct 27, 2026): Steelray lists an annual subscription at $3,990 per user per year or a monthly subscription at $390 per user per month, both with unlimited projects, tech support and updates. Foresight publishes no prices; its calls to action are Talk to our team. See each tool page for detail.
- Not like-for-like: a claims or forensic schedule team and a forward-looking project controls team may each want one of these; this page sets out what each vendor says, and no vendor page we read says a forecast replaces a forensic delay analysis.
- Not used here: Foresight's forecast-accuracy, overrun, hours-saved and case study figures and customer quotes, and Steelray's days-saved line (vendor material). Neither tool has been tested by Means & Methods Lab.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Steelray Delay Analyzer
No reviews yet. Used Steelray Delay Analyzer? Yours would be the first.
Foresight
No reviews yet. Used Foresight? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- Whether Foresight's change analysis on your P6 updates agrees with a half-step analysis of the same updates
- What Foresight costs for your project or portfolio
- How either tool handles schedules from software other than Primavera P6
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: Preconstruction management & AI scheduling tools
- Compare: ALICE vs nPlan
- Compare: ALICE vs Karmen
- Compare: nPlan vs SmartPM
- Compare: Outbuild vs Planera
- Compare: Karmen vs Planera
- Compare: Outbuild vs SmartPM
- Compare: SmartPM vs Document Crunch
- Compare: Steelray Delay Analyzer vs SmartPM
- Compare: Nodes & Links vs Foresight
- Compare: Foresight vs nPlan
- Compare: Nialli vs BlackHyve
- Compare: cmBuilder vs PLOT
- Compare: Nialli vs Outbuild
- Compare: Planera vs SmartPM
- Compare: Steelray Delay Analyzer vs Nodes & Links
- Compare: BlackHyve vs blade ai
- Compare: Foresight vs SmartPM
- Compare: nPlan vs Nodes & Links
- Compare: ALICE vs Outbuild
- Compare: Nodes & Links vs SmartPM
- Compare: Karmen vs Nodes & Links
- Compare: Nialli vs Planera
- Compare: Karmen vs SmartPM: AI schedule building or schedule analytics
- Compare: Karmen vs nPlan
- Compare: ALICE vs SmartPM
- Compare: Outbuild vs nPlan
- Compare: ALICE vs Planera
- Compare: Karmen vs Outbuild
- Compare: ALICE vs Foresight