Home / Compare / Outbuild vs SmartPM
Outbuild vs SmartPM
Two scheduling products that both publish starting prices and include unlimited users, but do different jobs: Outbuild is a scheduling and field-coordination platform that can replace your CPM tool; SmartPM analyzes the schedules you build elsewhere. Vendor-published facts only.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Outbuild | SmartPM |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Collaborative scheduling & lookahead | Schedule analytics & project controls |
| AI role (our label) | AI-first | Not AI-first |
| What it does | Vendor describes itself as an AI-powered, collaborative scheduling and field coordination platform: build master schedules (or import from MS Project or P6), create lookaheads from the master schedule with progress pushing back automatically, weekly work plans with trade commitments, and reporting such as Percent Planned Complete, Percent Roadblocks Removed, Reason for Variance, and S-curves. Procore integration is described by customers; the pricing FAQ (checked Oct 15, 2026) lists two-way Procore integration, Autodesk Construction Cloud integration, and export to PDF, XML, or XER. Vendor cites 450+ customers and $50B+ in active projects (vendor claims). | Project controls and schedule analytics platform that connects to existing CPM scheduling software and runs what the vendor calls Automated Project Controls: schedule quality checks, progress against baselines, delay and compression metrics, and windows analysis (a customer quote says this went from weeks to minutes or hours; customer claim, not verified). Company, executive, and project dashboards plus a web-based Gantt. Procore integration is mentioned in a customer quote. The homepage does not describe the product as AI, so we tag it Not AI-first. |
| Who it's for | General contractors, owners, trade partners, and architects; superintendents and schedulers. | General contractors, owners, and developers in commercial construction (vendor wording). |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Starts at $999/month, billed annually, scaled by the company's annual construction volume rather than by user or project; every plan includes unlimited users and projects. Outbuild Pro (portfolio dashboards, risk and variance analysis) is custom-priced. Free trial offered. (Pricing checked Oct 15, 2026.) | Annual plans with unlimited users. Essentials $12K per year for up to 50 projects (automated schedule health checks, revision compare, core analytics). Controls $25K per year with 5 Controls slots (adds full project analytics, interactive Gantt, what-if scenarios and time impact analysis, portfolio insights). Pricing page offers a 60-day risk-free trial. (Pricing checked Oct 15, 2026.) |
| Test status | Not tested. No scores. | Not tested. No scores. |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 15, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Job: Outbuild builds master schedules (or imports MS Project or P6), creates lookaheads from them, and runs weekly work plans with trade commitments. SmartPM connects to your existing CPM scheduling software and runs schedule quality checks, progress against baselines, delay and compression metrics, and windows analysis.
- AI role on Means & Methods Lab: Outbuild calls itself AI-powered and is tagged AI-first. SmartPM's pages do not describe AI, so it is tagged Not AI-first.
- Reporting: Outbuild lists lean metrics (Percent Planned Complete, Percent Roadblocks Removed, Reason for Variance) and S-curves. SmartPM lists company, executive, and project dashboards and a web-based Gantt.
- Integrations: Outbuild's pricing FAQ lists two-way Procore integration, Autodesk Construction Cloud integration, and export to PDF, XML, or XER. SmartPM integration with Procore is mentioned in a customer quote.
- Pricing (checked Oct 15, 2026): Outbuild starts at $999 per month billed annually, scaled by annual construction volume, with unlimited users and projects. SmartPM lists Essentials at $12K per year (up to 50 projects) and Controls at $25K per year (5 Controls slots), both with unlimited users.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What we can't tell you yet
Which tool is better for your work. That needs testing on the same package with a verified answer key. Planned measures for this comparison:
- Whether SmartPM's schedule-quality flags agree with Outbuild's own reporting on the same project
- Time for a field team to keep each tool current week to week
See the methodology and leaderboard status.
Related
- Category hub: Preconstruction management & AI scheduling tools
- Compare: Togal.AI vs Kreo
- Compare: HCSS HeavyBid vs B2W Estimate
- Compare: AGTEK vs Trimble Business Center
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Provision
- Compare: Nomic vs Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: Exayard vs Togal.AI
- Compare: Beam AI vs Civils.ai
- Compare: Downtobid vs BuildingConnected
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Nomic
- Compare: STACK vs Handoff AI
- Compare: Countfire vs Exayard
- Compare: ALICE vs nPlan
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: PlanHub vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Trunk Tools vs Provision
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: Kreo vs Exayard
- Compare: Handoff AI vs Beam AI
- Compare: ALICE vs Karmen
- Compare: nPlan vs SmartPM
- Compare: Part3 vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Propeller vs AGTEK
- Compare: SitesAI Estimate vs Foreman AI
- Compare: DESTINI Estimator vs Ediphi
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Tenna vs Trackunit
- Compare: Tenna vs Tenderd
- Compare: Bedrock Robotics vs Gravis Robotics
- Compare: One Click LCA vs EC3
- Compare: HammerTech vs WakeCap
- Compare: MaintainX vs Brightly
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Outbuild vs Planera
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Propeller
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: Civils.ai vs Exayard
- Compare: Togal.AI vs STACK
- Compare: Karmen vs Planera
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: Samsara vs Tenna
- Compare: Built Robotics vs Bedrock Robotics
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Dodge One vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Shovels vs Dodge One
- Compare: C.Scale vs One Click LCA
- Compare: Trayd vs Miter
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Kwant.ai vs WakeCap
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: CivCheck vs CodeComply.AI
- Compare: PermitFlow vs GreenLite
- Compare: Civ Robotics vs Dusty Robotics
- Compare: Okibo vs KEWAZO
- Compare: Rebar vs Countfire
- Compare: Rebar vs Pelles AI
- Compare: Davis AI vs TestFit
- Compare: TraceAir vs TestFit
- Compare: Trendspek vs ConeLabs
- Compare: Citylogix vs Trendspek
- Compare: Voliro vs Skydio
- Compare: SmartPM vs Document Crunch
- Compare: SewerAI vs ITpipes
- Compare: Exodigo vs GroundedAI
- Compare: Sitewire vs Built Technologies
- Compare: Converge vs Giatec
- Compare: Cloud Cycle vs Giatec MixPilot
- Compare: CivilGrid vs Exodigo
- Compare: OneCrew vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Compare: All3 vs Reframe Systems
- Compare: Reds10 vs All3
- Compare: Reframe Systems vs Reds10
- Compare: Foldcast vs Strong by Form
- Compare: Steelray Delay Analyzer vs SmartPM
- Compare: Nodes & Links vs Foresight
- Compare: First Rule vs Document Crunch
- Compare: First Rule vs Provision
Means & Methods Lab has no commercial relationship with any vendor on this page. Rankings and placement are never for sale. See how we make money.