GreenLite vs UpCodes
Two ways to deal with building codes before a permit. GreenLite is a permitting service for commercial developers: licensed architects and engineers work with its AI plan review agent and LiteTable platform to prepare, review and track permit submissions, priced per project. UpCodes is self-serve code research software: searchable code libraries, assemblies and products, with Copilot, an AI research assistant, on its Professional plan, priced per seat. Not like-for-like: GreenLite does the permitting work for you as a managed service, while UpCodes is a tool your own team uses to look up and check code requirements. Desk research from vendor sites read Oct 30, 2026; no winner.
In short: GreenLite (AI permitting & plan review; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs UpCodes (Building code research & Copilot; vendor publishes prices). Facts last checked Nov 1, 2026. No winner declared; desk research from vendor sites.
Side by side
| Sheet row | GreenLite | UpCodes |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI permitting & plan review | Building code research & Copilot |
| AI role (our label) | AI features added to established product | AI features added to established product |
| What it does | Permitting and plan review service backed by software, titled "Permit Intelligence for Enterprise Developers": licensed architects and engineers work with AI agents to get commercial projects permitted, with human validation. Services listed are Diligence, Plan Review, Live Tracking, Full Service Management and Private Plan Review (certified experts review, approve and stamp plans before submission in jurisdictions that allow it; where it is not permitted, GreenLite still runs code compliance reviews ahead of submission). LiteTable is described as its permitting platform, Atlas as the dashboard clients use to follow each project, and Glen as its AI plan review agent, which does a first pass before experts decide; the vendor describes automated intake with jurisdiction-specific checklists. Industries listed include quick-service restaurants, automotive, retail, health and wellness, fitness, education and childcare, financial services and EV charging; project types include ground-up construction, tenant improvements, renovations and multi-site rollouts. A building-department offering described earlier was not shown on the current homepage, contact page or sitemap. Footer links a Trust Center. Expert-led service with AI in the workflow, so we tag it AI features added. Timeline, revenue and revision-cycle figures and case-study results are vendor claims not used here. | Code compliance platform that now describes itself as AI-native for codes, plans and specifications in one QA/QC workflow. It combines a building code library (vendor: 11M+ code sections with adopted codes, local amendments, errata and effective dates inline, side-by-side comparison of code years or jurisdictions) with diagrams, assemblies and building products. Copilot, its AI assistant, answers code questions with citations; its page lists prompts to find an assembly, ask a code question, get definitions, perform calculations and generate a checklist, and notes Copilot may generate incorrect information and is not legal advice. UpCodes Specifications imports office masters into a multi-user editor with suggesting mode, version control, Copilot first drafts and automated QA/QC, exporting Word or PDF. AI Plan Review (listed on the pricing page as in early access, Enterprise only) reads uploaded drawings and flags possible code issues cited to the adopted code; the features page lists cross-discipline coordination, code review, spec coordination, custom firm checks, constructability review and a civil review that it says will cover local requirements in roughly 4,000 municipalities at launch. ROI and savings figures on the site are not used. |
| Who it's for | Commercial and enterprise developers seeking permits (as of Oct 29, 2026; building departments were listed through Oct 28, 2026). | Architects and designers researching code requirements; also useful to estimators and subs who need to look up a code section cited in a spec (our framing). |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | No public prices. /pricing and /plans return not found. The homepage FAQ says GreenLite prices per project based on scope, jurisdiction mix and service level (managed permitting vs. private plan review authority). Calls to action are Talk to an expert and Get started. Confirm pricing with the vendor. | Vendor-listed per-seat prices: Essentials $39/user/month billed annually or $45 billed monthly (code, diagram, assembly and product libraries, search, projects, bookmarks, comments and Code Calculator); Professional $59/user/month billed annually or $68 billed monthly (adds unlimited Copilot AI questions with jurisdiction-specific answers and inline citations, UL and GA assembly lookup, and SAML SSO). Enterprise is Contact sales (dedicated platform specialist, personalized onboarding, materials library implementation, bulk discounting for teams of 25+, and AI Plan Review). Essentials and Professional offer a 2-week free trial. Confirm current terms with the vendor. |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Nov 1, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- What each sells (vendor wording): GreenLite calls itself permit intelligence for enterprise developers and says it combines licensed architects and engineers with AI agents to get commercial projects permitted on a predictable timeline. UpCodes describes a code compliance platform to research, collaborate and calculate code requirements, with Copilot as an AI-powered research assistant.
- Service versus software: GreenLite lists Diligence (a roadmap of forms, requirements and submission steps for the project type and location), Plan Review (discipline-by-discipline review citing the code section and plan location), Live Tracking (a portfolio view of every permit), Full Service Management and Private Plan Review where jurisdictions allow it. UpCodes lists code libraries, assemblies and building products, project bookmarks and collaboration, which your own staff use.
- AI (vendor statements): GreenLite names Glen as its AI plan review agent, which does a first pass before a licensed expert validates the work and owns the outcome. UpCodes Copilot answers code questions, defines terms, runs calculations, suggests assemblies and generates checklists, and its page warns that Copilot may generate incorrect information and is not legal advice.
- Human sign-off: GreenLite says its team includes registered architects, professional engineers and former plan reviewers and building officials, with stamp and license authority in house. UpCodes leaves interpretation and sign-off to your own design team.
- Who it's for (vendor wording): GreenLite's industries include quick-service restaurants, retail, automotive, health and wellness, fitness, education and childcare, financial services and EV charging, mostly multi-site commercial programs. UpCodes is aimed at architects and designers researching code requirements; estimators and subs can use it to look up a code section cited in a spec (our framing).
- Pricing (checked Oct 30, 2026): GreenLite publishes no prices; its FAQ says it prices per project based on scope, jurisdiction mix and service level. UpCodes lists Essentials at $39 per seat a month billed annually or $45 billed monthly (no Copilot), Professional at $59 or $68 with Copilot, a free tier for viewing codes and Enterprise by Talk to sales, with a two-week free trial.
- AI tags: we tag both as AI features added to an established product (GreenLite is expert-led with AI in the workflow; UpCodes adds Copilot to a code library).
- Not used here: GreenLite's revenue-recovered, average-days, first-pass and review-round figures, its ROI calculator and client logos, and UpCodes customer material (vendor material). Facts for both tools come from vendor websites (desk research).
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
GreenLite
No reviews yet. Used GreenLite? Yours would be the first.
UpCodes
No reviews yet. Used UpCodes? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- Whether your project type and jurisdictions are ones GreenLite covers
- Which code editions and local amendments UpCodes holds for your jurisdictions
- What GreenLite would quote for your project scope
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI design, site planning & engineering tools
- Compare: CivCheck vs CodeComply.AI
- Compare: PermitFlow vs GreenLite
- Compare: Davis AI vs TestFit
- Compare: TraceAir vs TestFit
- Compare: Aareas vs ResVR
- Compare: Higharc vs ResVR
- Compare: TestFit vs Autodesk Forma Site Design
- Compare: Snaptrude vs Arcol
- Compare: Autodesk Forma Site Design vs Arcol
- Compare: SWAPP vs Augmenta
- Compare: Endra vs Augmenta
- Compare: VAVETEK AI (BAMROC) vs Augmenta
- Compare: UpCodes vs CodeComply.AI
- Compare: GRAITEC vs IMAGINiT
- Compare: Higharc vs Augrade Dreamspace
- Compare: Anori vs Davis AI
- Compare: Solibri vs BIMcollab
- Compare: Revizto vs Autodesk Model Management
- Compare: Solibri vs Autodesk Model Management
- Compare: Marengo vs TestFit
- Compare: GreenLite vs CivCheck
- Compare: Revizto vs BIMcollab
- Compare: Snaptrude vs SWAPP
- Compare: Endra vs VAVETEK AI (BAMROC)
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Aareas
- Compare: PermitFlow vs UpCodes
- Compare: TraceAir vs Anori
- Compare: Augrade Dreamspace vs SWAPP
- Compare: IMAGINiT vs Revizto
- Compare: BidLight vs Marengo
- Compare: Solibri vs Revizto
- Compare: BIMcollab vs Autodesk Model Management
- Compare: CodeComply.AI vs GreenLite
- Compare: Anori vs TestFit
- Compare: PermitFlow vs CodeComply.AI
- Compare: Aareas vs Higharc
- Compare: Snaptrude vs Autodesk Forma Site Design
- Compare: TestFit vs Snaptrude
- Compare: PermitFlow vs CivCheck
- Compare: Revizto vs VAVETEK AI (BAMROC)
- Compare: UpCodes vs InspectMind
- Compare: Davis AI vs PLAN0
- Compare: Arcol vs SWAPP
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Higharc
- Compare: Solibri vs VAVETEK AI (BAMROC)
- Compare: Autodesk Forma Site Design vs SWAPP
- Compare: Endra vs Rebar
- Compare: Autodesk Model Management vs VAVETEK AI (BAMROC)
- Compare: UpCodes vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Deltek Specpoint vs UpCodes
- Compare: TestFit vs Arcol
- Compare: Higharc vs Arcol
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Higharc
- Compare: Structured AI vs CodeComply.AI
- Compare: Yard Designer vs ResVR
- Compare: Aareas vs Yard Designer