Home / Compare / UpKeep vs MaintainX
UpKeep vs MaintainX
Two CMMS platforms with published prices and AI assistants (UpKeep Nova; MaintainX Assist on Enterprise). Both cover work orders, PM and parts; Autodesk ownership is unique to MaintainX. Vendor-published facts only.
Side by side
| Sheet row | UpKeep | MaintainX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI-native CMMS & asset operations | CMMS & asset management |
| AI role (our label) | AI-first | AI features added to established product |
| What it does | AI-native CMMS and asset operations platform: work orders, preventive maintenance, parts and inventory, mobile technician tools, plus Safety (EHS), Learn (LMS built from SOPs and completed work orders), Edge IoT sensors (temperature, vibration, runtime that can open work orders), and Nova AI. Nova is described as building custom apps, generating work orders from voice/data, catching bad data, answering field questions by voice, and smart scheduling. Vendor says 4,000+ companies use it (vendor claim). | AI-powered CMMS and enterprise asset management: work orders, preventive and predictive maintenance, parts inventory, checklists and inspections, IoT and industrial controls data, reporting, and AI features that troubleshoot from manuals/procedures/work history, assist summaries and natural-language analytics, detect anomalies, and estimate work time. Site banner says MaintainX joins Autodesk. MaintainX Assist is listed on the Enterprise plan. Industries include manufacturing, building materials, facility management, and property management. |
| Who it's for | Maintenance and reliability teams in manufacturing, multi-site facilities, food service, fleet, healthcare and related industries. | Maintenance, facilities, and operations teams. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Essential $24/user/month (unlimited work orders and locations, Nova AI with 250 Nova credits/mo). Premium $55/user/month (adds Studio, PM scheduling, checklists, parts costing, time/labor, 30-day analytics). Professional and Enterprise: request a quote (offline mobile, request portal, full analytics, multi-site, API/SSO on Enterprise). Free trial / Pledge onboarding; no credit card required to start. (Checked Oct 15, 2026.) | Basic free forever (limited procedures and repeating work orders). Essential $20/user/month billed annually ($25 monthly). Premium and Enterprise are quote/sales (Premium adds unlimited procedures, analytics, meter-based maintenance, parts/PO, REST API; Enterprise adds multi-site, SSO, IoT, MaintainX Assist). Requester accounts free. (Checked Oct 15, 2026.) |
| Test status | Not tested. No scores. | Not tested. No scores. |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 15, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- AI: UpKeep positions Nova as foundational (custom apps, voice work orders, data cleanup, smart scheduling) even on Essential. MaintainX describes AI-powered troubleshooting from manuals/history, summaries, natural-language analytics and anomaly detection; MaintainX Assist is listed on Enterprise.
- Scope beyond CMMS: UpKeep adds Safety (EHS), Learn (LMS from SOPs/work orders) and Edge IoT sensors on the same asset records. MaintainX lists IoT/industrial controls integrations and joins Autodesk per its site banner.
- Pricing (checked Oct 15, 2026): UpKeep Essential $24/user/mo, Premium $55/user/mo, Professional/Enterprise quote. MaintainX Basic free, Essential $20/user/mo annual ($25 monthly), Premium/Enterprise quote. Both offer free requester-style accounts.
- Industries: MaintainX leads with manufacturing. UpKeep lists manufacturing plus multi-site facilities, food service and fleet among others.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What we can't tell you yet
Which tool is better for your work. That needs testing on the same package with a verified answer key. Planned measures for this comparison:
- Technician minutes to close a typical work order in each app
- Outside Means & Methods Lab's current benchmark scope.
See the methodology and leaderboard status.
Related
- Category hub: Facilities, building operations & asset management AI
- Compare: Togal.AI vs Kreo
- Compare: HCSS HeavyBid vs B2W Estimate
- Compare: AGTEK vs Trimble Business Center
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Provision
- Compare: Nomic vs Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: Exayard vs Togal.AI
- Compare: Beam AI vs Civils.ai
- Compare: Downtobid vs BuildingConnected
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Nomic
- Compare: STACK vs Handoff AI
- Compare: Countfire vs Exayard
- Compare: ALICE vs nPlan
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: PlanHub vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Trunk Tools vs Provision
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: Kreo vs Exayard
- Compare: Handoff AI vs Beam AI
- Compare: ALICE vs Karmen
- Compare: nPlan vs SmartPM
- Compare: Part3 vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Propeller vs AGTEK
- Compare: SitesAI Estimate vs Foreman AI
- Compare: DESTINI Estimator vs Ediphi
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Tenna vs Trackunit
- Compare: Tenna vs Tenderd
- Compare: Bedrock Robotics vs Gravis Robotics
- Compare: One Click LCA vs EC3
- Compare: HammerTech vs WakeCap
- Compare: MaintainX vs Brightly
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Outbuild vs Planera
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Propeller
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: Civils.ai vs Exayard
- Compare: Togal.AI vs STACK
- Compare: Karmen vs Planera
- Compare: Outbuild vs SmartPM
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: Samsara vs Tenna
- Compare: Built Robotics vs Bedrock Robotics
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Dodge One vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Shovels vs Dodge One
- Compare: C.Scale vs One Click LCA
- Compare: Trayd vs Miter
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Kwant.ai vs WakeCap
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: CivCheck vs CodeComply.AI
- Compare: PermitFlow vs GreenLite
- Compare: Civ Robotics vs Dusty Robotics
- Compare: Okibo vs KEWAZO
- Compare: Rebar vs Countfire
- Compare: Rebar vs Pelles AI
- Compare: Davis AI vs TestFit
- Compare: TraceAir vs TestFit
- Compare: Trendspek vs ConeLabs
- Compare: Citylogix vs Trendspek
- Compare: Voliro vs Skydio
- Compare: SmartPM vs Document Crunch
- Compare: SewerAI vs ITpipes
- Compare: Exodigo vs GroundedAI
- Compare: Sitewire vs Built Technologies
- Compare: Converge vs Giatec
- Compare: Cloud Cycle vs Giatec MixPilot
- Compare: CivilGrid vs Exodigo
- Compare: OneCrew vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Compare: All3 vs Reframe Systems
- Compare: Reds10 vs All3
- Compare: Reframe Systems vs Reds10
- Compare: Foldcast vs Strong by Form
- Compare: Steelray Delay Analyzer vs SmartPM
- Compare: Nodes & Links vs Foresight
- Compare: First Rule vs Document Crunch
- Compare: First Rule vs Provision
- Compare: Procore Resource Planning (LaborChart) vs Bridgit
- Compare: Assignar vs Procore Resource Planning
- Compare: HammerTech vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: Eyrus vs Kwant.ai
- Compare: Field Materials vs Kojo
- Compare: ProcurePro vs Field Materials
- Compare: Tread vs Curri
- Compare: Parspec vs Andercore
- Compare: TestFit vs Autodesk Forma Site Design
- Compare: Snaptrude vs Arcol
- Compare: Autodesk Forma Site Design vs Arcol
- Compare: SWAPP vs Augmenta
- Compare: Facilio vs Willow
- Compare: BrainBox AI vs Willow
- Compare: Verdigris vs BrainBox AI
Means & Methods Lab has no commercial relationship with any vendor on this page. Rankings and placement are never for sale. See how we make money.