Home / Compare / Kantiv vs Unanet ProposalAI
Kantiv vs Unanet ProposalAI
Two AI tools for drafting AEC proposal responses from a firm's own past work: Kantiv (pursuit intelligence platform, joist.ai now serves its site) and Unanet ProposalAI (proposal drafting that can connect to Unanet CRM). Vendor-published facts only, as recorded on each tool page; not tested, no winner.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Kantiv | Unanet ProposalAI (AEC) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AEC pursuit intelligence | AI RFP response drafting |
| AI role (our label) | AI-first | AI-first |
| What it does | "Pursuit intelligence platform" for AEC firms that pulls firm knowledge (past proposals, project narratives, resumes, client history, images) from drives, inboxes and old proposals into an AEC data model of people, projects, clients and pursuits. Described features: upload an RFP for a structured first draft built from the firm's past wins, requirement tracking, addendum syncing and compliance checks before submission, SF-330 completion, contributor collaboration, win/loss visibility by client for go/no-go calls, and Image Hub, which auto-tags images by what is in the photo. Says it integrates with Deltek, SharePoint and Egnyte. The joist.ai domain now serves the Kantiv site (checked Oct 16, 2026). Vendor cites 200+ AEC teams, $2.4B+ in proposals submitted and 50% less prep time (vendor claims, not verified). | AI proposal software for AEC firms. Unanet says it breaks a solicitation into actionable pieces, auto-generates prompts to answer each requirement, builds the outline in the required format with references, and maps every requirement to the response; a Champ assistant answers questions from business data and assesses opportunities before you pursue. Source material can include past proposals, project sheets, resumes, firm overviews and project descriptions, uploaded in batches, from supported content sources, or from documents attached to an opportunity in Unanet CRM. Unanet says it can be evaluated standalone, with the CRM connection adding opportunity, project and people context, and that connector behavior varies by environment. Its solution brief lists an RFP shredder and compliance matrix analyzer, natural-language search of the proposal library, a proposal chat bot, and hosting on a secure private cloud. Vendor claims 70% faster to first draft and responding to 30% more proposals (vendor claims, not verified). |
| Who it's for | AEC marketing and pursuit teams. | AEC marketing and proposal teams; Unanet CRM customers for the connected workflow. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Custom quote / no public prices on pricing page (checked Oct 16, 2026): the Pricing & ROI page is an ROI calculator (pursuits, hours and hourly cost inputs) with no plan prices. | No public prices found (checked Oct 16, 2026): the ProposalAI page links no pricing or plans page, unanet.com/pricing returns a not-found page, and the calls to action are "Book a Demo" and a video tour. Confirm current pricing, and whether it is sold standalone or with Unanet CRM, with the vendor. |
| Test status | Not tested. No scores. | Not tested. No scores. |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 16, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Approach: Kantiv describes an AEC data model of people, projects, clients and pursuits built from drives, inboxes and old proposals. Unanet ProposalAI describes a solicitation-to-draft workflow powered by governed CRM data, and says it can also be evaluated standalone with uploaded or connected content.
- RFP handling: Kantiv lists a structured first draft from past wins, requirement tracking, addendum syncing and compliance checks. ProposalAI lists breaking down the solicitation, auto-generated prompts per requirement, outline in the required format and mapping every requirement to the response; its brief names an RFP shredder and compliance matrix analyzer.
- Beyond drafting: Kantiv lists SF-330 completion, resume generation, win/loss visibility by client and Image Hub image tagging. ProposalAI lists the Champ assistant for questions and opportunity assessment.
- Integrations: Kantiv says it integrates with Deltek, SharePoint and Egnyte. ProposalAI's deepest connection is to Unanet CRM; Unanet says connector behavior varies by environment.
- Vendor figures (not verified): Kantiv cites 200+ AEC teams and 50% less prep time; Unanet cites 70% faster to first draft and 30% more proposals. Not measured the same way.
- Pricing (checked Oct 16, 2026): both quote-only. Kantiv's pricing page is an ROI calculator; Unanet links no pricing page. Not like-for-like: Kantiv is a standalone platform, ProposalAI is often bought alongside a CRM.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What we can't tell you yet
Which tool is better for your work. That needs testing on the same package with a verified answer key. Planned measures for this comparison:
- Share of drafted sections a proposal manager keeps after review on the same RFP
- Requirement-mapping misses against a hand-built compliance matrix
- Outside Means & Methods Lab's current benchmark scope.
See the methodology and leaderboard status.
Related
- Category hub: AEC proposals, pursuits & marketing AI
- Compare: Togal.AI vs Kreo
- Compare: HCSS HeavyBid vs B2W Estimate
- Compare: AGTEK vs Trimble Business Center
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Provision
- Compare: Nomic vs Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: Exayard vs Togal.AI
- Compare: Beam AI vs Civils.ai
- Compare: Downtobid vs BuildingConnected
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Nomic
- Compare: STACK vs Handoff AI
- Compare: Countfire vs Exayard
- Compare: ALICE vs nPlan
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: PlanHub vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Trunk Tools vs Provision
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: Kreo vs Exayard
- Compare: Handoff AI vs Beam AI
- Compare: ALICE vs Karmen
- Compare: nPlan vs SmartPM
- Compare: Part3 vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Propeller vs AGTEK
- Compare: SitesAI Estimate vs Foreman AI
- Compare: DESTINI Estimator vs Ediphi
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Tenna vs Trackunit
- Compare: Tenna vs Tenderd
- Compare: Bedrock Robotics vs Gravis Robotics
- Compare: One Click LCA vs EC3
- Compare: HammerTech vs WakeCap
- Compare: MaintainX vs Brightly
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Outbuild vs Planera
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Propeller
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: Civils.ai vs Exayard
- Compare: Togal.AI vs STACK
- Compare: Karmen vs Planera
- Compare: Outbuild vs SmartPM
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: Samsara vs Tenna
- Compare: Built Robotics vs Bedrock Robotics
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Dodge One vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Shovels vs Dodge One
- Compare: C.Scale vs One Click LCA
- Compare: Trayd vs Miter
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Kwant.ai vs WakeCap
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: CivCheck vs CodeComply.AI
- Compare: PermitFlow vs GreenLite
- Compare: Civ Robotics vs Dusty Robotics
- Compare: Okibo vs KEWAZO
- Compare: Rebar vs Countfire
- Compare: Rebar vs Pelles AI
- Compare: Davis AI vs TestFit
- Compare: TraceAir vs TestFit
- Compare: Trendspek vs ConeLabs
- Compare: Citylogix vs Trendspek
- Compare: Voliro vs Skydio
- Compare: SmartPM vs Document Crunch
- Compare: SewerAI vs ITpipes
- Compare: Exodigo vs GroundedAI
- Compare: Sitewire vs Built Technologies
- Compare: Converge vs Giatec
- Compare: Cloud Cycle vs Giatec MixPilot
- Compare: CivilGrid vs Exodigo
- Compare: OneCrew vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Compare: All3 vs Reframe Systems
- Compare: Reds10 vs All3
- Compare: Reframe Systems vs Reds10
- Compare: Foldcast vs Strong by Form
- Compare: Steelray Delay Analyzer vs SmartPM
- Compare: Nodes & Links vs Foresight
- Compare: First Rule vs Document Crunch
- Compare: First Rule vs Provision
- Compare: Procore Resource Planning (LaborChart) vs Bridgit
- Compare: Assignar vs Procore Resource Planning
- Compare: HammerTech vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: Eyrus vs Kwant.ai
- Compare: Field Materials vs Kojo
- Compare: ProcurePro vs Field Materials
- Compare: Tread vs Curri
- Compare: Parspec vs Andercore
- Compare: TestFit vs Autodesk Forma Site Design
- Compare: Snaptrude vs Arcol
- Compare: Autodesk Forma Site Design vs Arcol
- Compare: SWAPP vs Augmenta
- Compare: Facilio vs Willow
- Compare: UpKeep vs MaintainX
- Compare: BrainBox AI vs Willow
- Compare: Verdigris vs BrainBox AI
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: EquipmentShare T3 vs Samsara
- Compare: Hilti ON!Track vs Trackunit
- Compare: Komatsu Smart Construction vs Tenna
- Compare: Gearflow vs Tenna
- Compare: Procore Bid Management vs BuildingConnected
- Compare: SmartBid vs PreconSuite
- Compare: Pantera Tools vs SmartBid
- Compare: Buildr vs ProcurePro (BidLevel)
- Compare: Highwire vs Constrafor
- Compare: TrustLayer vs Jones
- Compare: bcs vs TrustLayer
- Compare: Jones vs Constrafor
- Compare: Avetta vs ISNetworld
- Compare: ISNetworld vs Highwire
- Compare: Marapone SpecChecker vs Helonic
- Compare: Deltek Specpoint vs RIB SpecLink
- Compare: Helonic vs Specset
- Compare: Specset vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Helonic vs InspectMind
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Riskcast
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: GCPay vs Trimble Pay
- Compare: Procore Pay vs GCPay
- Compare: Clearstory vs eSUB
- Compare: Adaptive vs SuperConstruct
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: Cat VisionLink vs HCSS Telematics
- Compare: Teletrac Navman vs HCSS Telematics
- Compare: Krane vs ConstructivIQ
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Billy vs illumend
- Compare: Bobyard vs Togal.AI
- Compare: Primepoint vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Adaptive vs Agave
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Mercator.ai vs Kantiv
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: AsBuilt vs Struction
- Compare: Drawboard vs Revizto
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: InspectMind vs Marapone SpecChecker
- Compare: AsBuilt vs Datagrid
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Followup CRM vs ProjectMark
- Compare: Mercator.ai vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Dodge One vs Building Radar
- Compare: OpenAsset vs Kantiv (DAM vs Image Hub)
- Compare: Flowcase vs RFPM.ai
- Compare: Deltek Vantagepoint vs Unanet CRM by Cosential
Means & Methods Lab has no commercial relationship with any vendor on this page. Rankings and placement are never for sale. See how we make money.