Kantiv vs Workorb
Two AI-first proposal tools for AEC firms that build first drafts from a firm's own past proposals, project sheets and resumes. Kantiv calls itself a pursuit intelligence platform built on an AEC data model and is quote-only; Workorb connects a Knowledge Hub to CRM, ERP and document systems and publishes a per-user price for its lighter RFP & Proposal AI Evaluator. Pages read Oct 16-17, 2026 (both re-checked Oct 19, 2026); desk research, not tested, no winner.
In short: Kantiv (AEC pursuit intelligence; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs Workorb (AEC proposal automation; vendor publishes prices). Facts last checked Oct 19, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Kantiv | Workorb |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AEC pursuit intelligence | AEC proposal automation |
| AI role (our label) | AI-first | AI-first |
| What it does | Pursuit intelligence platform (vendor term) for AEC firms that turns past proposals, resumes and project history into first drafts of RFP responses. It pulls firm knowledge (past proposals, project narratives, resumes, client history, images) from drives, inboxes and old proposals into an AEC data model of people, projects, clients and pursuits. Described features: upload an RFP for a structured first draft built from the firm's past wins, requirement tracking, addendum syncing and compliance checks before submission, SF-330 completion, contributor collaboration, win/loss visibility by client for go/no-go calls, and Image Hub, which auto-tags images by what is in the photo. Says it integrates with Deltek, SharePoint and Egnyte; its homepage (checked Oct 19, 2026) describes it as SOC 2 Type II certified. The joist.ai domain now serves the Kantiv site (checked Oct 16, 2026). Vendor cites 200+ AEC teams, $2.4B+ in proposals submitted and 50% less prep time (vendor claims, not verified). | AI proposal software for architecture, engineering and construction firms (Toronto-based per its site). The homepage (checked Oct 16, 2026) describes a Knowledge Hub that connects to CRM, ERP and document systems and has AI agents organise past proposals, project sheets and team bios; RFP summaries and evaluation against the firm's own Go/No-Go scorecard; suggested past projects and team members matched to RFP requirements; first drafts of proposals and fee letters in the firm's writing style; and a compliance and proofreading pass in which the AI acts as an evaluator. Connections shown include Deltek Vantagepoint, Unanet CRM, SharePoint and OpenAsset. Vendor claims, not verified: a structured first draft in about 30 minutes, most firms running in about 48 hours, and accuracy described as having no hallucinations. |
| Who it's for | AEC marketing and pursuit teams. | AEC marketing, business development and proposal teams; the lighter RFP & Proposal Evaluator is pitched at small and mid-sized firms. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Custom quote / no public prices on pricing page (checked Oct 16, 2026): the Pricing & ROI page is an ROI calculator (pursuits, hours and hourly cost inputs) with no plan prices. | Published in part (pricing page, checked Oct 16, 2026): RFP & Proposal AI Evaluator $175 per user per month on a monthly commitment or $149 per user per month on an annual commitment (the page says save 16%), no credit card required; Workorb Enterprise (Proposal Assistant, Document Assistant, brand voice, enterprise support) and Enterprise with Knowledge Hub are custom pricing. Taxes, minimum seats and term details not stated. Re-checked Oct 17 and Oct 19, 2026: unchanged. |
| Test status | Not tested. No scores. | Not tested. No scores. |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 19, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Where the firm's knowledge comes from: Kantiv says it unifies proposals, project narratives, resumes and client history from drives, inboxes and old proposals into an AEC data model of people, projects, clients and pursuits. Workorb says its Knowledge Hub connects to CRM, ERP and document systems and that AI agents organize and clean past proposals, project sheets and team bios, with no manual uploads.
- Drafting: Kantiv describes uploading an RFP for a structured first draft built from the firm's past wins, with technical staff contributing directly. Workorb describes RFP summaries, suggested past projects and team members matched to the requirements, and first drafts of proposals and fee letters in the firm's writing style.
- Compliance and review: Kantiv lists requirement tracking, addendum syncing and compliance checks before submission. Workorb says its AI acts as an evaluator that checks the submission against the RFP requirements, proofreads it and critiques the draft.
- Go/no-go: Kantiv describes win and loss visibility by client to inform go/no-go calls. Workorb says it can evaluate RFPs against the firm's own Go/No-Go scorecard.
- Other features: Kantiv lists SF-330 completion, resume generation and Image Hub, which auto-tags photos by what is in them. Workorb's pricing page lists a Proposal Assistant, a Document Assistant and brand voice and tone on its Enterprise plans.
- Integrations and security: Kantiv says it integrates with Deltek, SharePoint and Egnyte, and its homepage describes it as SOC 2 Type II certified. Workorb shows connections to Deltek Vantagepoint, Unanet CRM, SharePoint and OpenAsset; we did not record a security certification on the two Workorb pages we read.
- Pricing (checked Oct 19, 2026): Workorb lists the RFP & Proposal AI Evaluator at $175 per user per month on a monthly commitment or $149 on an annual one, with no credit card required to try it; Workorb Enterprise and Enterprise with Knowledge Hub are custom pricing. Kantiv's Pricing & ROI page is an ROI calculator with no plan prices.
- Vendor claims (not verified): Kantiv cites 200+ AEC teams, $2.4B+ in proposals submitted and 50% less prep time; Workorb claims a structured first draft in about 30 minutes, most firms running in about 48 hours, and no hallucinations. Not measured the same way; neither tool has been tested by Means & Methods Lab.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What we can't tell you yet
Which tool is better for your work. That needs testing on the same package with a verified answer key. Planned measures for this comparison:
- Share of drafted sections a proposal manager keeps after review on the same RFP
- Requirement misses in each tool's compliance check against a hand-built compliance matrix
- Outside Means & Methods Lab's current benchmark scope.
See the methodology and leaderboard status.
Related
- Category hub: AEC proposals, pursuits & marketing AI
- Compare: Mercator.ai vs Kantiv
- Compare: Followup CRM vs Unanet (Construction)
- Compare: OpenAsset vs Kantiv (DAM vs Image Hub)
- Compare: Kantiv vs Unanet ProposalAI
- Compare: Flowcase vs RFPM.ai
- Compare: Deltek Vantagepoint vs Unanet CRM by Cosential
- Compare: Unanet ProposalAI vs Workorb