Home / Compare / Exodigo vs GroundedAI
Exodigo vs GroundedAI
Two underground-intelligence companies with different jobs: Exodigo maps utilities and subsurface conditions before design and construction; GroundedAI records changing ground conditions during tunnelling and mining.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Exodigo | GroundedAI |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI subsurface & utility mapping | Underground mapping & decisions (tunnelling, mining) |
| AI role (our label) | AI-first | AI-first |
| What it does | Non-intrusive subsurface intelligence for infrastructure projects: utilities, foundations and geotechnical conditions mapped without breaking ground. Four stages: Remote Data Intelligence (ExoInfo, which uses AI to connect utility records, as-builts, geotechnical reports, satellite imagery and permits), On-Site Reality Capture (multi-sensor scanning with AI analysis, plus targeted validation), AI Engineering (2D/3D mapping, digital twins and design deliverables), and Utility Relocation Services. Combines AI with engineers and geophysicists. Vendor cites $75B of de-risked infrastructure investment, 86.1M sq ft scanned, $200M+ in venture funding and 100+ customers (vendor claims), and announces the acquisition of California civil engineering firm V&A Inc. | Platform for mining, tunnelling and engineering teams that connects underground observations to decisions: Lithos captures 3D data, photos and notes in the field and works offline; Strata turns field data into shared views, mappable data and repeatable reports. Exports datasets to Leapfrog, Deswik and AutoCAD. The CSV describes it as a system of record for tunnelling and underground construction that captures and georeferences changing ground conditions (C$2M pre-seed). |
| Who it's for | Owners, designers and contractors on infrastructure projects with utility conflicts: transportation, transit, water and energy. | Tunnelling contractors, mining operations and geotechnical engineering consultants. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Not publicly listed (site routes to sales). (Checked Oct 15, 2026.) | Not publicly listed (site routes to a demo). (Checked Oct 15, 2026.) |
| Test status | Not tested. No scores. | Not tested. No scores. |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 15, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- When: Exodigo works before you break ground (records research, non-intrusive scanning, design deliverables, utility relocation). GroundedAI works during underground operations (field capture, shared views, reports).
- Delivery: Exodigo combines technology with its own engineers and geophysicists and now owns a civil engineering firm (V&A Inc.). GroundedAI is software (Lithos and Strata) used by your team.
- Outputs: Exodigo lists 2D/3D maps and digital twins. GroundedAI exports to Leapfrog, Deswik and AutoCAD.
- Pricing: neither publishes prices.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What we can't tell you yet
Which tool is better for your work. That needs testing on the same package with a verified answer key. Planned measures for this comparison:
- Utility location and depth accuracy against potholing
- Fit with ASCE 38 quality levels (not stated on the pages we read)
See the methodology and leaderboard status.
Related
- Category hub: Heavy civil estimating & earthwork takeoff tools
- Compare: Togal.AI vs Kreo
- Compare: HCSS HeavyBid vs B2W Estimate
- Compare: AGTEK vs Trimble Business Center
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Provision
- Compare: Nomic vs Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: Exayard vs Togal.AI
- Compare: Beam AI vs Civils.ai
- Compare: Downtobid vs BuildingConnected
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Nomic
- Compare: STACK vs Handoff AI
- Compare: Countfire vs Exayard
- Compare: ALICE vs nPlan
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: PlanHub vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Trunk Tools vs Provision
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: Kreo vs Exayard
- Compare: Handoff AI vs Beam AI
- Compare: ALICE vs Karmen
- Compare: nPlan vs SmartPM
- Compare: Part3 vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Propeller vs AGTEK
- Compare: SitesAI Estimate vs Foreman AI
- Compare: DESTINI Estimator vs Ediphi
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Tenna vs Trackunit
- Compare: Tenna vs Tenderd
- Compare: Bedrock Robotics vs Gravis Robotics
- Compare: One Click LCA vs EC3
- Compare: HammerTech vs WakeCap
- Compare: MaintainX vs Brightly
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Outbuild vs Planera
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Propeller
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: Civils.ai vs Exayard
- Compare: Togal.AI vs STACK
- Compare: Karmen vs Planera
- Compare: Outbuild vs SmartPM
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: Samsara vs Tenna
- Compare: Built Robotics vs Bedrock Robotics
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Dodge One vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Shovels vs Dodge One
- Compare: C.Scale vs One Click LCA
- Compare: Trayd vs Miter
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Kwant.ai vs WakeCap
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: CivCheck vs CodeComply.AI
- Compare: PermitFlow vs GreenLite
- Compare: Civ Robotics vs Dusty Robotics
- Compare: Okibo vs KEWAZO
- Compare: Rebar vs Countfire
- Compare: Rebar vs Pelles AI
- Compare: Davis AI vs TestFit
- Compare: TraceAir vs TestFit
- Compare: Trendspek vs ConeLabs
- Compare: Citylogix vs Trendspek
- Compare: Voliro vs Skydio
- Compare: SmartPM vs Document Crunch
- Compare: SewerAI vs ITpipes
- Compare: Sitewire vs Built Technologies
- Compare: Converge vs Giatec
- Compare: Cloud Cycle vs Giatec MixPilot
- Compare: CivilGrid vs Exodigo
- Compare: OneCrew vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Compare: All3 vs Reframe Systems
- Compare: Reds10 vs All3
- Compare: Reframe Systems vs Reds10
- Compare: Foldcast vs Strong by Form
Means & Methods Lab has no commercial relationship with any vendor on this page. Rankings and placement are never for sale. See how we make money.