Home / Compare / SitesAI Estimate vs Foreman AI
SitesAI Estimate vs Foreman AI
Two tools that compute cut and fill directly from PDF grading plans with published prices. SitesAI is a focused earthworks takeoff app; Foreman AI is a broader AI estimating copilot with an earthwork module. Vendor-published facts only.
Side by side
| Sheet row | SitesAI Estimate | Foreman AI |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Earthwork takeoff | Estimating copilot |
| AI role (our label) | AI features added to established product | AI-first |
| What it does | Browser-based earthworks takeoff and estimating: load a PDF, DWG, or DXF plan, calibrate scale, trace work areas, set existing and design levels, and get cut and fill volumes with a 3D terrain view of levels and batters, then price and export to Excel or PDF. Volumes are geometric; you add your own bulking and compaction allowances. On the AI plan, AI auto-takeoff proposes boundaries, areas, and counts for review before anything is applied, and an MCP connector (22 tools) lets AI assistants drive the app. The core takeoff is manual; AI is a paid add-on tier, so we tag it AI features added. | AI assistant for contractors that reads full plan sets and project manuals on upload and answers plain-English questions with sheet citations, plus Takeoff Studio (calibrated, correctable takeoff objects), cross-discipline conflict flags, a budget builder priced from your cost catalog, company history, AI market estimates, or web pricing, and generators for proposals, RFIs, reports, and schedules of values. Earthwork takeoff computes cut/fill from traced PDF contours and spot grades (vendor notes accuracy tracks the plan's contour interval). Vendor says it was built by a licensed contractor and runs on US-based servers. |
| Who it's for | Civil and earthmoving contractors. | Solo estimators, small crews, GCs, remodelers, and specialty contractors (vendor wording per plan). |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Free US$0 (no volume figures or exports). Pro US$39/user/month or US$390/year (volumes, unlimited sheets, Excel/PDF export, cloud sync). AI US$99/user/month or US$990/year (adds AI auto-takeoff, MCP connector, monthly AI credits; 14-day free trial). 30-day money-back guarantee on paid plans. (Checked Oct 14, 2026.) | Free $0 (starter AI credits, 10 voice minutes, no card). Starter $399/mo (1 seat, $399 of AI credits monthly). Pro $799/mo (1 seat, $799 of AI credits, priority processing). Elite: contact (3 seats, unlimited AI usage). Enterprise: custom. Monthly plans; annual contracts for teams by contact. (Checked Oct 14, 2026.) |
| Test status | Not tested. No scores. | Not tested. No scores. |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 14, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Method: SitesAI has you trace the work area and set existing and design levels (spot levels, contours, or a survey DXF) and compares the two surfaces. Foreman AI has you trace existing and proposed contours and spot grades and differences the surfaces into cut, fill, and net volume with a heat map.
- File types: SitesAI opens PDF, DWG (R14-2018), and DXF (R12-2018). Foreman AI describes working from the PDF plan set.
- Shrink and swell: SitesAI says volumes are geometric and you add bulking and compaction as priced lines. Foreman AI reports bank yards with a swell/haul factor for truck yards and says to apply your own shrink factor.
- Scope beyond earthwork: Foreman AI also reads full plan sets and specs for cited Q&A, flags cross-discipline conflicts, and generates budgets, proposals, RFIs, and SOVs. SitesAI is limited to earthworks takeoff and estimate export, with AI auto-takeoff and an MCP connector on its AI plan.
- Pricing: SitesAI Free $0, Pro $39, AI $99 per user per month (14-day AI trial). Foreman AI Free $0, Starter $399/mo, Pro $799/mo (both one seat with matching AI credits), Elite and Enterprise by contact.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What we can't tell you yet
Which tool is better for your work. That needs testing on the same package with a verified answer key. Planned measures for this comparison:
- Cut/fill volumes against an engineer's earthwork report for the same grading plan
- Minutes to trace and check a typical commercial site
See the methodology and leaderboard status.
Related
- Category hub: Heavy civil estimating & earthwork takeoff tools
- Compare: Togal.AI vs Kreo
- Compare: HCSS HeavyBid vs B2W Estimate
- Compare: AGTEK vs Trimble Business Center
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Provision
- Compare: Nomic vs Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: Exayard vs Togal.AI
- Compare: Beam AI vs Civils.ai
- Compare: Downtobid vs BuildingConnected
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Nomic
- Compare: STACK vs Handoff AI
- Compare: Countfire vs Exayard
- Compare: ALICE vs nPlan
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: PlanHub vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Trunk Tools vs Provision
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: Kreo vs Exayard
- Compare: Handoff AI vs Beam AI
- Compare: ALICE vs Karmen
- Compare: nPlan vs SmartPM
- Compare: Part3 vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Propeller vs AGTEK
- Compare: DESTINI Estimator vs Ediphi
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Tenna vs Trackunit
- Compare: Tenna vs Tenderd
- Compare: Bedrock Robotics vs Gravis Robotics
- Compare: One Click LCA vs EC3
- Compare: HammerTech vs WakeCap
- Compare: MaintainX vs Brightly
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Outbuild vs Planera
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Propeller
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: Civils.ai vs Exayard
- Compare: Togal.AI vs STACK
- Compare: Karmen vs Planera
- Compare: Outbuild vs SmartPM
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: Samsara vs Tenna
- Compare: Built Robotics vs Bedrock Robotics
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Dodge One vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Shovels vs Dodge One
- Compare: C.Scale vs One Click LCA
- Compare: Trayd vs Miter
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Kwant.ai vs WakeCap
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: CivCheck vs CodeComply.AI
- Compare: PermitFlow vs GreenLite
- Compare: Civ Robotics vs Dusty Robotics
- Compare: Okibo vs KEWAZO
- Compare: Rebar vs Countfire
- Compare: Rebar vs Pelles AI
- Compare: Davis AI vs TestFit
- Compare: TraceAir vs TestFit
- Compare: Trendspek vs ConeLabs
- Compare: Citylogix vs Trendspek
- Compare: Voliro vs Skydio
- Compare: SmartPM vs Document Crunch
- Compare: SewerAI vs ITpipes
- Compare: Exodigo vs GroundedAI
- Compare: Sitewire vs Built Technologies
- Compare: Converge vs Giatec
- Compare: Cloud Cycle vs Giatec MixPilot
- Compare: CivilGrid vs Exodigo
- Compare: OneCrew vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Compare: All3 vs Reframe Systems
- Compare: Reds10 vs All3
- Compare: Reframe Systems vs Reds10
- Compare: Foldcast vs Strong by Form
Means & Methods Lab has no commercial relationship with any vendor on this page. Rankings and placement are never for sale. See how we make money.