Home / Compare / Samsara vs Tenna
Samsara vs Tenna
Two fleet and equipment platforms that both pair telematics with AI dash cams. Samsara is a broad connected-operations platform with a construction offering; Tenna is built around construction mixed fleets. Vendor-published facts only.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Samsara | Tenna |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Fleet telematics & video safety | Equipment management & telematics |
| AI role (our label) | AI features added to established product | AI features added to established product |
| What it does | Connected-operations platform with a construction offering: GPS fleet tracking, dual-facing and front-facing AI dash cams with real-time safety alerts and driver coaching, asset tags for small and unpowered assets, utilization, dormancy, and machine-use reporting for equipment and vehicles, preventive maintenance and remote fault-code alerts for vehicles and yellow iron, fuel reporting, and a worker-safety wearable. Its AI page describes Samsara Assistant (plain-language questions about your operation), Agent Studio (custom AI agents and automations), and Samsara MCP, which connects Samsara data to tools such as Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot while respecting existing permissions (vendor description). | Equipment management software that puts equipment, vehicles, tools, attachments, and materials in one system: GPS tracking and geofences, utilization, preventive maintenance and work orders, dispatching, asset financials, AI dash cams with driver and operations scorecards, DVIR/ELD/IFTA compliance, and a Virtual Superintendent with automated load counts. Sells its own trackers (TennaCANbus, TennaCAM, TennaFLEET, and more) and integrates with OEM telematics and accounting/ERP. Vendor says 750+ construction businesses use it (vendor claim). Tenna announced Virtual Superintendent on Oct 6, 2026; its first module, Load Tracking, runs machine-learning models on 1 Hz telematics data to recognize loading, queuing, and dumping and to count haul cycles and quantities by job, with no added hardware (vendor description). |
| Who it's for | Contractors and other operators running vehicle fleets, yellow iron, and mixed assets. | Contractors' field, shop, and office teams managing mixed fleets. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Not publicly listed (no prices shown in the pricing page text we fetched; the site routes to sales). | Not publicly listed (custom pricing by request). Pricing page says data and hardware pricing is based on asset count, with Premium Products such as Maintenance and Safety & Compliance as optional add-ons to the TennaCORE platform. (Checked Oct 15, 2026.) |
| Test status | Not tested. No scores. | Not tested. No scores. |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 15, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Scope: Samsara's construction page lists GPS tracking, asset tags for small and unpowered assets, utilization and dormancy reporting, preventive maintenance and remote fault-code alerts for vehicles and yellow iron, fuel reporting, and a worker-safety wearable. Tenna lists tracking and geofences, utilization, maintenance and work orders, dispatching, asset financials, DVIR/ELD/IFTA, and its own tracker line.
- AI: both sell AI dash cams with safety alerts and coaching. Samsara describes Samsara Assistant, Agent Studio for custom agents, and Samsara MCP for connecting its data to tools like Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot. Tenna describes Virtual Superintendent Load Tracking, which it says uses machine-learning models on 1 Hz telematics data to count loads and haul cycles by job (announced Oct 6, 2026).
- Pricing: neither publishes prices. Tenna's pricing page says data and hardware pricing is based on asset count; Samsara's pricing page text we fetched showed no prices (both checked Oct 15, 2026).
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What we can't tell you yet
Which tool is better for your work. That needs testing on the same package with a verified answer key. Planned measures for this comparison:
- Outside the benchmark scope; a fair comparison would need both on the same mixed fleet, including how load counts reconcile with haul tickets.
See the methodology and leaderboard status.
Related
- Category hub: Equipment, fleet & site operations tools
- Compare: Togal.AI vs Kreo
- Compare: HCSS HeavyBid vs B2W Estimate
- Compare: AGTEK vs Trimble Business Center
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Provision
- Compare: Nomic vs Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: Exayard vs Togal.AI
- Compare: Beam AI vs Civils.ai
- Compare: Downtobid vs BuildingConnected
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Nomic
- Compare: STACK vs Handoff AI
- Compare: Countfire vs Exayard
- Compare: ALICE vs nPlan
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: PlanHub vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Trunk Tools vs Provision
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: Kreo vs Exayard
- Compare: Handoff AI vs Beam AI
- Compare: ALICE vs Karmen
- Compare: nPlan vs SmartPM
- Compare: Part3 vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Propeller vs AGTEK
- Compare: SitesAI Estimate vs Foreman AI
- Compare: DESTINI Estimator vs Ediphi
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Tenna vs Trackunit
- Compare: Tenna vs Tenderd
- Compare: Bedrock Robotics vs Gravis Robotics
- Compare: One Click LCA vs EC3
- Compare: HammerTech vs WakeCap
- Compare: MaintainX vs Brightly
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Outbuild vs Planera
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Propeller
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: Civils.ai vs Exayard
- Compare: Togal.AI vs STACK
- Compare: Karmen vs Planera
- Compare: Outbuild vs SmartPM
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: Built Robotics vs Bedrock Robotics
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Dodge One vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Shovels vs Dodge One
- Compare: C.Scale vs One Click LCA
- Compare: Trayd vs Miter
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Kwant.ai vs WakeCap
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: CivCheck vs CodeComply.AI
- Compare: PermitFlow vs GreenLite
- Compare: Civ Robotics vs Dusty Robotics
- Compare: Okibo vs KEWAZO
- Compare: Rebar vs Countfire
- Compare: Rebar vs Pelles AI
- Compare: Davis AI vs TestFit
- Compare: TraceAir vs TestFit
- Compare: Trendspek vs ConeLabs
- Compare: Citylogix vs Trendspek
- Compare: Voliro vs Skydio
- Compare: SmartPM vs Document Crunch
- Compare: SewerAI vs ITpipes
- Compare: Exodigo vs GroundedAI
- Compare: Sitewire vs Built Technologies
- Compare: Converge vs Giatec
- Compare: Cloud Cycle vs Giatec MixPilot
- Compare: CivilGrid vs Exodigo
- Compare: OneCrew vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Compare: All3 vs Reframe Systems
- Compare: Reds10 vs All3
- Compare: Reframe Systems vs Reds10
- Compare: Foldcast vs Strong by Form
Means & Methods Lab has no commercial relationship with any vendor on this page. Rankings and placement are never for sale. See how we make money.