Home / Compare / Komatsu Smart Construction vs Tenna
Komatsu Smart Construction vs Tenna
Two routes to production tracking on sitework: Komatsu Smart Construction ties machine control, drone surveys and a Fleet load-tracking app to a design-vs-progress dashboard; Tenna runs machine-learning load counts on its own telematics data. Vendor-published facts only.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Komatsu Smart Construction | Tenna |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Machine control, guidance & site data suite | Equipment management & telematics |
| AI role (our label) | Not AI-first | AI features added to established product |
| What it does | Komatsu's suite of construction technology: Dashboard (combines 3D design data, aerial mapping and machine data to confirm quantities and progress daily), Design (prepares design files for Komatsu intelligent machine control and other GNSS machine control systems), Drone and Edge, Field (cost tracking of labor, machines and materials against the bid), Fleet (mobile app for fleet and load-tracking data to track production), Office, Remote (send files to machines, view what the operator sees), 3D Machine Guidance for Komatsu excavators, 3D Machine Guidance Flex (as-built data from any machine with an in-cab tablet), Intelligent Machine Control (IMC), a base/rover RTK unit, and Whiteboard for assigning equipment across jobs. The page we read describes automation and connected data but does not describe the suite as AI, so we tag it Not AI-first. | Equipment management software that puts equipment, vehicles, tools, attachments, and materials in one system: GPS tracking and geofences, utilization, preventive maintenance and work orders, dispatching, asset financials, AI dash cams with driver and operations scorecards, DVIR/ELD/IFTA compliance, and a Virtual Superintendent with automated load counts. Sells its own trackers (TennaCANbus, TennaCAM, TennaFLEET, and more) and integrates with OEM telematics and accounting/ERP. Vendor says 750+ construction businesses use it (vendor claim). Tenna announced Virtual Superintendent on Oct 6, 2026; its first module, Load Tracking, runs machine-learning models on 1 Hz telematics data to recognize loading, queuing, and dumping and to count haul cycles and quantities by job, with no added hardware (vendor description). |
| Who it's for | Earthwork and sitework contractors running Komatsu or mixed machines with GNSS machine control. | Contractors' field, shop, and office teams managing mixed fleets. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Not publicly listed (Smart Construction Remote offers a 30-day free trial on the page we read; other modules route to sales). (Checked Oct 16, 2026.) | Not publicly listed (custom pricing by request). Pricing page says data and hardware pricing is based on asset count, with Premium Products such as Maintenance and Safety & Compliance as optional add-ons to the TennaCORE platform. (Checked Oct 15, 2026.) |
| Test status | Not tested. No scores. | Not tested. No scores. |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Komatsu Smart Construction Oct 16, 2026; Tenna Oct 15, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Production data: Komatsu lists a Fleet mobile app for fleet and load-tracking data and a Dashboard that combines 3D design, aerial mapping and machine data to confirm quantities. Tenna's Load Tracking (announced Oct 6, 2026) says ML models on 1 Hz telematics recognize loading, queuing and dumping and count haul cycles by job without added hardware (vendor claim).
- Machine control: Komatsu sells 3D Machine Guidance, Guidance Flex for any machine, Intelligent Machine Control and design-file prep. Tenna does not list machine control; it focuses on tracking, maintenance, dispatch, dash cams and compliance.
- AI: Tenna explicitly describes machine-learning load recognition and AI dash cams. The Komatsu page we read describes automation and connected data, not AI.
- Pricing: neither publishes prices; Komatsu offers a 30-day free trial of Smart Construction Remote, and Tenna prices by asset count.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What we can't tell you yet
Which tool is better for your work. That needs testing on the same package with a verified answer key. Planned measures for this comparison:
- Counted loads versus scale tickets for one week on the same spread
- Outside Means & Methods Lab's current benchmark scope.
See the methodology and leaderboard status.
Related
- Category hub: Equipment, fleet & site operations tools
- Compare: Togal.AI vs Kreo
- Compare: HCSS HeavyBid vs B2W Estimate
- Compare: AGTEK vs Trimble Business Center
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Provision
- Compare: Nomic vs Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: Exayard vs Togal.AI
- Compare: Beam AI vs Civils.ai
- Compare: Downtobid vs BuildingConnected
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Nomic
- Compare: STACK vs Handoff AI
- Compare: Countfire vs Exayard
- Compare: ALICE vs nPlan
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: PlanHub vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Trunk Tools vs Provision
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: Kreo vs Exayard
- Compare: Handoff AI vs Beam AI
- Compare: ALICE vs Karmen
- Compare: nPlan vs SmartPM
- Compare: Part3 vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Propeller vs AGTEK
- Compare: SitesAI Estimate vs Foreman AI
- Compare: DESTINI Estimator vs Ediphi
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Tenna vs Trackunit
- Compare: Tenna vs Tenderd
- Compare: Bedrock Robotics vs Gravis Robotics
- Compare: One Click LCA vs EC3
- Compare: HammerTech vs WakeCap
- Compare: MaintainX vs Brightly
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Outbuild vs Planera
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Propeller
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: Civils.ai vs Exayard
- Compare: Togal.AI vs STACK
- Compare: Karmen vs Planera
- Compare: Outbuild vs SmartPM
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: Samsara vs Tenna
- Compare: Built Robotics vs Bedrock Robotics
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Dodge One vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Shovels vs Dodge One
- Compare: C.Scale vs One Click LCA
- Compare: Trayd vs Miter
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Kwant.ai vs WakeCap
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: CivCheck vs CodeComply.AI
- Compare: PermitFlow vs GreenLite
- Compare: Civ Robotics vs Dusty Robotics
- Compare: Okibo vs KEWAZO
- Compare: Rebar vs Countfire
- Compare: Rebar vs Pelles AI
- Compare: Davis AI vs TestFit
- Compare: TraceAir vs TestFit
- Compare: Trendspek vs ConeLabs
- Compare: Citylogix vs Trendspek
- Compare: Voliro vs Skydio
- Compare: SmartPM vs Document Crunch
- Compare: SewerAI vs ITpipes
- Compare: Exodigo vs GroundedAI
- Compare: Sitewire vs Built Technologies
- Compare: Converge vs Giatec
- Compare: Cloud Cycle vs Giatec MixPilot
- Compare: CivilGrid vs Exodigo
- Compare: OneCrew vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Compare: All3 vs Reframe Systems
- Compare: Reds10 vs All3
- Compare: Reframe Systems vs Reds10
- Compare: Foldcast vs Strong by Form
- Compare: Steelray Delay Analyzer vs SmartPM
- Compare: Nodes & Links vs Foresight
- Compare: First Rule vs Document Crunch
- Compare: First Rule vs Provision
- Compare: Procore Resource Planning (LaborChart) vs Bridgit
- Compare: Assignar vs Procore Resource Planning
- Compare: HammerTech vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: Eyrus vs Kwant.ai
- Compare: Field Materials vs Kojo
- Compare: ProcurePro vs Field Materials
- Compare: Tread vs Curri
- Compare: Parspec vs Andercore
- Compare: TestFit vs Autodesk Forma Site Design
- Compare: Snaptrude vs Arcol
- Compare: Autodesk Forma Site Design vs Arcol
- Compare: SWAPP vs Augmenta
- Compare: Facilio vs Willow
- Compare: UpKeep vs MaintainX
- Compare: BrainBox AI vs Willow
- Compare: Verdigris vs BrainBox AI
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: EquipmentShare T3 vs Samsara
- Compare: Hilti ON!Track vs Trackunit
- Compare: Gearflow vs Tenna
Means & Methods Lab has no commercial relationship with any vendor on this page. Rankings and placement are never for sale. See how we make money.