Kojo vs LeadTime
Two ways to keep track of materials before they reach the job. Kojo is materials management for trade contractors, built for MEP contractors, that runs purchasing itself (field requisitions, POs, warehouse, prefab, tools) and adds AI invoice scanning and 3-way matching in Kojo AP. LeadTime is a procurement tracking log for project teams that builds the log from your PM software, links the CPM schedule and collects status updates from subs and suppliers. Neither publishes prices. Desk research from vendor sites read Nov 4, 2026; no winner.
In short: Kojo (Materials procurement & AP; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs LeadTime (Procurement tracking; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Nov 4, 2026. No winner declared; desk research from vendor sites.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Kojo | LeadTime |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Materials procurement & AP | Procurement tracking |
| AI role (our label) | AI features added to established product | Not AI-first |
| What it does | Materials management for trade contractors, built for MEP contractors: plan, purchase, track, receive and pay for materials, with mobile field requisitions, purchasing, warehouse inventory, prefab and kitting, and tool tracking. Kojo AP uses AI-powered invoice scanning and 3-way matching of invoices to POs and delivery slips to flag discrepancies, with accounting/ERP and supplier integrations. Tool Tracking (usekojo.com/solutions/tool-tracking and a launch blog post) describes a central tool inventory showing each tool's assignee, location and condition; tool detail pages with pictures and statuses; lifecycle statuses including service, damaged, lost and stolen; filters by job, assignee, location, status, serial and model number; bulk moves and check-in/check-out with a status-change history; and field, warehouse and tool crib teams checking tools in and out and requesting tools on their phones. Savings figures and customer quotes are vendor claims not used here. | Supply chain, procurement and delivery tracking for construction projects, replacing manual procurement spreadsheets. Listed features: generate the procurement log automatically from existing PM-software data, link CPM project schedules and stay in sync with schedule changes, real-time tracking of every item, automatic collection of status updates from subs and suppliers, and a real-time dashboard and mobile app for the field, office and trades. The homepage (rendered in a headless browser; a plain fetch returns only the page title) does not name specific PM or scheduling products and does not describe AI features, so we tag it Not AI-first. Customer quotes are vendor-published and are not used. |
| Who it's for | MEP and other trade contractors' field, purchasing, and finance teams. | General contractors and their trades. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Not publicly listed. The pricing page offers a custom quote for each product group (Warehouse and Prefab, Procurement, Finance; the quote form also lists Tool Tracking) and lists unlimited users, unlimited data, tailored onboarding, ongoing support and no hidden fees (vendor statements). The Finance group lists automated invoice scanning, accounting integrations, custom approvals and 3-way invoice matching. No prices shown. | Not publicly listed. The homepage lists two subscription types, both with unlimited users: Project Subscriptions (project-level tracking, includes building partners, duration-based billing, live training and support) and an Enterprise Subscription (company-wide features, annual billing, volume discounts, dedicated support); custom quote after a demo. Confirm pricing with the vendor. |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Nov 4, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Partly like-for-like (our reading): both replace procurement spreadsheets and show the status of material orders. Kojo is where a trade contractor places and pays for its own orders; LeadTime tracks procurement items across a project, including those held by trades and suppliers, against the schedule. AI tags differ: Kojo is AI features added to an established product, LeadTime is Not AI-first because its homepage does not describe AI.
- Ordering and tracking (vendor statements): Kojo says the field can order from their phone like online shopping, with requisitions, purchasing, warehouse inventory, prefab and kitting, and real-time visibility from field to finance. LeadTime says it generates the procurement log automatically from existing PM-software data, tracks every item in real time and collects updates from subs and suppliers automatically, with a real-time dashboard and a mobile app for the field, office and trades.
- Schedule link: LeadTime links CPM project schedules and stays in sync with schedule changes. The Kojo pages we read describe getting materials to the right place at the right time but do not describe a CPM schedule link.
- Beyond procurement: Kojo covers the back office too (Kojo AP: AI-powered invoice scanning, 3-way matching of invoices to POs and delivery slips, custom approvals and accounting integrations) and tool tracking. LeadTime's homepage stays on procurement and delivery tracking.
- Connections: Kojo's site lists Acumatica, Autodesk, CMiC, Access Coins Evo, Deltek ComputerEase, eCMS, Foundation, Procore, QuickBooks Desktop and Online, Sage 100, Sage 300 CRE, Sage Intacct, Spectrum and Vista. LeadTime's homepage does not name specific PM or scheduling products.
- Pricing (read Nov 4, 2026): neither publishes prices. Kojo quotes per product group with unlimited users and data, tailored onboarding and no hidden fees (vendor statements); LeadTime offers Project Subscriptions (duration-based billing) and an Enterprise Subscription (annual billing, volume discounts), both with unlimited users, and a custom quote after a demo. See each tool page for detail.
- Not used here: Kojo's savings and time figures and customer quotes, and LeadTime's customer quote (vendor material). Facts for both tools come from vendor websites (desk research).
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Kojo
No reviews yet. Used Kojo? Yours would be the first.
LeadTime
No reviews yet. Used LeadTime? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- Whether you need to place and pay for your own material orders or track procurement across all trades on a project
- Which PM and scheduling software LeadTime reads from in practice
- What each costs for your project count and team size
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: Materials, procurement & supply chain tools
- Compare: PLOT vs Voyage Control
- Compare: Converge vs Giatec
- Compare: Cloud Cycle vs Giatec MixPilot
- Compare: Field Materials vs Kojo
- Compare: ProcurePro vs Field Materials
- Compare: Tread vs Curri
- Compare: Parspec vs Andercore
- Compare: Krane vs ConstructivIQ
- Compare: Concrete.ai vs Giatec SmartMix
- Compare: LeadTime vs ConstructivIQ
- Compare: Koncurent vs LeadTime
- Compare: Remarcable vs Kojo
- Compare: Krane vs LeadTime
- Compare: Converge vs Cloud Cycle
- Compare: Curri vs Andercore
- Compare: Koncurent vs Stratus
- Compare: cmBuilder vs Voyage Control
- Compare: Tread vs Pronto
- Compare: BuildVision vs Remarcable
- Compare: Kojo vs ConstructivIQ
- Compare: Krane vs Voyage Control
- Compare: PLOT vs LeadTime
- Compare: Field Materials vs Krane
- Compare: Field Materials vs Remarcable
- Compare: Kojo vs Krane: trade materials platform or AI procurement crew
- Compare: Andercore vs Field Materials: AI supplier or AI procurement software
- Compare: Koncurent vs ConstructivIQ
- Compare: Kojo vs ProcurePro
- Compare: Field Materials vs Parspec
- Compare: Converge vs Concrete.ai
- Compare: Krane vs Remarcable
- Compare: Field Materials vs ConstructivIQ
- Compare: Kojo vs Koncurent
- Compare: PLOT vs Krane
- Compare: ProcurePro vs Krane
- Compare: PLOT vs Field Materials
- Compare: Curri vs PLOT
- Compare: Cloud Cycle vs Concrete.ai
- Compare: Koncurent vs Krane
- Compare: Kojo vs Hilti ON!Track
- Compare: Parspec vs Remarcable
- Compare: EzzyBills vs Kojo
- Compare: LeadTime vs Remarcable
- Compare: Curri vs Voyage Control
- Compare: CarbonCure vs Cloud Cycle
- Compare: Koncurent vs Remarcable
- Compare: Kojo vs PLOT