Enlaye vs Provision
Two AI tools that read construction contracts for risk, sold in very different ways. Enlaye is an AI-native risk lifecycle management platform for builders, developers and owners, with an AI risk assistant whose answers can be checked against sources and integrations with Autodesk Construction Cloud, Procore and SharePoint; it publishes no prices. Provision is a preconstruction AI platform for general contractors and subcontractors with three products (Chat Agent, Scope Agent and Risk Review) priced per project from $50, $500 and $100. Desk research from vendor pages read Oct 28, 2026; not tested, no winner.
In short: Enlaye (AI risk lifecycle management; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs Provision (Contract & document review; vendor publishes prices). Facts last checked Oct 28, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Enlaye | Provision |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI risk lifecycle management | Contract & document review |
| AI role (our label) | AI-first | AI-first |
| What it does | AI-native "Risk Lifecycle Management" platform for builders, developers and owners, with an AI risk assistant that cites its sources. Vendor says it never shares your data. Its What We Do page covers builders managing and transferring project risk, developers assessing construction risk exposure across projects, and public and agency owners assembling bid packages, catching RFP errors or overlaps and comparing bids. An Autodesk Construction Cloud integration (announced Sept 15, 2025; Autodesk App Store listing) imports documents from Autodesk Build or Docs for risk analysis and creates ACC issues from Enlaye; the announcement also describes multi-modal analysis of contracts, RFIs, schedules, drawings and field reports and an Enlaye Field App for logging incidents and delays. Announced a $5M seed round on June 10, 2026 (vendor press release). Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: homepage and What We Do page unchanged in substance; the homepage still says the assistant's responses can be corroborated with sources and that Enlaye AI fits into a customer's own workflows, and lists a Boston, MA address. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: homepage and What We Do page unchanged in substance (AI risk assistant whose responses can be corroborated with sources, never shares customer data, separate builder, developer and owner use cases). The homepage now says Enlaye integrates with Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC), Procore, Microsoft SharePoint and more (vendor statement); the What We Do page's time and bottom-line savings percentages and the homepage's 10x-faster line are vendor claims not used here. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026 (rendered in a headless browser): homepage and What We Do page unchanged in substance (AI-native Risk Lifecycle Management platform; responses can be corroborated with sources; never shares customer data; integrates with Autodesk Construction Cloud, Procore, Microsoft SharePoint and more; builder, developer and owner use cases; $5M seed announcement banner). The 10x-faster line and the 67% time and 20% bottom-line savings figures are vendor claims and are not used. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026 (rendered in a headless browser): enlaye.com now redirects to an /en/ path and the menu shows a language selector; homepage unchanged in substance (AI-native Risk Lifecycle Management platform for builders, developers and owners; responses corroborated with sources; integrates with Autodesk Construction Cloud, Procore, Microsoft SharePoint and more; $5M seed banner); the footer links a Legal Center and Trust Center. The 10x-faster line is a vendor claim and not used. | AI preconstruction platform with a Chat Agent for cited document answers, a Scope Agent for scopes of work, and Risk Review for contract risk. The Chat Agent gives source-cited answers from drawings, specs, contracts, RFIs, and addenda; the Scope Agent writes scopes of work and finds scope gaps; Risk Review is automated contract analysis that flags risky clauses, missing scope, and commercial exposures with citations, severity levels, default-position comparison, and RFI/redline generation. Vendor claims 95% verified accuracy, that it can read up to 100,000 pages, and that it is SOC 2 Type II certified (vendor claims, not verified). Homepage cites 66,000+ documents processed, 1M+ risks identified, and 50,000+ queries answered. Risk Review page (read Oct 16, 2026) now describes contract review and spec review bundled in one product: spec requirements surfaced and organized, requirements traced across specs, drawings and contracts, cross-document conflict detection, conflicting or unclear requirements flagged before bid day, and unlimited custom checklists (vendor descriptions). Site banner says Scope Agent is now generally available. Its YC profile (read Oct 18, 2026) now describes Provision as building the AI Estimator for construction, identifying risks and obligations in contracts, specs and drawings. Y Combinator batch: Summer 2022 (YC company profile). Re-read Oct 19, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance; the pricing page now also cites $100B+ in project value reviewed and claims 95-99% accuracy (vendor claims, not verified). Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (Chat Agent, Scope Agent and Risk Review; source citations; reads up to 100,000 pages per project). The pages also cite 95% verified accuracy, 95-99% accuracy against about 60% for generic AI, a 4.7-star G2 rating and a feature table against Trunk Tools, LegalOn and general chatbots; these are vendor claims and are not used here. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged in substance; the homepage still describes Chat Agent, Scope Agent and Risk Review, now with a results section citing figures from Provision case studies (savings, 2x faster pursuits, risks found) and named customer quotes; these, the 95% accuracy line and the platform-wide totals are vendor claims and not used here. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (Chat Agent, Risk Review and Scope Agent sold per project); the homepage adds a link to grade a scope of work first. Review-site rating, accuracy percentage and case-study figures remain vendor content not used here. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: homepage unchanged (Chat Agent, Scope Agent now generally available, Risk Review for drawings, specs and contracts, with source citations); the G2 rating, accuracy figure and document counters are vendor claims not used here. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: homepage, pricing, Scope Agent and Risk Review pages unchanged in substance (Chat Agent with source-cited answers across drawings, specs, contracts, RFIs and addenda; Scope Agent, generally available, returning trade-organized scope packages as Word and Excel files with each item traced to its source; Risk Review combining contract review, spec review and cross-document conflict detection with severity levels, RFI and redline generation and custom checklists). The G2 rating, accuracy and speed percentages, document and risk counters, case-study figures and quotes are vendor claims not used here; the pricing page's competitor comparison table is the vendor's own and is not repeated. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (Chat Agent with source-cited answers across drawings, specs, contracts, RFIs and addenda; Scope Agent, generally available; Risk Review with contract and spec review and cross-document conflict detection; SOC 2 Type II stated). The G2 rating, accuracy and speed percentages, counters and quotes are vendor claims not used here; the vendor's competitor table is not repeated. |
| Who it's for | General contractors and joint ventures, developers, and public and agency owners. | General contractors and subcontractors' preconstruction teams. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | No public prices found (checked Oct 16, 2026; re-checked Oct 17 and Oct 19, 2026): the vendor site has no pricing or plans link in its navigation or footer, and /pricing returns a not-found page; calls to action are a demo sign-up. Confirm current pricing with the vendor. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: unchanged; enlaye.com/pricing still returns a not-found page and the calls to action are still a demo sign-up. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged; enlaye.com/pricing still returns a not-found page and the calls to action are still a demo sign-up. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: unchanged; enlaye.com/pricing still returns a not-found page and the calls to action are still a demo sign-up. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: unchanged; enlaye.com/pricing still returns a not-found page and the calls to action are still a demo sign-up. Re-checked Oct 28, 2026: unchanged; enlaye.com/pricing still returns a not-found page and the calls to action are still a demo sign-up. | Per-project pricing, not per seat. Chat Agent from $50 per project; Risk Review (Chat Agent included) from $100 per project; Scope Agent (Chat Agent included) from $500 per project. Chat Agent is included free with Scope Agent or Risk Review plans; platform and volume pricing through sales. (Pricing re-checked Oct 17, 2026: unchanged.) Re-checked Oct 18, 2026: unchanged ($50, $100 and $500 per project starting prices). Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: unchanged; each product is sold separately, and platform or volume pricing goes through sales. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: unchanged (Chat Agent from $50, Risk Review from $100 and Scope Agent from $500 per project; Chat Agent included free with Scope Agent or Risk Review; platform and volume pricing through sales). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged ($50 Chat Agent, $100 Risk Review, $500 Scope Agent per project; Chat Agent free with either; platform and volume pricing through sales). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged ($50 Chat Agent, $100 Risk Review and $500 Scope Agent per project; Chat included free with either paid product; products sold separately). Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: pricing page unchanged ($50 per project for Chat Agent, $100 for Risk Review, $500 for Scope Agent, Chat included with either; platform and volume pricing through sales). Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: unchanged ($50 per project for Chat Agent, $500 for Scope Agent and $100 for Risk Review, starting prices; Chat Agent included free with Scope Agent or Risk Review; no per-seat fees; platform and volume pricing through sales). Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: unchanged ($50 per project for Chat Agent, $500 for Scope Agent and $100 for Risk Review, starting prices; Chat Agent included free with Scope Agent or Risk Review; no per-seat fees; platform and volume pricing through sales). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: unchanged ($50 per project for Chat Agent, $500 for Scope Agent and $100 for Risk Review; Chat Agent included free with Scope Agent or Risk Review; no per-seat license fees). Re-checked Oct 28, 2026: unchanged (Chat Agent from $50, Scope Agent from $500 and Risk Review from $100 per project; Chat Agent included free with Scope Agent or Risk Review; no per-seat fees; platform and volume pricing through sales). |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 28, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Core job: Enlaye's homepage describes an AI risk assistant that learns how your company manages risk, responses you can corroborate with sources, and risk management across all project actors for the whole project. Its What We Do page splits the use cases: builders managing and transferring project risk, developers assessing construction risk exposure across projects and reducing contracting costs, and public and agency owners assembling bid packages, catching RFP errors or overlaps, comparing bids and reducing claims exposure. Provision's homepage describes reviewing drawings, specs and contracts before bid day to catch risks and scope gaps.
- Contract and spec review: Provision's Risk Review page describes contract review and spec review in one workflow: upload drawings, specs and contracts together, flag clauses with high, medium or low severity and a citation, compare each against your default positions, generate RFIs and redlines, filter for clauses that deviate from your templates, re-run as addenda arrive, and export to PDF, Word, Excel or comment tables. It ships checklists such as Contract Review, Estimator Review, Tariff Checklist, PM Playbook, Go / No Go, Subcontractor Review, RFP Review and Geotechnical Report Review, and lets you build your own. Enlaye's pages read today describe risk work at a higher level and do not list review checklists or output formats.
- Beyond contracts: Provision's Scope Agent standardizes scopes of work and scope-package generation and flags missing, unclear or conflicting scope, and its Chat Agent gives source-cited answers from drawings, specs, contracts, RFIs and addenda (the vendor says up to 100,000 pages per project). Enlaye's Autodesk Construction Cloud integration announcement (Sept 2025) describes importing documents from Autodesk Build or Docs for risk analysis, creating ACC issues from Enlaye, and an Enlaye Field App for logging incidents and delays.
- AI: both are tagged AI-first. Enlaye calls itself AI-native and says it never shares customer data. Provision describes AI agents with a citation on every answer and states SOC 2 Type II certification (vendor statement).
- Pricing (checked Oct 28, 2026): Enlaye publishes no prices (enlaye.com/pricing returns a not-found page) and its call to action is a demo sign-up. Provision prices per project, not per seat: Chat Agent from $50, Scope Agent from $500 and Risk Review from $100 per project, with Chat Agent included free with Scope Agent or Risk Review, Buy now and Book a Demo on each, and platform or volume pricing through sales. See each tool page for detail.
- Not like-for-like: Enlaye pitches risk management across the whole project for builders, developers and owners; Provision is a preconstruction document-review toolset for contractors with self-serve per-project prices.
- Not used here: Enlaye's time-savings, bottom-line savings and 10x-faster figures, and Provision's accuracy and review-time percentages, document, risk and project-value counters, G2 rating, case-study figures, customer logos and quotes (vendor material). Neither tool has been tested by Means & Methods Lab.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Enlaye
No reviews yet. Used Enlaye? Yours would be the first.
Provision
No reviews yet. Used Provision? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- What you actually pay, and on what basis (neither publishes full prices)
- Whether either can apply your company's own contract positions and fallback language, and how much setup that takes
- How each handles owner-side work (RFP drafting, bid comparison) versus contractor-side bid review
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI contract, document & drawing review tools
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Provision
- Compare: Nomic vs Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Nomic
- Compare: Trunk Tools vs Provision
- Compare: Part3 vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: First Rule vs Document Crunch
- Compare: First Rule vs Provision
- Compare: Marapone SpecChecker vs Helonic
- Compare: Deltek Specpoint vs RIB SpecLink
- Compare: Helonic vs Specset
- Compare: Specset vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Helonic vs InspectMind
- Compare: Primepoint vs Buildcheck
- Compare: AsBuilt vs Struction
- Compare: Drawboard vs Revizto
- Compare: InspectMind vs Marapone SpecChecker
- Compare: AsBuilt vs Datagrid
- Compare: HingePoint ProConnector vs SyncEzy
- Compare: ProjectReady vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Structured AI vs Nomic
- Compare: Neuron Factory vs Provision
- Compare: Enlaye vs Document Crunch
- Compare: iFieldSmart AI vs CONXAI
- Compare: Newforma vs ProjectReady
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Drawboard
- Compare: Primepoint vs Struction
- Compare: Extracts Pro vs HingePoint ProConnector
- Compare: MeltPlan vs Neuron Factory
- Compare: Structured AI vs Wyre AI
- Compare: Brickanta vs First Rule
- Compare: Enlaye vs Brickanta
- Compare: iFieldSmart AI vs Procore AI
- Compare: Newforma vs Part3
- Compare: Firmus vs CONXAI
- Compare: Deltek Specpoint vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: RIB SpecLink vs Specset
- Compare: Primepoint vs Structured AI
- Compare: InspectMind vs Firmus
- Compare: Firmus vs Nomic
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Specset vs InspectMind
- Compare: Datagrid vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: HingePoint ProConnector vs ProjectReady
- Compare: Struction vs Wyre AI
- Compare: Procore AI vs Bluebeam Max
- Compare: Nomic vs InspectMind
- Compare: Specset vs Marapone SpecChecker
- Compare: CONXAI vs blade ai
- Compare: Primepoint vs Nomic
- Compare: Helonic vs Buildcheck: two AI drawing reviewers, different delivery models
- Compare: Specset vs Firmus: spec-to-drawing agents or AI drawing review
- Compare: Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: AutoSpecs vs RIB SpecLink
- Compare: Structured AI vs Firmus
- Compare: Provision vs Buildcheck
- Compare: InspectMind vs Primepoint
- Compare: Part3 vs Specset
- Compare: Datagrid vs iFieldSmart AI
- Compare: Newforma vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Nomic vs Helonic
- Compare: UpCodes vs InspectMind
- Compare: Firmus vs Helonic
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Datagrid
- Compare: Struction vs Structured AI
- Compare: Procore AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Buildcheck vs Specset
- Compare: Buildcheck vs Marapone SpecChecker
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Part3
- Compare: Brickanta vs Trunk Tools