MEANS&METHODS LAB
ALL TOOL PAGES ARE DESK RESEARCH, NOT TESTED · ROUND 1 TESTING NOT STARTED
How we make money: nothing yet. Planned revenue never buys placement or rankings. Full disclosure

Home / Compare / Trunk Tools vs Provision

Trunk Tools vs Provision

Two AI-first platforms that read construction documents. Provision is aimed at preconstruction (chat, scope, and contract risk); Trunk Tools spans field and office document workflows on top of a project knowledge graph. Compared using only vendor-published facts.

DESK RESEARCH, NOT TESTED. Compiled from vendors' public websites (accessed Oct 15, 2026). Vendor claims are not verified by Means & Methods Lab. No scores or rankings.

Side by side

Trunk Tools vs Provision: vendor-published facts side by side
Sheet rowTrunk ToolsProvision
CategoryDocument intelligenceContract & document review
AI role (our label)AI-firstAI-first
What it doesAI platform ("Cortex") that plugs into a project's tech stack, reads documents and drawings into a living knowledge graph, and runs tools on top: TrunkBid (maps subcontractor bids against scope and highlights gaps), TrunkRFI (catches RFIs documents already answer and drafts the rest), TrunkSubmittal (builds a submittal register from a spec book and drafts responses against specs), TrunkReview (highlights clouded and unclouded changes from new bulletins), and TrunkText (SMS Q&A with source checks). Vendor says custom AI models are trained on 5+ years of jobsite data, live on 1,000 U.S. projects handling $50B in construction volume, and that teams get in-person jobsite training plus head-office change management (vendor claims).AI preconstruction platform with Chat Agent (source-cited answers from drawings, specs, contracts, RFIs, and addenda), Scope Agent (scope-of-work writing and scope-gap finding), and Risk Review (automated contract analysis that flags risky clauses, missing scope, and commercial exposures with citations, severity levels, default-position comparison, and RFI/redline generation). Vendor claims 95% verified accuracy, that it can read up to 100,000 pages, and that it is SOC 2 Type II certified (vendor claims, not verified). Homepage cites 66,000+ documents processed, 1M+ risks identified, and 50,000+ queries answered.
Who it's forSuperintendents, project managers, project engineers, project executives, subcontractors, and owners.General contractors and subcontractors' preconstruction teams.
Pricing (as publicly stated)Not publicly listed. Pricing page lists Core and Enterprise plans, each described as "one clear price based off your construction volume," with unlimited seats and no token limits; both are quoted on request. (Checked Oct 15, 2026.)Per-project pricing, not per seat. Chat Agent from $50 per project; Risk Review (Chat Agent included) from $100 per project; Scope Agent (Chat Agent included) from $500 per project. Chat Agent is included free with Scope Agent or Risk Review plans; platform and volume pricing through sales. (Pricing re-checked Oct 15, 2026; previously not publicly listed.)
Test statusNot tested. No scores.Not tested. No scores.
Vendor links
Sources

Facts last checked: Oct 15, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.

Where the vendor descriptions differ

Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.

What we can't tell you yet

Which tool is better for your work. That needs testing on the same package with a verified answer key. Planned measures for this comparison:

See the methodology and leaderboard status.

Related

Means & Methods Lab has no commercial relationship with any vendor on this page. Rankings and placement are never for sale. See how we make money.