Exayard vs HCSS HeavyBid
Two very different estimating tools. Exayard is an AI-first takeoff and estimating platform where you upload PDF, image or CAD plans, describe what to count or measure in plain language, review the results and price a proposal, on per-user plans of $99 and $249 a month. HCSS HeavyBid is established estimating and bidding software for civil and infrastructure contractors, built on shared templates, crews and cost data with DOT bid exports, sold by custom quote; HCSS's included AI assistant summarizes estimate history. Desk research from vendor pages read Oct 28, 2026; not tested, no winner.
In short: Exayard (Takeoff & estimating; vendor publishes prices) vs HCSS HeavyBid (Heavy civil estimating; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Oct 28, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Exayard | HCSS HeavyBid |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Takeoff & estimating | Heavy civil estimating |
| AI role (our label) | AI-first | AI features added to established product |
| What it does | AI takeoff and estimating platform: describe what to count or measure in plain language, review the detected quantities, and price the estimate. It accepts PDF, image, or CAD (DWG/DXF/DGN) plans. Offers a REST API, MCP server, webhooks, and CLI. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: the pricing page also lists yearly billing (2 months free), multi-currency display, bids with logo, e-signature and reminders, a price book with trade starter packs and QuickBooks, market prices from published cost books, and on Professional alternates, allowances, revision compare and live supplier prices; Starter and Professional still show $100 and $250 of AI work per seat each month (about 20 and 50 drawing sheets). Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: the pricing page lists AI takeoffs and its Exa assistant on web, email, WhatsApp and a customer's own website on Starter; its plan comparison also lists API keys for the REST API, MCP server and Public CLI, and webhooks, Zapier, n8n, Make, Slack and Teams. Local prices are shown in 15 currencies, which the page says are reviewed every six months, with existing subscribers keeping their price for 12 months after any change. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: unchanged in substance (describe-what-to-count AI takeoffs on PDF, image and CAD files, estimates and proposals, agent and API access); the pricing page now also says local prices are reviewed every six months and existing subscribers keep their price for 12 months after any change, and lists AI takeoffs and its Exa assistant on web, email, WhatsApp and your website. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: the homepage now carries an Onboard your agent to Exayard banner and says it works with Claude, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode, alongside the existing REST API, MCP server and CLI. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (upload PDF, image or CAD plans, describe the count or measurement in plain language, review and export to Excel, PDF or integrations; trade examples from landscaping to FF&E); a banner now invites users to connect an AI agent (Claude, Codex, Cursor or OpenCode). Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (describe the count or measurement in plain language on PDF, image or CAD plans, review and export; the Onboard your agent banner names Claude, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode). The homepage says MCP, REST, webhooks and a public CLI come on every paid plan. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (Onboard your agent banner naming Claude, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode; MCP, REST API, webhooks and CLI on every paid plan). Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (the Onboard your agent banner naming Claude, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode; MCP, REST API, webhooks and CLI on paid plans; 15 currencies). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026 (read for a compare): homepage, AI takeoff page and pricing unchanged in substance (describe what to count or measure; PDF, image and CAD files with automatic scale detection; review and approve quantities on the plan; the homepage invites users to onboard their own agent and names Claude, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode). | Estimating and bidding software for civil and infrastructure contractors (vendor: trusted since 1986). Shared templates, crews, and cost data, automated error alerts, what-if analysis, historical data, custom proposals, and export to DOT or digital submission. Available as HeavyBid Desktop (vendor cites integrations to 30+ accounting and DOT systems) and a web-based version. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: the product page says HeavyBid comes in three levels sized from small contractors bidding about $100,000+ projects to large contractors bidding in the billions; Desktop keeps advanced risk tools and native interfaces to 30+ accounting and DOT systems (Vista, QuickBooks, Sage 300 named); the web-based version is described as browser-based with Flashback estimate history and system-wide libraries, and customers can hold both license types with codebooks carried over. HCSS's AI page (read Oct 19, 2026) says the HCSS AI assistant, included in current subscriptions, connects across HeavyBid, HeavyJob, HCSS Safety and HCSS Plans, and in HeavyBid summarizes estimate audit history so you can see what changed and when. An Estimate Builder agent that drafts an estimate from an imported pay-item list using your estimate history and HCSS libraries is marked Coming Fall 2026 (beta, then a paid upgrade). Because this AI is added to the established product, we now tag HeavyBid AI features added (it was Not AI-first until Oct 19, 2026). Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: the product page still describes HeavyBid Desktop with native interfaces to 30+ back-office systems (Vista, QuickBooks and Sage 300 named) and the web-based version, with Desktop and web licenses usable together; HCSS's AI page still lists HeavyBid estimate audit summaries in the included assistant and the Estimate Builder agent as coming in beta, then a paid upgrade, and now also lists HCSS AI Core as Coming Fall 2026. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: the HeavyBid page's FAQ says buyers get a dedicated project coordinator for implementation (setup typically 1-3 days), that cities, engineering firms and public utilities also use HeavyBid for capital budget estimates, and that it interfaces with RSMeans and Richardson pricing data (vendor statements); its implementation-time percentage and customer quotes are not used. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: the HCSS AI page says the AI assistant is included in the subscription and lists HCSS AI Core and HCSS AI Studio as coming fall 2026, with AI Studio described as where agents are configured in plain language; the first pre-built agents it names are a Production Analyst, an Estimate Builder that imports pay items and drafts an estimate from your own history and libraries, and a Field Agent for voice daily logs, with an agents beta later this year followed by a paid upgrade. The HeavyBid FAQ says web-based licenses can be added alongside Desktop licenses. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: product page unchanged in substance (HeavyBid Desktop with native interfaces to 30+ back-office systems such as Vista, QuickBooks and Sage 300, and a web-based HeavyBid); the HCSS AI page still describes AI that works across estimating, field, fleet and safety data. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: product page unchanged in substance (HeavyBid Desktop with native interfaces to 30+ back-office systems such as Vista, QuickBooks and Sage 300, and a web-based HeavyBid); the HCSS AI page still lists the included assistant (smart search, job data analysis, estimate audit summaries, document Q&A, daily digest summaries) and HCSS AI Core and AI Studio as Coming Fall 2026. Customer counts, ENR and bid-volume figures are vendor claims not used here. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: unchanged in substance (HeavyBid Desktop with native interfaces to 30+ back-office systems including Vista, QuickBooks and Sage 300; web-based HeavyBid; the HCSS AI page still lists AI Core and AI Studio as Coming Fall 2026). The estimator-count figure is a vendor claim and not used here. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: the product page is unchanged in substance (HeavyBid Desktop with native interfaces to 30+ back-office systems including Vista, QuickBooks and Sage 300, plus web-based HeavyBid, and both license types usable together); HCSS's AI page still lists the AI assistant and the Estimate Builder agent, with HCSS AI Core and HCSS AI Studio marked Coming Fall 2026. The bid-cycle percentage remains a vendor claim not used here. Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: the product page is unchanged in substance (HeavyBid Desktop with native interfaces to 30+ back-office systems including Vista, QuickBooks and Sage 300, web-based HeavyBid with Flashback estimate history, and both usable together). HCSS's AI page still lists the AI assistant (in HeavyBid, summarizing estimate audit history) with HCSS AI Core and HCSS AI Studio marked Coming Fall 2026, and names its first agents as Production Analyst, Estimate Builder and Field agents, with confidence scores and human override (vendor statements). Customer quotes are not used. |
| Who it's for | Contractors across trades (vendor lists concrete, electrical, roofing, framing, plumbing, drywall, and more). | Self-performing civil and infrastructure contractors' estimating teams. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Per-user subscription plus metered AI usage. Starter $99/user/month ($100 AI credits; up to 50 manual takeoffs/month at our Oct 14 read), Professional $249/user/month ($250 AI credits, unlimited manual takeoffs), Enterprise custom ($1,000+ AI credits/user/month at our Oct 14 read). Developer docs say AI takeoffs are metered and a plan sheet averages about 15 credits (stated as an average, not a price). (Pricing re-checked Oct 14, 2026; unchanged Oct 19, 2026: Starter $99/user/month, Professional $249/user/month, Enterprise custom.) Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: Starter ($99) and Professional ($249) per user per month are unchanged, with the same $100 and $250 of AI work per seat each month (about 20 and 50 drawing sheets). Two plan details read differently: Starter now lists unlimited seats, projects and measuring by hand (the 50-manual-takeoff cap is no longer shown), and Enterprise now reads AI usage per seat set to your volume rather than a $1,000+ credit figure. The page lists unlimited seats while quoting prices per seat, so confirm how seats are billed with Exayard. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: no price changes (Starter $99 and Professional $249 per seat per month with $100 and $250 of AI work per seat, about 20 and 50 drawing sheets; Enterprise custom with AI usage set to your volume); prices are stated per seat before tax. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: no price changes (Starter $99 and Professional $249 per seat per month before tax, with $100 and $250 of AI work per seat, about 20 and 50 drawing sheets; Enterprise custom; local prices in 15 currencies). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: no price changes (Starter $99 and Professional $249 per seat per month before tax with $100 and $250 of AI work, about 20 and 50 sheets; Enterprise custom; two months free with yearly billing). The developer docs say 1 credit is $1, the Free plan gets 30 credits a month per company, the API and MCP server are free on every plan, and admins can allow extra usage with a default $1,000 a month limit. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: no price changes (Starter $99 and Professional $249 per seat per month with $100 and $250 of AI work, about 20 and 50 drawing sheets; Enterprise custom; two months free with yearly billing). The developer docs still say 1 credit is $1, the Free plan gets 30 credits a month per company, extra usage has a default $1,000 a month limit, and a plan sheet averages about 15 credits. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: unchanged (Starter $99 and Professional $249 per seat per month with $100 and $250 of AI work included, about 20 and 50 sheets; two months free on yearly billing; 15 currencies). Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: unchanged (Starter $99 and Professional $249 per user per month; Starter includes $100 of AI work, about 20 sheets; 2 months free on yearly billing). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: unchanged (Starter $99 and Professional $249 per user per month with $100 and $250 of AI work per seat, about 20 and 50 sheets; 2 months free on yearly billing; Enterprise custom). Re-checked Oct 28, 2026: unchanged (Starter $99 and Professional $249 per user per month with $100 and $250 of AI work per seat, about 20 and 50 sheets; 2 months free on yearly billing; Enterprise custom). | No public prices (checked Oct 16, 2026; unchanged Oct 19, 2026): the HeavyBid page's "Get pricing" link goes to HCSS's pricing page, a "Start here for a custom quote" form ("Share your needs and we'll build the right quote"); no figures. Confirm current pricing with the vendor. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: the pricing page is still a "Start here for a custom quote" form with no figures. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: unchanged; the pricing page is still a "Start here for a custom quote" form with no figures. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: still no public prices; the pricing page is a custom-quote form. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged; the pricing page is still a "Start here for a custom quote" form with no figures. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: unchanged; the pricing page is still a "Start here for a custom quote" form with no figures. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: unchanged (the pricing page is a Start here for a custom quote form; no prices). Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: unchanged (the pricing page is still a Start here for a custom quote form; no prices). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: unchanged (the pricing page is still a Start here for a custom quote form; no prices). Re-checked Oct 28, 2026: unchanged (the pricing page is still a Start here for a custom quote form; no prices). |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 28, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Takeoff: Exayard's homepage says you drag and drop PDF, image or CAD files with automatic scale detection, then ask in plain words (for example count all outlets or measure turf area) and AI counts symbols and measures areas and lengths for you to review. HeavyBid's page lists setup and takeoff as one step of its estimating workflow and says it integrates with takeoff software; quantities are not produced by AI there.
- Estimating and bidding: HeavyBid lists bid management, subcontractor and vendor quote management, unit pricing and markups from historical data and productivity-based calculations, error detection, what-if analysis, proposals and project handoff, and says bids can go straight to owner systems such as AASHTOWare, PennDOT, UDOT, iCX and Bid Express. Exayard lists estimate templates, a price book with trade starter packs and QuickBooks, market prices from published cost books, and bids with e-signature; Professional adds alternates, allowances and revision compare.
- Where the AI sits: Exayard is AI throughout takeoff, with an Exa assistant and API, MCP server, webhooks and CLI so agents such as Claude, Codex and Cursor can drive it. HCSS's AI page says its assistant, included in current subscriptions, summarizes HeavyBid estimate audit history, and an Estimate Builder agent that drafts an estimate from an imported pay-item list using your estimate history and HCSS libraries is marked Coming Fall 2026.
- Who it is for: Exayard names trades from electrical, plumbing and drywall to concrete, paving and earthwork. HeavyBid is aimed at self-performing civil and infrastructure contractors, comes as HeavyBid Desktop (native interfaces to 30+ accounting and DOT systems) or a web-based version, and links to HeavyJob, Primavera P6 and Microsoft Project.
- AI tag: Exayard is tagged AI-first; HeavyBid is tagged AI features added to an established product.
- Pricing (checked Oct 28, 2026): Exayard Starter $99 and Professional $249 per user per month, including $100 and $250 of AI work per seat each month (about 20 and 50 drawing sheets), two months free on yearly billing, Enterprise custom. HeavyBid publishes no prices; its Get pricing link goes to HCSS's Start here for a custom quote form. See each tool page for detail.
- Not like-for-like: Exayard sells fast AI takeoff and proposals to trade contractors on monthly seats, while HeavyBid is a full heavy civil estimating system built around crews, equipment, productivity and DOT bid items. A civil estimator might pair an AI takeoff tool with an estimating system rather than pick one over the other.
- Not used here: Exayard's time-saving headline and HCSS's estimator and customer counts, ENR share, bid-volume figure, ROI calculator and customer quotes (vendor material). Neither tool has been tested by Means & Methods Lab.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Exayard
No reviews yet. Used Exayard? Yours would be the first.
HCSS HeavyBid
No reviews yet. Used HCSS HeavyBid? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- How Exayard's AI handles civil plan sets, profiles and cross sections
- What a HeavyBid license costs for your estimators and which level you need
- Whether Exayard quantities can be brought into HeavyBid without retyping
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI takeoff & estimating tools
- Compare: Togal.AI vs Kreo
- Compare: HCSS HeavyBid vs B2W Estimate
- Compare: Exayard vs Togal.AI
- Compare: Beam AI vs Civils.ai
- Compare: STACK vs Handoff AI
- Compare: Countfire vs Exayard
- Compare: Kreo vs Exayard
- Compare: Handoff AI vs Beam AI
- Compare: DESTINI Estimator vs Ediphi
- Compare: Civils.ai vs Exayard
- Compare: Togal.AI vs STACK
- Compare: Rebar vs Countfire
- Compare: Rebar vs Pelles AI
- Compare: Hover vs Eagleview
- Compare: Roofr vs GAF QuickMeasure
- Compare: Eagleview vs GAF QuickMeasure
- Compare: OneCrew vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Compare: Bobyard vs Togal.AI
- Compare: ConCntric vs Zebel
- Compare: Join vs BidLight
- Compare: FlowManual vs STACK
- Compare: Bobyard vs STACK
- Compare: Ediphi vs ConCntric
- Compare: PLAN0 vs Zebel
- Compare: Hover vs Roofr
- Compare: Foreman AI vs DESTINI Estimator
- Compare: Join vs PLAN0
- Compare: B2W Estimate (Trimble) vs FlowManual
- Compare: Kreo vs STACK
- Compare: Togal.AI vs Beam AI
- Compare: DESTINI Estimator vs Zebel
- Compare: PLAN0 vs MeltPlan
- Compare: Kreo vs Beam AI
- Compare: Countfire vs STACK
- Compare: Exayard vs Bobyard
- Compare: Eagleview vs Roofr
- Compare: FlowManual vs Rebar
- Compare: Join vs ConCntric
- Compare: Ediphi vs Zebel
- Compare: Bobyard vs BuildCrew.AI
- Compare: Beam AI vs Countfire
- Compare: Civils.ai vs STACK
- Compare: HCSS HeavyBid vs AGTEK: heavy civil estimating vs earthwork takeoff
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Exayard: AI on PDF plans, two different starting points
- Compare: Hover vs GAF QuickMeasure
- Compare: FlowManual vs Togal.AI
- Compare: Kreo vs Civils.ai
- Compare: Togal.AI vs Handoff AI
- Compare: Countfire vs Kreo
- Compare: HCSS HeavyBid vs SitesAI Estimate
- Compare: FlowManual vs PLAN0
- Compare: STACK vs Exayard
- Compare: Foreman AI vs Togal
- Compare: Civils.ai vs Togal.AI
- Compare: STACK vs Beam AI
- Compare: Ediphi vs Foreman AI