Home / Compare / STACK vs Handoff AI
STACK vs Handoff AI
Two estimating platforms planned for Round 1 (AI Takeoff) that name different buyers: STACK names specialty and general contractors, suppliers, and owners; Handoff AI names residential remodelers and home builders. Compared using only vendor-published facts.
Side by side
| Sheet row | STACK | Handoff AI |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Takeoff & estimating | Estimating |
| AI role (our label) | AI features added to established product | AI-first |
| What it does | Cloud-based construction software covering digital takeoff, estimating and proposals, and field/project management ("Build & Operate"). The vendor now describes STACK as an AI preconstruction platform: AI that reads uploaded sheets, auto-names pages, and flags revisions; AI auto-counting of symbols and suggestions of scope that may be missed; and AI described as pressure-testing pricing and flagging risk, gaps, and pricing drift in estimates. Unlimited viewer seats. | AI estimating and project-management assistant ("AI Teammate") that builds estimates from uploaded scope, voice notes, or site-walkthrough photos, and generates proposals, scopes of work, and material lists, with CRM, client portals, invoicing, scheduling, daily logs, and time tracking. On the Scale plan, the vendor lists AI takeoffs from residential plans up to 7,000 sq ft (vendor says under 2 hours) and API/MCP access. Vendor says its AI is trained on 100,000+ completed residential estimates (vendor claim, not verified). |
| Who it's for | Specialty contractors, general contractors, suppliers and manufacturers, owners and developers. | Residential remodelers, home builders, and trade contractors (vendor lists many residential trades). |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Per-user subscription. Takeoff & Estimate $299/user/mo; Build & Operate $49/user/mo; full platform $348/user/mo. A free version of Takeoff & Estimate is offered; Build & Operate has a two-week free trial. (Pricing re-checked Oct 14, 2026.) | Monthly price, billed annually: Flex $119/mo (page also shows $149; 2 users, 50 AI usage credits/mo, 7-day free trial); Pro $239/mo (also shown $299; 12-month commitment, 5 users, unlimited AI credits); Scale $719/mo (also shown $899; 12-month commitment, adds AI takeoffs and API/MCP access). Supplier Platform: contact for pricing. (Pricing re-checked Oct 14, 2026.) |
| Test status | Not tested. No scores. | Not tested. No scores. |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 14, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Audience: STACK names specialty contractors, general contractors, suppliers and manufacturers, and owners and developers. Handoff AI names residential remodelers, home builders, and trade contractors and handymen.
- AI scope: STACK describes AI that reads uploaded sheets, auto-names pages, flags revisions, auto-counts symbols, suggests scope that may be missed, and flags risk, gaps, and pricing drift in estimates. Handoff describes an "AI Teammate" that builds estimates from uploaded scope, voice notes, or site-walkthrough photos and generates proposals and scopes of work; AI takeoffs from residential plans up to 7,000 sq ft are listed on its Scale plan.
- Pricing structure: STACK prices per user per month: Takeoff & Estimate $299, Build & Operate $49, full platform $348. Handoff prices per account with users included, billed annually: Flex $119/mo (2 users), Pro $239/mo (5 users), Scale $719/mo; the page also shows $149, $299, and $899 next to those figures.
- Free options: STACK offers a free version of Takeoff & Estimate and a two-week trial of Build & Operate. Handoff offers a 7-day free trial on Flex; Pro and Scale carry a 12-month commitment.
- Beyond estimating: STACK's Build & Operate covers plan viewing and markup, issues, punch lists, and daily reports. Handoff describes CRM, client portals, invoicing and payments, scheduling, daily logs, time tracking, and a QuickBooks Online integration.
- Accuracy claims: we recorded no accuracy figure from either vendor. Nothing here has been tested by Means & Methods Lab.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What we can't tell you yet
Which tool is better for your work. That needs testing on the same package with a verified answer key. Planned measures for this comparison:
- Quantity error against a verified answer key on a civil bid-item schedule
- Missed items and false counts
- Minutes to first result and minutes for an estimator to correct the output
See the methodology and leaderboard status.
Related
- Category hub: AI takeoff & estimating tools
- Compare: Togal.AI vs Kreo
- Compare: HCSS HeavyBid vs B2W Estimate
- Compare: AGTEK vs Trimble Business Center
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Provision
- Compare: Nomic vs Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: Exayard vs Togal.AI
- Compare: Beam AI vs Civils.ai
- Compare: Downtobid vs BuildingConnected
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Nomic
- Compare: Countfire vs Exayard
- Compare: ALICE vs nPlan
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: PlanHub vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Trunk Tools vs Provision
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: Kreo vs Exayard
- Compare: Handoff AI vs Beam AI
- Compare: ALICE vs Karmen
- Compare: nPlan vs SmartPM
- Compare: Part3 vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Propeller vs AGTEK
- Compare: SitesAI Estimate vs Foreman AI
- Compare: DESTINI Estimator vs Ediphi
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Tenna vs Trackunit
- Compare: Tenna vs Tenderd
- Compare: Bedrock Robotics vs Gravis Robotics
- Compare: One Click LCA vs EC3
- Compare: HammerTech vs WakeCap
- Compare: MaintainX vs Brightly
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Outbuild vs Planera
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Propeller
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: Civils.ai vs Exayard
- Compare: Togal.AI vs STACK
- Compare: Karmen vs Planera
- Compare: Outbuild vs SmartPM
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: Samsara vs Tenna
- Compare: Built Robotics vs Bedrock Robotics
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Dodge One vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Shovels vs Dodge One
- Compare: C.Scale vs One Click LCA
- Compare: Trayd vs Miter
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Kwant.ai vs WakeCap
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: CivCheck vs CodeComply.AI
- Compare: PermitFlow vs GreenLite
- Compare: Civ Robotics vs Dusty Robotics
- Compare: Okibo vs KEWAZO
- Compare: Rebar vs Countfire
- Compare: Rebar vs Pelles AI
- Compare: Davis AI vs TestFit
- Compare: TraceAir vs TestFit
- Compare: Trendspek vs ConeLabs
- Compare: Citylogix vs Trendspek
- Compare: Voliro vs Skydio
- Compare: SmartPM vs Document Crunch
- Compare: SewerAI vs ITpipes
- Compare: Exodigo vs GroundedAI
- Compare: Sitewire vs Built Technologies
- Compare: Converge vs Giatec
- Compare: Cloud Cycle vs Giatec MixPilot
- Compare: CivilGrid vs Exodigo
- Compare: OneCrew vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Compare: All3 vs Reframe Systems
- Compare: Reds10 vs All3
- Compare: Reframe Systems vs Reds10
- Compare: Foldcast vs Strong by Form
- Compare: Steelray Delay Analyzer vs SmartPM
- Compare: Nodes & Links vs Foresight
- Compare: First Rule vs Document Crunch
- Compare: First Rule vs Provision
Means & Methods Lab has no commercial relationship with any vendor on this page. Rankings and placement are never for sale. See how we make money.