Home / Compare / Togal.AI vs Kreo
Togal.AI vs Kreo
Two AI-first takeoff tools, both planned for Round 1 (AI Takeoff). Compared here using only what each vendor publishes.
DESK RESEARCH, NOT TESTED. Compiled from vendors' public websites (accessed Oct 14, 2026). Vendor claims are not verified by Means & Methods Lab. No scores or rankings.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Togal.AI | Kreo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Takeoff | Takeoff |
| AI role (our label) | AI-first | AI-first |
| What it does | AI-powered takeoff tool that the vendor says automatically detects, measures, and compares spaces and features on drawings, with cloud collaboration, drawing-set comparison, and a Togal.CHAT feature for querying plans. Vendor claims up to 98% accuracy on floor plans (vendor claim, not verified). | Cloud-based AI takeoff and estimating software. Vendor says its agentic AI detects elements, cross-references data across sheets, generates reports, and turns measurements into cost estimates. Supports PDF, CAD, and images. |
| Who it's for | Estimators (vendor describes it as "built by estimators, for estimators"). | AEC professionals and estimating teams. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Per-user subscription. Growth plan listed at $299/mo per user, billed yearly. Business plan: custom pricing for teams with 4+ users. (Pricing re-checked Oct 14, 2026.) | Per-user subscription, billed annually. Lite $35/user/mo and Plus $70/user/mo (both listed as without AI-powered tools); Pro $175/user/mo adds AI tools (Auto Measure, One-Click Area, Auto Count); Enterprise custom. 7-day free trial. (Pricing re-checked Oct 14, 2026.) |
| Test status | Not tested. No scores. | Not tested. No scores. |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 14, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Pricing structure: Togal lists one public tier, Growth at $299 per user per month billed yearly, with custom Business pricing for teams of 4+ users. Kreo lists four tiers billed annually per user: Lite $35 and Plus $70 (described by Kreo as without AI-powered tools), Pro $175 (adds Auto Measure, One-Click Area, and Auto Count), and custom Enterprise.
- Trial: Kreo advertises a 7-day free trial. Togal's pricing page routes sign-up through a demo booking.
- Inputs: Kreo lists PDF, CAD, and image support. We did not record a file-format list for Togal.
- Beyond measuring: Togal describes drawing-set comparison and Togal.CHAT for querying plans. Kreo describes agentic AI that cross-references data across sheets, generates reports, and turns measurements into cost estimates.
- Accuracy claims: Togal claims up to 98% accuracy on floor plans. We recorded no accuracy figure from Kreo. Neither claim has been tested by Means & Methods Lab.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What we can't tell you yet
Which tool is better for your work. That needs testing on the same package with a verified answer key. Planned measures for this comparison:
- Quantity error against a verified answer key on a civil bid-item schedule
- Missed items and false counts
- Minutes to first result and minutes for an estimator to correct the output
See the methodology and leaderboard status.
Related
- Category hub: AI takeoff & estimating tools
- Compare: HCSS HeavyBid vs B2W Estimate
- Compare: AGTEK vs Trimble Business Center
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Provision
- Compare: Nomic vs Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: Exayard vs Togal.AI
- Compare: Beam AI vs Civils.ai
- Compare: Downtobid vs BuildingConnected
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Nomic
- Compare: STACK vs Handoff AI
- Compare: Countfire vs Exayard
- Compare: ALICE vs nPlan
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: PlanHub vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Trunk Tools vs Provision
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: Kreo vs Exayard
- Compare: Handoff AI vs Beam AI
- Compare: ALICE vs Karmen
- Compare: nPlan vs SmartPM
- Compare: Part3 vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Propeller vs AGTEK
- Compare: SitesAI Estimate vs Foreman AI
- Compare: DESTINI Estimator vs Ediphi
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Tenna vs Trackunit
- Compare: Tenna vs Tenderd
- Compare: Bedrock Robotics vs Gravis Robotics
- Compare: One Click LCA vs EC3
- Compare: HammerTech vs WakeCap
- Compare: MaintainX vs Brightly
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Outbuild vs Planera
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Propeller
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: Civils.ai vs Exayard
- Compare: Togal.AI vs STACK
- Compare: Karmen vs Planera
- Compare: Outbuild vs SmartPM
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: Samsara vs Tenna
- Compare: Built Robotics vs Bedrock Robotics
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Dodge One vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Shovels vs Dodge One
- Compare: C.Scale vs One Click LCA
- Compare: Trayd vs Miter
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Kwant.ai vs WakeCap
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: CivCheck vs CodeComply.AI
- Compare: PermitFlow vs GreenLite
- Compare: Civ Robotics vs Dusty Robotics
- Compare: Okibo vs KEWAZO
- Compare: Rebar vs Countfire
- Compare: Rebar vs Pelles AI
- Compare: Davis AI vs TestFit
- Compare: TraceAir vs TestFit
- Compare: Trendspek vs ConeLabs
- Compare: Citylogix vs Trendspek
- Compare: Voliro vs Skydio
- Compare: SmartPM vs Document Crunch
- Compare: SewerAI vs ITpipes
- Compare: Exodigo vs GroundedAI
- Compare: Sitewire vs Built Technologies
- Compare: Converge vs Giatec
- Compare: Cloud Cycle vs Giatec MixPilot
- Compare: CivilGrid vs Exodigo
- Compare: OneCrew vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Compare: All3 vs Reframe Systems
- Compare: Reds10 vs All3
- Compare: Reframe Systems vs Reds10
- Compare: Foldcast vs Strong by Form
Means & Methods Lab has no commercial relationship with any vendor on this page. Rankings and placement are never for sale. See how we make money.