Brickanta vs Provision
Two Y Combinator-backed AI platforms that read tender drawings, specs and contracts before the bid, priced in very different ways. Brickanta, from Stockholm, runs AI agents for tender risk and gap review, repackaging an RFP into procurement packages, a knowledge base of past projects and contract review against Swedish construction law, at about €890 per user per month on its Quickstart plan. Provision sells three products (Chat Agent, Scope Agent and Risk Review) priced per project rather than per seat, starting from $50, $500 and $100 per project. Desk research from vendor pages read Oct 29, 2026; not tested, no winner.
In short: Brickanta (AI agents for tenders and contract review; vendor publishes prices) vs Provision (Contract & document review; vendor publishes prices). Facts last checked Oct 29, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Brickanta | Provision |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI agents for tenders and contract review | Contract & document review |
| AI role (our label) | AI-first | AI-first |
| What it does | Agentic AI platform from Stockholm that reads tender documents, assembles procurement packages and reviews contracts for builders. Its YC profile describes hundreds of construction-specific AI agents for project analysis, insights, tenders and procurement, combined with an organization's own project data, templates and workflows. The product page (read Oct 18, 2026) lists modules: AI Documents (reads every drawing, spec and contract in a tender and surfaces risks, gaps and opportunities), Repackaging (turns a raw RFP into discipline-specific procurement packages), Knowledge Base (completed projects become searchable, including pricing, deviations and decisions), Construction Law (reviews contracts against Swedish construction law and court precedent and flags risky clauses with the reasoning) and Quality Assurance (structured project checkpoints). Firms upload their own standards from SharePoint, OneDrive or a computer and the agents apply them as rules; implementation is done with the customer on site by Brickanta's forward-deployed engineers. Brickanta states ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification, GDPR compliance and EU AI Act compliance (vendor statements). Homepage figures such as 3x faster bidding and 56 hours saved monthly are vendor claims, not verified. Y Combinator batch: Fall 2025 (YC company profile). Re-read Oct 19, 2026: modules and security statements are unchanged (the security section still states EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and GDPR compliance); the homepage now announces an all-new Brickanta and the product page says new features ship every week (vendor statements). Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: product modules (AI Documents, Repackaging, Knowledge Base, Construction Law, Quality Assurance) and security statements (EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, GDPR) unchanged. The product page now describes its architecture as an application layer (client data, integrations, document intelligence, an agentic harness) over the same LLMs available to everyone, and the homepage carries a banner announcing an $8M seed round led by Northzone and says forward-deployed engineers handle setup from SharePoint and OneDrive through onboarding (vendor statements). Homepage percentages, capacity multiples and customer quotes are not used here. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: homepage, product and pricing pages unchanged in substance (AI Documents, Repackaging, Knowledge Base, Construction Law for Swedish law and Quality Assurance; EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and GDPR statements). The homepage now has sections for groundwork, residential, commercial and public buildings, and installation contractors, plus an FAQ that includes whether customer data is used to train its AI models. Percentage and hours figures and customer quotes on the site are vendor material and are not used. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: the homepage has been redesigned ("The all-new Brickanta is here"): it now pitches agentic AI that carries decisions and evidence across every handover, with agents for tendering, procurement, construction law and compliance, says it is used by mid-market subcontractors, large global general contractors and real estate developers, and describes forward deployed engineers who implement on site (SharePoint and OneDrive integration, onboarding, knowledge transfer). Percentage, hours and capacity figures and customer quotes are vendor material and are not used. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (agents for tendering, procurement, construction law and compliance that read documents against the firm's history and flag what needs a human call; setup from SharePoint connection to data integration handled by Brickanta; the $8M seed round led by Northzone still shown). The menu now lists segment pages: Brickanta for Groundwork, Residential, Commercial & Public Buildings and Installation. Customer quotes and figures are vendor material and not used. | AI preconstruction platform with a Chat Agent for cited document answers, a Scope Agent for scopes of work, and Risk Review for contract risk. The Chat Agent gives source-cited answers from drawings, specs, contracts, RFIs, and addenda; the Scope Agent writes scopes of work and finds scope gaps; Risk Review is automated contract analysis that flags risky clauses, missing scope, and commercial exposures with citations, severity levels, default-position comparison, and RFI/redline generation. Vendor claims 95% verified accuracy, that it can read up to 100,000 pages, and that it is SOC 2 Type II certified (vendor claims, not verified). Homepage cites 66,000+ documents processed, 1M+ risks identified, and 50,000+ queries answered. Risk Review page (read Oct 16, 2026) now describes contract review and spec review bundled in one product: spec requirements surfaced and organized, requirements traced across specs, drawings and contracts, cross-document conflict detection, conflicting or unclear requirements flagged before bid day, and unlimited custom checklists (vendor descriptions). Site banner says Scope Agent is now generally available. Its YC profile (read Oct 18, 2026) now describes Provision as building the AI Estimator for construction, identifying risks and obligations in contracts, specs and drawings. Y Combinator batch: Summer 2022 (YC company profile). Re-read Oct 19, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance; the pricing page now also cites $100B+ in project value reviewed and claims 95-99% accuracy (vendor claims, not verified). Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (Chat Agent, Scope Agent and Risk Review; source citations; reads up to 100,000 pages per project). The pages also cite 95% verified accuracy, 95-99% accuracy against about 60% for generic AI, a 4.7-star G2 rating and a feature table against Trunk Tools, LegalOn and general chatbots; these are vendor claims and are not used here. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged in substance; the homepage still describes Chat Agent, Scope Agent and Risk Review, now with a results section citing figures from Provision case studies (savings, 2x faster pursuits, risks found) and named customer quotes; these, the 95% accuracy line and the platform-wide totals are vendor claims and not used here. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (Chat Agent, Risk Review and Scope Agent sold per project); the homepage adds a link to grade a scope of work first. Review-site rating, accuracy percentage and case-study figures remain vendor content not used here. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: homepage unchanged (Chat Agent, Scope Agent now generally available, Risk Review for drawings, specs and contracts, with source citations); the G2 rating, accuracy figure and document counters are vendor claims not used here. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: homepage, pricing, Scope Agent and Risk Review pages unchanged in substance (Chat Agent with source-cited answers across drawings, specs, contracts, RFIs and addenda; Scope Agent, generally available, returning trade-organized scope packages as Word and Excel files with each item traced to its source; Risk Review combining contract review, spec review and cross-document conflict detection with severity levels, RFI and redline generation and custom checklists). The G2 rating, accuracy and speed percentages, document and risk counters, case-study figures and quotes are vendor claims not used here; the pricing page's competitor comparison table is the vendor's own and is not repeated. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (Chat Agent with source-cited answers across drawings, specs, contracts, RFIs and addenda; Scope Agent, generally available; Risk Review with contract and spec review and cross-document conflict detection; SOC 2 Type II stated). The G2 rating, accuracy and speed percentages, counters and quotes are vendor claims not used here; the vendor's competitor table is not repeated. Re-checked Oct 29, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (Chat Agent with source-cited answers across drawings, specs, contracts, RFIs and addenda, reading up to 100,000 pages per project; Scope Agent, generally available, for scope gaps and standardized scope packages; Risk Review with risk severity levels, default positions, RFI and redline generation and custom checklists; SOC 2 Type II stated). The G2 rating, accuracy percentages, case-study results, counters and quotes are vendor material not used here; the vendor's competitor table is not repeated. |
| Who it's for | Groundwork, residential, commercial and public building and installation contractors; the site names mid-market subcontractors, large general contractors and real estate developers. The construction law module is written around Swedish law. | General contractors and subcontractors' preconstruction teams. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Published on brickanta.com/pricing (read Oct 18, 2026): Quickstart about €890 per user per month (shown as "~ €890"), for small and mid-sized builders starting with single users, with a 30-day money-back guarantee, unlimited AI agents, system integrations and a dedicated implementation expert. Enterprise is custom ("based on your needs") with a low-risk pilot or opt-out period. The page says there are no hidden fees and unlimited AI usage is included. Confirm currency, tax and contract terms with Brickanta. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: unchanged (Quickstart ~€890 per user per month; Enterprise custom); the page also lists user training and direct product influence as included. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: no price changes (Quickstart ~€890 per user per month with a 30-day money-back guarantee; Enterprise custom with a low-risk pilot or opt-out period; unlimited AI usage, implementation expert, user training, system integrations and direct product influence listed as included). The page also links an ROI calculator, not used here. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged (Quickstart about €890 per user per month with a 30-day money-back guarantee; Enterprise custom with a pilot and opt-out; unlimited AI usage, an implementation expert, training and integrations included). Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: unchanged (Quickstart about €890 per user per month with a 30-day money-back guarantee; Enterprise custom with a low-risk pilot or opt-out period; unlimited AI agents, integrations and an implementation expert included). Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: unchanged (Quickstart about €890 per user per month with a 30-day money-back guarantee; Enterprise custom with a low-risk pilot or opt-out period; unlimited AI agents, system integrations and an implementation expert included). Re-checked Oct 28, 2026: unchanged (Quickstart about €890 per user per month with a 30-day money-back guarantee, unlimited AI agents, system integrations and an implementation expert; Enterprise custom with a low-risk pilot or opt-out period). Re-checked Oct 29, 2026 (also read for a compare): unchanged (Quickstart about €890 per user per month with a 30-day money-back guarantee, unlimited AI agents, system integrations and a dedicated implementation expert; Enterprise custom with a low-risk pilot or opt-out period). | Per-project pricing, not per seat. Chat Agent from $50 per project; Risk Review (Chat Agent included) from $100 per project; Scope Agent (Chat Agent included) from $500 per project. Chat Agent is included free with Scope Agent or Risk Review plans; platform and volume pricing through sales. (Pricing re-checked Oct 17, 2026: unchanged.) Re-checked Oct 18, 2026: unchanged ($50, $100 and $500 per project starting prices). Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: unchanged; each product is sold separately, and platform or volume pricing goes through sales. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: unchanged (Chat Agent from $50, Risk Review from $100 and Scope Agent from $500 per project; Chat Agent included free with Scope Agent or Risk Review; platform and volume pricing through sales). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged ($50 Chat Agent, $100 Risk Review, $500 Scope Agent per project; Chat Agent free with either; platform and volume pricing through sales). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged ($50 Chat Agent, $100 Risk Review and $500 Scope Agent per project; Chat included free with either paid product; products sold separately). Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: pricing page unchanged ($50 per project for Chat Agent, $100 for Risk Review, $500 for Scope Agent, Chat included with either; platform and volume pricing through sales). Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: unchanged ($50 per project for Chat Agent, $500 for Scope Agent and $100 for Risk Review, starting prices; Chat Agent included free with Scope Agent or Risk Review; no per-seat fees; platform and volume pricing through sales). Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: unchanged ($50 per project for Chat Agent, $500 for Scope Agent and $100 for Risk Review, starting prices; Chat Agent included free with Scope Agent or Risk Review; no per-seat fees; platform and volume pricing through sales). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: unchanged ($50 per project for Chat Agent, $500 for Scope Agent and $100 for Risk Review; Chat Agent included free with Scope Agent or Risk Review; no per-seat license fees). Re-checked Oct 28, 2026: unchanged (Chat Agent from $50, Scope Agent from $500 and Risk Review from $100 per project; Chat Agent included free with Scope Agent or Risk Review; no per-seat fees; platform and volume pricing through sales). Re-checked Oct 29, 2026: unchanged (Chat Agent from $50, Risk Review from $100 and Scope Agent from $500 per project, each with Buy now and Book a Demo; Chat Agent included free with Scope Agent or Risk Review; no per-seat fees; platform plan and volume pricing through sales). |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 29, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Products: Brickanta's product page lists AI Documents (reads every drawing, spec and contract in the tender and surfaces risks, gaps and opportunities), Repackaging (turns a raw RFP into discipline-specific procurement packages), Knowledge Base (completed projects become searchable memory), Construction Law and Quality Assurance checkpoints. Provision's pricing page lists Chat Agent (source-cited answers from drawings, specs, contracts, RFIs and addenda, up to 100,000 pages per project), Scope Agent (finds missing, unclear or conflicting scope and generates standardized scope packages) and Risk Review (flags risky clauses and commercial exposures with citations and custom review checklists).
- Scope packages: both describe building trade or discipline packages from bid documents. Brickanta calls it Repackaging a raw RFP into procurement packages; Provision's Scope Agent generates standardized scope packages and flags scope gaps before bid day.
- Contracts: Brickanta's Construction Law module reviews contracts against Swedish construction law and court precedent and explains each flagged clause. Provision's Risk Review flags risky clauses against standardized risk positions and custom checklists; its pricing page does not name a jurisdiction.
- Firm standards: Brickanta says firms upload standards from SharePoint, OneDrive or a computer and the agents apply each document as rules on every project, with forward-deployed engineers handling setup on site. Provision lists custom review checklists and standardized risk positions across projects.
- Pricing (checked Oct 29, 2026): Brickanta's Quickstart is about €890 per user per month (shown as "~ €890") with a 30-day money-back guarantee, unlimited AI agents, system integrations and a dedicated implementation expert; Enterprise is custom with a low-risk pilot or opt-out period. Provision prices per project, not per seat: Chat Agent from $50, Risk Review from $100 and Scope Agent from $500 per project, with Chat Agent included free with Scope Agent or Risk Review and platform plans with volume pricing through sales. See each tool page for detail.
- How the bill grows: Brickanta's Quickstart cost scales with users; Provision's scales with projects, and its page says the whole team can be added to a project without adding to the bill. Which is cheaper depends on how many people and how many bids you run.
- AI tags: both are listed as AI-first in the directory.
- Not used here: Brickanta's speed, capacity and hours-saved figures, ROI calculator and customer quotes, and Provision's accuracy percentages, competitor comparison table and customer material (vendor material). Neither tool has been tested by Means & Methods Lab.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Brickanta
No reviews yet. Used Brickanta? Yours would be the first.
Provision
No reviews yet. Used Provision? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- Whether Brickanta's construction law review covers contracts outside Sweden
- What a Provision platform plan costs for your annual bid volume
- How each handles your drawing formats, spec books and contract templates
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI contract, document & drawing review tools
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Provision
- Compare: Nomic vs Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Nomic
- Compare: Trunk Tools vs Provision
- Compare: Part3 vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: First Rule vs Document Crunch
- Compare: First Rule vs Provision
- Compare: Marapone SpecChecker vs Helonic
- Compare: Deltek Specpoint vs RIB SpecLink
- Compare: Helonic vs Specset
- Compare: Specset vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Helonic vs InspectMind
- Compare: Primepoint vs Buildcheck
- Compare: AsBuilt vs Struction
- Compare: Drawboard vs Revizto
- Compare: InspectMind vs Marapone SpecChecker
- Compare: AsBuilt vs Datagrid
- Compare: HingePoint ProConnector vs SyncEzy
- Compare: ProjectReady vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Structured AI vs Nomic
- Compare: Neuron Factory vs Provision
- Compare: Enlaye vs Document Crunch
- Compare: iFieldSmart AI vs CONXAI
- Compare: Newforma vs ProjectReady
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Drawboard
- Compare: Primepoint vs Struction
- Compare: Extracts Pro vs HingePoint ProConnector
- Compare: MeltPlan vs Neuron Factory
- Compare: Structured AI vs Wyre AI
- Compare: Brickanta vs First Rule
- Compare: Enlaye vs Brickanta
- Compare: iFieldSmart AI vs Procore AI
- Compare: Newforma vs Part3
- Compare: Firmus vs CONXAI
- Compare: Deltek Specpoint vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: RIB SpecLink vs Specset
- Compare: Primepoint vs Structured AI
- Compare: InspectMind vs Firmus
- Compare: InspectMind vs Structured AI
- Compare: Helonic vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Provision vs Pelles AI
- Compare: Firmus vs Nomic
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Specset vs InspectMind
- Compare: Datagrid vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: HingePoint ProConnector vs ProjectReady
- Compare: Struction vs Wyre AI
- Compare: Procore AI vs Bluebeam Max
- Compare: Nomic vs InspectMind
- Compare: Specset vs Marapone SpecChecker
- Compare: CONXAI vs blade ai
- Compare: Primepoint vs Nomic
- Compare: Helonic vs Buildcheck: two AI drawing reviewers, different delivery models
- Compare: Specset vs Firmus: spec-to-drawing agents or AI drawing review
- Compare: Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: AutoSpecs vs RIB SpecLink
- Compare: Structured AI vs Firmus
- Compare: Provision vs Buildcheck
- Compare: InspectMind vs Primepoint
- Compare: Part3 vs Specset
- Compare: Datagrid vs iFieldSmart AI
- Compare: Newforma vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Nomic vs Helonic
- Compare: UpCodes vs InspectMind
- Compare: Firmus vs Helonic
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Datagrid
- Compare: Struction vs Structured AI
- Compare: Procore AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Buildcheck vs Specset
- Compare: Buildcheck vs Marapone SpecChecker
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Part3
- Compare: Enlaye vs Provision
- Compare: Neuron Factory vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Brickanta vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Piper AI vs Pelles AI