Home / Compare / Followup CRM vs ProjectMark
Followup CRM vs ProjectMark
Two construction CRM products aimed at sales and business-development teams: Followup CRM publishes per-user monthly prices with an annual commitment, while ProjectMark lists plan tiers by user count but routes each to request pricing. Vendor-published facts only; not like-for-like on pricing.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Followup CRM | ProjectMark |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Construction CRM | Construction CRM |
| AI role (our label) | AI features added to established product | AI features added to established product |
| What it does | Construction CRM that connects to your ERP, with AI-assisted data entry, tracking and follow-up emails; a Voice AI feature (labeled "In Beta") lets users log updates by speaking. | CRM built for construction with AI built in; vendor states SOC 2 Type II and 10+ integrations. |
| Who it's for | Contractors' sales and estimating teams. | AEC business development teams. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Vendor-listed pricing (pricing page, checked Oct 16, 2026): Starter $99 per user/month and Professional $149 per user/month (shown billed annually, 5-user minimum); Enterprise $4,000/month platform fee plus $125 per user. The page says all CRM plans commit annually and paying up front saves 20%. One-time launch plan (onboarding, data migration, training): $2,500 Starter, $5,000 Professional, $10,000 Enterprise. 30-day money-back guarantee listed. Confirm current terms with the vendor. | No public prices on the plans page (checked Oct 16, 2026): Starter (up to 6 users) and Scale (up to 10 users) are "Request pricing", Enterprise (10+ users) is "Talk to our team"; the page says implementation, support and enrichment credits are included and lists integrations (Vista, Procore, BuildingConnected, Adobe InDesign) as paid add-ons. Implementation packages are also "Request pricing". Confirm current pricing with the vendor. |
| Test status | Not tested. No scores. | Not tested. No scores. |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 16, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Job: both are construction CRMs. Followup CRM describes connecting to an ERP, with AI-assisted data entry, tracking and follow-up emails, plus a Voice AI feature labeled In Beta for logging updates by speaking. ProjectMark describes a CRM built for construction with AI built in, and states SOC 2 Type II and 10+ integrations.
- Who for (vendor framing): Followup CRM, contractors' sales and estimating teams; ProjectMark, AEC business development teams.
- AI role (our desk-research label): both are labeled AI features added to an established product.
- Pricing visibility differs: Followup CRM publishes prices; ProjectMark is quote-only with named plan tiers. The products are not like-for-like on pricing.
- Pricing (vendor-listed / recorded, Oct 16, 2026): Followup CRM lists Starter $99 per user/month and Professional $149 per user/month (shown billed annually, 5-user minimum); Enterprise $4,000/month platform fee plus $125 per user; all CRM plans commit annually and paying up front saves 20%; one-time launch plans $2,500 / $5,000 / $10,000; 30-day money-back guarantee listed. ProjectMark's plans page lists Starter (up to 6 users) and Scale (up to 10 users) as Request pricing, Enterprise (10+ users) as Talk to our team; implementation, support and enrichment credits are said to be included; Vista, Procore, BuildingConnected and Adobe InDesign integrations are listed as paid add-ons; implementation packages are also Request pricing.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What we can't tell you yet
Which tool is better for your work. That needs testing on the same package with a verified answer key. Planned measures for this comparison:
- CRM pipeline stages completed on the same pursuit list in each product
- Outside Means & Methods Lab's current benchmark scope.
See the methodology and leaderboard status.
Related
- Category hub: Bid management & project lead tools
- Compare: Togal.AI vs Kreo
- Compare: HCSS HeavyBid vs B2W Estimate
- Compare: AGTEK vs Trimble Business Center
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Provision
- Compare: Nomic vs Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: Exayard vs Togal.AI
- Compare: Beam AI vs Civils.ai
- Compare: Downtobid vs BuildingConnected
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Nomic
- Compare: STACK vs Handoff AI
- Compare: Countfire vs Exayard
- Compare: ALICE vs nPlan
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: PlanHub vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Trunk Tools vs Provision
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: Kreo vs Exayard
- Compare: Handoff AI vs Beam AI
- Compare: ALICE vs Karmen
- Compare: nPlan vs SmartPM
- Compare: Part3 vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Propeller vs AGTEK
- Compare: SitesAI Estimate vs Foreman AI
- Compare: DESTINI Estimator vs Ediphi
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Tenna vs Trackunit
- Compare: Tenna vs Tenderd
- Compare: Bedrock Robotics vs Gravis Robotics
- Compare: One Click LCA vs EC3
- Compare: HammerTech vs WakeCap
- Compare: MaintainX vs Brightly
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Outbuild vs Planera
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Propeller
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: Civils.ai vs Exayard
- Compare: Togal.AI vs STACK
- Compare: Karmen vs Planera
- Compare: Outbuild vs SmartPM
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: Samsara vs Tenna
- Compare: Built Robotics vs Bedrock Robotics
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Dodge One vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Shovels vs Dodge One
- Compare: C.Scale vs One Click LCA
- Compare: Trayd vs Miter
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Kwant.ai vs WakeCap
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: CivCheck vs CodeComply.AI
- Compare: PermitFlow vs GreenLite
- Compare: Civ Robotics vs Dusty Robotics
- Compare: Okibo vs KEWAZO
- Compare: Rebar vs Countfire
- Compare: Rebar vs Pelles AI
- Compare: Davis AI vs TestFit
- Compare: TraceAir vs TestFit
- Compare: Trendspek vs ConeLabs
- Compare: Citylogix vs Trendspek
- Compare: Voliro vs Skydio
- Compare: SmartPM vs Document Crunch
- Compare: SewerAI vs ITpipes
- Compare: Exodigo vs GroundedAI
- Compare: Sitewire vs Built Technologies
- Compare: Converge vs Giatec
- Compare: Cloud Cycle vs Giatec MixPilot
- Compare: CivilGrid vs Exodigo
- Compare: OneCrew vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Compare: All3 vs Reframe Systems
- Compare: Reds10 vs All3
- Compare: Reframe Systems vs Reds10
- Compare: Foldcast vs Strong by Form
- Compare: Steelray Delay Analyzer vs SmartPM
- Compare: Nodes & Links vs Foresight
- Compare: First Rule vs Document Crunch
- Compare: First Rule vs Provision
- Compare: Procore Resource Planning (LaborChart) vs Bridgit
- Compare: Assignar vs Procore Resource Planning
- Compare: HammerTech vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: Eyrus vs Kwant.ai
- Compare: Field Materials vs Kojo
- Compare: ProcurePro vs Field Materials
- Compare: Tread vs Curri
- Compare: Parspec vs Andercore
- Compare: TestFit vs Autodesk Forma Site Design
- Compare: Snaptrude vs Arcol
- Compare: Autodesk Forma Site Design vs Arcol
- Compare: SWAPP vs Augmenta
- Compare: Facilio vs Willow
- Compare: UpKeep vs MaintainX
- Compare: BrainBox AI vs Willow
- Compare: Verdigris vs BrainBox AI
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: EquipmentShare T3 vs Samsara
- Compare: Hilti ON!Track vs Trackunit
- Compare: Komatsu Smart Construction vs Tenna
- Compare: Gearflow vs Tenna
- Compare: Procore Bid Management vs BuildingConnected
- Compare: SmartBid vs PreconSuite
- Compare: Pantera Tools vs SmartBid
- Compare: Buildr vs ProcurePro (BidLevel)
- Compare: Highwire vs Constrafor
- Compare: TrustLayer vs Jones
- Compare: bcs vs TrustLayer
- Compare: Jones vs Constrafor
- Compare: Avetta vs ISNetworld
- Compare: ISNetworld vs Highwire
- Compare: Marapone SpecChecker vs Helonic
- Compare: Deltek Specpoint vs RIB SpecLink
- Compare: Helonic vs Specset
- Compare: Specset vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Helonic vs InspectMind
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Riskcast
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: GCPay vs Trimble Pay
- Compare: Procore Pay vs GCPay
- Compare: Clearstory vs eSUB
- Compare: Adaptive vs SuperConstruct
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: Cat VisionLink vs HCSS Telematics
- Compare: Teletrac Navman vs HCSS Telematics
- Compare: Krane vs ConstructivIQ
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Billy vs illumend
- Compare: Bobyard vs Togal.AI
- Compare: Primepoint vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Adaptive vs Agave
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Mercator.ai vs Kantiv
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: AsBuilt vs Struction
- Compare: Drawboard vs Revizto
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: InspectMind vs Marapone SpecChecker
- Compare: AsBuilt vs Datagrid
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Mercator.ai vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Dodge One vs Building Radar
Means & Methods Lab has no commercial relationship with any vendor on this page. Rankings and placement are never for sale. See how we make money.