Extracts Pro (COPE) vs SyncEzy
Two ways to get Procore project files into your own document systems. Extracts Pro, now branded COPE, is an embedded Procore app for closeout packages and rule-based, scheduled extraction from 20+ Procore tools to SharePoint, Box or Procore. SyncEzy is an integrations company whose Procore SharePoint integration runs a two-way document sync with SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams or Windows Explorer. Not a like-for-like pair: COPE adds closeout tracking and binders; SyncEzy is a live sync and also sells many non-Procore integrations. Desk research from vendor sites read Oct 30, 2026; no winner.
In short: Extracts Pro (Closeout & Procore data workflows; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs SyncEzy (Integrations; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Nov 1, 2026. No winner declared; desk research from vendor sites.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Extracts Pro | SyncEzy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Closeout & Procore data workflows | Integrations |
| AI role (our label) | Not AI-first | Not AI-first |
| What it does | Procore closeout packages and scheduled Procore data sync to SharePoint, Box or Procore, run as an embedded app inside Procore. extractspro.com now redirects to withcope.com, where the product is titled COPE (Procore Closeout & Data Sync) under a banner reading Extracts Pro is now COPE; the footer says Extracts Pro and COPE are trade names of TrailB Technologies LLC. Listed at Groundbreak as COPE. Closeout Log requests and tracks subcontractor closeout documents with a live dashboard and reminders and compiles a searchable, locally hyperlinked ZIP binder. Automations applies if-this-then-that rules to sync data from 20+ Procore tools (among them drawings, correspondence, photos, punch list, RFIs, specifications, submittals, daily log, meetings, forms, inspections and observations) on a schedule or after an event, with configurable folders and file names, so files stay in your own systems if Procore access lapses; the Automations page title also names Egnyte, while its body lists SharePoint, Procore and Box. Its FAQ says it works primarily with US customers. The pages do not describe AI features. Customer quotes and percentages are not used. | Point-to-point integrations: the homepage, titled Integrations for QuickBooks Time & more, lists Simpro (30+ integrations), Procore (to SharePoint, OneDrive, Google Drive and Dropbox), Zoho, QuickBooks Time, PropertyMe, PropertyTree, Employment Hero and ServiceM8 among its key partners. Its Procore SharePoint integration covers SharePoint, OneDrive, Microsoft Teams and Windows Explorer with auto, folder and manual sync modes: project documents, photos and folder structure sync two ways, and RFIs, submittals and drawings one way for backup, usually within 1-3 minutes (vendor statement), with a per-project choice of Procore tools. The Procore integrations page also lists Box and QuickBooks Time connections, with HubSpot, Cloud Payroll, UKG Payroll, TwinView and contract lifecycle management marked Under Consideration. The vendor says it stores only file metadata and cites SOC 2 Type 2 certification and a Cloud Application Security Assessment (App Defense Alliance). The integrations are not described as using AI. Customer quotes are not used. |
| Who it's for | Procore customers handling closeout and backups. | Procore and Simpro users. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Custom quote; no public prices. The pricing page, still under the Extracts Pro name, lists Closeout Log and Automations and Standard, Advanced and Enterprise packages, each routing to Get a Quote; its FAQ says quotes depend on product selection, project size, number of connected projects and customization such as integrations with existing document systems. | No public prices: the pricing page says each of its 50+ integrations is priced separately (by records, employees, unlimited or volume, with business scale and location factored in), and prices are shown only after registering a free account on its integrations portal (not done). The Procore SharePoint FAQ describes a base subscription per company, not per user, in tiers such as Standard and Enterprise, quoted on project volume, with a free trial (Start For Free, no credit card). Confirm pricing with the vendor. |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Nov 1, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- What each covers (vendor pages): COPE lists Closeout Log, which requests and tracks subcontractor closeout documents with a live dashboard and automated reminders and compiles a searchable, locally hyperlinked ZIP binder, and Automations, which applies if-this-then-that rules to sync data from 20+ Procore tools on a schedule or after an event. SyncEzy's Procore SharePoint page describes two-way sync of project documents with version history, mirroring your folder structure, with some Procore tools synced one way.
- Where files land: COPE names SharePoint, Box and Procore (its Automations page title also names Egnyte) and says files stay in your own systems if Procore access or subscriptions lapse. SyncEzy names SharePoint, OneDrive, Microsoft Teams and Windows Explorer folders, and its Procore integrations page also lists Google Drive, Dropbox and Box.
- Security statements (vendor claims): SyncEzy says it is SOC 2 Type 2 certified and stores only file metadata. We did not record a security certification on COPE's pages.
- Where AI fits: neither describes AI features in the product. SyncEzy's SharePoint page promotes a webinar on getting project data ready for AI tools.
- Pricing (checked Oct 30, 2026): neither publishes figures. COPE lists Closeout Log, Automations and Standard, Advanced and Enterprise packages, each Get a Quote, with quotes depending on products, project size and connected projects. SyncEzy shows prices only after registering a free account, and its Procore SharePoint FAQ describes a base subscription per company, not per user, quoted on project volume, with a free trial.
- Not used here: customer quotes and logos (vendor content). Facts for both tools come from vendor websites (desk research).
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Extracts Pro
No reviews yet. Used Extracts Pro? Yours would be the first.
SyncEzy
No reviews yet. Used SyncEzy? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- Whether you need closeout tracking and binders plus scheduled extracts (COPE) or a continuous two-way document sync (SyncEzy)
- How either handles your folder structure, permissions and the Procore tools you rely on
- What you actually pay, and on what basis (neither publishes full prices)
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI contract, document & drawing review tools
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Provision
- Compare: Nomic vs Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Nomic
- Compare: Trunk Tools vs Provision
- Compare: Part3 vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: First Rule vs Document Crunch
- Compare: First Rule vs Provision
- Compare: Marapone SpecChecker vs Helonic
- Compare: Deltek Specpoint vs RIB SpecLink
- Compare: Helonic vs Specset
- Compare: Specset vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Helonic vs InspectMind
- Compare: Primepoint vs Buildcheck
- Compare: AsBuilt vs Struction
- Compare: Drawboard vs Revizto
- Compare: InspectMind vs Marapone SpecChecker
- Compare: AsBuilt vs Datagrid
- Compare: HingePoint ProConnector vs SyncEzy
- Compare: ProjectReady vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Structured AI vs Nomic
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Neuron Factory vs Provision
- Compare: Enlaye vs Document Crunch
- Compare: iFieldSmart AI vs CONXAI
- Compare: Newforma vs ProjectReady
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Drawboard
- Compare: Primepoint vs Struction
- Compare: Extracts Pro vs HingePoint ProConnector
- Compare: MeltPlan vs Neuron Factory
- Compare: Structured AI vs Wyre AI
- Compare: Brickanta vs First Rule
- Compare: Morpheus vs SyncEzy
- Compare: Enlaye vs Brickanta
- Compare: iFieldSmart AI vs Procore AI
- Compare: Newforma vs Part3
- Compare: Firmus vs CONXAI
- Compare: Deltek Specpoint vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: RIB SpecLink vs Specset
- Compare: Primepoint vs Structured AI
- Compare: InspectMind vs Firmus
- Compare: InspectMind vs Structured AI
- Compare: Helonic vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Provision vs Pelles AI
- Compare: Firmus vs Nomic
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Specset vs InspectMind
- Compare: Datagrid vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: HingePoint ProConnector vs ProjectReady
- Compare: Struction vs Wyre AI
- Compare: Procore AI vs Bluebeam Max
- Compare: Nomic vs InspectMind
- Compare: Specset vs Marapone SpecChecker
- Compare: CONXAI vs blade ai
- Compare: Primepoint vs Nomic
- Compare: Helonic vs Buildcheck: two AI drawing reviewers, different delivery models
- Compare: Specset vs Firmus: spec-to-drawing agents or AI drawing review
- Compare: Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: AutoSpecs vs RIB SpecLink
- Compare: Structured AI vs Firmus
- Compare: Provision vs Buildcheck
- Compare: InspectMind vs Primepoint
- Compare: Part3 vs Specset
- Compare: Datagrid vs iFieldSmart AI
- Compare: Newforma vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Nomic vs Helonic
- Compare: UpCodes vs InspectMind
- Compare: Firmus vs Helonic
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Datagrid
- Compare: Struction vs Structured AI
- Compare: Procore AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Buildcheck vs Specset
- Compare: Buildcheck vs Marapone SpecChecker
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Part3
- Compare: Enlaye vs Provision
- Compare: SyncEzy vs Agave
- Compare: Brickanta vs Provision
- Compare: Neuron Factory vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Brickanta vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Piper AI vs Pelles AI
- Compare: Wyre AI vs InspectMind
- Compare: Nomic vs Specset
- Compare: Neuron Factory vs Piper
- Compare: Brickanta vs Neuron Factory
- Compare: Procore AI vs Datagrid
- Compare: Firmus vs Marapone SpecChecker
- Compare: Helonic vs Primepoint
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Wyre AI
- Compare: AsBuilt vs blade ai
- Compare: Drawboard vs BIMcollab
- Compare: Newforma vs SyncEzy
- Compare: Provision vs Piper AI
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs InspectMind
- Compare: UpCodes vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Deltek Specpoint vs UpCodes
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Brickanta vs Document Crunch
- Compare: Primepoint vs Firmus