Datagrid vs Firmus
Two AI-first precon products now owned by larger platforms, aimed at different document jobs. Datagrid (a Procore company) sells AI agents that connect systems and run workflows such as submittals, RFIs, daily logs and spec review, with published Free, Pro and Enterprise plans. Firmus (now part of Bluebeam) focuses on computer-vision design review of PDF drawing sets to find incomplete design, scope gaps and sheet discrepancies, with annual plans priced by analyses per year but no dollar figures. Partly like-for-like (our reading): both sit in precon document work and open issues toward Procore, but Datagrid spans many agent workflows while Firmus centres on drawing-set QA. Desk research from vendor sites read Nov 5, 2026; no winner.
In short: Datagrid (AI agents for construction; vendor publishes prices) vs Firmus (Drawing review & QA; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Datagrid Nov 5, 2026; Firmus Nov 4, 2026. No winner declared; desk research from vendor sites.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Datagrid | Firmus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI agents for construction | Drawing review & QA |
| AI role (our label) | AI-first | AI-first |
| What it does | AI agents that connect systems, interpret project files and complete workflows such as submittals, RFIs and spec review; voice lookup answers questions out loud from Procore, Primavera and other connected systems. The site footer reads "Datagrid, a Procore company"; Groundbreak speaker pages list it as "Datagrid AI from Procore". The agents page lists 18 pre-built agents, including Deep Search, Fast Search, Submittal Review, Document Comparison, Submittal-Builder, Summary Spec Submittal, Scope Checker, RFI, Daily Log (raw field notes mapped to Procore daily log types), Change Order, Change Analysis, Audit, Contract Review, Pre-Qualification, Site Safety, SOP, Mentor and a Single Line Drawings Expert Agent (extracting and structuring electrical system data from single-line drawings into validated tables). The homepage says customer data is never used for model training and lists SOC 2 (vendor statements). Output multiples, percentages and customer quotes are vendor claims and are not used. | AI design review for preconstruction that uses computer vision on PDF drawing sets to find incomplete design, scope gaps, missing information and discrepancies across hundreds of sheets, with a dashboard to filter, assign and track issues. Firmus's site says it is now part of Bluebeam (the footer says Bluebeam is part of the Nemetschek Group). Products: AI-REVIEW (computer-vision drawing review; included checks cover architectural packages, MEP connection points and document health such as sheets missing from the set), AI-MATCH (View-to-View Match on all annual plans, Full Set-to-Set Match as a Premium option) and a Procore integration whose RFI Connector groups issues into an RFI that opens in Procore. Analysis is iterative across design stages (100% DD, 50% CD, 90% CD, IFP, IFC). Vendor says it complements, not replaces, human review. Logo wall and case-study claims are not used. |
| Who it's for | Teams managing large projects. | General contractors, construction managers, architects, and owners/developers in preconstruction. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Vendor-listed pricing: Free $0/month; Pro $90/month with 1,000 credits; Enterprise custom pricing with premium credits via sales. All three plans list unlimited users. Plans differ in data sync frequency (daily, hourly, every 15 minutes) and features: file support up to 200 MB per file on Pro and 300 MB on Enterprise, Slack and Teams on Pro (SMS added on Enterprise), Basic, Core (50+ connectors) and Expanded (100+ connectors, including an ERPs and Financials pack) integration packs, and video or audio processing up to 2 GB per file, BI connections (Power BI, Tableau, Looker) and a credit usage dashboard on Enterprise only. The page links separate credit usage and pricing terms. Confirm current terms with the vendor. | No public prices. The pricing page ("Firmus Plan Options", annual subscription plans) lists Basic (5 analyses/year) and Advanced (20 analyses/year), both with Standard SLA and self-service AI-MATCH; Premium (100 analyses/year; adds an enterprise SLA, AI-MATCH Premium full set-to-set drawing comparison, white-label reporting and SSO/enterprise controls); and Enterprise (customized). All include unlimited users and unlimited exports; each has a Get Started button and no figures. Confirm pricing with the vendor. |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Datagrid Nov 5, 2026; Firmus Nov 4, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- What it reviews: Datagrid's agents page lists pre-built agents including Submittal Review, Document Comparison, Submittal-Builder, Summary Spec Submittal, Scope Checker, RFI, Daily Log, Change Order, Contract Review and a Single Line Drawings Expert Agent, plus voice lookup against Procore, Primavera and other connected systems. Firmus lists AI-REVIEW for computer-vision drawing review (architectural packages, MEP connection points and document health such as sheets missing from the set), AI-MATCH for view-to-view and optional full set-to-set match, and analysis across design stages from DD through IFC.
- Ownership and integrations: Datagrid's site footer reads "Datagrid, a Procore company". Firmus's site says it is now part of Bluebeam. Datagrid emphasises connectors and sync frequency by plan; Firmus highlights a Procore RFI Connector that groups issues into an RFI that opens in Procore.
- Pricing (Datagrid read Nov 5, 2026; Firmus as last checked): Datagrid publishes Free at $0/month, Pro at $90/month with 1,000 credits and Enterprise custom with premium credits, all with unlimited users, differing by sync frequency, file size limits and connector packs. Firmus's pricing page lists Basic (5 analyses/year), Advanced (20), Premium (100, with full set-to-set match and SSO) and Enterprise custom, all unlimited users and exports, with Get Started buttons and no dollar figures. See each tool page for detail.
- Not used here: Datagrid's output multiples and customer quotes, and Firmus logo-wall and case-study claims (vendor material). Facts for both tools come from vendor websites (desk research).
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Datagrid
No reviews yet. Used Datagrid? Yours would be the first.
Firmus
No reviews yet. Used Firmus? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- Whether your bottleneck is multi-workflow agents across RFIs and submittals (Datagrid) or drawing-set completeness and match checks (Firmus)
- How each fits if you already standardize on Procore versus Bluebeam
- What Firmus costs at your annual analysis volume, and which Datagrid credit tier covers your file sizes and connectors
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI contract, document & drawing review tools
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Provision
- Compare: Nomic vs Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Nomic
- Compare: Trunk Tools vs Provision
- Compare: Part3 vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: First Rule vs Document Crunch
- Compare: First Rule vs Provision
- Compare: Marapone SpecChecker vs Helonic
- Compare: Deltek Specpoint vs RIB SpecLink
- Compare: Helonic vs Specset
- Compare: Specset vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Helonic vs InspectMind
- Compare: Primepoint vs Buildcheck
- Compare: AsBuilt vs Struction
- Compare: Drawboard vs Revizto
- Compare: InspectMind vs Marapone SpecChecker
- Compare: AsBuilt vs Datagrid
- Compare: Ontollo vs Datagrid
- Compare: HingePoint ProConnector vs SyncEzy
- Compare: ProjectReady vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Structured AI vs Nomic
- Compare: Neuron Factory vs Provision
- Compare: Enlaye vs Document Crunch
- Compare: iFieldSmart AI vs CONXAI
- Compare: Newforma vs ProjectReady
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Drawboard
- Compare: Primepoint vs Struction
- Compare: Extracts Pro vs HingePoint ProConnector
- Compare: MeltPlan vs Neuron Factory
- Compare: Structured AI vs Wyre AI
- Compare: Brickanta vs First Rule
- Compare: Enlaye vs Brickanta
- Compare: iFieldSmart AI vs Procore AI
- Compare: Newforma vs Part3
- Compare: Firmus vs CONXAI
- Compare: Deltek Specpoint vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: RIB SpecLink vs Specset
- Compare: Primepoint vs Structured AI
- Compare: InspectMind vs Firmus
- Compare: InspectMind vs Structured AI
- Compare: Helonic vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Provision vs Pelles AI
- Compare: Firmus vs Nomic
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Specset vs InspectMind
- Compare: Datagrid vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: HingePoint ProConnector vs ProjectReady
- Compare: Struction vs Wyre AI
- Compare: Procore AI vs Bluebeam Max
- Compare: Nomic vs InspectMind
- Compare: Specset vs Marapone SpecChecker
- Compare: CONXAI vs blade ai
- Compare: Primepoint vs Nomic
- Compare: Helonic vs Buildcheck: two AI drawing reviewers, different delivery models
- Compare: Specset vs Firmus: spec-to-drawing agents or AI drawing review
- Compare: Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: AutoSpecs vs RIB SpecLink
- Compare: Structured AI vs Firmus
- Compare: Provision vs Buildcheck
- Compare: InspectMind vs Primepoint
- Compare: Part3 vs Specset
- Compare: Datagrid vs iFieldSmart AI
- Compare: Newforma vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Nomic vs Helonic
- Compare: UpCodes vs InspectMind
- Compare: Firmus vs Helonic
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Datagrid
- Compare: Struction vs Structured AI
- Compare: Procore AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Buildcheck vs Specset
- Compare: Buildcheck vs Marapone SpecChecker
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Part3
- Compare: Enlaye vs Provision
- Compare: Brickanta vs Provision
- Compare: Neuron Factory vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Brickanta vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Piper AI vs Pelles AI
- Compare: Extracts Pro (COPE) vs SyncEzy
- Compare: Wyre AI vs InspectMind
- Compare: Nomic vs Specset
- Compare: Neuron Factory vs Piper
- Compare: Brickanta vs Neuron Factory
- Compare: Procore AI vs Datagrid
- Compare: Firmus vs Marapone SpecChecker
- Compare: Helonic vs Primepoint
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Wyre AI
- Compare: AsBuilt vs blade ai
- Compare: Drawboard vs BIMcollab
- Compare: Newforma vs SyncEzy
- Compare: Provision vs Piper AI
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs InspectMind
- Compare: UpCodes vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Deltek Specpoint vs UpCodes
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Brickanta vs Document Crunch
- Compare: Primepoint vs Firmus
- Compare: RIB SpecLink vs UpCodes
- Compare: AutoSpecs vs Marapone SpecChecker
- Compare: AsBuilt vs Part3
- Compare: ProjectReady vs SyncEzy
- Compare: Pelles AI vs MeltPlan
- Compare: First Rule vs Wyre AI
- Compare: CONXAI vs Datagrid
- Compare: Structured AI vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Helonic vs Structured AI
- Compare: Specset vs Primepoint
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Pelles AI
- Compare: iFieldSmart AI vs Nomic