Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
Two ways to turn 360° site captures into progress numbers. Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting is a service: the project supplies a federated NWD model and a P6 or Excel schedule, Multivista or the project team captures 360° photos, Hexagon's technology marks model elements built or unbuilt and analysts QA every update. Track3D is a software platform that measures installed work straight from captures with no BIM model required to start, priced per square foot. Desk research from vendor pages read Oct 23, 2026; not tested, no winner.
In short: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting (Progress reporting service; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs Track3D (Progress tracking; vendor publishes prices). Facts last checked Oct 23, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting | Track3D |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Progress reporting service | Progress tracking |
| AI role (our label) | AI features added to established product | AI-first |
| What it does | Compares 360° site photos with the 3D model and schedule to report progress by trade, floor or system. This progress reporting service from Hexagon Multivista uses automated model-to-photo comparison of 360° photos against a federated 3D model (NWD) and a project schedule (P6 or Excel), marking model elements built or unbuilt and reporting progress by trade, floor, or system. Hexagon says its technology detects progress automatically and expert analysts QA every update. Its FAQ says building progress reporting requires an NWD model, a P6 or Excel schedule, and 360° photos from approved apps such as Multivista or Hexagon GoCapture; drone and SLR photos are not supported; setup can take up to 6-8 weeks; and reports are typically available 48-72 hours after images are posted. Lists compatibility with Autodesk ACC, Procore, Primavera P6, and Microsoft Project, and up to 10 years of data hosting. It sits in Hexagon Multivista's Analyze services alongside deviation analysis (which Hexagon describes as an AI-driven model-to-scan comparison) and UAV-based earthwork progress reporting. Separately, Hexagon announced on Oct 6, 2022 that it would integrate AVVIR's AI-powered technology into its construction portfolio; we did not find a Hexagon page naming AVVIR as the engine of this service. Re-read Oct 17, 2026: the same service page also advertises "agnostic data inputs" (360° photos, LiDAR scans or third-party tools, self-captured or Multivista-captured), which is broader than its FAQ; Hexagon's GoCapture app lets project teams self-capture 360° photos, 360° walks or 2D photos mapped to floor plans and BIM in its Analyze Hub. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: the service page is unchanged in substance (NWD model, P6 or Excel schedule, approved 360° apps, drone and SLR photos not supported, setup up to 6-8 weeks, reports typically 48-72 hours after images are posted, email alerts when a report is ready); one FAQ answer on the same page says reports are usually ready within 48 hours, so confirm turnaround with Hexagon. The 2022 AVVIR press release was not re-read today (hexagon.com returned an access-denied response). Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: the service page is unchanged in substance (NWD model, P6 or Excel schedule, 360° photos captured by Multivista or the project team, approved apps only, drone and SLR photos not supported, reports by trade, floor or system, email alerts, up to 10 years of hosting, ACC, Procore, Primavera P6 and Microsoft Project compatibility). The FAQ still gives two turnaround answers (typically 48-72 hours, and usually within 48 hours) and two setup answers (up to 6-8 weeks, and up to eight weeks); confirm with Hexagon. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: the service page is unchanged in substance (NWD model, P6 or Excel schedule, 360° photos from approved apps, drone and SLR photos not supported, agnostic data inputs also advertised, analysts QA every update, email alerts, up to 10 years of hosting, ACC, Procore, Primavera P6 and Microsoft Project compatibility); the FAQ still gives both turnaround answers (typically 48-72 hours, and usually within 48 hours) and both setup answers (up to 6-8 weeks, and up to eight weeks). The site menu now lists a Getting Ahead with AI section on how AI supports owners (not read). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: the service page is unchanged in substance (NWD model, P6 or Excel schedule, 360° photos from approved apps, drone and SLR photos not supported, agnostic data inputs also advertised, analysts QA every update, email alerts, up to 10 years of hosting, ACC, Procore, Primavera P6 and Microsoft Project compatibility); both turnaround answers (typically 48-72 hours, and usually within 48 hours) and both setup answers (up to 6-8 weeks, and up to eight weeks) remain. The page now also names healthcare, data centers and education as industries. | AI reality intelligence platform that unifies reality capture data and quantifies installed work across job activities from each capture. Vendor says visuals are available in 30 minutes and progress data in 6 hours (conditions apply), with no BIM model required to start, and production analytics tied to cost codes. Customers quoted include Hensel Phelps and Performance Contracting Group. The homepage (Oct 19, 2026) announces a new commercial model with visual documentation at no additional cost. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: unchanged in substance (visual data in 30 minutes and progress data in 6 hours, conditions apply; no BIM model required to start; the new commercial model banner). The site menu lists VisualTrack, ProgressTrack and DeviationTrack (marked Coming Soon) and Procore, Autodesk Forma and Fieldwire integrations. The homepage percentage results (such as 15% coordination time saved and 20% lower rework cost) are vendor claims and were not used. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (the new commercial model banner; visuals in 30 minutes and progress in as fast as 6 hours; no BIM model required to start; VisualTrack, ProgressTrack and DeviationTrack (Coming Soon); Procore, Autodesk Forma and Fieldwire integrations); the pricing page also lists Schedule Recovery (the pace needed to get back on track when the schedule slips). Customer time-saved quotes not used. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (new commercial model banner; visuals in 30 minutes and progress in as fast as 6 hours; no BIM model required to start; VisualTrack, ProgressTrack and DeviationTrack (Coming Soon); Procore, Autodesk Forma and Fieldwire integrations; Schedule Recovery). Customer quotes not used. |
| Who it's for | General contractors and owners; Hexagon also names project executives, quality teams, and schedulers. | Owners, general contractors, and trade partners. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | No public prices found (re-checked Oct 17 and Oct 19, 2026): the service page has no pricing link, and multivistaservices.hexagon.com/pricing returns a not-found page. Calls to action: "Book a demo" and "Contact us". A dollar figure on the page is a customer testimonial claim, not a price. Confirm current pricing with the vendor. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: unchanged (no pricing link; multivistaservices.hexagon.com/pricing returns a not-found page; Book a demo and Contact us). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged (no pricing link; Book a demo; the dollar figure on the page is still a customer testimonial, not a price). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged (no pricing link; multivistaservices.hexagon.com/pricing returns not found; Book a demo; testimonials on the page are not prices). | Pricing page (checked Oct 16, 2026; unchanged on Oct 19, 2026), headline: "Pricing Rebuilt Around Progress, Not Pictures. At $0.15/sqft", with "Talk to Sales". The vendor says every sq ft registered for Progress Intelligence unlocks 5X that in visual documentation coverage at no added cost, and lists unlimited users. Minimums, term and what counts as a registered sq ft are not stated. Vendor-listed; confirm current pricing with the vendor. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: unchanged ($0.15/sqft headline with Talk to Sales; 5X visual coverage for every sq ft registered for Progress Intelligence at no added cost; unlimited users). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged ($0.15/sqft headline with Talk to Sales; 5X visual coverage at no added cost for every sq ft registered for Progress Intelligence; unlimited users). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged ($0.15/sqft headline with Talk to Sales; 5X visual coverage at no added cost for every sq ft registered for Progress Intelligence; unlimited users). |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
|
Facts last checked: Oct 23, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Inputs: Hexagon's FAQ says progress reporting for new construction needs a 3D model in NWD format, a schedule in P6 or Excel format and 360° photos from approved apps such as Multivista or Hexagon GoCapture, and that drone and SLR photos are not supported; the same page also advertises agnostic data inputs (360° photos, LiDAR scans or third-party tools, self-captured or Multivista-captured). Track3D says it measures installed work directly from capture and that no BIM model is required to start, so a project can be measured from its first day.
- How progress is produced: Hexagon describes automated model-to-photo comparison that identifies built versus unbuilt elements, with expert analysts checking each update, reports by trade, floor or system in a cloud portal and email alerts when a report is ready. Track3D describes VisualTrack (visual documentation), ProgressTrack (quantified installed work across job activities) and DeviationTrack (marked Coming Soon), plus a Schedule Recovery view of the pace needed to get back on track.
- Turnaround and setup (vendor statements, checked Oct 23, 2026): Hexagon's FAQ gives reports typically 48-72 hours after 360° images are posted and, in another answer, usually within 48 hours; setup can take up to 6-8 weeks (another answer says up to eight weeks). Track3D says visuals are available in as little as 30 minutes from capture and progress data in as fast as 6 hours. Confirm both against your own capture schedule.
- Integrations and data: Hexagon lists compatibility with Autodesk ACC, Procore, Primavera P6 and Microsoft Project and up to 10 years of project data hosting; GoCapture lets any team member self-capture 360° photos, 360° walks or 2D photos mapped to floor plans and BIM in its Analyze Hub, with professional capture available to supplement. Track3D's menu lists Procore, Autodesk Forma and Fieldwire integrations.
- Pricing (checked Oct 23, 2026): Hexagon publishes no prices (no pricing link; multivistaservices.hexagon.com/pricing returns not found; Book a demo). Track3D's pricing page headline is $0.15/sqft with Talk to Sales, says every square foot registered for Progress Intelligence unlocks 5X that in visual documentation at no added cost, and lists unlimited users; minimums and term are not stated. Customer testimonials and percentage results on both sites are vendor material and not used here.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
No reviews yet. Used Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting? Yours would be the first.
Track3D
No reviews yet. Used Track3D? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- What Track3D counts as a registered square foot and whether there is a minimum
- Whether Hexagon's progress reports accept captures from non-approved 360° apps in practice, given the FAQ and the agnostic-inputs claim differ
- How each handles a model that lags the field (Hexagon needs an NWD model; Track3D says it does not)
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend