Evercam vs Timescapes
Two construction camera platforms for a continuous visual record of the jobsite. Evercam combines fixed cameras, drone flights and 360 walkthroughs with an AI Platform Suite and publishes per-camera prices; Timescapes sells self-contained solar, cellular cameras plus a progress platform with AI activity detection, quoted on request. Vendor pages read Oct 23, 2026; desk research, not tested, no winner.
In short: Evercam (Construction cameras & site intelligence; vendor publishes prices) vs Timescapes (Progress cameras; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Oct 23, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Evercam | Timescapes |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Construction cameras & site intelligence | Progress cameras |
| AI role (our label) | AI features added to established product | AI features added to established product |
| What it does | Camera platform combining fixed cameras, drone flights and 360° walkthroughs with a visual timeline and BIM vs as-built comparison. AI features listed: Safety Observations, Smart Search and Automated Gate Reports. Its FAQ (checked Oct 19, 2026) says installation is typically completed within hours once power and connectivity are available, and that it is ISO 27001 certified and SOC 2 compliant. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: unchanged in substance (fixed cameras, drone flights and 360 walkthroughs, BIM vs as-built comparison, Safety Observations, Smart Search and Automated Gate Reports). Re-read Oct 23, 2026 for a compare: the AI Platform Suite page lists Ask AI (questions answered from project data and visual records), Smart Search (search footage by vehicle, plant, crew or frame area, including software-only use on existing site cameras, with PDF/CSV export), Progress Automations (AI summary of visible change between two dates, emailed on a schedule) and 360 object detection; the connectors page lists Procore, Autodesk, Voyage Control, Aconex, Bentley iTwin and HammerTech. | Self-contained solar, cellular construction cameras plus a platform for a continuous visual record. Cameras page lists 21 megapixels, up to a 99° field of view and up to 400 m operating distance; the vendor says cameras install in under 30 minutes and system monitoring is free of charge (vendor claims). Platform page lists unlimited timelapses, an automated daily log (weather, personnel, equipment), equipment uptime and weather-impact tracking, health and safety scores, BIM overlays, IoT sensor correlation, Procore and Autodesk integrations, and AI that automatically detects and logs concrete trucks, excavators and personnel. Serves GCs and owners in the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Re-read Oct 17, 2026; the AI detection on the platform page moved our label from Not AI-first to AI features added. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: platform and cameras pages unchanged in substance; the cameras page adds that the hardware achieves over 98% continuous uptime (vendor claim) and uses aluminum and polycarbonate enclosures. Customer quotes (KiwiRail, New Zealand Ministry of Education) are vendor-published. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: homepage, platform and cameras pages unchanged in substance (solar, cellular cameras installed in under 30 minutes, unlimited timelapses, automated daily log, BIM overlays, IoT correlation, Procore and Autodesk integrations, AI detection of concrete trucks, excavators and personnel). The homepage's claim-dollar examples, 500+ active projects, $50B+ of project value documented and 45+ average users per project are vendor claims and not used. Re-read Oct 23, 2026 for a compare: homepage, platform and cameras pages unchanged in substance (solar, cellular 21 MP cameras, up to 99 degree field of view and 400 m operating distance; unlimited timelapses, automated daily log, BIM overlays, IoT sensor correlation, Procore and Autodesk integrations, AI detection of concrete trucks, excavators and personnel). |
| Who it's for | Construction project teams. | General contractors and owners/developers. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Vendor-listed pricing (pricing calculator page, checked Oct 16, 2026; camera, add-on, SiteSecure, 360 and drone prices unchanged on Oct 19, 2026, when the page also offered 25% off Drone and 360 Walkthrough with Pro for 30 days from the quote date): construction cameras on SiteCommand Essential $395/camera/month or Pro $595/camera/month (Pro adds PPE detection, BIM compare, incident video, SSO); Timelapse Pro add-on $150/month; Gate Report $950/kit/month; SiteSecure $395/kit/month with Jobsite Monitoring +$120/camera/month; 360 Walkthrough $5 per 1,000 sq ft/month ($300/month minimum); Drone View from $249/month. The page calls results a preliminary estimate; final pricing depends on site, hardware and installation. Confirm current terms with the vendor. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: pricing calculator unchanged (SiteCommand Essential $395 and Pro $595 per camera/month; Timelapse Pro $150/month; Gate Report $950/kit/month; SiteSecure $395/kit/month, Jobsite Monitoring +$120/camera/month; 360 Walkthrough $5 per 1,000 sq ft/month, $300 minimum; Drone View from $249/month; 25% off Drone and 360 with Pro for 30 days from the quote date; US market pricing). Re-read Oct 23, 2026: prices unchanged (Essential $395 and Pro $595 per camera/month; Timelapse Pro $150/month; Gate Report $950/kit/month; SiteSecure $395/kit/month with Jobsite Monitoring +$120/camera/month; 360 Walkthrough $5 per 1,000 sq ft/month, $300 minimum; drone from $249/month); the page says Gate Report and SiteSecure replace Essential or Pro on dedicated security camera kits and calls results a preliminary estimate. | Not publicly listed: the homepage links a /pricing page, but it returned 404 when checked Oct 16, Oct 17 and Oct 19, 2026; the call to action is Request Demo. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: /pricing still returns 404; the call to action is still Request Demo. Re-read Oct 23, 2026: unchanged (no prices shown; a Pricing link appears in the navigation but /pricing returns a not-found page; Request Demo). |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 23, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Capture: Evercam brings fixed cameras (fixed, 180 degree wide, PTZ and gate/ANPR types), drone flights and 360 walkthroughs into one platform. Timescapes centers on its own solar, cellular cameras, listed at 21 MP with up to a 99 degree field of view and up to 400 m operating distance, which the vendor says install in under 30 minutes.
- AI features: Evercam's AI Platform Suite page lists Ask AI (questions answered from project data and visual records), Smart Search (find vehicles, plant or crews in an area of the frame, including on existing site cameras as software only, with PDF/CSV export), Progress Automations (AI summary of visible change between two dates) and 360 object detection, plus Safety Observations and Automated Gate Reports. Timescapes says its AI detects and logs concrete trucks, excavators and personnel to verify daily logs and deliveries.
- Progress and claims records: both offer timelapse and a visual timeline. Timescapes lists unlimited timelapses for any date range, an automated daily log (weather, personnel, equipment), weather-impact and equipment-uptime tracking, and frames its record around disputes and claims. Evercam lists a visual timeline, BIM vs as-built comparison and scheduled progress emails.
- Integrations: Evercam's connectors page lists Procore, Autodesk, Voyage Control (gate bookings), Aconex, Bentley iTwin (4D BIM view) and HammerTech (observations). Timescapes lists Procore and Autodesk integrations, BIM overlays and IoT sensor correlation.
- Security and site access: Evercam sells Gate Report (vehicle logging) and SiteSecure (monitored security kits) as separate products that replace Essential or Pro on dedicated kits, and its FAQ lists ISO 27001 and SOC 2. Timescapes' pages read focus on progress monitoring and do not list a security monitoring product.
- Pricing (checked Oct 23, 2026): Evercam's calculator lists SiteCommand Essential $395 or Pro $595 per camera/month, Timelapse Pro $150/month, Gate Report $950/kit/month, SiteSecure $395/kit/month (+$120/camera/month monitoring), 360 Walkthrough $5 per 1,000 sq ft/month ($300 minimum) and drone from $249/month, called a preliminary estimate. Timescapes shows no prices (its /pricing link returns a not-found page) and routes to Request Demo.
- Not used here: customer quotes, project counts, construction-value and uptime figures (vendor material). Neither tool has been tested by Means & Methods Lab.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Evercam
No reviews yet. Used Evercam? Yours would be the first.
Timescapes
No reviews yet. Used Timescapes? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- What a Timescapes quote includes for hardware, data plan and platform per camera
- Whether Evercam hardware is bought, rented or bundled in the monthly camera price
- How accurate each platform's AI detection is on your site
- Install requirements for power and connectivity on remote or early-stage sites
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken