busybusy vs Arcoro Time
Two GPS time-tracking apps for construction crews, both with published per-person prices and neither built around AI. busybusy pairs crew and kiosk clock-in with equipment hours, photos and auto-assembled daily project reports, and has a free tier. Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime) focuses on geofenced, cost-coded time feeding payroll, with an optional Arcoro Payroll plan. Vendor pages read Oct 22, 2026; desk research, not tested, no winner.
In short: busybusy (GPS time tracking & daily project reports; vendor publishes prices) vs Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime) (GPS time tracking for construction crews; vendor publishes prices). Facts last checked Oct 22, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | busybusy | Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | GPS time tracking & daily project reports | GPS time tracking for construction crews |
| AI role (our label) | Not AI-first | Not AI-first |
| What it does | GPS time-card app for construction and field industries, with crew clock-in, GPS tracking, cost codes, equipment hours, photos and daily reports. Features listed: clock in/out (individual, supervisor crew clock-in, kiosk), GPS breadcrumbing and required-onsite clock-in, location-based reminders, signed digital time cards, daily safety/injury sign-off, cost codes and job costing, budgets vs actuals, equipment hours and GPS, scheduling, unlimited GPS/time-stamped photos and notes, documents, and customizable daily project reports. The homepage says the daily can auto-generate weather, job costing, equipment, photos, injury report and hours on site for each project, and that kiosk facial recognition "uses AI" to notify the office about buddy punching. That is the only AI use described; the daily report is assembled from captured data, not described as AI-written. Offline mode listed. Homepage figures (e.g. total time-card hours tracked) are vendor claims. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: prices, the free tier, the $40 admin license and the 14-day Pro trial are unchanged (annual billing is described as two free months). Kiosk facial recognition is still the only AI described, so the tag stays. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: the pricing page is unchanged and kiosk facial recognition is still the only AI described, so the tag stays. Re-read Oct 22, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (crew and kiosk clock-in, required-onsite clock-in, location-based reminders, GPS breadcrumbing, signed time cards, daily sign-off, equipment hours and hour meters, budgets vs actuals, auto-assembled daily project reports, offline mode; kiosk facial recognition is still the only AI described). Rankings, customer quotes and hours-tracked figures are vendor material and not used. | GPS-verified time tracking for contractors and construction crews, renamed from ExakTime to Arcoro Time. The exaktime.com site now redirects to arcoro.com/exaktime. The page lists geofenced clock-ins limited to a job site, breadcrumb tracking, project and cost-code hours, tool and equipment tracking with incident/repair notes, a daily employee work report across job sites, regular vs overtime hours by site, start/stop detail per employee, a tablet kiosk option with face photos at clock-in (per a customer quote on the page), and connection to Arcoro Payroll or your payroll provider. Integrations named: QuickBooks, Sage, ADP, Acumatica, Foundation and Viewpoint. The FAQ says GPS is active only while an employee is on the clock. Savings figures on the page cite American Payroll Association estimates (vendor-cited, not verified). The only AI mention we found is AI-powered support tools in Arcoro's support center; the time-tracking product itself is not described as AI. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: Arcoro now publishes an Arcoro Time pricing page (see Pricing). The time product is still not described as AI, so the tag stays. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: the product page and pricing page are unchanged in substance (geofenced clock-ins, breadcrumb tracking, cost codes, equipment tracking, daily reports; AI mentioned only for support tools). The homepage now says Arcoro Time has served the construction industry since 2018. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: the product page is unchanged in substance (geofenced clock-ins, breadcrumb tracking, project and cost-code hours, tool and equipment tracking with incident and repair notes, daily employee work report, regular and overtime hours by site, GPS active only on the clock; QuickBooks, Sage, ADP, Acumatica, Foundation and Viewpoint named). It still says Arcoro has served construction since 2018, while the page footer still dates the time-tracking product to 1999 (vendor wording; ExakTime predates the rename). AI is still mentioned only for support tools. Payroll-loss figures cite American Payroll Association estimates and customer quotes are vendor material; neither is used. |
| Who it's for | Construction crews and owners of small to mid-size trade, excavation, restoration and similar field businesses. | Construction contractors and payroll administrators replacing paper time cards with GPS-verified, cost-coded time. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Free tier plus paid plans (pricing page, checked Oct 16, 2026; unchanged Oct 19, 2026): Pro $11.99 per user/month billed monthly or $9.99 billed annually; Premium $17.99 monthly or $14.99 annually; both plus a $40 admin license (first user included). 14-day Pro trial, no credit card required. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: unchanged: Pro $11.99 per user/month monthly or $9.99 annually, Premium $17.99 or $14.99, plus the $40 admin license (first user included), 14-day Pro trial with no credit card. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged (Free $0 with GPS time tracking, job costing, equipment tracking and unlimited users; Pro $11.99 per user/month billed monthly or $9.99 annually; Premium $17.99 or $14.99; each plus a $40 admin license with the first user included; 14-day free trial, no credit card). | Vendor-listed prices (Arcoro Time pricing page, checked Oct 19, 2026; unchanged Oct 20, 2026): Time Essential starts at $9, Time Professional at $12 and Time + Payroll at $20 per employee per month, with an annual contract and annual payment terms; monthly and quarterly payment terms are also available, and volume pricing is offered for organizations with 200+ employees. Time Essential covers mobile time and attendance, GPS/location tracking, meal-break tracking, custom forms and alerts; Time Professional adds job-assignment scheduling and PTO administration; Time + Payroll adds paying employees through Arcoro Payroll. A free trial is offered. Confirm current terms with the vendor. Earlier note (Oct 16, 2026): no public prices found (demo request; exaktime.com/pricing/ redirected to a 404 on arcoro.com). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: no price change (Time Essential from $9, Time Professional from $12 and Time + Payroll from $20 per employee per month with an annual contract and annual payment terms; monthly and quarterly payment terms available; volume pricing for 200+ employees; free trial). |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 22, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Clocking in: busybusy lists individual, supervisor crew and kiosk clock-in, a Required Onsite setting that blocks clock-in outside the project boundary, location-based reminders when workers arrive and leave, GPS breadcrumbing and yes-or-no sign-in questions. Arcoro Time lists geofences that limit clock-ins to a job site, breadcrumb tracking, perimeter control for clock-in and out, meal-break tracking and a tablet kiosk option; its FAQ says GPS is active only while an employee is on the clock.
- Beyond hours: busybusy lists cost codes, budgets vs actuals, equipment hours with GPS and optional hour meters, GPS- and time-stamped photos, documents, scheduling, signed digital time cards and a daily injury sign-off, plus daily project reports it says can pull weather, job costing, equipment, photos, injury reports and hours on site. Arcoro Time lists project and cost-code hours, tool and equipment tracking with incident and repair notes, a daily employee work report across job sites, regular and overtime hours by site, custom forms, alerts to employees, and on the higher plans job-assignment scheduling and PTO administration.
- Payroll: Arcoro Time connects to Arcoro Payroll or another provider and names QuickBooks, Sage, ADP, Acumatica, Foundation and Viewpoint; its Time + Payroll plan pays employees through Arcoro Payroll. busybusy says its time and job-costing data flows into many project management and accounting products and lists an Add Payroll option on Pro.
- AI: busybusy's only described AI is kiosk facial recognition that alerts the office to buddy punching; its daily report is assembled from captured data. Arcoro mentions AI only for its support tools; the time product is not described as AI. Both are tagged Not AI-first here.
- Offline and support: busybusy lists an offline mode and free in-app chat support. Arcoro lists a dedicated implementation team, Arcoro Learning tutorials and office hours, and Support Central by chat, web form or phone.
- Pricing (checked Oct 22, 2026): busybusy has a Free plan ($0, GPS time tracking, job costing, equipment tracking, unlimited users), Pro at $11.99 per user per month billed monthly or $9.99 billed annually and Premium at $17.99 or $14.99, each plus a $40 admin license (first user included), with a 14-day trial and no credit card. Arcoro Time lists Time Essential from $9, Time Professional from $12 and Time + Payroll from $20 per employee per month with an annual contract and annual payment terms, monthly and quarterly terms also available, volume pricing for 200+ employees and a free trial. The bases differ (per user plus an admin license vs per employee on an annual contract), so the figures are not like-for-like.
- Not used here: busybusy's rankings, customer quotes and hours-tracked counts, and Arcoro's payroll-loss calculator figures (American Payroll Association estimates) and customer quotes (vendor material). Neither tool has been tested by Means & Methods Lab.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
busybusy
No reviews yet. Used busybusy? Yours would be the first.
Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime)
No reviews yet. Used Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime)? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- How each handles a crew lead clocking in a crew that includes workers without phones
- Which plan a contractor needs for certified payroll or prevailing wage reporting
- How well kiosk photo or facial checks work on a dusty jobsite tablet
- Total first-year cost for a 25-person crew on each, including busybusy's admin license
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex