Home / Compare / FYLD vs Sitemate
FYLD vs Sitemate
Two AI-first approaches to capturing field work from video, voice and photos: FYLD (risk assessments and job records for utility and infrastructure crews, with manager alerts) and Sitemate (Storm AI drafting forms, timesheets and daily reports inside Dashpivot). Vendor-published facts only.
Side by side
| Sheet row | FYLD | Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI field-work capture for utility & infrastructure crews | Field forms, daily reports & voice-to-record AI |
| AI role (our label) | AI-first | AI features added to established product |
| What it does | AI platform for high-risk infrastructure field work (utilities, energy, highways, water); not a timesheet app. The product page says the FYLD app converts crew video, photo, audio and text into video work or risk assessments, records progress through the day, flags issues to managers and hands over incomplete jobs, while FYLD Cloud (described as AI-powered) alerts managers only to events that need action and supports setting job-duration targets, comparing team performance and scheduling. The FAQ says crews film and describe the task, hazards and controls and FYLD's AI flags conditions the worker might have missed, with managers able to add controls remotely; it lists offline mode with original timestamps on sync, open APIs and data services for ERP/EAM/GIS, and ISO 27001 / SOC 2 Type II / GDPR (vendor statements). Customers quoted on the site include Amey, M Group Water, NCDOT and Morrisons Water Services; outcome figures (e.g. 20% fewer injuries and incidents, 90% less paper, 6x ROI) are vendor claims. The vendor announced a $41M Series B on Feb 18, 2026 (vendor press release). | Field data platform for construction, infrastructure and other built-world teams: Dashpivot (forms, templates and workflows for safety, quality, field reporting, time & materials), the login-free Sitemate App for front-line workers, Flowsite (no-code integrations), Gearbelt (fleet, tools & equipment), an Open API and a Sitemate MCP server with read access to Dashpivot data. Storm is the AI layer built into Dashpivot: the vendor says it drafts daily reports, permits, JSAs, ITPs and timesheets from voice notes, photos, typed notes, weather and location, builds templates from a description or converts uploaded PDF/Word/Excel/photo-of-paper forms, works in multiple languages and offline (queued until reconnect), flags low-confidence fields, and never commits a record on its own: every output is a draft for human review, signature and sign-off fields always need manual action, and admins choose which workspaces, templates and fields Storm can write to. The Storm page also lists LLM selection per workflow. The homepage calls Sitemate the "#1 Front Line AI Company for the Built World" and cites customer-story figures (e.g. 1+ hour saved per crew per day); the Storm FAQ says users cut 20-30 minutes of paperwork per day for one form. These are vendor claims. We tag it AI features added because Storm sits inside the established Dashpivot product. |
| Who it's for | Utility, energy, highways and water contractors and asset owners managing large field crews and subcontractors; DOT-scale field programs. | Infrastructure, civil and building contractors, trades, and supervisors/foremen, engineers, safety and quality teams who want field records drafted from voice and photos. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Not publicly listed (FAQ: tailored subscription tiers by use case and scale; demo request). (Checked Oct 16, 2026.) | Per-user (Dashpivot Contributor licenses) for companies up to about 150 employees, Enterprise beyond; Sitemate App users have free and paid licenses; Dashpivot Visitors free and unlimited on Pro and above. Minimum license counts depend on company size (none under 10 employees; 10 Contributor licenses at 10-99; 20 at 100-999; 30 at 1,000+). The pricing page did not render dollar amounts in what we read, so per-seat price is Not publicly listed. Storm FAQ: included on all Dashpivot plans, including free trials, at no additional cost. (Checked Oct 16, 2026.) |
| Test status | Not tested. No scores. | Not tested. No scores. |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 16, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- What the AI produces: FYLD says its app converts crew video, photo, audio and text into video work/risk assessments and its AI flags conditions a worker might have missed. Sitemate says Storm drafts forms such as daily reports, timesheets or JSAs from voice notes, photos, typed notes, weather and location, held as drafts for human review.
- Human control: Sitemate says Storm never commits a record on its own and sign-off fields need manual action. FYLD describes managers reviewing sites remotely, adding hazards/controls and intervening, with all activities auditable.
- Who it is for: FYLD names utility, energy, highways and water customers (Amey, M Group Water, NCDOT). Sitemate spans safety, quality, field reporting, T&M, fleet and tools for contractors.
- Pricing: FYLD offers tailored subscription tiers (demo). Sitemate prices Dashpivot per Contributor license with Storm included on all plans; dollar figures did not render on the page we read.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What we can't tell you yet
Which tool is better for your work. That needs testing on the same package with a verified answer key. Planned measures for this comparison:
- Accuracy of hazard flags or drafted fields on the same crew's footage
- Outside Means & Methods Lab's current benchmark scope.
See the methodology and leaderboard status.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: Togal.AI vs Kreo
- Compare: HCSS HeavyBid vs B2W Estimate
- Compare: AGTEK vs Trimble Business Center
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Provision
- Compare: Nomic vs Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: Exayard vs Togal.AI
- Compare: Beam AI vs Civils.ai
- Compare: Downtobid vs BuildingConnected
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Nomic
- Compare: STACK vs Handoff AI
- Compare: Countfire vs Exayard
- Compare: ALICE vs nPlan
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: PlanHub vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Trunk Tools vs Provision
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: Kreo vs Exayard
- Compare: Handoff AI vs Beam AI
- Compare: ALICE vs Karmen
- Compare: nPlan vs SmartPM
- Compare: Part3 vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Propeller vs AGTEK
- Compare: SitesAI Estimate vs Foreman AI
- Compare: DESTINI Estimator vs Ediphi
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Tenna vs Trackunit
- Compare: Tenna vs Tenderd
- Compare: Bedrock Robotics vs Gravis Robotics
- Compare: One Click LCA vs EC3
- Compare: HammerTech vs WakeCap
- Compare: MaintainX vs Brightly
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Outbuild vs Planera
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Propeller
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: Civils.ai vs Exayard
- Compare: Togal.AI vs STACK
- Compare: Karmen vs Planera
- Compare: Outbuild vs SmartPM
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: Samsara vs Tenna
- Compare: Built Robotics vs Bedrock Robotics
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Dodge One vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Shovels vs Dodge One
- Compare: C.Scale vs One Click LCA
- Compare: Trayd vs Miter
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Kwant.ai vs WakeCap
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: CivCheck vs CodeComply.AI
- Compare: PermitFlow vs GreenLite
- Compare: Civ Robotics vs Dusty Robotics
- Compare: Okibo vs KEWAZO
- Compare: Rebar vs Countfire
- Compare: Rebar vs Pelles AI
- Compare: Davis AI vs TestFit
- Compare: TraceAir vs TestFit
- Compare: Trendspek vs ConeLabs
- Compare: Citylogix vs Trendspek
- Compare: Voliro vs Skydio
- Compare: SmartPM vs Document Crunch
- Compare: SewerAI vs ITpipes
- Compare: Exodigo vs GroundedAI
- Compare: Sitewire vs Built Technologies
- Compare: Converge vs Giatec
- Compare: Cloud Cycle vs Giatec MixPilot
- Compare: CivilGrid vs Exodigo
- Compare: OneCrew vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Compare: All3 vs Reframe Systems
- Compare: Reds10 vs All3
- Compare: Reframe Systems vs Reds10
- Compare: Foldcast vs Strong by Form
- Compare: Steelray Delay Analyzer vs SmartPM
- Compare: Nodes & Links vs Foresight
- Compare: First Rule vs Document Crunch
- Compare: First Rule vs Provision
- Compare: Procore Resource Planning (LaborChart) vs Bridgit
- Compare: Assignar vs Procore Resource Planning
- Compare: HammerTech vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: Eyrus vs Kwant.ai
- Compare: Field Materials vs Kojo
- Compare: ProcurePro vs Field Materials
- Compare: Tread vs Curri
- Compare: Parspec vs Andercore
- Compare: TestFit vs Autodesk Forma Site Design
- Compare: Snaptrude vs Arcol
- Compare: Autodesk Forma Site Design vs Arcol
- Compare: SWAPP vs Augmenta
- Compare: Facilio vs Willow
- Compare: UpKeep vs MaintainX
- Compare: BrainBox AI vs Willow
- Compare: Verdigris vs BrainBox AI
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: EquipmentShare T3 vs Samsara
- Compare: Hilti ON!Track vs Trackunit
- Compare: Komatsu Smart Construction vs Tenna
- Compare: Gearflow vs Tenna
- Compare: Procore Bid Management vs BuildingConnected
- Compare: SmartBid vs PreconSuite
- Compare: Pantera Tools vs SmartBid
- Compare: Buildr vs ProcurePro (BidLevel)
- Compare: Highwire vs Constrafor
- Compare: TrustLayer vs Jones
- Compare: bcs vs TrustLayer
- Compare: Jones vs Constrafor
- Compare: Avetta vs ISNetworld
- Compare: ISNetworld vs Highwire
- Compare: Marapone SpecChecker vs Helonic
- Compare: Deltek Specpoint vs RIB SpecLink
- Compare: Helonic vs Specset
- Compare: Specset vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Helonic vs InspectMind
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Riskcast
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: GCPay vs Trimble Pay
- Compare: Procore Pay vs GCPay
- Compare: Clearstory vs eSUB
- Compare: Adaptive vs SuperConstruct
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: Cat VisionLink vs HCSS Telematics
- Compare: Teletrac Navman vs HCSS Telematics
Means & Methods Lab has no commercial relationship with any vendor on this page. Rankings and placement are never for sale. See how we make money.