Home / Compare / ClockShark vs Workyard
ClockShark vs Workyard
Two GPS time-tracking apps for contractors that now both describe AI, aimed at different jobs: ClockShark Lightning's JobReady writes a shift brief, while Workyard's Autopilot plan describes AI that fixes timecards and allocates time to projects. Vendor-published facts only.
Side by side
| Sheet row | ClockShark | Workyard |
|---|---|---|
| Category | GPS time tracking & crew scheduling (with Lightning AI) | GPS time tracking, cost codes & field ops |
| AI role (our label) | AI features added to established product | AI features added to established product |
| What it does | Time-tracking, scheduling and job-management app for construction and field service: mobile and web clock in/out, GPS and geofencing, who's-working-now view, drag-and-drop scheduling, time off, job costing, job management, conversations, shift wrap-up and compliance forms, reports, and payroll/accounting integrations (QuickBooks, Sage 100 Contractor, Xero, ADP and Paychex named). The vendor has added ClockShark Lightning (marked New in the site navigation), which its Lightning page describes as AI inside the existing app: at launch one AI agent, JobReady, which composes a shift brief from the day's schedule, jobs, site notes, checklists and attachments when a crew member opens the app on a scheduled day, plus two standard (non-AI) features, Task Checklists (up to 20 timestamped items that appear at clock-in) and Mileage Tracking (miles entered at clock-out, CSV export; Pro). The vendor says JobReady only produces a brief and never changes a schedule, job or record on its own, that on-clock GPS collection is unchanged, and that customer data is not used to train AI models. Figures on the site (9,500+ companies, 100,000+ field pros, "99.9% accuracy", "industry's #1 timesheet app") are vendor claims. | Workforce management for contractors and field teams: GPS time tracking with time-clock rules and auto clock-in, overtime and break compliance with a GPS audit trail, time capture by project and cost code on every time card, live job-cost reporting by employee and cost code, sync of time by job and cost code to accounting/ERP (Sage, NetSuite, ComputerEase and Foundation named on the pricing page), scheduling with notes/checklists/attachments, a live crew map, mileage allocation, field expenses on a company card, mobile forms with an AI-powered form builder/converter (upload a PDF or image), and a developer API with 60+ endpoints. The pricing page's Autopilot plan adds "AI Time Keeping": a Time assistant (marked New) that the vendor says finds and fixes a full pay period of timecards automatically, with all changes reviewed and approved by admins before they go to payroll, and a Project Time Tracking Agent that detects work-site visits and allocates time to the right project using your offsite and rule-group settings with no manual clock-ins. Homepage figures (50,000+ workers, 10,000+ contractors) and customer quotes are vendor-published claims. |
| Who it's for | Small and mid-size construction and field service businesses that need crew time, GPS and scheduling feeding payroll and job costing. | Contractors (trade, restoration, service and GC crews) that need GPS-verified, cost-coded time feeding payroll and job costing. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Not publicly listed in the page text we read: the pricing page lists Standard and Pro plans priced per user, but dollar amounts did not render. It states a three-year contract term applies to all pricing plans, a 14-day trial with Pro features, billing in US dollars, and pro-rated billing for active users. Lightning page: JobReady and Task Checklists on all plans, Mileage Tracking on Pro. (Checked Oct 16, 2026.) | Pricing page (checked Oct 16, 2026): plans start at $6 per user/month billed annually, monthly billing available. Plans: Starter, Pro, Autopilot (marked most popular; adds the AI Time Keeping features, time-clock automations, time-card sign-offs, ERP integrations and API access) and Enterprise (contact sales). Per-plan prices above the $6 starting figure did not render in the page text we read. |
| Test status | Not tested. No scores. | Not tested. No scores. |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 16, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- What the AI touches: ClockShark says JobReady only produces a brief from the schedule, jobs, notes and attachments and never changes a schedule, job or record. Workyard says its Time assistant finds and fixes a full pay period of timecards, with every change reviewed and approved by admins before payroll, and its Project Time Tracking Agent allocates time to projects from detected site visits.
- Time capture: both list GPS clock-in, geofencing, job and cost-code time, scheduling and payroll/accounting exports. Workyard adds auto clock-in at a geofence, auto-trimmed clock-outs and meal-break rules on Autopilot. ClockShark adds timestamped Task Checklists and (Pro) mileage at clock-out.
- Data use: ClockShark's Lightning page says customer data is not used to train AI models and on-clock GPS collection is unchanged. Workyard's pricing page did not address training data.
- Pricing: Workyard publishes a $6 per user/month (billed annually) starting price; higher plans did not render. ClockShark lists Standard and Pro per user without visible dollar figures in the text we read and states a three-year contract term on all plans.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What we can't tell you yet
Which tool is better for your work. That needs testing on the same package with a verified answer key. Planned measures for this comparison:
- Correction rate on a real pay period of time cards in each
- Outside Means & Methods Lab's current benchmark scope.
See the methodology and leaderboard status.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: Togal.AI vs Kreo
- Compare: HCSS HeavyBid vs B2W Estimate
- Compare: AGTEK vs Trimble Business Center
- Compare: Document Crunch vs Provision
- Compare: Nomic vs Buildcheck vs InspectMind
- Compare: Exayard vs Togal.AI
- Compare: Beam AI vs Civils.ai
- Compare: Downtobid vs BuildingConnected
- Compare: Bluebeam Max vs Nomic
- Compare: STACK vs Handoff AI
- Compare: Countfire vs Exayard
- Compare: ALICE vs nPlan
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: PlanHub vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Trunk Tools vs Provision
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: Kreo vs Exayard
- Compare: Handoff AI vs Beam AI
- Compare: ALICE vs Karmen
- Compare: nPlan vs SmartPM
- Compare: Part3 vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Firmus vs Buildcheck
- Compare: Propeller vs AGTEK
- Compare: SitesAI Estimate vs Foreman AI
- Compare: DESTINI Estimator vs Ediphi
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Tenna vs Trackunit
- Compare: Tenna vs Tenderd
- Compare: Bedrock Robotics vs Gravis Robotics
- Compare: One Click LCA vs EC3
- Compare: HammerTech vs WakeCap
- Compare: MaintainX vs Brightly
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Outbuild vs Planera
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Propeller
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: Civils.ai vs Exayard
- Compare: Togal.AI vs STACK
- Compare: Karmen vs Planera
- Compare: Outbuild vs SmartPM
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: Samsara vs Tenna
- Compare: Built Robotics vs Bedrock Robotics
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Dodge One vs ConstructConnect
- Compare: Shovels vs Dodge One
- Compare: C.Scale vs One Click LCA
- Compare: Trayd vs Miter
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Pelles AI vs Trunk Tools
- Compare: Kwant.ai vs WakeCap
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: CivCheck vs CodeComply.AI
- Compare: PermitFlow vs GreenLite
- Compare: Civ Robotics vs Dusty Robotics
- Compare: Okibo vs KEWAZO
- Compare: Rebar vs Countfire
- Compare: Rebar vs Pelles AI
- Compare: Davis AI vs TestFit
- Compare: TraceAir vs TestFit
- Compare: Trendspek vs ConeLabs
- Compare: Citylogix vs Trendspek
- Compare: Voliro vs Skydio
- Compare: SmartPM vs Document Crunch
- Compare: SewerAI vs ITpipes
- Compare: Exodigo vs GroundedAI
- Compare: Sitewire vs Built Technologies
- Compare: Converge vs Giatec
- Compare: Cloud Cycle vs Giatec MixPilot
- Compare: CivilGrid vs Exodigo
- Compare: OneCrew vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Compare: All3 vs Reframe Systems
- Compare: Reds10 vs All3
- Compare: Reframe Systems vs Reds10
- Compare: Foldcast vs Strong by Form
- Compare: Steelray Delay Analyzer vs SmartPM
- Compare: Nodes & Links vs Foresight
- Compare: First Rule vs Document Crunch
- Compare: First Rule vs Provision
- Compare: Procore Resource Planning (LaborChart) vs Bridgit
- Compare: Assignar vs Procore Resource Planning
- Compare: HammerTech vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: Eyrus vs Kwant.ai
- Compare: Field Materials vs Kojo
- Compare: ProcurePro vs Field Materials
- Compare: Tread vs Curri
- Compare: Parspec vs Andercore
- Compare: TestFit vs Autodesk Forma Site Design
- Compare: Snaptrude vs Arcol
- Compare: Autodesk Forma Site Design vs Arcol
- Compare: SWAPP vs Augmenta
- Compare: Facilio vs Willow
- Compare: UpKeep vs MaintainX
- Compare: BrainBox AI vs Willow
- Compare: Verdigris vs BrainBox AI
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: EquipmentShare T3 vs Samsara
- Compare: Hilti ON!Track vs Trackunit
- Compare: Komatsu Smart Construction vs Tenna
- Compare: Gearflow vs Tenna
- Compare: Procore Bid Management vs BuildingConnected
- Compare: SmartBid vs PreconSuite
- Compare: Pantera Tools vs SmartBid
- Compare: Buildr vs ProcurePro (BidLevel)
- Compare: Highwire vs Constrafor
- Compare: TrustLayer vs Jones
- Compare: bcs vs TrustLayer
- Compare: Jones vs Constrafor
- Compare: Avetta vs ISNetworld
- Compare: ISNetworld vs Highwire
- Compare: Marapone SpecChecker vs Helonic
- Compare: Deltek Specpoint vs RIB SpecLink
- Compare: Helonic vs Specset
- Compare: Specset vs AutoSpecs
- Compare: Helonic vs InspectMind
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Riskcast
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: GCPay vs Trimble Pay
- Compare: Procore Pay vs GCPay
- Compare: Clearstory vs eSUB
- Compare: Adaptive vs SuperConstruct
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: Cat VisionLink vs HCSS Telematics
- Compare: Teletrac Navman vs HCSS Telematics
Means & Methods Lab has no commercial relationship with any vendor on this page. Rankings and placement are never for sale. See how we make money.