Visibuild vs Dalux Field
Two field quality platforms for inspections, punch lists and handover. Visibuild frames itself as QA-powered construction management from inspection test plans through defects and warranty, with no public prices; Dalux Field leads with BIM on site and a free Basic tier. Vendor pages read Oct 23, 2026; desk research, not tested, no winner.
In short: Visibuild (Construction QA, ITPs & punch/closeout; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs Dalux Field (BIM field QA, punch lists & inspections; free option; paid prices not listed). Facts last checked Oct 23, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Visibuild | Dalux Field |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Construction QA, ITPs & punch/closeout | BIM field QA, punch lists & inspections |
| AI role (our label) | Not AI-first | Not AI-first |
| What it does | Construction quality-management platform for inspections, ITPs, NCRs, punch lists, handover packs and defect liability workflows. It is built around inspections, ITPs/ITCs with hold and witness points, issues/NCRs, punch lists and snagging, project completion/handover packs, and post-completion defect liability workflows. Homepage and punch-list product pages describe mobile capture with photos and locations (online or offline), multi-reviewer sign-off, lot/zone closeout, revision control that updates linked inspections when drawings change, and a handover pack that builds from signed inspections and certificates as work happens. Vendor customer quotes cite defect-cost cuts and preventing a wrong concrete pour (customer claims, not verified). The pages we read do not describe generative AI, so we tag it Not AI-first. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: the homepage now frames the platform in four stages: pre-construction (risk registers, ITP and ITC templates mapped to hold and witness points, milestones built once and pushed to every project), construction, project completion and maintenance and warranty. It adds suppliers logging factory checks on precast or switchgear before delivery as a named role, and lists data centres, healthcare, residential, commercial and infrastructure. It still describes no AI, so the tag stays. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026 (homepage read through a fetch service; direct curl and headless Chrome returned an empty 202 response): unchanged in substance (pre-construction, construction, project completion and maintenance and warranty stages; ITP and ITC templates mapped to hold and witness points; revision control; multi-reviewer sign-off; offline field use; a handover pack built as work is signed off). Still no AI described, so the tag stays. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: still covers pre-construction through construction, completion and maintenance/warranty, with inspection test plans, punch lists, commissioning, off-site supplier checks and post-completion defects linked back to the original inspection; the site now announces a Document Management feature. No AI is described on the pages read. | On-site construction management app that connects drawings, BIM models, quality, safety and tasks on mobile. Lists checklist / test-and-inspection workflows with inspection points, responsibilities and acceptance criteria; punch lists and defect tasks pinned to drawings or BIM elements; offline capture with auto sync; safety inspections and observations; and SiteWalk / TwinBIM-style model-to-field checks. Vendor says 2.5 million+ app downloads, 1.7 million users, 23 languages, and unlimited users with local support (vendor claims). Dalux Field Basic is a free punch/defect tier (unlimited tasks, drawings/BIM upload, invite project members); Field Standard/Pro add features such as inspection plans. The Field pages we read do not describe generative AI. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: (read through a text fetch; a plain request returned 403) the Field and Field Basic pages are unchanged in substance. Field Basic is still described as completely free, with unlimited tasks, user groups, status dashboards and export of tasks and audit trails for handover, and a viewer the vendor says handles anything from 1 to 600 BIM models on any device with on-site measuring; inspection plans still need Field Standard or Field Pro. Still no AI described. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026 (text fetch; a plain request returned 403): the Field and Field Basic pages are unchanged in substance (2.5 million+ downloads, 1.7 million users, 23 languages, unlimited users and local support, vendor claims); still no AI described. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026 (text fetch; a plain request returned 403): the Field, Field Basic and punch list pages are unchanged in substance (BIM viewer for 1 to 600 models, issues, tasks and inspections linked to BIM elements, SiteWalk evaluation in Field, checklists and test-and-inspection plans, weekly safety inspections and observations, offline sync, 23 languages, unlimited users); still no AI described. Download and user counts and customer quotes are vendor material and not used. Re-read Oct 23, 2026 for a compare: Field Basic is still free with unlimited tasks, user groups, dashboards, export and the BIM viewer; inspection plans still need Field Standard or Field Pro. Still no AI described. |
| Who it's for | General contractors, trade partners, consultants, engineers and clients standardising QA across residential, commercial, infrastructure and data-centre projects (vendor framing; Australia-heavy customer examples). | Construction and site managers, quality and safety managers, BIM managers and subcontractors on BIM-enabled or drawing-based projects (strong European / infrastructure presence on customer quotes). |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Not publicly listed (book-a-demo / sales; no public price list on the pages we reached Oct 16, 2026; unchanged Oct 19, 2026, every call to action is Book a Demo). Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: unchanged, no public prices. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: still no public prices (Book a demo / Contact sales); no change. | Field Basic: free (no hidden fees per product page; unlimited tasks and project invites). Field Standard and Field Pro: upgrade when you need more (e.g. inspection plans); dollar prices not publicly listed on the pages we read. (Checked Oct 16, 2026; unchanged Oct 19, 2026.) Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: Field Basic still completely free with no hidden fees; inspection plans still need Field Standard or Field Pro. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged (Field Basic completely free with no hidden fees; inspection plans need Field Standard or Field Pro, which are not priced on the pages we read). Re-read Oct 23, 2026: Field Basic free; Field Standard and Field Pro still unpriced on the site. |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 23, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Scope: Visibuild covers four stages: pre-construction (risk, project planning, inspection test plans), construction (inspections, progress, documents, off-site supplier tracking, issues), completion (commissioning, defects, snags, punch lists) and maintenance (post-completion defects and tickets). Dalux Field covers tasks, punch lists and defects, checklists, test-and-inspection plans, safety inspections and observations, all tied to drawings and BIM models.
- Models vs workflow: Dalux Field's centre is the model; its Basic tier includes a BIM viewer the vendor says handles anything from 1 to 600 models on any device. Visibuild's pages focus on the QA record: a handover pack that builds as work happens, revision control, multi-reviewer sign-off and DLP defects linked back to the original inspection.
- Who takes part: Visibuild names GCs, trade partners, owners, suppliers and consultants, with suppliers logging factory checks before delivery. Dalux Field Basic lets you invite any number of project participants and export data for your records or the client.
- Offline and reporting: both say they work offline in the field; Visibuild lists live dashboards across one job or many, and Dalux Field Basic includes dashboards and export.
- AI tags: neither vendor describes AI on the pages read; both are tagged Not AI-first.
- Pricing (checked Oct 23, 2026): Visibuild lists no prices (Book a demo / Contact sales). Dalux Field Basic is free; inspection plans need Field Standard or Field Pro, which have no public prices.
- Not used here: customer stories, project values and usage figures (vendor material). Neither tool has been tested by Means & Methods Lab.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Visibuild
No reviews yet. Used Visibuild? Yours would be the first.
Dalux Field
No reviews yet. Used Dalux Field? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- Whether Field Basic covers enough of your inspection workflow or you would need Standard or Pro
- What Visibuild costs for one project or a portfolio
- How a trade partner closes out a punch item in each, and whether that needs a paid seat
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman