Cintoo vs OpenSpace
Laser-scan point clouds versus 360 and phone imagery: Cintoo streams and classifies terrestrial scan data as meshes, while OpenSpace builds a visual record from walks, photos and drone flights with an optional progress-tracking add-on. Desk research from vendor pages read Oct 25, 2026; not tested, no winner.
In short: Cintoo (Reality capture data platform; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs OpenSpace (Reality capture & progress; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Cintoo Oct 25, 2026; OpenSpace Oct 24, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Cintoo | OpenSpace |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reality capture data platform | Reality capture & progress |
| AI role (our label) | AI features added to established product | AI-first |
| What it does | Cloud platform to upload, process, view, and share large 3D laser-scan datasets from any scanner brand. Patented TurboMesh converts point clouds to lightweight meshes for streaming. Editions: BIM (scan-to-BIM, design on as-built), Twin (assets plus CAD/BIM and enterprise data), and 360 (lightweight 360 video). Lists AI-powered classification of scan data, open SDKs/APIs, a VR experience on Unreal Engine, and an unlimited-users model. Vendor says it is ISO 27001 and SOC 2 compliant (vendor claim). Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: the homepage still describes TurboMesh, the BIM, Twin and 360 editions, AI-powered classification, open SDKs and APIs, the Unreal Engine VR experience and the unlimited model (unlimited users and web access); its navigation now also lists Cintoo Workspace, it adds GDPR compliance, and it says it is trusted by 110,000+ industry professionals (vendor claim). Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (cloud, agnostic and multimodal scan data platform; TurboMesh point-cloud-to-mesh; open SDKs and APIs; unlimited users and web access; AI-powered classification; VR experience on the Cintoo Streaming SDK and Unreal Engine; ISO 27001, SOC 2 and GDPR statements; Workspace in navigation); its sample projects list scan counts and scanner makes (Leica, Faro, Z+F, Trimble). The 110,000+ professionals line is a vendor claim. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (TurboMesh, BIM, Twin and 360 editions, AI-powered classification, open SDKs and APIs, unlimited users and web access, ISO 27001, SOC 2 and GDPR statements); its solutions menu lists progress tracking, design-issue checks, quality and compliance, asset management, remote collaboration and brownfield risk, and the footer offers a free 30-day trial. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (TurboMesh, unlimited users and web access, AI-powered classification, ISO 27001 and SOC 2 and GDPR statements, Workspace in navigation, free 30-day trial in the footer). The 110,000+ professionals line is a vendor claim. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (TurboMesh point-cloud-to-mesh, BIM, Twin and 360 editions, AI-powered classification, open SDKs and APIs, unlimited users and web access, ISO 27001, SOC 2 and GDPR statements, Workspace in navigation); its events list adds BIM World Munich (Nov 24-25, 2026) and Cintoo Converge Munich (Nov 25, 2026). The 110,000+ professionals line and customer quotes are vendor content. | Visual intelligence platform that turns site photos, video, 360 walks and drone flights into one visual record, with add-on progress tracking. Captures include photos, video, voice notes, 360 walks, and drone flights, with plan and model comparison, issue and RFI resolution, BIM coordination, and AI workflows. Progress tracking is sold as OpenSpace Track, an add-on: vendor describes AI-powered tracking with humans in the loop, 700+ visual components across 200+ schedule tasks, schedule support for P6, MS Project, Asta, and Excel, no BIM required (a model can be added), and progress reports 24-48 hours after capture; it says imagery is ready in 15 minutes on average and a 25,000 sq. ft. capture typically takes 10 minutes (vendor claims). Integrations named: Procore, Autodesk, Revizto. Vendor cites 77 billion square feet captured and 132 countries served (vendor claims). Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: the homepage now calls it the Visual Intelligence Platform, organised as Capture, Coordinate and Act (spot schedule risk earlier, automate routine work with AI and connect field data to business systems); it still names Procore, Autodesk and Revizto integrations and the 77 billion square feet and 132 countries figures (vendor claims), and lists OpenSpace at Procore Groundbreak 2026 in Orlando (Oct 20). The Track page still describes AI tracking with humans in the loop, 700+ visual components across 200+ schedule tasks, no BIM required and imagery ready in 15 minutes on average (vendor claim). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (Visual Intelligence Platform organised as Capture, Coordinate and Act; Procore, Autodesk and Revizto integrations; the same 77 billion square feet and 132 countries figures, vendor claims), with a Waypoint 2026 on-demand banner and AI Agents & APIs and Data Centers pages in the navigation (not read); the Track page still describes AI tracking with humans in the loop, no BIM required, imagery ready in 15 minutes on average (vendor claim) and P6, MS Project, Asta and Excel schedule support. Customer-story percentages not used. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (Visual Intelligence Platform organised as Capture, Coordinate and Act; Procore, Autodesk and Revizto integrations; square-footage and country figures are vendor claims); the Track page still describes AI tracking with expert human review, no BIM required, 700+ visual components across 200+ schedule tasks, Spotlights alerts on unfinished work, P6, MS Project, Asta and Excel schedule support, and progress reports 24 to 48 hours after capture (vendor claim). Customer-story percentages and quotes not used. |
| Who it's for | Reality capture, VDC, and geospatial teams at contractors, engineers, and owners (Arup quoted). | Owners, general contractors, and trades. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | No public prices found (checked Oct 16, 2026; unchanged Oct 19, 2026, cintoo.com/en/pricing returns not-found): the vendor site has no pricing or plans link in its navigation or footer, and /pricing and /plans return a not-found page. The site's calls to action include "Book a demo", "Request a demo". Earlier note (Oct 14, 2026): vendor describes an unlimited model (unlimited users and web access). Confirm current pricing with the vendor. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: still no public prices (cintoo.com/pricing and cintoo.com/en/pricing return not found; Request a Demo). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: still no public prices (cintoo.com/en/pricing returns not found); the footer now offers Try it Free with a free 30-day trial alongside Request a Demo. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: still no public prices (cintoo.com/en/pricing returns not found; Try it Free with a 30-day trial or Request a Demo). Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: still no public prices (cintoo.com/en/pricing returns not found; Try it Free with a 30-day trial or Request a Demo). | Quote-based. Pricing page re-checked Oct 16 and Oct 19, 2026 (unchanged; multi-year subscriptions are offered): Core and Enterprise subscriptions with no prices. Core lists unlimited capture across projects of any size, capture from any device (phones, 360 cameras, drones), BIM comparison and guided onboarding; Enterprise adds SSO, OpenSpace APIs and enterprise services and support; OpenSpace Track is a subscription add-on to either. The quote form says you can ask about a Core pilot before buying. Earlier note (Oct 15, 2026): Quote-based. Vendor says pricing is based on annual construction volume (ACV) and subscription tier (Core or Enterprise), not per user or per project; Enterprise adds SSO and API access; OpenSpace Track is an add-on to either tier, sold at the project or portfolio level and priced on project type and scope tracked (Track FAQ). Annual subscriptions can cover a single project, and a Core pilot can be requested. No prices listed. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: unchanged (Core and Enterprise with no figures; Enterprise adds SSO and OpenSpace APIs; Track is an add-on to either; the quote form still offers a Core pilot). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged (Core and Enterprise priced on annual construction volume and tier with no figures; Track an add-on to either; Core pilot on request; multi-year and single-project subscriptions); the FAQ also says all subscriptions include onboarding and support and that additions during a contract are prorated and co-termed. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged (Core and Enterprise priced on annual construction volume and tier with no figures; Enterprise adds SSO and OpenSpace APIs; Track an add-on to either, priced by project type and tracking scope; Core pilot on request; multi-year and single-project subscriptions). Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: unchanged (Core and Enterprise with no figures; Enterprise adds SSO and OpenSpace APIs; Track an add-on to either; Core pilot on request). |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Cintoo Oct 25, 2026; OpenSpace Oct 24, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Capture type: Cintoo is scanner-agnostic and built around laser-scan point clouds, converted with its patented TurboMesh into lightweight meshes for streaming in a browser. OpenSpace captures with smartphones, 360 cameras and drones and turns walks, photos, videos and voice notes into one visual record.
- What each is for: Cintoo pitches scan-to-BIM accuracy (BIM Edition), digital twin operations for asset owners (Twin Edition) and a 360 Edition. OpenSpace pitches field coordination for GCs, trades and owners: verify work, compare plans and models, track issues and hand over.
- Progress tracking: OpenSpace Track is a separately priced add-on that, per the vendor, tracks over 700 visual components across 200+ schedule tasks with AI plus human review, returns reports in 24-48 hours, works without BIM, and connects to P6, MS Project, Asta and Excel schedules. Cintoo lists tracking real site progress as a use case and offers AI-powered classification of scan data.
- Pricing shape: neither publishes prices. Cintoo offers a free 30-day trial and says its model is unlimited users and unlimited web access. OpenSpace prices by annual construction volume and tier (Core or Enterprise), not per user or per project, with Enterprise adding SSO and API access and a Core pilot available on request.
- Integrations: OpenSpace names Procore, Autodesk and Revizto. Cintoo points to open SDKs and APIs for BIM, GIS and digital twin platforms, plus a streaming SDK and an Unreal Engine VR app.
- Not used here: customer quotes, user counts and ROI figures on either vendor's site.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Cintoo
No reviews yet. Used Cintoo? Yours would be the first.
OpenSpace
No reviews yet. Used OpenSpace? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- What a Cintoo subscription costs after the trial and how editions are priced
- What OpenSpace Core costs at a given annual construction volume, and what Track adds per project
- Whether teams that laser-scan and also do 360 walks run both tools side by side
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend
- Compare: EarthCam vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: innDex vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Sitemate
- Compare: Matterport vs Cupix
- Compare: mJob vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs Oculo
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Intenseye
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Raken
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Track3D
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Jobber vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Projul vs Knowify