Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs OpenSpace
Two routes to progress reports from 360° photos: a model-based reporting service that needs a federated NWD model and schedule, and a visual-intelligence platform whose Track add-on works without BIM. Desk research from vendor pages read Oct 25, 2026; not tested, no winner.
In short: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting (Progress reporting service; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs OpenSpace (Reality capture & progress; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting Oct 25, 2026; OpenSpace Oct 24, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting | OpenSpace |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Progress reporting service | Reality capture & progress |
| AI role (our label) | AI features added to established product | AI-first |
| What it does | Compares 360° site photos with the 3D model and schedule to report progress by trade, floor or system. This progress reporting service from Hexagon Multivista uses automated model-to-photo comparison of 360° photos against a federated 3D model (NWD) and a project schedule (P6 or Excel), marking model elements built or unbuilt and reporting progress by trade, floor, or system. Hexagon says its technology detects progress automatically and expert analysts QA every update. Its FAQ says building progress reporting requires an NWD model, a P6 or Excel schedule, and 360° photos from approved apps such as Multivista or Hexagon GoCapture; drone and SLR photos are not supported; setup can take up to 6-8 weeks; and reports are typically available 48-72 hours after images are posted. Lists compatibility with Autodesk ACC, Procore, Primavera P6, and Microsoft Project, and up to 10 years of data hosting. It sits in Hexagon Multivista's Analyze services alongside deviation analysis (which Hexagon describes as an AI-driven model-to-scan comparison) and UAV-based earthwork progress reporting. Separately, Hexagon announced on Oct 6, 2022 that it would integrate AVVIR's AI-powered technology into its construction portfolio; we did not find a Hexagon page naming AVVIR as the engine of this service. Re-read Oct 17, 2026: the same service page also advertises "agnostic data inputs" (360° photos, LiDAR scans or third-party tools, self-captured or Multivista-captured), which is broader than its FAQ; Hexagon's GoCapture app lets project teams self-capture 360° photos, 360° walks or 2D photos mapped to floor plans and BIM in its Analyze Hub. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: the service page is unchanged in substance (NWD model, P6 or Excel schedule, approved 360° apps, drone and SLR photos not supported, setup up to 6-8 weeks, reports typically 48-72 hours after images are posted, email alerts when a report is ready); one FAQ answer on the same page says reports are usually ready within 48 hours, so confirm turnaround with Hexagon. The 2022 AVVIR press release was not re-read today (hexagon.com returned an access-denied response). Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: the service page is unchanged in substance (NWD model, P6 or Excel schedule, 360° photos captured by Multivista or the project team, approved apps only, drone and SLR photos not supported, reports by trade, floor or system, email alerts, up to 10 years of hosting, ACC, Procore, Primavera P6 and Microsoft Project compatibility). The FAQ still gives two turnaround answers (typically 48-72 hours, and usually within 48 hours) and two setup answers (up to 6-8 weeks, and up to eight weeks); confirm with Hexagon. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: the service page is unchanged in substance (NWD model, P6 or Excel schedule, 360° photos from approved apps, drone and SLR photos not supported, agnostic data inputs also advertised, analysts QA every update, email alerts, up to 10 years of hosting, ACC, Procore, Primavera P6 and Microsoft Project compatibility); the FAQ still gives both turnaround answers (typically 48-72 hours, and usually within 48 hours) and both setup answers (up to 6-8 weeks, and up to eight weeks). The site menu now lists a Getting Ahead with AI section on how AI supports owners (not read). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: the service page is unchanged in substance (NWD model, P6 or Excel schedule, 360° photos from approved apps, drone and SLR photos not supported, agnostic data inputs also advertised, analysts QA every update, email alerts, up to 10 years of hosting, ACC, Procore, Primavera P6 and Microsoft Project compatibility); both turnaround answers (typically 48-72 hours, and usually within 48 hours) and both setup answers (up to 6-8 weeks, and up to eight weeks) remain. The page now also names healthcare, data centers and education as industries. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: the service page is unchanged in substance (NWD model, P6 or Excel schedule, 360° photos from approved apps such as Multivista or Hexagon GoCapture, drone and SLR photos not supported, analysts QA every update, up to 10 years of hosting, ACC, Procore, Primavera P6 and Microsoft Project compatibility; healthcare and data centers among listed industries); the FAQ still gives both turnaround answers (typically 48-72 hours, and usually within 48 hours) and both setup answers (up to 6-8 weeks, and up to eight weeks). | Visual intelligence platform that turns site photos, video, 360 walks and drone flights into one visual record, with add-on progress tracking. Captures include photos, video, voice notes, 360 walks, and drone flights, with plan and model comparison, issue and RFI resolution, BIM coordination, and AI workflows. Progress tracking is sold as OpenSpace Track, an add-on: vendor describes AI-powered tracking with humans in the loop, 700+ visual components across 200+ schedule tasks, schedule support for P6, MS Project, Asta, and Excel, no BIM required (a model can be added), and progress reports 24-48 hours after capture; it says imagery is ready in 15 minutes on average and a 25,000 sq. ft. capture typically takes 10 minutes (vendor claims). Integrations named: Procore, Autodesk, Revizto. Vendor cites 77 billion square feet captured and 132 countries served (vendor claims). Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: the homepage now calls it the Visual Intelligence Platform, organised as Capture, Coordinate and Act (spot schedule risk earlier, automate routine work with AI and connect field data to business systems); it still names Procore, Autodesk and Revizto integrations and the 77 billion square feet and 132 countries figures (vendor claims), and lists OpenSpace at Procore Groundbreak 2026 in Orlando (Oct 20). The Track page still describes AI tracking with humans in the loop, 700+ visual components across 200+ schedule tasks, no BIM required and imagery ready in 15 minutes on average (vendor claim). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (Visual Intelligence Platform organised as Capture, Coordinate and Act; Procore, Autodesk and Revizto integrations; the same 77 billion square feet and 132 countries figures, vendor claims), with a Waypoint 2026 on-demand banner and AI Agents & APIs and Data Centers pages in the navigation (not read); the Track page still describes AI tracking with humans in the loop, no BIM required, imagery ready in 15 minutes on average (vendor claim) and P6, MS Project, Asta and Excel schedule support. Customer-story percentages not used. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (Visual Intelligence Platform organised as Capture, Coordinate and Act; Procore, Autodesk and Revizto integrations; square-footage and country figures are vendor claims); the Track page still describes AI tracking with expert human review, no BIM required, 700+ visual components across 200+ schedule tasks, Spotlights alerts on unfinished work, P6, MS Project, Asta and Excel schedule support, and progress reports 24 to 48 hours after capture (vendor claim). Customer-story percentages and quotes not used. |
| Who it's for | General contractors and owners; Hexagon also names project executives, quality teams, and schedulers. | Owners, general contractors, and trades. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | No public prices found (re-checked Oct 17 and Oct 19, 2026): the service page has no pricing link, and multivistaservices.hexagon.com/pricing returns a not-found page. Calls to action: "Book a demo" and "Contact us". A dollar figure on the page is a customer testimonial claim, not a price. Confirm current pricing with the vendor. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: unchanged (no pricing link; multivistaservices.hexagon.com/pricing returns a not-found page; Book a demo and Contact us). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged (no pricing link; Book a demo; the dollar figure on the page is still a customer testimonial, not a price). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged (no pricing link; multivistaservices.hexagon.com/pricing returns not found; Book a demo; testimonials on the page are not prices). Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: unchanged (no pricing link; multivistaservices.hexagon.com/pricing returns not found; Book a demo; the dollar figure on the page is a customer testimonial, not a price). | Quote-based. Pricing page re-checked Oct 16 and Oct 19, 2026 (unchanged; multi-year subscriptions are offered): Core and Enterprise subscriptions with no prices. Core lists unlimited capture across projects of any size, capture from any device (phones, 360 cameras, drones), BIM comparison and guided onboarding; Enterprise adds SSO, OpenSpace APIs and enterprise services and support; OpenSpace Track is a subscription add-on to either. The quote form says you can ask about a Core pilot before buying. Earlier note (Oct 15, 2026): Quote-based. Vendor says pricing is based on annual construction volume (ACV) and subscription tier (Core or Enterprise), not per user or per project; Enterprise adds SSO and API access; OpenSpace Track is an add-on to either tier, sold at the project or portfolio level and priced on project type and scope tracked (Track FAQ). Annual subscriptions can cover a single project, and a Core pilot can be requested. No prices listed. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: unchanged (Core and Enterprise with no figures; Enterprise adds SSO and OpenSpace APIs; Track is an add-on to either; the quote form still offers a Core pilot). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged (Core and Enterprise priced on annual construction volume and tier with no figures; Track an add-on to either; Core pilot on request; multi-year and single-project subscriptions); the FAQ also says all subscriptions include onboarding and support and that additions during a contract are prorated and co-termed. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged (Core and Enterprise priced on annual construction volume and tier with no figures; Enterprise adds SSO and OpenSpace APIs; Track an add-on to either, priced by project type and tracking scope; Core pilot on request; multi-year and single-project subscriptions). Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: unchanged (Core and Enterprise with no figures; Enterprise adds SSO and OpenSpace APIs; Track an add-on to either; Core pilot on request). |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
|
Facts last checked: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting Oct 25, 2026; OpenSpace Oct 24, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- What you buy: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting is a service. Hexagon says its technology compares 360° photos against your federated 3D model and schedule automatically and expert analysts QA every update. OpenSpace is a capture platform (Core or Enterprise) with OpenSpace Track sold as an add-on that, per the vendor, pairs AI tracking with expert human review.
- Inputs: Hexagon's FAQ requires an NWD model, a P6 or Excel schedule and 360° photos from approved apps such as Multivista or Hexagon GoCapture; drone and SLR photos are not supported. OpenSpace says BIM is not required for Track (a model can inform it), works from 360° captures, and supports P6, MS Project, Asta, Excel and Gantt schedules.
- Turnaround and setup: Hexagon's FAQ gives two turnaround answers (typically 48-72 hours after images are posted, and usually within 48 hours) and says setup can take up to 6-8 weeks. OpenSpace says Track reports arrive 24-48 hours after capture and imagery is ready in about 15 minutes on average. All vendor claims, not tested.
- Scope: Hexagon reports progress by trade, floor or system, lists compatibility with Autodesk ACC, Procore, Primavera P6 and Microsoft Project, and offers up to 10 years of data hosting. OpenSpace says Track covers 700+ visual components across 200+ schedule tasks, adds Spotlights alerts on unfinished work, and names Procore, Autodesk and Revizto integrations.
- Pricing shape: neither publishes prices. Hexagon routes to Book a demo. OpenSpace prices by annual construction volume and tier, not per user or per project, with Track as an add-on and a Core pilot available on request.
- Not used here: customer testimonials (including a dollar figure on Hexagon's page), square-footage and country counts, and ROI figures.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
No reviews yet. Used Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting? Yours would be the first.
OpenSpace
No reviews yet. Used OpenSpace? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- What Hexagon charges per project or per report cycle
- What OpenSpace Track adds to a Core subscription at your annual construction volume
- How each handles areas where the model or schedule is out of date
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend
- Compare: EarthCam vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: innDex vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Sitemate
- Compare: Matterport vs Cupix
- Compare: mJob vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs Oculo
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Intenseye
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Raken
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Track3D
- Compare: Cintoo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Jobber vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Projul vs Knowify