Intenseye vs WakeCap
Two safety platforms that start from different data. Intenseye runs computer vision on existing cameras or its own Sentinel devices to detect serious-injury hazards, priced as one annual subscription per connected camera. WakeCap is a site intelligence platform built on hard-hat sensors, connected equipment and AI site cameras feeding one Owner's Dashboard, with no public prices. Desk research from vendor pages read Oct 26, 2026; not tested, no winner.
In short: Intenseye (Safety (vision AI); no public prices (quote / sales)) vs WakeCap (Connected workforce & site intelligence; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Oct 26, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Intenseye | WakeCap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Safety (vision AI) | Connected workforce & site intelligence |
| AI role (our label) | AI-first | AI-first |
| What it does | Real-time AI workplace safety platform that runs computer vision on existing CCTV or its Sentinel devices to detect serious-injury hazards. Vendor says it works with 200+ camera brands and detects 50+ hazard types tied to serious injuries and fatalities: PPE, vehicle-pedestrian, zone controls, ergonomics (REBA/RULA scoring), housekeeping. Alerts can trigger speakers, lights, or a PLC hard stop; events become coaching sessions. Privacy features listed: face/body blurring and dynamic masking. Vendor cites 400+ facilities in 45+ countries (vendor claim). Note: examples are mostly industrial facilities, not construction sites. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: the homepage still lists 200+ camera brands, 50+ hazard types, speaker/light/PLC hard-stop actions and face and body blurring, and the Sentinel hardware line now named on the site includes a motorized dome camera, Hub and Hub Pro edge compute (NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX), a signal beacon, thermal and depth cameras, a 4G solar kit and an IP speaker; the safety copilot is named Chief (SafetyGPT). Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: the homepage still describes computer vision on existing cameras or Sentinel devices detecting 50+ hazard types, speaker, light, alert or PLC hard-stop actions, coaching sessions generated by Chief and face and body blurring, dynamic masking and timestamp anonymization; the 200+ camera brands and 400+ facilities figures recorded earlier did not appear in the rendered homepage text. The hardware lineup now shows Sentinel Hub Mini (smaller-to-mid sites) and Hub Pro, plus Core dome, Beacon, Thermal, Depth, Solar 4G and Speaker devices. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (computer vision on existing CCTV or Sentinel devices across 50+ hazard types; speaker, light, alert or PLC hard-stop actions; coaching generated by Chief; facial and body blurring and dynamic masking). The Sentinel Hub section again says it connects existing CCTV from 200+ camera brands and talks to modern and legacy PLCs, and the hardware menu lists Hub, Hub Pro, a motorized dome, Beacon, Thermal, Depth, a 4G solar kit and a speaker. Its 10-industries and 45+-countries line is a vendor claim and is not used. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: pricing page describes Prevent as the per-camera platform running 50+ safety detections (PPE compliance, area controls, behavioral safety, vehicle controls, housekeeping, ergonomics) with Chief (SafetyGPT), Insights, Actions and a Teams integration included; the Connect module covers industrial connectivity, EHS systems of record, identity and SSO, BI and digital safety signage, and the EHS Suite covers incidents, inspections, audits, risk assessment and a mobile app. The page now also offers forward-deployed engineers who custom-build safety, operations and quality solutions, and its FAQ says Intenseye is SOC 2 Type II and can trigger a machine stop in about 0.8 seconds (vendor statements). Its ROI calculator example and ROI-study figures are vendor content and are not used. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (Prevent per-camera platform with Chief, Insights and Actions; Connect and EHS Suite modules; Sentinel hardware including the Sentinel Solar 4G-solar camera kit still marked coming soon). Edge-compute specs, ROI figures and customer quotes are vendor content and are not used. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026 (also read for a compare): homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (computer vision on existing cameras from 200+ brands or Sentinel devices, 50+ hazard types; speaker, light, alert or PLC hard-stop actions; coaching generated by Chief; facial and body blurring, dynamic masking and timestamp anonymization; SOC 2 Type II badge; Sentinel Solar 4G-solar kit still marked coming soon). The menu now groups Safety, Operations (pathway, utilization, cycle-time) and Quality (hygiene, QA stations, cleanroom, cold chain) solutions, and its industries list still does not include construction. ROI figures and customer results are vendor content and are not used. | Site intelligence platform combining hard-hat worker data, equipment location and AI safety cameras in an owner's dashboard for safety and progress. Hard-hat data covers headcount, mustering and timekeeping; equipment data includes anti-collision; materials, documents and schedules are listed as coming soon, all feeding a knowledge graph and owner's dashboard for safety, productivity, and progress. Case studies cite Saudi Aramco (94% fewer violations), BESIX ($3.57M labor value), and NEOM (vendor claims, not verified). Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: the homepage now frames the platform as six source systems (workers, equipment, material, site cameras, project documents and construction schedule) feeding one knowledge graph and Owner's Dashboard; workers, equipment and site cameras are marked live, and material, project documents (plans, drawings, digital work permits) and schedule (look-ahead, progress, earned value) are marked soon. It says Connected Workers is the fastest source to deploy, with no training or infrastructure buildout, and lists Aramco approved-vendor status, ISO 45001, ISO 9001 and local data hosting. The NEOM case is now described as ghost-worker hours cut by 60 percentage points (vendor claim). Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (six source systems feeding one knowledge graph and Owner's Dashboard; workers, equipment and site cameras marked live; material, project documents and construction schedule marked soon; Connected Workers still described as the fastest source to deploy). The case-study figures, now also including BESIX 96% less over-reporting and 32% more productive zone time and NEOM SAR 8B+ projected savings, and the live data-point counters are vendor claims not used here. Re-read Oct 22, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance. The Connected Workers page lists Connected Worker, VerifyTime, Digital Passport, Digital Clinic and Heat Stress modules, with heat-stress and lone-worker alerts tied to location; the Site Cameras page describes SiteGuard 2.0, an agentic camera safety officer on existing cameras guided by the site's JSAs, with a reviewer agent that confirms violations before alerting, autonomous PTZ scouting and a plain-English archive chatbot; the Connected Equipment page lists GPS tracking with engine telemetry, QR-coded inspections, AI human detection with a non-invasive auto-brake it says needs no ECU changes, emissions insight and dashcams. Figures on those pages are vendor claims and not used. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (six source systems feeding one knowledge graph and Owner's Dashboard; workers, equipment and site cameras live; material, project documents and construction schedule marked soon; Connected Workers described as the fastest source to deploy, with no training or infrastructure buildout). Case-study figures and live counters are vendor claims and are not used. Re-read Oct 26, 2026 for a compare: homepage, Site Cameras, Connected Workers and Connected Equipment pages unchanged in substance (six source systems feeding one knowledge graph and Owner's Dashboard; workers, equipment and site cameras live, material, project documents and schedule marked soon; SiteGuard 2.0 on existing cameras guided by the site's JSAs with a reviewer agent; hard-hat sensors for headcount, mustering, verified hours and heat-stress and lone-worker alerts; AI anti-collision with a non-invasive auto-brake). Case-study figures and live counters are vendor claims and are not used. |
| Who it's for | Enterprise EHS teams at industrial facilities (manufacturing, building products). Construction use is not the vendor's focus. | Owners and contractors on large projects, especially in the Middle East per case studies. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Not publicly listed. Pricing page (re-checked Oct 16, 2026; unchanged Oct 19, 2026): one annual subscription per connected camera (Prevent, with the full safety detection library plus Chief, Insights and Actions included; no per-incident or per-use-case fees); Connect and EHS Suite are optional modules at an annual flat fee; hardware (Sentinel Hub edge devices and cameras) is a custom quote, opex, capex or both. The page says existing CCTV can be connected and the per-camera subscription is the same either way. No dollar amounts shown. Earlier note (Oct 15, 2026): Not publicly listed. Pricing page describes one annual subscription per connected camera (Prevent, with every safety use case included and no per-incident or per-use-case fees), optional Connect and EHS Suite modules at an annual flat fee, and custom quotes for hardware; no dollar amounts shown. Site also offers an ROI calculator. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: unchanged (one annual subscription per connected camera for Prevent with Chief, Insights and Actions included; Connect and EHS Suite optional modules at an annual flat fee; hardware by custom quote as opex, capex or both; the per-camera subscription is the same on existing CCTV or Sentinel cameras; no dollar amounts). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged (one annual subscription per connected camera for Prevent with Chief, Insights and Actions included and no per-incident or per-use-case fees; Connect and EHS Suite optional modules at an annual flat fee; hardware by custom quote as opex, capex or both; ROI calculator; no dollar amounts). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged pricing basis (one annual subscription per connected camera for Prevent with every use case, Chief, Insights, Actions and Teams integration included; no per-incident or per-use-case fees; Connect and EHS Suite optional modules at an annual flat fee; Sentinel Hub Mini or Hub Pro and other hardware by custom quote as opex, capex or both; existing IP cameras at the same per-camera rate; multi-year and multi-site terms by quote; no dollar amounts). Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: unchanged (one annual subscription per connected camera for Prevent with Chief, Insights and Actions included; Connect and EHS Suite optional modules at an annual flat fee; Sentinel hardware by custom quote; no dollar amounts). Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: unchanged (one annual subscription per connected camera with every safety use case plus Chief, Insights and Actions included and no per-incident or per-use-case fees; Connect and EHS Suite optional modules; Sentinel hardware by custom quote as opex, capex or both; no dollar amounts). Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: unchanged (one annual subscription per connected camera for Prevent with Chief, Insights and Actions included and no per-incident or per-use-case fees; Connect and EHS Suite optional modules at an annual flat fee; Sentinel Hub Mini or Hub Pro and other hardware by custom quote, opex, capex or both; no dollar amounts). | No public prices found (checked Oct 16, 2026; unchanged Oct 19, 2026): the vendor site has no pricing or plans link in its navigation or footer, and /pricing and /plans return a not-found page. The site's calls to action include "Schedule a demo". Confirm current pricing with the vendor. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: still no prices; calls to action are Book a call and Schedule a demo. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: still no prices (/pricing returns a not-found page; Book a Call and Schedule a Demo). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: still no prices (/pricing returns a not-found page; the homepage offers a get-in-touch form). Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: still no prices (/pricing returns a not-found page; Book a Call and Schedule a Demo). Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: still no prices (/pricing returns a not-found page; Book a Call, Get In Touch and Schedule A Demo). |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 26, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- What each sells (vendor wording): Intenseye calls itself a real-time AI workplace safety platform that runs computer vision on the cameras you already have, or its Sentinel devices, to detect 50+ types of high-risk hazards. WakeCap describes six source systems (workers, equipment, material, site cameras, project documents and construction schedule) feeding one knowledge graph and a live Owner's Dashboard.
- Where the data comes from: Intenseye is camera-first (existing CCTV from 200+ brands per the vendor, or Sentinel cameras and Hub edge compute). WakeCap lists workers, equipment and site cameras as live sources and material, project documents and schedule as coming soon; its Connected Workers source uses a sensor in each hard hat and is described as the fastest to deploy.
- Camera AI: Intenseye lists PPE, vehicle-pedestrian, area and zone controls, housekeeping, behavioral safety and ergonomics detections, with alerts that can trigger speakers, lights or a PLC machine stop and events turned into coaching sessions by its Chief copilot. WakeCap's SiteGuard 2.0 works on existing construction cameras, patrols by the site's JSAs, uses a reviewer agent and zoom-in verification before alerting, and offers a plain-English archive chatbot.
- Beyond cameras: WakeCap's hard-hat data covers headcount, mustering, verified hours for payroll and heat-stress and lone-worker alerts, and its Connected Equipment source lists GPS tracking, QR-coded inspections and AI anti-collision with a non-invasive auto-brake. Intenseye's menu also lists Operations and Quality solutions (utilization, cycle-time, QA stations) and an EHS Suite for incidents, inspections and audits.
- Fit for construction: Intenseye's industries list covers manufacturing, warehouses, metals, chemicals, building materials and similar facilities and does not list construction. WakeCap's pages and case studies are construction projects, largely in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, and it lists Aramco approved-vendor status, ISO 45001, ISO 9001 and local data hosting. Intenseye shows a SOC 2 Type II badge and lists facial and body blurring and dynamic masking (vendor statements).
- Pricing (checked Oct 26, 2026): Intenseye publishes its structure but no figures: one annual subscription per connected camera with every safety use case included, optional Connect and EHS Suite modules at an annual flat fee, and Sentinel hardware by custom quote. WakeCap publishes no pricing (/pricing returns not found; Book a Call or Schedule A Demo).
- Not used here: both vendors' case-study results, Intenseye's ROI calculator and customer figures, and WakeCap's live data-point counters (vendor content).
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Intenseye
No reviews yet. Used Intenseye? Yours would be the first.
WakeCap
No reviews yet. Used WakeCap? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- Whether you need camera-only hazard detection (Intenseye) or worker, equipment and camera data together (WakeCap), and how either handles a moving construction site rather than a fixed facility
- How many alerts each produces on your own sites and how many hold up on review
- What either costs for your camera count, workforce and project length
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: HammerTech vs WakeCap
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Kwant.ai vs WakeCap
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Eyrus vs WakeCap
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend
- Compare: EarthCam vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: innDex vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Sitemate
- Compare: Matterport vs Cupix
- Compare: mJob vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs Oculo
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Intenseye
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Raken
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Track3D
- Compare: Cintoo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Jobber vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Projul vs Knowify
- Compare: Constructable vs Procore AI
- Compare: HammerTech vs viAct
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Reconstruct
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Rhumbix
- Compare: busybusy vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Workyard vs Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime)
- Compare: BiltOn vs HammerTech
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs SkillSignal
- Compare: EarthCam vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Raken vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Doxel
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs Evercam
- Compare: Opusense vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Voxel vs HammerTech
- Compare: PlanRadar vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Riskcast vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Hover vs CompanyCam
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Workiz