Reconstruct vs Doxel
Two ways to monitor construction progress from site imagery. Reconstruct is a reality mapping platform that turns phone, 360 camera and drone footage into measurable 2D plans and 3D models, overlays design and links the schedule, with progress updated per activity by your team. Doxel compares hard-hat 360 video with your BIM using computer vision to measure work-in-place automatically and convert it to percent complete. Desk research from vendor pages read Oct 26, 2026; not tested, no winner.
In short: Reconstruct (Reality mapping & remote progress monitoring; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs Doxel (Progress tracking; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Oct 26, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Reconstruct | Doxel |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reality mapping & remote progress monitoring | Progress tracking |
| AI role (our label) | Not AI-first | AI-first |
| What it does | Reality mapping platform for remote quality control, progress monitoring, and facilities assessment. Vendor says it turns standard or 360 photos and video from smartphones, 360 cameras, and drones into measurable 2D floor plans, orthophotos, 3D point clouds, and mesh models, automatically positions footage in space and over time, overlays 2D and 3D design against reality (it calls the overlay technology patented), and adds 4D BIM visualization once a schedule and plans are uploaded. Progress features listed: schedule import via XML or bi-directional integrations with Oracle Primavera Cloud and Aconex, per-activity percent complete and root cause of delay with transcribed voice notes and annotated pictures, pins on issues, and on-demand progress reports. An Oracle Construction and Engineering executive is quoted on the integration with Oracle's platform. The pages we read describe reality mapping and photogrammetry rather than AI, so we tag it Not AI-first. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: still no AI described; the navigation now leads with a Visual Command Center for seeing and measuring the structure remotely, including online as-builts that rewind construction to see inside sealed walls, and the reality-mapping page lists 360 cameras, drones, phones, Matterport and laser scanning as capture sources. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (photogrammetry and reality mapping from smartphones, 360 cameras and drones; 2D and 3D design overlay; progress monitoring; pins and collaboration; schedule integration with 4D BIM visualization; online as-builts in the Visual Command Center); still no AI described, so the tag stays. ROI percentages and customer quotes are vendor content and not used. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: homepage and product pages unchanged in substance (photogrammetry from smartphones, 360 cameras and drones, with Matterport and laser scanning also listed; design overlay; XML or Oracle Primavera Cloud and Aconex schedule integration; 4D BIM; online as-builts); still no AI described. Several pages show unfinished template text ('Something Powerful / Tell The Reader More'), noted only. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: homepage, pricing and progress-monitoring pages unchanged in substance (Visual Command Center with online as-builts; XML or Oracle Primavera Cloud and Aconex schedule integration); still no AI described, and the unfinished template text ('Something Powerful / Tell The Reader More') is still shown, noted only. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: site unchanged (Visual Command Center, online as-builts, reality capture tied to schedule); still no AI features described. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: homepage, pricing, progress-monitoring and schedule-integration pages unchanged in substance (reality mapping from smartphones, 360 cameras and drones; design overlay; schedule import by XML or bidirectional Oracle Primavera Cloud and Aconex integrations; on-demand progress reports; online as-builts); still no AI described, and the unfinished template text ('Something Powerful / Tell The Reader More') is still on the homepage, noted only. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: homepage, pricing and progress-monitoring pages unchanged in substance (reality mapping from smartphones, 360 cameras and drones into measurable 2D floor plans and 3D models; patented design overlay; schedule import via XML or Oracle Primavera Cloud and Aconex integrations; per-activity percent complete and delay root cause with transcribed voice notes; 4D BIM; online as-builts); still no AI described, so the tag stays. The unfinished template text is still present; ROI figures and quotes are not used. | Automated progress tracking: computer vision measures work-in-place by trade, system, and stage against the plan from hard-hat 360 camera walks. You send BIM, walk the site with a 360 camera mounted to a hard hat, and Doxel measures the work in place. Product features listed include a rules-of-credit engine for % complete, progress by zone/trade/system, schedule mapping with language models, drone imagery for early phases, earned-value / pay-app support, and portfolio views. Vendor claims 11% faster project delivery, 16% reduction in monthly costs, and 95% less time tracking progress, with setup in less than 2 weeks (vendor claims, not verified). Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (hard-hat 360 camera walks, computer vision measuring work-in-place by trade, system and stage, setup in less than 2 weeks with no VDC work for your team). The 11%, 16% and 95% figures are still shown and remain vendor claims. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: the homepage headline now reads Physical Intelligence for Construction, with the same send-BIM, hard-hat 360 walk and computer-vision steps; the product page adds an Utilities Underground Tracking tab (progress from underground to finished buildout using drone imagery), and the site menu now lists solutions by stakeholder (owners, project executives, superintendents, BIM and VDC) and by industry (data centers, health care, life sciences, manufacturing, semiconductors, oil and gas) plus a Touchplan partnership page. The 11%, 16% and 95% figures remain vendor claims and are not used. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: the homepage still headlines Physical Intelligence for Construction; the product page is unchanged in substance (360° video compared to BIM to quantify work-in-place, a rules-of-credit engine for percent complete, language-model schedule mapping, drone-based tracking from underground to finished buildout, and earned value tracking). Vendor percentages and customer quotes are not used. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: unchanged in substance (360° video compared with BIM, rules-of-credit engine, language-model schedule mapping, drone-based tracking, earned value tracking). Vendor percentages and customer quotes are not used. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (automated progress tracking comparing plan with actual by component, system and schedule, delay forecasts from historic production rates, out-of-sequence work flagged, portfolio view; Send us the BIM). Customer quotes are not used. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: homepage and product page unchanged in substance (Physical Intelligence for Construction headline; send the BIM, walk the site with a hard-hat 360 camera, computer vision measures work-in-place; rules-of-credit engine for percent complete; 3D progress view, production rates, schedule mapping described as powered by language models, drone-based tracking from dirt work, Utilities Underground Tracking and earned-value budget tracking). Delivery-speed, cost and time-saving percentages and customer quotes are vendor claims and not used. |
| Who it's for | Owners, owner's representatives, and general contractors. | Executives, superintendents, and project teams on active jobs. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Not publicly listed. Pricing page (re-checked Oct 16 and Oct 19, 2026) still shows no prices or tiers; it offers personalized pricing for one project or hundreds and a Contact Us form. Earlier note (Oct 15, 2026): Not publicly listed (pricing page shows no prices or tiers; it offers personalized pricing and a Contact Us form). Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: unchanged (personalized pricing for one project or hundreds, Contact Us; no figures). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged (personalized pricing for one project or hundreds through Contact Us; no figures). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged (personalized pricing for one project or hundreds through Get Personalized Pricing; no figures). Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: pricing page still says pricing is personalized for one project or hundreds, with no figures. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: unchanged (personalized pricing for one project or hundreds through Get Personalized Pricing; no figures). Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: unchanged (Get Personalized Pricing; no figures). | Not publicly listed. Pricing FAQ (re-checked Oct 16 and Oct 19, 2026) still says cost depends on the capabilities you need and the amount of construction you do or the size of the jobsite, and that Doxel generally charges by the square foot. The page also says users are unlimited (not charged by the seat) and that Doxel can be used on a single jobsite. Quotes on request; no prices shown. Earlier note (Oct 15, 2026): Not publicly listed. Pricing FAQ says cost depends on the capabilities needed and the amount of construction (or jobsite size), and that Doxel generally charges by the square foot; quotes on request. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: the pricing page still says Doxel does not charge by the seat, integrates with P6, Procore and Autodesk, and offers a demo or an instant quick quote; the FAQ answers did not expand in our read, so the per-square-foot basis was not re-confirmed today. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: no price change. The pricing FAQ was readable today and again says Doxel generally charges by the square foot, with cost depending on the capabilities needed and the amount of construction or jobsite size; users are unlimited, a single jobsite is fine, and setup is under 2 weeks. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: no price change (generally charged by the square foot, depending on capabilities and the amount of construction or jobsite size; unlimited users; a single jobsite is fine; up and running in under 2 weeks). Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: no price change (generally by the square foot; unlimited users; under 2 weeks to get running). Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: no price change (generally charged by the square foot, depending on capabilities and amount of construction or jobsite size; unlimited users, not charged by the seat; single jobsite allowed; up and running in under 2 weeks; demo or instant quick quote). Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: no price change (generally charged by the square foot, depending on capabilities and the amount of construction or jobsite size; unlimited users; single jobsite allowed; integrates with P6, Procore and Autodesk; under 2 weeks to get running). |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 26, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- What each sells (vendor wording): Reconstruct offers a Visual Command Center to see and measure the structure from anywhere, reality mapping from virtually any capture device, 2D and 3D design integration (it calls its overlay technology patented), schedule integration, 4D scheduling and on-demand progress reports. Doxel offers automatic progress tracking, a 3D progress view, reality capture, production rates, schedule, utilities underground tracking and budget tracking.
- How progress gets measured: Reconstruct's progress page describes updating each activity's percent complete and root cause of delay with transcribed voice notes and annotated pictures, inside a measurable digital twin you can walk remotely. Doxel says its computer vision analyzes 360 video against BIM to quantify work-in-place by trade, system and stage, and a rules-of-credit engine converts that into percent complete.
- Setup: Doxel says you send the BIM and it does the rest with no VDC work for your team, with a crew member walking the site wearing a hard-hat 360 camera and setup in under 2 weeks. Reconstruct says virtually anyone on site can capture with a smartphone, 360 camera or drone; it also lists Matterport and laser scanning as sources.
- Schedule and cost: Reconstruct imports schedules by XML or through bi-directional integrations with Oracle Primavera Cloud and Aconex and adds 4D BIM sequencing. Doxel says it integrates with P6, Procore and Autodesk, maps schedule activities to actual progress using language models, and links installed quantities to contract values for earned-value tracking and pay applications.
- Beyond construction: Reconstruct also pitches online as-builts that rewind construction to see inside sealed walls, facility assessment and infrastructure inspection. Doxel's pages focus on progress, production and cost during construction.
- AI: Doxel describes computer vision and language models at the core, so we tag it AI-first. Reconstruct's pages describe photogrammetry and reality mapping rather than AI, so we tag it Not AI-first.
- Pricing (checked Oct 26, 2026): neither publishes figures. Reconstruct offers personalized pricing. Doxel says it generally charges by the square foot, depending on the capabilities needed and the amount of construction or jobsite size, with unlimited users and single-jobsite use allowed.
- Not used here: Doxel's delivery-speed, cost-reduction and tracking-time percentages, Reconstruct's ROI figures and both vendors' customer quotes (vendor content).
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Reconstruct
No reviews yet. Used Reconstruct? Yours would be the first.
Doxel
No reviews yet. Used Doxel? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- Whether you have a BIM model detailed enough for automated work-in-place measurement, or need progress tracking without one
- How each handles your schedule format and update cadence
- What you actually pay, and on what basis (neither publishes full prices)
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend
- Compare: EarthCam vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: innDex vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Sitemate
- Compare: Matterport vs Cupix
- Compare: mJob vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs Oculo
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Intenseye
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Raken
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Track3D
- Compare: Cintoo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Jobber vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Projul vs Knowify
- Compare: Constructable vs Procore AI
- Compare: HammerTech vs viAct
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Reconstruct
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Rhumbix
- Compare: busybusy vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Workyard vs Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime)
- Compare: BiltOn vs HammerTech
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs SkillSignal
- Compare: EarthCam vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Raken vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs Evercam
- Compare: Opusense vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Intenseye vs WakeCap
- Compare: Voxel vs HammerTech
- Compare: PlanRadar vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Riskcast vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Hover vs CompanyCam
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Workiz