OpenSpace vs Track3D
Two AI-first reality capture and progress tracking platforms. OpenSpace is a visual record platform (360 cameras, drones and smartphones) with progress tracking sold as the OpenSpace Track add-on, where AI processing is checked by trained specialists, priced by quote on annual construction volume. Track3D unifies reality capture data and quantifies installed work from each capture, with a $0.15 per square foot pricing headline and visual documentation at no added cost. Desk research from vendor pages read Oct 28, 2026; not tested, no winner.
In short: OpenSpace (Reality capture & progress; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs Track3D (Progress tracking; vendor publishes prices). Facts last checked Oct 28, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | OpenSpace | Track3D |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reality capture & progress | Progress tracking |
| AI role (our label) | AI-first | AI-first |
| What it does | Visual intelligence platform that turns site photos, video, 360 walks and drone flights into one visual record, with add-on progress tracking. Captures include photos, video, voice notes, 360 walks, and drone flights, with plan and model comparison, issue and RFI resolution, BIM coordination, and AI workflows. Progress tracking is sold as OpenSpace Track, an add-on: vendor describes AI-powered tracking with humans in the loop, 700+ visual components across 200+ schedule tasks, schedule support for P6, MS Project, Asta, and Excel, no BIM required (a model can be added), and progress reports 24-48 hours after capture; it says imagery is ready in 15 minutes on average and a 25,000 sq. ft. capture typically takes 10 minutes (vendor claims). Integrations named: Procore, Autodesk, Revizto. Vendor cites 77 billion square feet captured and 132 countries served (vendor claims). Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: the homepage now calls it the Visual Intelligence Platform, organised as Capture, Coordinate and Act (spot schedule risk earlier, automate routine work with AI and connect field data to business systems); it still names Procore, Autodesk and Revizto integrations and the 77 billion square feet and 132 countries figures (vendor claims), and lists OpenSpace at Procore Groundbreak 2026 in Orlando (Oct 20). The Track page still describes AI tracking with humans in the loop, 700+ visual components across 200+ schedule tasks, no BIM required and imagery ready in 15 minutes on average (vendor claim). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (Visual Intelligence Platform organised as Capture, Coordinate and Act; Procore, Autodesk and Revizto integrations; the same 77 billion square feet and 132 countries figures, vendor claims), with a Waypoint 2026 on-demand banner and AI Agents & APIs and Data Centers pages in the navigation (not read); the Track page still describes AI tracking with humans in the loop, no BIM required, imagery ready in 15 minutes on average (vendor claim) and P6, MS Project, Asta and Excel schedule support. Customer-story percentages not used. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (Visual Intelligence Platform organised as Capture, Coordinate and Act; Procore, Autodesk and Revizto integrations; square-footage and country figures are vendor claims); the Track page still describes AI tracking with expert human review, no BIM required, 700+ visual components across 200+ schedule tasks, Spotlights alerts on unfinished work, P6, MS Project, Asta and Excel schedule support, and progress reports 24 to 48 hours after capture (vendor claim). Customer-story percentages and quotes not used. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (Core with unlimited capture across projects, Enterprise adding SSO, OpenSpace APIs and premium support, Track as an add-on to either). Vendor figures and customer stories are not used. Re-read Oct 26, 2026 for a compare: homepage and Track page unchanged in substance (Visual Intelligence Platform organised as Capture, Coordinate and Act; capture from 360° cameras, drones and smartphones plus walk and pilot services; Track with human review and no BIM required). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (Visual Intelligence Platform framed as capture, coordinate and act; Waypoint 2026 on-demand banner; Core and Enterprise tiers with Track as an add-on). Vendor figures and customer stories are not used. | AI reality intelligence platform that unifies reality capture data and quantifies installed work across job activities from each capture. Vendor says visuals are available in 30 minutes and progress data in 6 hours (conditions apply), with no BIM model required to start, and production analytics tied to cost codes. Customers quoted include Hensel Phelps and Performance Contracting Group. The homepage (Oct 19, 2026) announces a new commercial model with visual documentation at no additional cost. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: unchanged in substance (visual data in 30 minutes and progress data in 6 hours, conditions apply; no BIM model required to start; the new commercial model banner). The site menu lists VisualTrack, ProgressTrack and DeviationTrack (marked Coming Soon) and Procore, Autodesk Forma and Fieldwire integrations. The homepage percentage results (such as 15% coordination time saved and 20% lower rework cost) are vendor claims and were not used. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (the new commercial model banner; visuals in 30 minutes and progress in as fast as 6 hours; no BIM model required to start; VisualTrack, ProgressTrack and DeviationTrack (Coming Soon); Procore, Autodesk Forma and Fieldwire integrations); the pricing page also lists Schedule Recovery (the pace needed to get back on track when the schedule slips). Customer time-saved quotes not used. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (new commercial model banner; visuals in 30 minutes and progress in as fast as 6 hours; no BIM model required to start; VisualTrack, ProgressTrack and DeviationTrack (Coming Soon); Procore, Autodesk Forma and Fieldwire integrations; Schedule Recovery). Customer quotes not used. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (new commercial model banner; visuals in 30 minutes and progress in as fast as 6 hours, conditions apply; no BIM model required to start; VisualTrack, ProgressTrack and DeviationTrack (Coming Soon); Procore, Autodesk Forma and Fieldwire integrations; Schedule Recovery). Customer quotes, including a new one citing weekly hours saved, and percentage results are vendor content and are not used. Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (the new commercial model banner; progress data in as fast as 6 hours; no BIM model required to start; Procore, Autodesk Forma and Fieldwire integrations; DeviationTrack still marked Coming Soon). Time-saved figures are vendor claims and not used. |
| Who it's for | Owners, general contractors, and trades. | Owners, general contractors, and trade partners. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Quote-based. Pricing page re-checked Oct 16 and Oct 19, 2026 (unchanged; multi-year subscriptions are offered): Core and Enterprise subscriptions with no prices. Core lists unlimited capture across projects of any size, capture from any device (phones, 360 cameras, drones), BIM comparison and guided onboarding; Enterprise adds SSO, OpenSpace APIs and enterprise services and support; OpenSpace Track is a subscription add-on to either. The quote form says you can ask about a Core pilot before buying. Earlier note (Oct 15, 2026): Quote-based. Vendor says pricing is based on annual construction volume (ACV) and subscription tier (Core or Enterprise), not per user or per project; Enterprise adds SSO and API access; OpenSpace Track is an add-on to either tier, sold at the project or portfolio level and priced on project type and scope tracked (Track FAQ). Annual subscriptions can cover a single project, and a Core pilot can be requested. No prices listed. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: unchanged (Core and Enterprise with no figures; Enterprise adds SSO and OpenSpace APIs; Track is an add-on to either; the quote form still offers a Core pilot). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged (Core and Enterprise priced on annual construction volume and tier with no figures; Track an add-on to either; Core pilot on request; multi-year and single-project subscriptions); the FAQ also says all subscriptions include onboarding and support and that additions during a contract are prorated and co-termed. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged (Core and Enterprise priced on annual construction volume and tier with no figures; Enterprise adds SSO and OpenSpace APIs; Track an add-on to either, priced by project type and tracking scope; Core pilot on request; multi-year and single-project subscriptions). Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: unchanged (Core and Enterprise with no figures; Enterprise adds SSO and OpenSpace APIs; Track an add-on to either; Core pilot on request). Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: unchanged (priced on annual construction volume and tier, Core or Enterprise, not per user or per project, with no figures; Track an add-on; Core pilot on request; onboarding and support included; additions prorated and co-termed; multi-year subscriptions offered). Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: unchanged (Core and Enterprise with no figures; unlimited capture across projects on Core; Enterprise adds SSO and OpenSpace APIs). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: unchanged (priced on annual construction volume and tier, Core or Enterprise, not per user or per project, with no figures; Enterprise adds SSO, OpenSpace APIs and premium support; Track an add-on; Core pilot on request; onboarding and support included). Re-checked Oct 28, 2026: unchanged (priced on annual construction volume and tier, Core or Enterprise, not per user or per project, with no figures; Enterprise adds SSO and OpenSpace APIs; Track an add-on priced by project type and tracking scope; Core pilot on request; single-project and multi-year subscriptions). The Track page now describes a weekly progress update delivered within about 48 hours of capture, with the schedule file returned with actual dates and an Excel report. | Pricing page (checked Oct 16, 2026; unchanged on Oct 19, 2026), headline: "Pricing Rebuilt Around Progress, Not Pictures. At $0.15/sqft", with "Talk to Sales". The vendor says every sq ft registered for Progress Intelligence unlocks 5X that in visual documentation coverage at no added cost, and lists unlimited users. Minimums, term and what counts as a registered sq ft are not stated. Vendor-listed; confirm current pricing with the vendor. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: unchanged ($0.15/sqft headline with Talk to Sales; 5X visual coverage for every sq ft registered for Progress Intelligence at no added cost; unlimited users). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged ($0.15/sqft headline with Talk to Sales; 5X visual coverage at no added cost for every sq ft registered for Progress Intelligence; unlimited users). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged ($0.15/sqft headline with Talk to Sales; 5X visual coverage at no added cost for every sq ft registered for Progress Intelligence; unlimited users). Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: unchanged ($0.15/sqft headline with Talk to Sales; 5X visual coverage at no added cost for every sq ft registered for Progress Intelligence; unlimited users). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: unchanged ($0.15 per sq ft with Talk to Sales; unlimited users; visual documentation at no additional cost). Re-read Oct 28, 2026 for a compare: unchanged ($0.15 per sq ft headline with Talk to Sales; each sq ft registered for Progress Intelligence unlocks 5X that in visual coverage at no added cost; unlimited users). |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 28, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Capture: OpenSpace lists capture from 360 cameras, drones and smartphones (photos, video, voice notes, 360 walks and drone flights), and offers Walk & Pilot Services if you want to hand capture off. Track3D says it brings reality capture data into one platform; the pages we read do not name specific capture devices.
- How progress is measured: OpenSpace says its AI processes captures and trained specialists then verify progress; Track can report percent complete or installed quantities in linear feet, square feet or units marked up on drawings, lists 700 visual components across 200+ schedule tasks plus custom components, and flags rework, non-conforming installs, removed or damaged work and incomplete tasks. Track3D says it quantifies work installed across job activities from each capture and lists early delay alerts, deviation detection and Schedule Recovery (the pace needed to get back on track when the schedule slips).
- BIM: both say no BIM model is required to start. OpenSpace says a model can be added if you have one; Track3D says it measures installed work directly from capture.
- Timing (vendor-stated, not like-for-like): OpenSpace describes a weekly progress update delivered within about 48 hours of capture, with your schedule file returned with actual dates added and an Excel progress report. Track3D says visuals are ready in as little as 30 minutes and progress in as fast as 6 hours after a capture.
- Schedules and integrations: OpenSpace Track supports P6, Asta Powerproject, Microsoft Project, Excel and Gantt schedules, the homepage names Procore, Autodesk and Revizto, and Enterprise adds OpenSpace APIs. Track3D's site lists VisualTrack, ProgressTrack and DeviationTrack (marked Coming Soon) and Procore, Autodesk Forma and Fieldwire integrations.
- AI tag: both are tagged AI-first.
- Pricing (checked Oct 28, 2026; not like-for-like): OpenSpace publishes no prices; it prices on annual construction volume and tier (Core or Enterprise), not per user or per project, with Track an add-on priced by project type and tracking scope, a Core pilot on request, and single-project or multi-year subscriptions. Track3D's pricing page headline is $0.15 per square foot with Talk to Sales, says each square foot registered for Progress Intelligence unlocks 5X that in visual coverage at no added cost, and lists unlimited users; minimums, term and what counts as a registered square foot are not stated. See each tool page for detail.
- Not used here: OpenSpace's square-footage-captured and country counts, capture-time claim and customer quote, and Track3D's time-saved figures and customer quotes (vendor material). Neither tool has been tested by Means & Methods Lab.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
OpenSpace
No reviews yet. Used OpenSpace? Yours would be the first.
Track3D
No reviews yet. Used Track3D? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- How each tool's percent complete compares with a manual walk of the same area on the same day
- What a registered square foot covers at Track3D and how OpenSpace's volume-based quote lands for a single job
- How well either tracks horizontal or site-wide heavy civil work (OpenSpace points to drone captures for external works)
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend
- Compare: EarthCam vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: innDex vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Sitemate
- Compare: Matterport vs Cupix
- Compare: mJob vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs Oculo
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Intenseye
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Raken
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Track3D
- Compare: Cintoo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Jobber vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Projul vs Knowify
- Compare: Constructable vs Procore AI
- Compare: HammerTech vs viAct
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Reconstruct
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Rhumbix
- Compare: busybusy vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Workyard vs Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime)
- Compare: BiltOn vs HammerTech
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs SkillSignal
- Compare: EarthCam vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Raken vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Doxel
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs Evercam
- Compare: Opusense vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Intenseye vs WakeCap
- Compare: Voxel vs HammerTech
- Compare: PlanRadar vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Riskcast vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Hover vs CompanyCam
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Projul
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Crewscope vs FYLD
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Visibuild
- Compare: Station 1 vs Sitemate
- Compare: Buildots vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: Intenseye vs HammerTech
- Compare: Matterport vs Reconstruct
- Compare: busybusy vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: MobiClocks vs Workyard
- Compare: Oculo vs Evercam
- Compare: SkillSignal vs innDex
- Compare: viAct vs Oracle Advisor for Safety
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Riskcast vs Workyard
- Compare: FieldPulse vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Service Fusion