Reconstruct vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
Two ways to track building progress from site imagery against the model and schedule. Reconstruct is a reality mapping platform that turns photos and video from phones, 360 cameras and drones into measurable 2D plans and 3D models, overlays design on reality and tracks per-activity progress against an imported schedule. Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting is a service that compares 360 photos from approved apps with a federated NWD model and a P6 or Excel schedule, marks elements built or unbuilt and has analysts QA every update. Neither publishes prices. Desk research from vendor pages read Oct 29, 2026; not tested, no winner.
In short: Reconstruct (Reality mapping & remote progress monitoring; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting (Progress reporting service; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Oct 29, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Reconstruct | Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reality mapping & remote progress monitoring | Progress reporting service |
| AI role (our label) | Not AI-first | AI features added to established product |
| What it does | Reality mapping platform for remote quality control, progress monitoring, and facilities assessment. Vendor says it turns standard or 360 photos and video from smartphones, 360 cameras, and drones into measurable 2D floor plans, orthophotos, 3D point clouds, and mesh models, automatically positions footage in space and over time, overlays 2D and 3D design against reality (it calls the overlay technology patented), and adds 4D BIM visualization once a schedule and plans are uploaded. Progress features listed: schedule import via XML or bi-directional integrations with Oracle Primavera Cloud and Aconex, per-activity percent complete and root cause of delay with transcribed voice notes and annotated pictures, pins on issues, and on-demand progress reports. An Oracle Construction and Engineering executive is quoted on the integration with Oracle's platform. The pages we read describe reality mapping and photogrammetry rather than AI, so we tag it Not AI-first. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: still no AI described; the navigation now leads with a Visual Command Center for seeing and measuring the structure remotely, including online as-builts that rewind construction to see inside sealed walls, and the reality-mapping page lists 360 cameras, drones, phones, Matterport and laser scanning as capture sources. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (photogrammetry and reality mapping from smartphones, 360 cameras and drones; 2D and 3D design overlay; progress monitoring; pins and collaboration; schedule integration with 4D BIM visualization; online as-builts in the Visual Command Center); still no AI described, so the tag stays. ROI percentages and customer quotes are vendor content and not used. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: homepage and product pages unchanged in substance (photogrammetry from smartphones, 360 cameras and drones, with Matterport and laser scanning also listed; design overlay; XML or Oracle Primavera Cloud and Aconex schedule integration; 4D BIM; online as-builts); still no AI described. Several pages show unfinished template text ('Something Powerful / Tell The Reader More'), noted only. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: homepage, pricing and progress-monitoring pages unchanged in substance (Visual Command Center with online as-builts; XML or Oracle Primavera Cloud and Aconex schedule integration); still no AI described, and the unfinished template text ('Something Powerful / Tell The Reader More') is still shown, noted only. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: site unchanged (Visual Command Center, online as-builts, reality capture tied to schedule); still no AI features described. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: homepage, pricing, progress-monitoring and schedule-integration pages unchanged in substance (reality mapping from smartphones, 360 cameras and drones; design overlay; schedule import by XML or bidirectional Oracle Primavera Cloud and Aconex integrations; on-demand progress reports; online as-builts); still no AI described, and the unfinished template text ('Something Powerful / Tell The Reader More') is still on the homepage, noted only. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: homepage, pricing and progress-monitoring pages unchanged in substance (reality mapping from smartphones, 360 cameras and drones into measurable 2D floor plans and 3D models; patented design overlay; schedule import via XML or Oracle Primavera Cloud and Aconex integrations; per-activity percent complete and delay root cause with transcribed voice notes; 4D BIM; online as-builts); still no AI described, so the tag stays. The unfinished template text is still present; ROI figures and quotes are not used. Re-checked Oct 29, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (reality mapping from phones, 360 cameras and drones; design overlay; schedule integration and 4D BIM; online as-builts); still no AI described, so the tag stays. The unfinished template text is still on the homepage, noted only. | Compares 360° site photos with the 3D model and schedule to report progress by trade, floor or system. This progress reporting service from Hexagon Multivista uses automated model-to-photo comparison of 360° photos against a federated 3D model (NWD) and a project schedule (P6 or Excel), marking model elements built or unbuilt and reporting progress by trade, floor, or system. Hexagon says its technology detects progress automatically and expert analysts QA every update. Its FAQ says building progress reporting requires an NWD model, a P6 or Excel schedule, and 360° photos from approved apps such as Multivista or Hexagon GoCapture; drone and SLR photos are not supported; setup can take up to 6-8 weeks; and reports are typically available 48-72 hours after images are posted. Lists compatibility with Autodesk ACC, Procore, Primavera P6, and Microsoft Project, and up to 10 years of data hosting. It sits in Hexagon Multivista's Analyze services alongside deviation analysis (which Hexagon describes as an AI-driven model-to-scan comparison) and UAV-based earthwork progress reporting. Separately, Hexagon announced on Oct 6, 2022 that it would integrate AVVIR's AI-powered technology into its construction portfolio; we did not find a Hexagon page naming AVVIR as the engine of this service. Re-read Oct 17, 2026: the same service page also advertises "agnostic data inputs" (360° photos, LiDAR scans or third-party tools, self-captured or Multivista-captured), which is broader than its FAQ; Hexagon's GoCapture app lets project teams self-capture 360° photos, 360° walks or 2D photos mapped to floor plans and BIM in its Analyze Hub. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: the service page is unchanged in substance (NWD model, P6 or Excel schedule, approved 360° apps, drone and SLR photos not supported, setup up to 6-8 weeks, reports typically 48-72 hours after images are posted, email alerts when a report is ready); one FAQ answer on the same page says reports are usually ready within 48 hours, so confirm turnaround with Hexagon. The 2022 AVVIR press release was not re-read today (hexagon.com returned an access-denied response). Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: the service page is unchanged in substance (NWD model, P6 or Excel schedule, 360° photos captured by Multivista or the project team, approved apps only, drone and SLR photos not supported, reports by trade, floor or system, email alerts, up to 10 years of hosting, ACC, Procore, Primavera P6 and Microsoft Project compatibility). The FAQ still gives two turnaround answers (typically 48-72 hours, and usually within 48 hours) and two setup answers (up to 6-8 weeks, and up to eight weeks); confirm with Hexagon. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: the service page is unchanged in substance (NWD model, P6 or Excel schedule, 360° photos from approved apps, drone and SLR photos not supported, agnostic data inputs also advertised, analysts QA every update, email alerts, up to 10 years of hosting, ACC, Procore, Primavera P6 and Microsoft Project compatibility); the FAQ still gives both turnaround answers (typically 48-72 hours, and usually within 48 hours) and both setup answers (up to 6-8 weeks, and up to eight weeks). The site menu now lists a Getting Ahead with AI section on how AI supports owners (not read). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: the service page is unchanged in substance (NWD model, P6 or Excel schedule, 360° photos from approved apps, drone and SLR photos not supported, agnostic data inputs also advertised, analysts QA every update, email alerts, up to 10 years of hosting, ACC, Procore, Primavera P6 and Microsoft Project compatibility); both turnaround answers (typically 48-72 hours, and usually within 48 hours) and both setup answers (up to 6-8 weeks, and up to eight weeks) remain. The page now also names healthcare, data centers and education as industries. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: the service page is unchanged in substance (NWD model, P6 or Excel schedule, 360° photos from approved apps such as Multivista or Hexagon GoCapture, drone and SLR photos not supported, analysts QA every update, up to 10 years of hosting, ACC, Procore, Primavera P6 and Microsoft Project compatibility; healthcare and data centers among listed industries); the FAQ still gives both turnaround answers (typically 48-72 hours, and usually within 48 hours) and both setup answers (up to 6-8 weeks, and up to eight weeks). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: page unchanged in substance (requires NWD 3D models, a P6 or Excel schedule and 360 photos from Multivista or Hexagon GoCapture; drone and SLR photos not supported; ACC, Procore, Primavera P6 and Microsoft Project compatibility; up to 10 years of project data retention). Re-checked Oct 29, 2026: service page unchanged in substance (NWD model, P6 or Excel schedule, 360 photos from approved apps; drone and SLR photos not supported; setup up to eight weeks; up to 10 years of project data); the FAQ still also says reports are usually ready within 48 hours of upload, so confirm turnaround. |
| Who it's for | Owners, owner's representatives, and general contractors. | General contractors and owners; Hexagon also names project executives, quality teams, and schedulers. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Not publicly listed. Pricing page (re-checked Oct 16 and Oct 19, 2026) still shows no prices or tiers; it offers personalized pricing for one project or hundreds and a Contact Us form. Earlier note (Oct 15, 2026): Not publicly listed (pricing page shows no prices or tiers; it offers personalized pricing and a Contact Us form). Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: unchanged (personalized pricing for one project or hundreds, Contact Us; no figures). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged (personalized pricing for one project or hundreds through Contact Us; no figures). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged (personalized pricing for one project or hundreds through Get Personalized Pricing; no figures). Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: pricing page still says pricing is personalized for one project or hundreds, with no figures. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: unchanged (personalized pricing for one project or hundreds through Get Personalized Pricing; no figures). Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: unchanged (Get Personalized Pricing; no figures). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: unchanged (Get Personalized Pricing for one project or hundreds; no figures). Re-checked Oct 29, 2026: unchanged (Personalized Pricing for one project or hundreds; no figures). | No public prices found (re-checked Oct 17 and Oct 19, 2026): the service page has no pricing link, and multivistaservices.hexagon.com/pricing returns a not-found page. Calls to action: "Book a demo" and "Contact us". A dollar figure on the page is a customer testimonial claim, not a price. Confirm current pricing with the vendor. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: unchanged (no pricing link; multivistaservices.hexagon.com/pricing returns a not-found page; Book a demo and Contact us). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged (no pricing link; Book a demo; the dollar figure on the page is still a customer testimonial, not a price). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged (no pricing link; multivistaservices.hexagon.com/pricing returns not found; Book a demo; testimonials on the page are not prices). Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: unchanged (no pricing link; multivistaservices.hexagon.com/pricing returns not found; Book a demo; the dollar figure on the page is a customer testimonial, not a price). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: unchanged (no prices; /pricing returns a not-found page; setup up to 6-8 weeks and reports typically 48-72 hours after 360 images are posted, per the vendor FAQ). Re-checked Oct 29, 2026: unchanged (no prices; Book a demo). |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
|
Facts last checked: Oct 29, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Not quite like-for-like: Reconstruct is software your team works in (capture, measure, overlay, report). Hexagon's offering is a managed reporting service: you supply the model, schedule and 360 photos, and Hexagon delivers progress reports by trade, floor or system after its analysts check them.
- Capture: Reconstruct lists smartphones, 360 cameras and drones, with Matterport and laser scanning also named as capture sources. Hexagon's FAQ says the service needs 360 photos from approved apps such as Multivista or Hexagon GoCapture and that drone and SLR photos are not supported; the same page also advertises agnostic data inputs, so confirm what it will accept.
- Model and schedule: Hexagon requires a federated NWD model and a P6 or Excel schedule, and lists compatibility with Autodesk ACC, Procore, Primavera P6 and Microsoft Project. Reconstruct imports schedules via XML or bi-directional integrations with Oracle Primavera Cloud and Aconex, and adds 4D BIM visualization once a schedule and plans are uploaded.
- Progress output: Reconstruct describes per-activity percent complete and root cause of delay with transcribed voice notes and annotated pictures, pins on issues and on-demand reports. Hexagon describes automatic detection of built and unbuilt model elements, analyst QA on every update and email alerts when a report is ready.
- Timing: Hexagon's FAQ says setup can take up to eight weeks and gives two turnaround answers (typically 48-72 hours after images are posted, and usually within 48 hours of upload), so confirm with Hexagon. Reconstruct's pages we read do not state a turnaround.
- AI tag: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting is tagged AI features added to an established product; Reconstruct is tagged Not AI-first because the pages we read describe reality mapping and photogrammetry rather than AI.
- Pricing (checked Oct 29, 2026): neither publishes prices. Reconstruct's pricing page offers personalized pricing for one project or hundreds. Hexagon's service page has no pricing link (/pricing returns not found) and routes to Book a demo. See each tool page for detail.
- Not used here: Reconstruct's ROI percentages and quotes, and the customer testimonial dollar figure on Hexagon's page (vendor material). Neither tool has been tested by Means & Methods Lab.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Reconstruct
No reviews yet. Used Reconstruct? Yours would be the first.
Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
No reviews yet. Used Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- How each handles a horizontal or civil job where a federated building model is not the main reference
- Who does the capture walk each week, and what that costs in field time
- What each costs for one project versus a program
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend
- Compare: EarthCam vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: innDex vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Sitemate
- Compare: Matterport vs Cupix
- Compare: mJob vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs Oculo
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Intenseye
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Raken
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Track3D
- Compare: Cintoo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Jobber vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Projul vs Knowify
- Compare: Constructable vs Procore AI
- Compare: HammerTech vs viAct
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Reconstruct
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Rhumbix
- Compare: busybusy vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Workyard vs Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime)
- Compare: BiltOn vs HammerTech
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs SkillSignal
- Compare: EarthCam vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Raken vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Doxel
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs Evercam
- Compare: Opusense vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Intenseye vs WakeCap
- Compare: Voxel vs HammerTech
- Compare: PlanRadar vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Riskcast vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Hover vs CompanyCam
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Projul
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Crewscope vs FYLD
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Visibuild
- Compare: Station 1 vs Sitemate
- Compare: Buildots vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: Intenseye vs HammerTech
- Compare: Matterport vs Reconstruct
- Compare: busybusy vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: MobiClocks vs Workyard
- Compare: Oculo vs Evercam
- Compare: SkillSignal vs innDex
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Track3D
- Compare: viAct vs Oracle Advisor for Safety
- Compare: Riskcast vs Workyard
- Compare: FieldPulse vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Service Fusion