Riskcast vs Workyard
Two field time tools aimed at different crews. Riskcast is field software for self-perform heavy civil and specialty contractors that captures time, production quantities, T&M, JHAs and dailies on one screen, synced to the ERP, with jobcost forecasting. Workyard is GPS time tracking and workforce management for contractor crews, with cost-code job costing, accounting sync, scheduling and AI time-keeping features on its Autopilot plan. Workyard publishes a starting price; Riskcast does not. Desk research from vendor pages read Oct 29, 2026; not tested, no winner.
In short: Riskcast (Field time, production & forecasting; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs Workyard (GPS time tracking, cost codes & field ops; vendor publishes prices). Facts last checked Riskcast Oct 29, 2026; Workyard Oct 28, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Riskcast | Workyard |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Field time, production & forecasting | GPS time tracking, cost codes & field ops |
| AI role (our label) | Not AI-first | AI features added to established product |
| What it does | Field software for self-perform contractors that captures time, production quantities, T&M, JHAs and dailies on one screen, synced to the ERP. It also lists equipment tracking, worker certification, and job-cost forecasting. Customers cited include Posillico (which the vendor quotes as leaving HeavyJob for Riskcast) and E-J Electric. The homepage does not describe AI features (re-read Oct 16, 2026; Posillico quote and one-screen time/production/T&M/safety/dailies positioning unchanged). Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: the homepage now also features a Branch case study (heavy civil, Roanoke, VA) alongside Posillico, lists integrations with Autodesk, CMiC, eCMS, Procore, Sage and Viewpoint, and lists attendance, dispatching and job hazard analysis among its products. It still describes no AI, so the Not AI-first tag stays. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: unchanged in substance (Posillico and Branch case studies, the E-J Electric partner story, integrations with Autodesk, CMiC, eCMS, Procore, Sage and Viewpoint; still no AI described). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged in substance (the homepage now leads with Construction Time, Production & Forecasting Software; Posillico and Branch case studies and the E-J Electric partner story; products from attendance and time entry to jobcost forecasting, dispatching and JHAs; Autodesk, CMiC, eCMS, Procore, Sage and Viewpoint integrations; still no AI described, so the Not AI-first tag stays). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged in substance (Construction Time, Production & Forecasting Software for self-perform contractors; products from attendance and time entry to jobcost forecasting, dispatching and JHAs; Autodesk, CMiC, eCMS, Procore, Sage and Viewpoint integrations; still no AI described, so the Not AI-first tag stays). Customer quotes are not used. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: unchanged in substance (Construction Time, Production & Forecasting Software for self-perform contractors; jobcost forecasting among the tools; Autodesk, CMiC, eCMS, Procore, Sage and Viewpoint integrations; still no AI described, so the Not AI-first tag stays). Customer quotes are not used. Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (Construction Time, Production & Forecasting Software for self-perform contractors; Posillico and Branch case studies and the E-J Electric partner story; Autodesk, CMiC, eCMS, Procore, Sage and Viewpoint integrations; still no AI described, so the Not AI-first tag stays). Customer quotes are not used. Re-checked Oct 29, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (Construction Time, Production & Forecasting Software for self-perform contractors; attendance through jobcost forecasting, dispatching and JHAs; Autodesk, CMiC, eCMS, Procore, Sage and Viewpoint integrations); still no AI described. Customer quotes are not used. | Workforce management for contractors and field teams, with GPS time tracking, cost-code job costing, accounting sync and scheduling. It offers GPS time tracking with time-clock rules and auto clock-in, overtime and break compliance with a GPS audit trail, time capture by project and cost code on every time card, live job-cost reporting by employee and cost code, sync of time by job and cost code to accounting/ERP (Sage, NetSuite, ComputerEase and Foundation named on the pricing page), scheduling with notes/checklists/attachments, a live crew map, mileage allocation, field expenses on a company card, mobile forms with an AI-powered form builder/converter (upload a PDF or image), and a developer API with 60+ endpoints. The pricing page's Autopilot plan adds "AI Time Keeping": a Time assistant (marked New) that the vendor says finds and fixes a full pay period of timecards automatically, with all changes reviewed and approved by admins before they go to payroll, and a Project Time Tracking Agent that detects work-site visits and allocates time to the right project using your offsite and rule-group settings with no manual clock-ins. Homepage figures (50,000+ workers, 10,000+ contractors) and customer quotes are vendor-published claims. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: unchanged: plans still start at $6 per user/month billed annually with monthly billing available, the Autopilot plan still lists the Time assistant (marked New) and the Project Time Tracking Agent, and mobile forms still offer an AI form builder. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: the pricing page still lists Starter, Pro, Autopilot (most popular, with AI Time Keeping and the Time assistant marked New) and Enterprise (contact sales). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: the pricing page still lists Starter, Pro, Autopilot (AI Time Keeping, time-clock automations, time-card sign-offs, ERP integrations, API access) and Enterprise, and now shows Smart Forms under Add-ons; the homepage still offers an AI-powered form builder. The site footer links a page titled AI Instructions aimed at AI tools; it was not opened or used. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: the pricing page still lists Starter, Pro, Autopilot (AI Time Keeping with the Time assistant marked New and the Project Time Tracking Agent, time-clock automations, time-card sign-offs, ERP integrations, API access) and Enterprise; its plan comparison also lists a time clock kiosk and clock-in verification with facial photos (face detection to ensure only facial photos are submitted), and Smart Forms remains an add-on with an AI-powered form generator. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: the pricing page is unchanged in substance (Starter, Pro, Autopilot with AI Time Keeping, the Time assistant and the Project Time Tracking Agent, and Enterprise; time clock kiosk and clock-in verification with facial photos in the plan comparison; ERP sync naming Sage, NetSuite, ComputerEase and Foundation; API with no additional usage fees). The worker and contractor counts and customer quotes are still not used. |
| Who it's for | Self-perform heavy civil and specialty (e.g. union electrical) contractors and their foremen. | Contractors (trade, restoration, service and GC crews) that need GPS-verified, cost-coded time feeding payroll and job costing. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Not publicly listed (demo request; unchanged Oct 19 and Oct 20, 2026: riskcast.com/pricing is a learn-more page with Schedule a Demo and Get More Info, and no prices). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged (riskcast.com/pricing is still a learn-more page with a demo form; no prices). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged; riskcast.com/pricing now redirects to a find-out-more page with Schedule a Demo and Get More Info, and no prices. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: unchanged; riskcast.com/pricing still redirects to a find-out-more page with Schedule a Demo and Get More Info, and no prices. Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: unchanged; no prices published and the site routes to Book a Demo. Re-checked Oct 29, 2026: unchanged; riskcast.com/pricing is still a find-out-more page with Schedule a Demo and Get More Info, and no prices. | Pricing page (checked Oct 16, 2026; unchanged Oct 19, 2026): plans start at $6 per user/month billed annually, monthly billing available. Plans: Starter, Pro, Autopilot (marked most popular; adds the AI Time Keeping features, time-clock automations, time-card sign-offs, ERP integrations and API access) and Enterprise (contact sales). Per-plan prices above the $6 starting figure did not render in the page text we read. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: unchanged: plans still start at $6 per user/month billed annually, monthly billing available; per-plan prices above the starting figure still did not render in the page text. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged: plans still start at $6 per user/month billed annually, monthly billing available; per-plan prices above the starting figure still not shown in the page text; Smart Forms listed as an add-on without a price. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: unchanged: plans still start at $6 per user/month billed annually, monthly billing available; per-plan prices above the starting figure still not shown in the page text; Smart Forms listed as an add-on without a price. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: unchanged: plans still start at $6 per user/month billed annually, monthly billing available; per-plan prices above the starting figure still not shown in the page text. Re-checked Oct 28, 2026: unchanged (plans start at $6 per user/month billed annually, monthly billing available; Starter, Pro, Autopilot marked most popular, and Enterprise; per-plan prices above the starting figure not shown in the page text). |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Riskcast Oct 29, 2026; Workyard Oct 28, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Not like-for-like: both capture crew time by job and cost code, but Riskcast also captures production quantities, T&M, JHAs and dailies and forecasts job cost, aimed at self-perform foremen. Workyard centers on GPS-verified time, compliance and labor-cost reporting for trade, restoration, service and GC crews. Time capture feeding payroll and job cost is where they overlap.
- Time capture: Riskcast lists attendance, time entry, worker certification and dispatching. Workyard lists GPS time tracking with time-clock rules and auto clock-in, overtime and break compliance with a GPS audit trail, project and cost-code time on every time card, a live crew map and mileage allocation.
- Beyond time: Riskcast lists production tracking, equipment tracking, time and material, job hazard analysis and jobcost forecasting. Workyard lists live job-cost reporting by employee and cost code, project expenses tagged to cost codes, scheduling with notes and checklists, and mobile forms.
- Integrations: Riskcast names Autodesk, CMiC, eCMS, Procore, Sage and Viewpoint. Workyard imports and syncs jobs and cost codes from accounting systems, naming Sage, NetSuite, ComputerEase and Foundation on its pricing page, and offers a developer API.
- AI: Workyard's Autopilot plan lists AI Time Keeping: a Time assistant (marked New) that the vendor says finds and fixes a pay period of timecards, with changes reviewed by admins before payroll, and a Project Time Tracking Agent that detects work-site visits and allocates time to projects. Riskcast's pages we read describe no AI. AI tag: Workyard is tagged AI features added to an established product; Riskcast is tagged Not AI-first.
- Pricing (checked Oct 29, 2026): Workyard says plans start at $6 per user/month billed annually, with monthly billing available, across Starter, Pro, Autopilot and Enterprise (contact sales); per-plan prices above the starting figure were not shown in the page text. Riskcast publishes no prices; its pricing link goes to a find-out-more page with Schedule a Demo. See each tool page for detail.
- Not used here: Riskcast's customer quotes and case-study headcounts, and Workyard's worker and contractor counts and customer quotes (vendor material). Neither tool has been tested by Means & Methods Lab.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Riskcast
No reviews yet. Used Riskcast? Yours would be the first.
Workyard
No reviews yet. Used Workyard? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- Whether Workyard can capture production quantities alongside time for unit-price work
- How each handles union and certified payroll rules on a public job
- What Riskcast costs for a self-perform crew of your size
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Riskcast
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend
- Compare: EarthCam vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: innDex vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Sitemate
- Compare: Matterport vs Cupix
- Compare: mJob vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs Oculo
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Intenseye
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Raken
- Compare: SmartBarrel vs Workyard
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Track3D
- Compare: Cintoo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Jobber vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Projul vs Knowify
- Compare: Constructable vs Procore AI
- Compare: HammerTech vs viAct
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Reconstruct
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Rhumbix
- Compare: busybusy vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Workyard vs Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime)
- Compare: BiltOn vs HammerTech
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs SkillSignal
- Compare: EarthCam vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Raken vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Doxel
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs Evercam
- Compare: Opusense vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Intenseye vs WakeCap
- Compare: Voxel vs HammerTech
- Compare: PlanRadar vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Riskcast vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Hover vs CompanyCam
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Projul
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Crewscope vs FYLD
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Visibuild
- Compare: Station 1 vs Sitemate
- Compare: Buildots vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: Intenseye vs HammerTech
- Compare: Matterport vs Reconstruct
- Compare: busybusy vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: MobiClocks vs Workyard
- Compare: Oculo vs Evercam
- Compare: SkillSignal vs innDex
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Track3D
- Compare: viAct vs Oracle Advisor for Safety
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: FieldPulse vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Service Fusion