Cupix vs Reconstruct
Two reality-capture platforms that turn site walks into models you can compare against design and schedule. Cupix turns 360° video into measurable 3D models and sells SiteInsights, an AI progress add-on that needs a BIM model; Reconstruct maps sites from phones, 360 cameras and drones, overlays 2D and 3D designs, and ties progress to an imported schedule, and is not AI-first. Neither publishes prices. Desk research from vendor pages read Oct 29, 2026; not tested, no winner.
In short: Cupix (360° digital twin; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs Reconstruct (Reality mapping & remote progress monitoring; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Oct 29, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Cupix | Reconstruct |
|---|---|---|
| Category | 360° digital twin | Reality mapping & remote progress monitoring |
| AI role (our label) | AI features added to established product | Not AI-first |
| What it does | 4D digital twin platform whose "spatial AI" turns 360° video into measurable 3D models over time, plus a SiteInsights AI progress add-on. Customers use it to digitize sites, reduce visits, track changes and validate work, and it unifies laser scans, drone orthophotos and BIM; it is also used in oil & gas, manufacturing and government. SiteInsights uses computer vision and geometry to detect changes between 360° captures against BIM and the schedule, needs a BIM model, and its 4.0 release (Jun 2026) added an AI S-curve forecast and an Oracle Primavera Cloud integration. It names integrations with BIM 360, Autodesk Forma, Procore, Revizto, Oracle and ArcGIS, and lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and CSA STAR. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: unchanged; the SiteInsights page names Oracle P6 and Microsoft Project among compatible scheduling platforms. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: the homepage now says Cupix is trusted by 70% of the ENR Top 30 general contractors, has captured over 20,000 project sites since 2023 and verifies more than 1 million as-built BIM elements a day (vendor claims, not verified), and lists industries from data centers, healthcare and airports to linear infrastructure, oil and gas and maritime. Its integrations heading names Procore, but the sentence under it lists only BIM 360, Autodesk Forma, Revizto, Oracle and ArcGIS, so confirm the Procore connection with the vendor. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: homepage and SiteInsights page unchanged in substance (360° video turned into measurable 3D models; laser scans, drone orthophotos and BIM in one platform; SiteInsights needs a BIM model, detects changes between captures with computer vision and geometry, filters by trade, level and work area, forecasts completion dates from the past rate of work, works with Oracle P6 and Microsoft Project, and takes 4-6 weeks to set up with the customer success team). The homepage served to us also carried Korean-language sections and lorem ipsum placeholder text, and its second integrations block now lists BIM 360, ACC, Revizto and ArcGIS. The security page still lists SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001. ENR, site-count and case-study figures remain vendor claims and are not used. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (360° video turned into measurable 3D models; SiteInsights add-on analyzes completion by work area, trade and BIM category). The integrations heading still names Procore while the sentences under it list Autodesk BIM 360, Autodesk Forma or ACC, Revizto, Oracle and ArcGIS, and lorem ipsum placeholder text is still on the page served to us. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (360° video into a 3D/4D digital twin, SiteInsights progress add-on; integrations listed as BIM 360, Autodesk Forma, Revizto, Oracle and ArcGIS under a heading naming Procore); the page still carries some placeholder text, which we do not use. The menu now also lists CupixField, AssetAtlas, Compass and Cupix MCP, BIM Deviation Analysis and Point Cloud pages (not read this pass). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026 (read for a compare): SiteInsights page unchanged in substance (needs a BIM model for automatic progress; setup with customer success in 4-6 weeks; Oracle P6 and Microsoft Project compatible; completion forecasts from past rate of work). The active-user figure and customer quote are vendor material not used here. Re-checked Oct 29, 2026: homepage and SiteInsights page unchanged in substance (360° video turned into measurable 3D models; SiteInsights uses computer vision and geometry to detect changes between 360° captures, needs a BIM model for automatic progress, takes 4-6 weeks to set up, works with Oracle P6 and Microsoft Project, and forecasts completion from the past rate of work). Integration headings still name Procore while the sentences under them list BIM 360, Autodesk Forma or ACC, Revizto, Oracle and ArcGIS, and placeholder text is still on the homepage (noted only). Active-user figures and quotes are vendor material and not used. | Reality mapping platform for remote quality control, progress monitoring, and facilities assessment. Vendor says it turns standard or 360 photos and video from smartphones, 360 cameras, and drones into measurable 2D floor plans, orthophotos, 3D point clouds, and mesh models, automatically positions footage in space and over time, overlays 2D and 3D design against reality (it calls the overlay technology patented), and adds 4D BIM visualization once a schedule and plans are uploaded. Progress features listed: schedule import via XML or bi-directional integrations with Oracle Primavera Cloud and Aconex, per-activity percent complete and root cause of delay with transcribed voice notes and annotated pictures, pins on issues, and on-demand progress reports. An Oracle Construction and Engineering executive is quoted on the integration with Oracle's platform. The pages we read describe reality mapping and photogrammetry rather than AI, so we tag it Not AI-first. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: still no AI described; the navigation now leads with a Visual Command Center for seeing and measuring the structure remotely, including online as-builts that rewind construction to see inside sealed walls, and the reality-mapping page lists 360 cameras, drones, phones, Matterport and laser scanning as capture sources. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (photogrammetry and reality mapping from smartphones, 360 cameras and drones; 2D and 3D design overlay; progress monitoring; pins and collaboration; schedule integration with 4D BIM visualization; online as-builts in the Visual Command Center); still no AI described, so the tag stays. ROI percentages and customer quotes are vendor content and not used. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: homepage and product pages unchanged in substance (photogrammetry from smartphones, 360 cameras and drones, with Matterport and laser scanning also listed; design overlay; XML or Oracle Primavera Cloud and Aconex schedule integration; 4D BIM; online as-builts); still no AI described. Several pages show unfinished template text ('Something Powerful / Tell The Reader More'), noted only. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: homepage, pricing and progress-monitoring pages unchanged in substance (Visual Command Center with online as-builts; XML or Oracle Primavera Cloud and Aconex schedule integration); still no AI described, and the unfinished template text ('Something Powerful / Tell The Reader More') is still shown, noted only. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: site unchanged (Visual Command Center, online as-builts, reality capture tied to schedule); still no AI features described. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: homepage, pricing, progress-monitoring and schedule-integration pages unchanged in substance (reality mapping from smartphones, 360 cameras and drones; design overlay; schedule import by XML or bidirectional Oracle Primavera Cloud and Aconex integrations; on-demand progress reports; online as-builts); still no AI described, and the unfinished template text ('Something Powerful / Tell The Reader More') is still on the homepage, noted only. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: homepage, pricing and progress-monitoring pages unchanged in substance (reality mapping from smartphones, 360 cameras and drones into measurable 2D floor plans and 3D models; patented design overlay; schedule import via XML or Oracle Primavera Cloud and Aconex integrations; per-activity percent complete and delay root cause with transcribed voice notes; 4D BIM; online as-builts); still no AI described, so the tag stays. The unfinished template text is still present; ROI figures and quotes are not used. Re-checked Oct 29, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (reality mapping from phones, 360 cameras and drones; design overlay; schedule integration and 4D BIM; online as-builts); still no AI described, so the tag stays. The unfinished template text is still on the homepage, noted only. |
| Who it's for | General contractors, owners and operators. | Owners, owner's representatives, and general contractors. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Custom quote / no public prices (re-checked Oct 17, 2026): the pricing link redirects to Cupix's contact sales page, which also offers a free start for capturing a project. The SiteInsights FAQ says its pricing takes into account total project value, square footage and other factors. Confirm current pricing with the vendor. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: unchanged; /pricing still opens the contact-sales page, which offers a free start for capturing a project, and shows no figures. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged; /pricing still opens a contact-sales page (Start for free with Cupix) with no figures, and the SiteInsights FAQ still says pricing takes into account total project value, square footage and other factors. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: unchanged; /pricing still opens a contact-sales page (Start for free with Cupix) with no figures. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: still no prices; /pricing now redirects to a contact-sales page (Contact our sales team) that also offers a free start to capture a project. Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: unchanged; /pricing still goes to a contact-sales page (Contact our sales team; Start for free with Cupix) with no figures. Re-checked Oct 29, 2026: unchanged; /pricing still goes to a contact-sales page (Contact our sales team; Start for free with Cupix) with no figures, and the SiteInsights FAQ still says pricing takes into account total project value, square footage and other factors. | Not publicly listed. Pricing page (re-checked Oct 16 and Oct 19, 2026) still shows no prices or tiers; it offers personalized pricing for one project or hundreds and a Contact Us form. Earlier note (Oct 15, 2026): Not publicly listed (pricing page shows no prices or tiers; it offers personalized pricing and a Contact Us form). Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: unchanged (personalized pricing for one project or hundreds, Contact Us; no figures). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged (personalized pricing for one project or hundreds through Contact Us; no figures). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged (personalized pricing for one project or hundreds through Get Personalized Pricing; no figures). Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: pricing page still says pricing is personalized for one project or hundreds, with no figures. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: unchanged (personalized pricing for one project or hundreds through Get Personalized Pricing; no figures). Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: unchanged (Get Personalized Pricing; no figures). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: unchanged (Get Personalized Pricing for one project or hundreds; no figures). Re-checked Oct 29, 2026: unchanged (Personalized Pricing for one project or hundreds; no figures). |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 29, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Capture: Cupix is built around 360° video walks turned into a 3D map, and also lists drone mapping and point clouds. Reconstruct says virtually anyone on site can capture with a smartphone, 360 camera or drone, and builds floor plans and 3D models from that footage.
- Design comparison: Cupix lists BIM comparison and verification and BIM deviation analysis. Reconstruct describes a patented overlay of 2D and 3D designs and plans against reality.
- Progress and schedule: Cupix SiteInsights uses computer vision and geometry to detect changes between 360° captures and calculate progress, needs a BIM model for automatic progress, takes 4-6 weeks to set up, works with Oracle P6 and Microsoft Project, and forecasts completion from the past rate of work. Reconstruct imports a schedule by XML or through two-way integrations with Oracle Primavera Cloud and Aconex, and progress is updated per activity, including percent complete and root cause of delay, with transcribed voice notes and annotated pictures; it also lists 4D scheduling with BIM.
- How the AI is used: Cupix's automatic progress detection in SiteInsights is the AI piece, added to an established product. Reconstruct's pages we read describe reality mapping, overlay and schedule tools rather than an AI feature, so it is tagged Not AI-first here.
- Pricing (checked Oct 29, 2026): neither publishes prices. Cupix's /pricing goes to a contact-sales page with a free start, and its SiteInsights FAQ says pricing takes into account total project value, square footage and other factors. Reconstruct offers personalized pricing through a form. See each tool page for detail.
- Not used here: Cupix's active-user figures and quotes, and Reconstruct's time and money savings claims and testimonials (vendor material).
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Cupix
No reviews yet. Used Cupix? Yours would be the first.
Reconstruct
No reviews yet. Used Reconstruct? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- Whether your jobs have the BIM model SiteInsights needs for automatic progress
- How much field time a weekly capture walk takes with each on your sites
- What either costs for your project size and number of captures
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend
- Compare: EarthCam vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: innDex vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Sitemate
- Compare: Matterport vs Cupix
- Compare: mJob vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs Oculo
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Intenseye
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Raken
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Track3D
- Compare: Cintoo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Jobber vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Projul vs Knowify
- Compare: Constructable vs Procore AI
- Compare: HammerTech vs viAct
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Reconstruct
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Rhumbix
- Compare: busybusy vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Workyard vs Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime)
- Compare: BiltOn vs HammerTech
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs SkillSignal
- Compare: EarthCam vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Raken vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Doxel
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs Evercam
- Compare: Opusense vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Intenseye vs WakeCap
- Compare: Voxel vs HammerTech
- Compare: PlanRadar vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Riskcast vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Hover vs CompanyCam
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Projul
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Crewscope vs FYLD
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Visibuild
- Compare: Station 1 vs Sitemate
- Compare: Buildots vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: Intenseye vs HammerTech
- Compare: Matterport vs Reconstruct
- Compare: busybusy vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: MobiClocks vs Workyard
- Compare: Oculo vs Evercam
- Compare: SkillSignal vs innDex
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Track3D
- Compare: viAct vs Oracle Advisor for Safety
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Riskcast vs Workyard
- Compare: FieldPulse vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldPulse
- Compare: Jobber vs FieldEdge