Cupix vs Doxel
Two progress tracking tools that both start from 360° video and a BIM model, sold in different shapes. Cupix is a 4D digital twin platform that turns 360° video into measurable 3D models and unifies laser scans, drone orthophotos and BIM, with automatic progress sold as its SiteInsights add-on. Doxel is a progress tracking product built around measuring work-in-place against BIM, with production rates, schedule mapping and earned value tracking. Desk research from vendor pages read Oct 29, 2026; not tested, no winner.
In short: Cupix (360° digital twin; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs Doxel (Progress tracking; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Cupix Oct 30, 2026; Doxel Oct 29, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Cupix | Doxel |
|---|---|---|
| Category | 360° digital twin | Progress tracking |
| AI role (our label) | AI features added to established product | AI-first |
| What it does | 4D digital twin platform whose "spatial AI" turns 360° video into measurable 3D models over time, plus a SiteInsights AI progress add-on. Customers use it to digitize sites, reduce visits, track changes and validate work, and it unifies laser scans, drone orthophotos and BIM; it is also used in oil & gas, manufacturing and government. SiteInsights uses computer vision and geometry to detect changes between 360° captures against BIM and the schedule, needs a BIM model, and its 4.0 release (Jun 2026) added an AI S-curve forecast and an Oracle Primavera Cloud integration. It names integrations with BIM 360, Autodesk Forma, Procore, Revizto, Oracle and ArcGIS, and lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and CSA STAR. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: unchanged; the SiteInsights page names Oracle P6 and Microsoft Project among compatible scheduling platforms. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: the homepage now says Cupix is trusted by 70% of the ENR Top 30 general contractors, has captured over 20,000 project sites since 2023 and verifies more than 1 million as-built BIM elements a day (vendor claims, not verified), and lists industries from data centers, healthcare and airports to linear infrastructure, oil and gas and maritime. Its integrations heading names Procore, but the sentence under it lists only BIM 360, Autodesk Forma, Revizto, Oracle and ArcGIS, so confirm the Procore connection with the vendor. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: homepage and SiteInsights page unchanged in substance (360° video turned into measurable 3D models; laser scans, drone orthophotos and BIM in one platform; SiteInsights needs a BIM model, detects changes between captures with computer vision and geometry, filters by trade, level and work area, forecasts completion dates from the past rate of work, works with Oracle P6 and Microsoft Project, and takes 4-6 weeks to set up with the customer success team). The homepage served to us also carried Korean-language sections and lorem ipsum placeholder text, and its second integrations block now lists BIM 360, ACC, Revizto and ArcGIS. The security page still lists SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001. ENR, site-count and case-study figures remain vendor claims and are not used. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (360° video turned into measurable 3D models; SiteInsights add-on analyzes completion by work area, trade and BIM category). The integrations heading still names Procore while the sentences under it list Autodesk BIM 360, Autodesk Forma or ACC, Revizto, Oracle and ArcGIS, and lorem ipsum placeholder text is still on the page served to us. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (360° video into a 3D/4D digital twin, SiteInsights progress add-on; integrations listed as BIM 360, Autodesk Forma, Revizto, Oracle and ArcGIS under a heading naming Procore); the page still carries some placeholder text, which we do not use. The menu now also lists CupixField, AssetAtlas, Compass and Cupix MCP, BIM Deviation Analysis and Point Cloud pages (not read this pass). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026 (read for a compare): SiteInsights page unchanged in substance (needs a BIM model for automatic progress; setup with customer success in 4-6 weeks; Oracle P6 and Microsoft Project compatible; completion forecasts from past rate of work). The active-user figure and customer quote are vendor material not used here. Re-checked Oct 29, 2026: homepage and SiteInsights page unchanged in substance (360° video turned into measurable 3D models; SiteInsights uses computer vision and geometry to detect changes between 360° captures, needs a BIM model for automatic progress, takes 4-6 weeks to set up, works with Oracle P6 and Microsoft Project, and forecasts completion from the past rate of work). Integration headings still name Procore while the sentences under them list BIM 360, Autodesk Forma or ACC, Revizto, Oracle and ArcGIS, and placeholder text is still on the homepage (noted only). Active-user figures and quotes are vendor material and not used. | Automated progress tracking: computer vision measures work-in-place by trade, system, and stage against the plan from hard-hat 360 camera walks. You send BIM, walk the site with a 360 camera mounted to a hard hat, and Doxel measures the work in place. Product features listed include a rules-of-credit engine for % complete, progress by zone/trade/system, schedule mapping with language models, drone imagery for early phases, earned-value / pay-app support, and portfolio views. Vendor claims 11% faster project delivery, 16% reduction in monthly costs, and 95% less time tracking progress, with setup in less than 2 weeks (vendor claims, not verified). Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (hard-hat 360 camera walks, computer vision measuring work-in-place by trade, system and stage, setup in less than 2 weeks with no VDC work for your team). The 11%, 16% and 95% figures are still shown and remain vendor claims. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: the homepage headline now reads Physical Intelligence for Construction, with the same send-BIM, hard-hat 360 walk and computer-vision steps; the product page adds an Utilities Underground Tracking tab (progress from underground to finished buildout using drone imagery), and the site menu now lists solutions by stakeholder (owners, project executives, superintendents, BIM and VDC) and by industry (data centers, health care, life sciences, manufacturing, semiconductors, oil and gas) plus a Touchplan partnership page. The 11%, 16% and 95% figures remain vendor claims and are not used. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: the homepage still headlines Physical Intelligence for Construction; the product page is unchanged in substance (360° video compared to BIM to quantify work-in-place, a rules-of-credit engine for percent complete, language-model schedule mapping, drone-based tracking from underground to finished buildout, and earned value tracking). Vendor percentages and customer quotes are not used. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: unchanged in substance (360° video compared with BIM, rules-of-credit engine, language-model schedule mapping, drone-based tracking, earned value tracking). Vendor percentages and customer quotes are not used. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (automated progress tracking comparing plan with actual by component, system and schedule, delay forecasts from historic production rates, out-of-sequence work flagged, portfolio view; Send us the BIM). Customer quotes are not used. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: homepage and product page unchanged in substance (Physical Intelligence for Construction headline; send the BIM, walk the site with a hard-hat 360 camera, computer vision measures work-in-place; rules-of-credit engine for percent complete; 3D progress view, production rates, schedule mapping described as powered by language models, drone-based tracking from dirt work, Utilities Underground Tracking and earned-value budget tracking). Delivery-speed, cost and time-saving percentages and customer quotes are vendor claims and not used. Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (automated progress tracking by component, system and schedule; delay forecasts from historic production rates; out-of-sequence work flagged; portfolio view; send the BIM, no VDC work). Customer quotes are not used. Re-checked Oct 29, 2026: homepage and product page unchanged in substance (Physical Intelligence for Construction; 360° video compared with BIM to quantify work-in-place; rules-of-credit engine; 3D progress view, production rates, language-model schedule mapping, drone-based tracking from dirt work, Utilities Underground Tracking and earned-value budget tracking). Vendor percentages and customer quotes are not used. |
| Who it's for | General contractors, owners and operators. | Executives, superintendents, and project teams on active jobs. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Custom quote / no public prices (re-checked Oct 17, 2026): the pricing link redirects to Cupix's contact sales page, which also offers a free start for capturing a project. The SiteInsights FAQ says its pricing takes into account total project value, square footage and other factors. Confirm current pricing with the vendor. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: unchanged; /pricing still opens the contact-sales page, which offers a free start for capturing a project, and shows no figures. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged; /pricing still opens a contact-sales page (Start for free with Cupix) with no figures, and the SiteInsights FAQ still says pricing takes into account total project value, square footage and other factors. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: unchanged; /pricing still opens a contact-sales page (Start for free with Cupix) with no figures. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: still no prices; /pricing now redirects to a contact-sales page (Contact our sales team) that also offers a free start to capture a project. Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: unchanged; /pricing still goes to a contact-sales page (Contact our sales team; Start for free with Cupix) with no figures. Re-checked Oct 29, 2026: unchanged; /pricing still goes to a contact-sales page (Contact our sales team; Start for free with Cupix) with no figures, and the SiteInsights FAQ still says pricing takes into account total project value, square footage and other factors. Re-read Oct 30, 2026 for a compare: unchanged; /pricing still goes to a contact-sales page (Contact our sales team; Start for free with Cupix) with no figures, and the SiteInsights FAQ still says pricing takes into account total project value, square footage and other factors. | Not publicly listed. Pricing FAQ (re-checked Oct 16 and Oct 19, 2026) still says cost depends on the capabilities you need and the amount of construction you do or the size of the jobsite, and that Doxel generally charges by the square foot. The page also says users are unlimited (not charged by the seat) and that Doxel can be used on a single jobsite. Quotes on request; no prices shown. Earlier note (Oct 15, 2026): Not publicly listed. Pricing FAQ says cost depends on the capabilities needed and the amount of construction (or jobsite size), and that Doxel generally charges by the square foot; quotes on request. Re-checked Oct 21, 2026: the pricing page still says Doxel does not charge by the seat, integrates with P6, Procore and Autodesk, and offers a demo or an instant quick quote; the FAQ answers did not expand in our read, so the per-square-foot basis was not re-confirmed today. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: no price change. The pricing FAQ was readable today and again says Doxel generally charges by the square foot, with cost depending on the capabilities needed and the amount of construction or jobsite size; users are unlimited, a single jobsite is fine, and setup is under 2 weeks. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: no price change (generally charged by the square foot, depending on capabilities and the amount of construction or jobsite size; unlimited users; a single jobsite is fine; up and running in under 2 weeks). Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: no price change (generally by the square foot; unlimited users; under 2 weeks to get running). Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: no price change (generally charged by the square foot, depending on capabilities and amount of construction or jobsite size; unlimited users, not charged by the seat; single jobsite allowed; up and running in under 2 weeks; demo or instant quick quote). Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: no price change (generally charged by the square foot, depending on capabilities and the amount of construction or jobsite size; unlimited users; single jobsite allowed; integrates with P6, Procore and Autodesk; under 2 weeks to get running). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: no price change (generally charged by the square foot, depending on capabilities and the amount of construction or jobsite size; unlimited users; single jobsite allowed; under 2 weeks to get running; demo or quick quote). Re-checked Oct 28, 2026: no price change (generally charged by the square foot, depending on capabilities and the amount of construction or jobsite size; not charged by the seat; demo or quick quote). Re-checked Oct 29, 2026: no price change (generally charged by the square foot, depending on capabilities and the amount of construction or jobsite size; unlimited users, not charged by the seat; single jobsite allowed; integrates with P6, Procore and Autodesk; under 2 weeks to get running; demo or quick quote). |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Cupix Oct 30, 2026; Doxel Oct 29, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- How progress is measured: Cupix says SiteInsights uses computer vision and geometry to detect changes between 360° captures against BIM and the schedule, and needs a BIM model for automatic progress. Doxel says it compares 360° video to BIM to quantify work-in-place and converts field work into percent complete with a rules-of-credit engine.
- Scope: Cupix's core product is a digital twin used to digitize sites, reduce visits, track changes and validate work, bringing laser scans, drone orthophotos and BIM into one platform, with progress layered on through SiteInsights. Doxel's product page is organized around progress: a 3D progress view, reality capture with side-by-side photo history, production rates by zone, trade or system, schedule mapping it says is powered by language models, drone-based tracking from dirt work through Utilities Underground Tracking, and earned-value budget tracking.
- Schedules and integrations: Cupix says SiteInsights works with Oracle P6 and Microsoft Project, forecasts completion from the past rate of work, and its 4.0 release (Jun 2026) added an Oracle Primavera Cloud integration; its integration sentences list BIM 360, Autodesk Forma or ACC, Revizto, Oracle and ArcGIS (a heading also names Procore, so confirm that connection). Doxel's pricing page says it integrates with P6, Procore and Autodesk.
- Setup: Cupix says SiteInsights takes 4-6 weeks to set up with its customer success team. Doxel says it is running in under 2 weeks with no VDC work for your team.
- Pricing (checked Oct 29, 2026): neither publishes prices. Cupix's /pricing goes to a contact-sales page that also offers a free start for capturing a project, and its SiteInsights FAQ says pricing takes into account total project value, square footage and other factors. Doxel's pricing FAQ says it generally charges by the square foot, depending on capabilities and the amount of construction or jobsite size, with unlimited users and single-jobsite use allowed. See each tool page for detail.
- AI tags: we tag Doxel AI-first and Cupix AI features added to an established product.
- Not used here: Cupix's ENR, site-count, element and active-user figures, Doxel's delivery, cost and time percentages, and both vendors' customer quotes (vendor material). Neither tool has been tested by Means & Methods Lab.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Cupix
No reviews yet. Used Cupix? Yours would be the first.
Doxel
No reviews yet. Used Doxel? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- How each tool's percent-complete reads compare with your superintendent's on the same areas
- Whether you need a full digital twin with scans and drone data (Cupix) or a progress-focused product (Doxel)
- What each costs for your project value and square footage
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend
- Compare: EarthCam vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: innDex vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Sitemate
- Compare: Matterport vs Cupix
- Compare: mJob vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs Oculo
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Intenseye
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Raken
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Track3D
- Compare: Cintoo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Jobber vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Projul vs Knowify
- Compare: Constructable vs Procore AI
- Compare: HammerTech vs viAct
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Reconstruct
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Rhumbix
- Compare: busybusy vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Workyard vs Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime)
- Compare: BiltOn vs HammerTech
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs SkillSignal
- Compare: EarthCam vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Raken vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Doxel
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs Evercam
- Compare: Opusense vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Intenseye vs WakeCap
- Compare: Voxel vs HammerTech
- Compare: PlanRadar vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Riskcast vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Hover vs CompanyCam
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Projul
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Crewscope vs FYLD
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Visibuild
- Compare: Station 1 vs Sitemate
- Compare: Buildots vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: Intenseye vs HammerTech
- Compare: Matterport vs Reconstruct
- Compare: busybusy vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: MobiClocks vs Workyard
- Compare: Oculo vs Evercam
- Compare: SkillSignal vs innDex
- Compare: RDrive vs ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Track3D vs Cupix
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Track3D
- Compare: viAct vs Oracle Advisor for Safety
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Riskcast vs Workyard
- Compare: FieldPulse vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldPulse
- Compare: Jobber vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Cupix vs Reconstruct