Track3D vs Cupix
Two ways to turn site captures into measured progress. Track3D is an AI reality intelligence platform that quantifies installed work from each capture, says no BIM model is needed to start and headlines $0.15 per square foot. Cupix is a 360° video digital twin platform with a SiteInsights AI progress add-on that needs a BIM model and is quoted by project value and square footage. Close but not identical: Cupix's core product is the digital twin, with progress tracking as an add-on. Desk research from vendor pages read Oct 30, 2026; not tested, no winner.
In short: Track3D (Progress tracking; vendor publishes prices) vs Cupix (360° digital twin; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Oct 30, 2026. No winner declared; not tested.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Track3D | Cupix |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Progress tracking | 360° digital twin |
| AI role (our label) | AI-first | AI features added to established product |
| What it does | AI reality intelligence platform that unifies reality capture data and quantifies installed work across job activities from each capture. Vendor says visuals are available in 30 minutes and progress data in 6 hours (conditions apply), with no BIM model required to start, and production analytics tied to cost codes. Customers quoted include Hensel Phelps and Performance Contracting Group. The homepage (Oct 19, 2026) announces a new commercial model with visual documentation at no additional cost. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: unchanged in substance (visual data in 30 minutes and progress data in 6 hours, conditions apply; no BIM model required to start; the new commercial model banner). The site menu lists VisualTrack, ProgressTrack and DeviationTrack (marked Coming Soon) and Procore, Autodesk Forma and Fieldwire integrations. The homepage percentage results (such as 15% coordination time saved and 20% lower rework cost) are vendor claims and were not used. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (the new commercial model banner; visuals in 30 minutes and progress in as fast as 6 hours; no BIM model required to start; VisualTrack, ProgressTrack and DeviationTrack (Coming Soon); Procore, Autodesk Forma and Fieldwire integrations); the pricing page also lists Schedule Recovery (the pace needed to get back on track when the schedule slips). Customer time-saved quotes not used. Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (new commercial model banner; visuals in 30 minutes and progress in as fast as 6 hours; no BIM model required to start; VisualTrack, ProgressTrack and DeviationTrack (Coming Soon); Procore, Autodesk Forma and Fieldwire integrations; Schedule Recovery). Customer quotes not used. Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (new commercial model banner; visuals in 30 minutes and progress in as fast as 6 hours, conditions apply; no BIM model required to start; VisualTrack, ProgressTrack and DeviationTrack (Coming Soon); Procore, Autodesk Forma and Fieldwire integrations; Schedule Recovery). Customer quotes, including a new one citing weekly hours saved, and percentage results are vendor content and are not used. Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: homepage and pricing page unchanged in substance (the new commercial model banner; progress data in as fast as 6 hours; no BIM model required to start; Procore, Autodesk Forma and Fieldwire integrations; DeviationTrack still marked Coming Soon). Time-saved figures are vendor claims and not used. | 4D digital twin platform whose "spatial AI" turns 360° video into measurable 3D models over time, plus a SiteInsights AI progress add-on. Customers use it to digitize sites, reduce visits, track changes and validate work, and it unifies laser scans, drone orthophotos and BIM; it is also used in oil & gas, manufacturing and government. SiteInsights uses computer vision and geometry to detect changes between 360° captures against BIM and the schedule, needs a BIM model, and its 4.0 release (Jun 2026) added an AI S-curve forecast and an Oracle Primavera Cloud integration. It names integrations with BIM 360, Autodesk Forma, Procore, Revizto, Oracle and ArcGIS, and lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and CSA STAR. Re-checked Oct 19, 2026: unchanged; the SiteInsights page names Oracle P6 and Microsoft Project among compatible scheduling platforms. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: the homepage now says Cupix is trusted by 70% of the ENR Top 30 general contractors, has captured over 20,000 project sites since 2023 and verifies more than 1 million as-built BIM elements a day (vendor claims, not verified), and lists industries from data centers, healthcare and airports to linear infrastructure, oil and gas and maritime. Its integrations heading names Procore, but the sentence under it lists only BIM 360, Autodesk Forma, Revizto, Oracle and ArcGIS, so confirm the Procore connection with the vendor. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: homepage and SiteInsights page unchanged in substance (360° video turned into measurable 3D models; laser scans, drone orthophotos and BIM in one platform; SiteInsights needs a BIM model, detects changes between captures with computer vision and geometry, filters by trade, level and work area, forecasts completion dates from the past rate of work, works with Oracle P6 and Microsoft Project, and takes 4-6 weeks to set up with the customer success team). The homepage served to us also carried Korean-language sections and lorem ipsum placeholder text, and its second integrations block now lists BIM 360, ACC, Revizto and ArcGIS. The security page still lists SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001. ENR, site-count and case-study figures remain vendor claims and are not used. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (360° video turned into measurable 3D models; SiteInsights add-on analyzes completion by work area, trade and BIM category). The integrations heading still names Procore while the sentences under it list Autodesk BIM 360, Autodesk Forma or ACC, Revizto, Oracle and ArcGIS, and lorem ipsum placeholder text is still on the page served to us. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: homepage unchanged in substance (360° video into a 3D/4D digital twin, SiteInsights progress add-on; integrations listed as BIM 360, Autodesk Forma, Revizto, Oracle and ArcGIS under a heading naming Procore); the page still carries some placeholder text, which we do not use. The menu now also lists CupixField, AssetAtlas, Compass and Cupix MCP, BIM Deviation Analysis and Point Cloud pages (not read this pass). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026 (read for a compare): SiteInsights page unchanged in substance (needs a BIM model for automatic progress; setup with customer success in 4-6 weeks; Oracle P6 and Microsoft Project compatible; completion forecasts from past rate of work). The active-user figure and customer quote are vendor material not used here. Re-checked Oct 29, 2026: homepage and SiteInsights page unchanged in substance (360° video turned into measurable 3D models; SiteInsights uses computer vision and geometry to detect changes between 360° captures, needs a BIM model for automatic progress, takes 4-6 weeks to set up, works with Oracle P6 and Microsoft Project, and forecasts completion from the past rate of work). Integration headings still name Procore while the sentences under them list BIM 360, Autodesk Forma or ACC, Revizto, Oracle and ArcGIS, and placeholder text is still on the homepage (noted only). Active-user figures and quotes are vendor material and not used. |
| Who it's for | Owners, general contractors, and trade partners. | General contractors, owners and operators. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Pricing page (checked Oct 16, 2026; unchanged on Oct 19, 2026), headline: "Pricing Rebuilt Around Progress, Not Pictures. At $0.15/sqft", with "Talk to Sales". The vendor says every sq ft registered for Progress Intelligence unlocks 5X that in visual documentation coverage at no added cost, and lists unlimited users. Minimums, term and what counts as a registered sq ft are not stated. Vendor-listed; confirm current pricing with the vendor. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: unchanged ($0.15/sqft headline with Talk to Sales; 5X visual coverage for every sq ft registered for Progress Intelligence at no added cost; unlimited users). Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged ($0.15/sqft headline with Talk to Sales; 5X visual coverage at no added cost for every sq ft registered for Progress Intelligence; unlimited users). Re-checked Oct 23, 2026: unchanged ($0.15/sqft headline with Talk to Sales; 5X visual coverage at no added cost for every sq ft registered for Progress Intelligence; unlimited users). Re-checked Oct 25, 2026: unchanged ($0.15/sqft headline with Talk to Sales; 5X visual coverage at no added cost for every sq ft registered for Progress Intelligence; unlimited users). Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: unchanged ($0.15 per sq ft with Talk to Sales; unlimited users; visual documentation at no additional cost). Re-read Oct 28, 2026 for a compare: unchanged ($0.15 per sq ft headline with Talk to Sales; each sq ft registered for Progress Intelligence unlocks 5X that in visual coverage at no added cost; unlimited users). Re-checked Oct 30, 2026 (also read for a compare): unchanged ($0.15/sqft headline with Talk to Sales; each sq ft registered for Progress Intelligence unlocks 5X that in visual coverage at no added cost; unlimited users; no BIM required). | Custom quote / no public prices (re-checked Oct 17, 2026): the pricing link redirects to Cupix's contact sales page, which also offers a free start for capturing a project. The SiteInsights FAQ says its pricing takes into account total project value, square footage and other factors. Confirm current pricing with the vendor. Re-checked Oct 20, 2026: unchanged; /pricing still opens the contact-sales page, which offers a free start for capturing a project, and shows no figures. Re-checked Oct 22, 2026: unchanged; /pricing still opens a contact-sales page (Start for free with Cupix) with no figures, and the SiteInsights FAQ still says pricing takes into account total project value, square footage and other factors. Re-checked Oct 24, 2026: unchanged; /pricing still opens a contact-sales page (Start for free with Cupix) with no figures. Re-checked Oct 26, 2026: still no prices; /pricing now redirects to a contact-sales page (Contact our sales team) that also offers a free start to capture a project. Re-checked Oct 27, 2026: unchanged; /pricing still goes to a contact-sales page (Contact our sales team; Start for free with Cupix) with no figures. Re-checked Oct 29, 2026: unchanged; /pricing still goes to a contact-sales page (Contact our sales team; Start for free with Cupix) with no figures, and the SiteInsights FAQ still says pricing takes into account total project value, square footage and other factors. Re-read Oct 30, 2026 for a compare: unchanged; /pricing still goes to a contact-sales page (Contact our sales team; Start for free with Cupix) with no figures, and the SiteInsights FAQ still says pricing takes into account total project value, square footage and other factors. |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Oct 30, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- What each covers (vendor pages): Track3D unifies reality capture data and quantifies installed work across job activities, with production analytics tied to cost codes and a Schedule Recovery view; its menu lists VisualTrack, ProgressTrack and DeviationTrack (marked Coming Soon). Cupix turns 360° video walks into measurable 3D models over time and brings laser scans, drone orthophotos and BIM into one platform; SiteInsights compares captures against BIM and the schedule, filters by trade, level and work area, and forecasts completion dates from the past rate of work.
- BIM requirement: Track3D says you can start tracking measurable progress without waiting on a BIM model. Cupix's SiteInsights FAQ says you have to have BIM models for its AI to measure progress automatically. If your jobs rarely have a usable model, that difference matters more than any feature list.
- Turnaround (vendor statements, not verified): Track3D says visuals are available in about 30 minutes and progress data in as little as 6 hours, conditions apply. Cupix's SiteInsights FAQ says its customer success team works with you during setup to get the data connections right; the page we read does not give a setup time.
- Integrations (vendor pages): Track3D lists Procore, Autodesk Forma and Fieldwire. Cupix names BIM 360, ACC or Autodesk Forma, Procore, Revizto, Oracle and ArcGIS, and says SiteInsights works with Oracle P6 and Microsoft Project. We have not tested any of these integrations.
- Pricing (checked Oct 30, 2026): Track3D's pricing page headlines $0.15 per sq ft with Talk to Sales, unlimited users, and 5X that area in visual documentation at no added cost; minimums and term are not stated. Cupix publishes no figures: /pricing opens a contact-sales page with a free start for capturing a project, and the SiteInsights FAQ says pricing reflects total project value, square footage and other factors.
- Not used here: Track3D's percentage results and customer quotes, and Cupix's ENR, site-count, user-count and case-study figures (vendor content). Neither tool has been tested by Means & Methods Lab.
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Track3D
No reviews yet. Used Track3D? Yours would be the first.
Cupix
No reviews yet. Used Cupix? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- Whether your projects have BIM models good enough for model-based progress (Cupix SiteInsights) or you need progress without one (Track3D)
- What counts as a registered square foot on Track3D, and any minimums or term
- What Cupix quotes for SiteInsights on a project like yours
- How accurately each measures installed work on your own captures
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Cupix vs Doxel
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend
- Compare: EarthCam vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: innDex vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Sitemate
- Compare: Matterport vs Cupix
- Compare: mJob vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs Oculo
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Intenseye
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Raken
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Track3D
- Compare: Cintoo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Jobber vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Projul vs Knowify
- Compare: Constructable vs Procore AI
- Compare: HammerTech vs viAct
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Reconstruct
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Rhumbix
- Compare: busybusy vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Workyard vs Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime)
- Compare: BiltOn vs HammerTech
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs SkillSignal
- Compare: EarthCam vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Raken vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Doxel
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs Evercam
- Compare: Opusense vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Intenseye vs WakeCap
- Compare: Voxel vs HammerTech
- Compare: PlanRadar vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Riskcast vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Hover vs CompanyCam
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Projul
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Crewscope vs FYLD
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Visibuild
- Compare: Station 1 vs Sitemate
- Compare: Buildots vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: Intenseye vs HammerTech
- Compare: Matterport vs Reconstruct
- Compare: busybusy vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: MobiClocks vs Workyard
- Compare: Oculo vs Evercam
- Compare: SkillSignal vs innDex
- Compare: RDrive vs ArchiSnapper
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Track3D
- Compare: viAct vs Oracle Advisor for Safety
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Riskcast vs Workyard
- Compare: FieldPulse vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldPulse
- Compare: Jobber vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Cupix vs Reconstruct