Cintoo vs Cupix
Two cloud platforms that turn site capture into navigable 3D next to BIM, so this is partly like-for-like. Cintoo starts from terrestrial laser scans, converting point clouds to lightweight meshes with its patented TurboMesh, and adds a 360 Edition; Cupix starts from 360° video walks, turning them into measurable 3D maps over time, with SiteInsights for AI progress tracking. Desk research from vendor sites read Nov 2, 2026; no winner.
In short: Cintoo (Reality capture data platform; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs Cupix (360° digital twin; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Nov 2, 2026. No winner declared; desk research from vendor sites.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Cintoo | Cupix |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reality capture data platform | 360° digital twin |
| AI role (our label) | AI features added to established product | AI features added to established product |
| What it does | Cloud, scanner-agnostic platform to upload, process, view and share large 3D laser-scan datasets (sample projects list Leica, Faro, Z+F and Trimble scanners). Patented TurboMesh converts point clouds to lightweight meshes for streaming. Editions: BIM (scan-to-BIM, design on as-built), Twin (assets plus CAD/BIM and enterprise data) and 360 (lightweight 360 video); navigation also lists Cintoo Workspace. Lists AI-powered classification of scan data, open SDKs and APIs, a VR experience on the Cintoo Streaming SDK and Unreal Engine, and an unlimited model (unlimited users and web access). The solutions menu covers progress tracking, design-issue checks, quality and compliance, asset management, remote collaboration and brownfield risk. Vendor states ISO 27001, SOC 2 and GDPR compliance (vendor claims). User counts and customer quotes are vendor content and are not used. | 4D digital twin platform whose "spatial AI" turns 360° video into measurable 3D models over time, plus a SiteInsights AI progress add-on. Customers use it to digitize sites, reduce visits, track changes and validate work, and it unifies laser scans, drone orthophotos and BIM; industries listed range from data centers, healthcare and airports to linear infrastructure, oil and gas, manufacturing, maritime and government. SiteInsights uses computer vision and geometry to detect changes between 360° captures against BIM and the schedule, needs a BIM model for automatic progress, filters by trade, level and work area, forecasts completion dates from the past rate of work, works with Oracle P6 and Microsoft Project, and takes 4-6 weeks to set up with the customer success team; its 4.0 release (Jun 2026) added an AI S-curve forecast and an Oracle Primavera Cloud integration. The menu also lists CupixField, AssetAtlas, Compass, Cupix MCP, BIM Deviation Analysis and Point Cloud pages. Its integrations heading names Procore, but the sentences under it list only BIM 360, Autodesk Forma or ACC, Revizto, Oracle and ArcGIS, so confirm the Procore connection with the vendor. The security page lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and CSA STAR. The homepage served to us has carried placeholder text (noted only). ENR, site-count, active-user and case-study figures and quotes are vendor claims and are not used. |
| Who it's for | Reality capture, VDC, and geospatial teams at contractors, engineers, and owners (Arup quoted). | General contractors, owners and operators. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Not publicly listed. The vendor site has no pricing or plans link in its navigation or footer; cintoo.com/pricing, /en/pricing and /plans return a not-found page. The site offers Request a Demo and Try it Free with a free 30-day trial, and describes an unlimited model (unlimited users and web access). Confirm pricing with the vendor. | Not publicly listed (custom quote). /pricing goes to Cupix's contact-sales page (Contact our sales team), which also offers a free start for capturing a project (Start for free with Cupix); no figures. The SiteInsights FAQ says its pricing takes into account total project value, square footage and other factors. Confirm current pricing with the vendor. |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Nov 2, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Partly like-for-like: both put reality data and BIM in one cloud platform. Cintoo is scanner-agnostic (its sample projects list Leica, Faro, Z+F and Trimble scanners) and also takes lightweight 360 video in its 360 Edition. Cupix converts 360° video into 3D maps and says it also brings in laser scans, drone orthophotos and BIM.
- Products: Cintoo lists BIM (scan-to-BIM, design on as-built), Twin (assets plus CAD/BIM and enterprise data) and 360 editions, plus Cintoo Workspace. Cupix's menu lists SiteInsights, CupixField, AssetAtlas, Compass, Cupix MCP, BIM deviation analysis and point cloud pages.
- Progress tracking: Cupix SiteInsights compares site captures with schedules and BIM models, tracks completion by trade, work area or other metrics, forecasts output from production rates and works with Oracle P6 and Microsoft Project; Cupix says setup can take 4-6 weeks. Cintoo's solutions menu lists progress tracking alongside design-issue checks, quality and compliance, asset management, remote collaboration and brownfield risk.
- AI and developer access: Cintoo lists AI-powered classification of scan data, open SDKs and APIs, and a VR experience on its Streaming SDK and Unreal Engine. Cupix describes AI that turns 360° video into 3D spaces you can measure, and lists Cupix MCP.
- Security (vendor claims): Cintoo states ISO 27001, SOC 2 and GDPR compliance. Cupix states SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and CSA STAR, and lists 360° video privacy protection.
- Pricing (vendor pages read Nov 2, 2026): neither publishes prices. Cintoo has no pricing link, offers Request a Demo and a free 30-day trial, and describes an unlimited model (unlimited users and web access). Cupix's pricing link goes to a contact-sales page with a Start for free option for capturing a project; it says SiteInsights pricing depends on total project value, square footage and other factors.
- Not used here: user counts, dataset sizes from sample projects, case-study figures and customer quotes (vendor material). Facts for both come from vendor websites (desk research).
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Cintoo
No reviews yet. Used Cintoo? Yours would be the first.
Cupix
No reviews yet. Used Cupix? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- Whether your field capture is mostly terrestrial laser scans or 360° video walks, since each platform starts from a different one
- How each handles your scan sizes, BIM models and schedule links on a live job
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
- Where does it fall short, and what would make you switch?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Cupix vs Doxel
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend
- Compare: EarthCam vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: innDex vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Sitemate
- Compare: Matterport vs Cupix
- Compare: mJob vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs Oculo
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Intenseye
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Raken
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Track3D
- Compare: Cintoo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Jobber vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Projul vs Knowify
- Compare: Constructable vs Procore AI
- Compare: HammerTech vs viAct
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Reconstruct
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Rhumbix
- Compare: busybusy vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Workyard vs Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime)
- Compare: BiltOn vs HammerTech
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs SkillSignal
- Compare: EarthCam vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Raken vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Doxel
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs Evercam
- Compare: Opusense vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Intenseye vs WakeCap
- Compare: Voxel vs HammerTech
- Compare: PlanRadar vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Riskcast vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Hover vs CompanyCam
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Projul
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Crewscope vs FYLD
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Visibuild
- Compare: Station 1 vs Sitemate
- Compare: Buildots vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: Intenseye vs HammerTech
- Compare: Matterport vs Reconstruct
- Compare: busybusy vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: MobiClocks vs Workyard
- Compare: Oculo vs Evercam
- Compare: SkillSignal vs innDex
- Compare: RDrive vs ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Track3D vs Cupix
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Track3D
- Compare: viAct vs Oracle Advisor for Safety
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Riskcast vs Workyard
- Compare: FieldPulse vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldPulse
- Compare: Jobber vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Cupix vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs innDex
- Compare: GoFormz vs Opusense
- Compare: ClockShark vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Novara Flex
- Compare: Alloovium vs Nyfty.ai
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs busybusy
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs innDex
- Compare: Riskcast vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: FieldPulse vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Jobber vs Projul
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Visibuild vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Visibuild
- Compare: Sitemate vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Station 1 vs FYLD
- Compare: Buildots vs Oculo
- Compare: Doxel vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Voxel
- Compare: HammerTech vs SkillSignal
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs BiltOn
- Compare: Crewscope vs Raken
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs SmartBarrel
- Compare: Arcoro Time vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Opusense vs FYLD
- Compare: Alloovium vs Sitemate
- Compare: Roofr vs Jobber
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Workyard
- Compare: BiltOn vs SkillSignal