SafetyClerk vs BiltOn
Two jobsite safety compliance platforms with a strong New York City focus that tie worker credentials and site access to daily safety paperwork and sync it into Procore. SafetyClerk centres on workers reviewing and signing pre-shift reviews, toolbox talks and logs on their own phones, with SST-based turnstile access and a SafetyScore for risk. BiltOn sells three modules (workforce, safety and compliance, risk prevention) with 3D facial recognition access, and describes AI risk scoring. Close to like-for-like; they differ on identity checks and how far AI is described. Desk research from vendor sites read Oct 31, 2026; no winner.
In short: SafetyClerk (Site safety compliance; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs BiltOn (Construction safety platform; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Nov 2, 2026. No winner declared; desk research from vendor sites.
Side by side
| Sheet row | SafetyClerk | BiltOn |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Site safety compliance | Construction safety platform |
| AI role (our label) | Not AI-first | AI features added to established product |
| What it does | Construction safety compliance software where workers review and sign safety documents, such as pre-shift reviews, on their own devices. Product pages list jobsite orientations, toolbox talks, pre-shift (pre-task) checks, daily logs, incident reporting and observation tools, certification tracking with alerts for expiring documents and a document archive, worker, equipment, insurance and risk management, time-tracking and CCIP/OCIP. Turnstile access control uses SST cards (no badge printing), with access rules by jobsite hours, expired cards, certifications and orientations, a pre-shift sent at check-in, an incident waiver at check-out, an SST Daily Log (LL196) and 12-24 hour battery backup. SafetyScore compares safety performance across workers, crews, companies and projects and offers views for insurance brokers and carriers; its page mentions AI-powered insights without describing them. The Procore integration files finished safety documents in Procore Documents, fills Daily Log manpower per subcontractor nightly and uploads daily-log photos; a Dashly integration is also listed. The homepage does not describe AI features. Homepage counters, customer logos and quotes are vendor content and are not used. | Safety and site-operations platform for owners and general contractors that ties verified worker identity and site access to daily safety routines, turning worker and site safety data into closed-loop safety workflows tied to each worker and site. Workforce features: SMS or QR self-onboarding, site badging, 3D facial recognition access control, digital turnstiles, real-time headcount and credential checks. Safety features: mandatory pre-task plans with supervisor sign-off, permits that cannot be bypassed, a JHA library, multilingual toolbox talks with 200+ topics, observations, and forms aimed at OSHA recordkeeping and NYC DOB requirements. The homepage and Risk Prevention module describe AI-powered risk scoring, predictive dashboards, AI-triggered alerts, EMR optimization and audit-ready reporting. The integrations page shows Procore and Autodesk tabs and the platform page mentions an open API with two-way Procore and Autodesk sync; the Procore tab details attendance synced to the Daily Log every 15 minutes, PTP, JHA and toolbox talk PDFs attached to the Daily Log, orientations and credentials, inspections to Procore Documents and contractor sync (Autodesk details did not render in our reads). Bilton states SOC 2 Type II, TLS 1.3 and AES-256 encryption (vendor statements). Outcome and savings figures and customer quotes are vendor content and are not used. |
| Who it's for | Contractor safety managers and site safety staff. | Construction owners and enterprise general contractors' safety and risk teams. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Not publicly listed. The pricing page describes "tailored plans" and a pricing configurator for your company or project, with a "Get Your Custom Quote!" call to action and no figures. Confirm current pricing with the vendor. | Custom quote; no public prices. The pricing page lists three modules (Workforce Management, Safety & Compliance Management, Risk Prevention at Scale), each Custom with Contact for custom quote, customized to project volume and operational complexity. The security page says SAML SSO is supported on Enterprise plans. Confirm pricing with the vendor. |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
|
Facts last checked: Nov 2, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Daily safety paperwork (vendor pages): SafetyClerk lists jobsite orientations, toolbox talks, pre-shift (pre-task) checks, daily logs, incident reporting and observations, plus certification tracking with alerts for expiring documents. BiltOn lists pre-task plans with supervisor approval and escalation, toolbox talks with digital sign-off, permit management (hot work, confined space, utility), safety observations, a JHA/JSA library and compliance dashboards.
- Site access (vendor statements): SafetyClerk's turnstiles use SST-based access without badge printing, check certifications, orientations and insurance status, send the pre-shift at check-in and an incident waiver at check-out, and keep an SST daily log (Local Law 196). BiltOn lists digital worker onboarding, site badging, real-time headcount, credential verification, digital turnstiles and 3D facial recognition access control.
- NYC focus: both describe NYC DOB and SST requirements. SafetyClerk's FAQ addresses non-NYC projects; BiltOn's pages describe a hazard library tailored to NYC construction alongside OSHA recordkeeping.
- Procore (vendor statements): SafetyClerk files finished safety documents in Procore Documents, fills each subcontractor's Daily Log manpower nightly or on submission, and uploads daily-log photos. BiltOn syncs attendance to the Procore Daily Log every 15 minutes, attaches PTP, JHA and toolbox talk forms as PDFs, syncs orientations and credentials and inspection records, and lists an Autodesk integration tab.
- Risk and AI (vendor descriptions): BiltOn's Risk Prevention module lists predictive risk scoring, behavioral analytics, automated intervention alerts, EMR optimization and carrier negotiation support; we tag it AI features added to an established product. SafetyClerk's SafetyScore compares safety performance across workers, crews, companies and projects, with views for subcontractors and insurance brokers and carriers, and mentions AI-powered insights without describing them, so it stays tagged Not AI-first.
- Security (vendor statements): BiltOn states SOC 2 Type II, TLS 1.3 and AES-256 encryption, and SAML SSO on Enterprise plans. The SafetyClerk pages we read do not state a security certification.
- Pricing (checked Oct 31, 2026): neither publishes figures. SafetyClerk offers tailored plans through a pricing configurator with Get Your Custom Quote. BiltOn lists each of its three modules as Custom, customized to project volume and operational complexity.
- Not used here: SafetyClerk's worker, review, sanctions and hours counters and paperwork-reduction percentage, BiltOn's completion, savings, recovery and admin-hours figures and case study, and customer quotes and logos on both sites (vendor content). Facts for both tools come from vendor websites (desk research).
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
SafetyClerk
No reviews yet. Used SafetyClerk? Yours would be the first.
BiltOn
No reviews yet. Used BiltOn? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- How each handles workers without an SST card or on non-NYC jobs
- Whether your turnstile hardware works with either system
- What each costs for your sites and the modules you need
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: HammerTech vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Cupix vs Doxel
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Kwant.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend
- Compare: EarthCam vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: innDex vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Sitemate
- Compare: Matterport vs Cupix
- Compare: mJob vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs Oculo
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Intenseye
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Raken
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Track3D
- Compare: Cintoo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Jobber vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Projul vs Knowify
- Compare: Constructable vs Procore AI
- Compare: HammerTech vs viAct
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Reconstruct
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Rhumbix
- Compare: busybusy vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Workyard vs Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime)
- Compare: BiltOn vs HammerTech
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs SkillSignal
- Compare: EarthCam vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Raken vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Doxel
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs Evercam
- Compare: Opusense vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Intenseye vs WakeCap
- Compare: Voxel vs HammerTech
- Compare: PlanRadar vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Riskcast vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Hover vs CompanyCam
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Projul
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Crewscope vs FYLD
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Visibuild
- Compare: Station 1 vs Sitemate
- Compare: Buildots vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: Intenseye vs HammerTech
- Compare: Matterport vs Reconstruct
- Compare: busybusy vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: BiltOn vs Eyrus
- Compare: MobiClocks vs Workyard
- Compare: Oculo vs Evercam
- Compare: SkillSignal vs innDex
- Compare: RDrive vs ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Track3D vs Cupix
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Track3D
- Compare: viAct vs Oracle Advisor for Safety
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Riskcast vs Workyard
- Compare: FieldPulse vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldPulse
- Compare: Jobber vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Cupix vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs innDex
- Compare: GoFormz vs Opusense
- Compare: ClockShark vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Novara Flex
- Compare: Alloovium vs Nyfty.ai
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs busybusy
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs innDex
- Compare: Riskcast vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: FieldPulse vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Jobber vs Projul
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Visibuild vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Visibuild
- Compare: Sitemate vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Station 1 vs FYLD
- Compare: Buildots vs Oculo
- Compare: Doxel vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Voxel
- Compare: HammerTech vs SkillSignal
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Crewscope vs Raken
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs SmartBarrel
- Compare: Arcoro Time vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Opusense vs FYLD
- Compare: Alloovium vs Sitemate
- Compare: Cintoo vs Cupix
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs Eyrus
- Compare: Roofr vs Jobber
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Workyard
- Compare: BiltOn vs SkillSignal