ClockShark vs Rhumbix
Two field timekeeping tools for contractors with different scope and buying models. Partly like-for-like (our reading): ClockShark is GPS time tracking, crew scheduling and job costing with published monthly prices and one AI agent (JobReady shift briefs), while Rhumbix is a field-first workforce platform for trade contractors, self-perform divisions and GCs that adds cost-coded production, T&M tickets and daily reports, sold by quote, and Autodesk has announced an agreement to acquire it. Desk research from vendor sites read Nov 2, 2026; no winner.
In short: ClockShark (GPS time tracking & crew scheduling (with Lightning AI); vendor publishes prices) vs Rhumbix (Field timekeeping, production & daily reports; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Nov 2, 2026. No winner declared; desk research from vendor sites.
Side by side
| Sheet row | ClockShark | Rhumbix |
|---|---|---|
| Category | GPS time tracking & crew scheduling (with Lightning AI) | Field timekeeping, production & daily reports |
| AI role (our label) | AI features added to established product | Not AI-first |
| What it does | Time-tracking, scheduling and job-management app for construction and field service, with GPS clock-in, job costing and payroll integrations. Features listed: mobile and web clock in/out, GPS and geofencing, who's-working-now view, drag-and-drop scheduling and draft schedules, time off, job costing, job management, conversations, shift wrap-up and compliance forms, reports, built-in Spanish language support, and payroll/accounting integrations (QuickBooks, Sage 100 Contractor, Xero, ADP and Paychex named). ClockShark Lightning, which its Lightning page describes as AI inside the existing app, has one AI agent, JobReady, which composes a shift brief from the day's schedule, jobs, site notes, checklists and attachments when a crew member opens the app on a scheduled day, plus two standard (non-AI) features: Task Checklists (up to 20 timestamped items that appear at clock-in) and Mileage Tracking (miles entered at clock-out, CSV export; Pro). The vendor says JobReady only produces a brief and never changes a schedule, job or record on its own, that on-clock GPS collection is unchanged, and that customer data is not used to train AI models. The Company menu links an AI Pledge from Simpro Group (Simpro Software, ClockShark, AroFlo and BigChange) with principles on privacy, transparency, fairness, accountability and inclusivity, including not sharing customer data with third parties to train AI models without express permission (vendor statement). Company counts, accuracy claims and testimonials are vendor content and are not used. | Field-first workforce management platform for trade contractors, self-perform divisions and GCs, covering timecards, production, T&M and dailies. It lists payroll-ready timecards (time and attendance), cost-coded production tracking against budget, change order tracking, time & materials (out-of-scope work) tracking from submission to approval with guest-mode external approvals of T&M tickets by email or text, daily field reports, health and safety reporting, custom forms, digital signatures, offline mode, Field Analytix and a no-code Data Explorer, with configurable workflows. The packages page (now at rhumbix.com/pricing) lists Essential Timekeeping, Essential Time & Materials, Plus (adds daily construction reporting and labor compliance reporting) and Advanced (enterprise workflows, controls and support); its plan table shows a Compliance Reporting Bundle (daily construction reports, toolbox talks, job hazard analysis and pre-task planning), active customer forms capped by plan (up to 3 or up to 10), items such as Data Explorer, API access and single sign-on on higher tiers or as add-ons, and a Time & Materials Dashboard marked Coming Soon. The page states SOC 2 Type 2 with encryption in transit and at rest, and says a dedicated field operations manager runs implementation. The vendor says many field forms can be trained and deployed in as little as 2 weeks (vendor claim). The site does not describe AI features. Autodesk said on March 31, 2026 that it had signed a definitive agreement to acquire Rhumbix, and the homepage shows an Autodesk acquisition banner. Project counts, case-study hours and savings figures and the ROI calculator are vendor material and are not used. |
| Who it's for | Small and mid-size construction and field service businesses that need crew time, GPS and scheduling feeding payroll and job costing. | Trade contractors, self-perform divisions of GCs, project owners and public-sector teams; foremen through payroll and accounting. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Vendor-listed USD prices (rendered pricing page): Standard $42/month plus $9.50 per user per month; Pro $63/month plus $11.50 per user per month (Pro adds PTO, multi-department controls, advanced job costing, shift wrap-up forms and mileage tracking). The page states a three-year contract term applies to all pricing plans; 14-day trial with Pro features; pro-rated billing for active users. JobReady and Task Checklists are on both plans, Mileage Tracking on Pro. Confirm current terms with the vendor. | Not publicly listed. The packages page (rhumbix.com/pricing) shows Essential Timekeeping, Essential Time & Materials, Plus and Advanced, each Contact Us, with no prices; its FAQ says each person with a login is a user license, major credit cards are accepted and pricing is by contacting sales. |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Nov 2, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Who it is built for (vendor pages): ClockShark names construction and field service businesses. Rhumbix names trade contractors, self-perform divisions and general contractors.
- Timekeeping: ClockShark lists mobile and web clock in/out, GPS and geofencing, a who's-working-now view, time off (PTO on Pro) and built-in Spanish language support. Rhumbix lists payroll-ready timecards (time and attendance), offline mode and digital signatures.
- Beyond the timecard: ClockShark lists drag-and-drop scheduling with draft schedules, job costing, job management, conversations, shift wrap-up and compliance forms, Task Checklists (up to 20 timestamped items at clock-in) and Mileage Tracking on Pro. Rhumbix lists cost-coded production tracking against budget, change order tracking, T&M tickets with guest-mode external approvals by email or text, daily field reports, health and safety reporting, custom forms, Field Analytix and a no-code Data Explorer.
- AI (vendor statements): ClockShark Lightning's one AI agent, JobReady, composes a shift brief from the day's schedule, jobs, site notes, checklists and attachments; the vendor says it never changes a schedule, job or record on its own and that customer data is not used to train AI models. The Rhumbix site does not describe AI features.
- Connections: ClockShark names QuickBooks, Sage 100 Contractor, Xero, ADP and Paychex payroll and accounting integrations. Rhumbix's plan table lists API access and single sign-on on higher tiers or as add-ons, and the page states SOC 2 Type 2 with encryption in transit and at rest.
- Ownership: Autodesk said on March 31, 2026 that it had signed a definitive agreement to acquire Rhumbix, and the Rhumbix homepage shows an Autodesk acquisition banner. ClockShark's Company menu links an AI Pledge from Simpro Group, which lists ClockShark among its brands. Ask Rhumbix how packages and integrations may change after the deal.
- Pricing (read Nov 2, 2026): ClockShark lists Standard at $42/month plus $9.50 per user per month and Pro at $63/month plus $11.50 per user per month, says a three-year contract term applies to all plans, and offers a 14-day trial with Pro features. Rhumbix lists Essential Timekeeping, Essential Time & Materials, Plus and Advanced packages, each Contact Us with no prices; its FAQ says each person with a login is a user license.
- AI tags: ClockShark stays AI features added to established product. Rhumbix stays Not AI-first.
- Not used here: company counts, accuracy, hours-saved and savings figures, ROI calculators and customer quotes (vendor material). Facts for both tools come from vendor websites (desk research).
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
ClockShark
No reviews yet. Used ClockShark? Yours would be the first.
Rhumbix
No reviews yet. Used Rhumbix? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- What Rhumbix costs for your crew size and package
- Whether ClockShark's three-year term can be shortened for your company
- How Rhumbix packages change once the Autodesk acquisition is complete
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Cupix vs Doxel
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Clearstory vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: mJob vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend
- Compare: EarthCam vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: innDex vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Sitemate
- Compare: Matterport vs Cupix
- Compare: mJob vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs Oculo
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Intenseye
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Raken
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Track3D
- Compare: Cintoo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Jobber vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Projul vs Knowify
- Compare: Constructable vs Procore AI
- Compare: HammerTech vs viAct
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Reconstruct
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Rhumbix
- Compare: busybusy vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Workyard vs Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime)
- Compare: BiltOn vs HammerTech
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs SkillSignal
- Compare: EarthCam vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Raken vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Doxel
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs Evercam
- Compare: Opusense vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Intenseye vs WakeCap
- Compare: Voxel vs HammerTech
- Compare: PlanRadar vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Riskcast vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Hover vs CompanyCam
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Projul
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Crewscope vs FYLD
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Visibuild
- Compare: Station 1 vs Sitemate
- Compare: Buildots vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: Intenseye vs HammerTech
- Compare: Matterport vs Reconstruct
- Compare: busybusy vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: MobiClocks vs Workyard
- Compare: Oculo vs Evercam
- Compare: SkillSignal vs innDex
- Compare: RDrive vs ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Track3D vs Cupix
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Track3D
- Compare: viAct vs Oracle Advisor for Safety
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Riskcast vs Workyard
- Compare: FieldPulse vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldPulse
- Compare: Jobber vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Cupix vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs innDex
- Compare: GoFormz vs Opusense
- Compare: ClockShark vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Novara Flex
- Compare: mJob vs ClockShark
- Compare: Alloovium vs Nyfty.ai
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs busybusy
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs innDex
- Compare: Riskcast vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: FieldPulse vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Jobber vs Projul
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Visibuild vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Visibuild
- Compare: Sitemate vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Station 1 vs FYLD
- Compare: Buildots vs Oculo
- Compare: Doxel vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Voxel
- Compare: HammerTech vs SkillSignal
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs BiltOn
- Compare: Crewscope vs Raken
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Dalux Field
- Compare: ClockShark vs SmartBarrel
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs SmartBarrel
- Compare: Arcoro Time vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Opusense vs FYLD
- Compare: Alloovium vs Sitemate
- Compare: Cintoo vs Cupix
- Compare: Roofr vs Jobber
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Workyard
- Compare: BiltOn vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Propeller vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Raken vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Raken vs Workyard
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Raken
- Compare: Oculo vs Doxel
- Compare: Novara Flex vs Sitemate