GoFormz vs Raken
Two field apps that turn paper on the jobsite into digital records, built around different starting points. Partly like-for-like (our reading): GoFormz is a form and workflow builder that mirrors the paper forms crews already use and routes the data into ERP, CRM, PM, storage and BI tools, while Raken is a construction field app with daily reports, time cards, production, safety, change orders and RFIs built in. GoFormz publishes a flat Starter plan for up to 10 users; Raken publishes per-user prices with a 3-user minimum. Desk research from vendor sites read Nov 3, 2026; no winner.
In short: GoFormz (Field data capture & workflows; vendor publishes prices) vs Raken (Daily reporting & field management; vendor publishes prices). Facts last checked GoFormz Nov 3, 2026; Raken Nov 2, 2026. No winner declared; desk research from vendor sites.
Side by side
| Sheet row | GoFormz | Raken |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Field data capture & workflows | Daily reporting & field management |
| AI role (our label) | AI features added to established product | AI features added to established product |
| What it does | "Field execution system of record" for frontline crews to run field workflows and capture data; the vendor says it deploys in 2-4 weeks. Forms mirror the paper forms crews already use, with conditional logic, required fields, calculations, photo, GPS, sketch and e-signature fields, offline use with auto-sync on reconnect, multi-step approval routing and audit trails, and validated data flows into ERP, CRM, PM, storage and BI tools. Construction workflows on the homepage include safety and JSA approvals, inspections with conditional findings, severity routing and defect tracking, T&M billing with change orders and customer sign-offs, and daily progress roll-ups. Its AI page and form builder say an AI-powered builder creates a digital form from an uploaded PDF or image and maps each field's type, size and name, and mention AI-enabled data capture tools, so we tag it AI features added. Connectors named include Microsoft Power Automate, SharePoint, SQL Server, Procore, Acumatica, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Salesforce, Snowflake, Box, Dropbox, Egnyte, Google Workspace, OneDrive and Autodesk, plus an open API. Vendor states SOC 2 Type II, GDPR with EU data residency and HIPAA-ready workflows on all plans (vendor statements). Customer counts are vendor content and are not used. | Field-first web and mobile app for daily progress reports, time and production tracking, materials and equipment, safety, RFIs, submittals, change orders, forms and documents. Daily reports collect notes, photos, videos and voice-to-text entries that sync in real time into a shareable, branded PDF report with the day's weather; the Daily Reports page also lists collaborator reports that give subcontractors free access to file their own dailies, and reports segmented by supervisor, shift or location. The Time Tracking page lists time cards, a mobile time clock and kiosk mode, geofencing and GPS, custom payroll policies, unlimited cost codes and AI photo ID for flagging attempted time fraud. The app also covers resource scheduling, certifications and a labor map, material and equipment tracking, safety and quality checklists, observations, toolbox talks, incidents with OSHA submit, RFIs, digital forms and document storage. The navigation marks Change Orders, Resource Scheduling and API & MCP as new: the Change Orders page describes change orders with cost items linked to RFIs and submittals, a no-login guest mode where respondents approve, partially approve or reject, and a ball-in-court log; the API & MCP page describes a client-facing API and Raken MCP for connecting field data to AI agents such as Claude and ChatGPT. Heavy civil is listed under Who We Serve. Tagged AI features added to an established product on the strength of AI photo ID and the MCP connection; the homepage itself does not lead with AI, and the Daily Reports page no longer lists AI report summaries. App-store ratings and customer quotes are not used. |
| Who it's for | Construction and energy field teams. | Contractors' field crews, superintendents, and safety managers. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Vendor-listed pricing (pricing page): Starter $499/month billed monthly or $4,999/year billed annually (saving $989), up to 10 users and up to 30 templates, with unlimited internal submissions, workflows, listed integrations and onboarding; Enterprise is a custom quote scoped to team size, workflows, integrations and support. Add-ons include public forms, API calls, storage and professional services. The page disagrees with itself on Starter limits: the plan card lists 600 API calls per day, pay-per-use public forms and integrations including monday.com, while the FAQ says 100 API calls per day, 25 public forms per month and Autodesk; ask GoFormz which limits apply. Confirm current terms with the vendor. | Per-user subscription in USD, billed annually, minimum 3 users. Basic $23/user/month ($69 a month at the 3-user minimum); Performance $59/user/month ($177 a month at 3 users; adds time tracking, production tracking, safety & quality, RFIs/forms/document storage, insights dashboards and dedicated onboarding). The rendered pricing page shows 5% off at 5 users and 10% off at 10 users; bulk discounts for larger teams through sales. |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: GoFormz Nov 3, 2026; Raken Nov 2, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Who it is built for (vendor pages): GoFormz names construction and energy field teams and frontline crews. Raken names contractors' field crews, superintendents and safety managers, and lists heavy civil under Who We Serve.
- How work gets captured: GoFormz forms copy existing paper layouts and add conditional logic, required fields, calculations, photo, GPS, sketch and e-signature fields, multi-step approval routing and audit trails; its AI form builder creates a digital form from an uploaded PDF or image. Raken's daily reports collect notes, photos, videos and voice-to-text entries into a branded PDF with the day's weather, with free collaborator reports for subcontractors.
- Construction workflows named: GoFormz's homepage lists safety and JSA approvals, inspections with conditional findings and defect tracking, T&M billing with change orders and customer sign-offs, and daily progress roll-ups. Raken lists time tracking with geofencing and kiosk mode, production, materials and equipment, safety and quality checklists, toolbox talks, incidents, RFIs, submittals and change orders with a no-login guest approval mode.
- Offline and field use: GoFormz says forms work offline and sync on reconnect. Raken describes web and mobile apps that sync daily report entries in real time.
- Connections: GoFormz names Microsoft Power Automate, SharePoint, SQL Server, Procore, Acumatica, Dynamics 365, Salesforce, Snowflake, Box, Dropbox, Egnyte, Google Workspace, OneDrive and Autodesk, plus an open API. Raken lists a client-facing API and Raken MCP for connecting field data to AI agents such as Claude and ChatGPT.
- Pricing (read Nov 2-3, 2026): GoFormz Starter is $499/month billed monthly or $4,999/year billed annually for up to 10 users and 30 templates; Enterprise is a custom quote, and the pricing page disagrees with itself on Starter API-call and public-form limits. Raken is billed annually with a 3-user minimum: Basic $23/user/month and Performance $59/user/month, with listed volume discounts at 5 and 10 users.
- AI tags: both are tagged AI features added to an established product: GoFormz for its AI form builder and AI-enabled data capture, Raken for AI photo ID on time cards and its MCP connection.
- Not used here: customer counts, app-store ratings, customer quotes and time-saved figures (vendor material). Facts for both tools come from vendor websites (desk research).
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
GoFormz
No reviews yet. Used GoFormz? Yours would be the first.
Raken
No reviews yet. Used Raken? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- Which GoFormz Starter API-call and public-form limits apply to your account
- Whether either tool connects to the other, or both only to your PM or ERP system
- How each handles your existing daily report, JSA and T&M paper forms without rework
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Cupix vs Doxel
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend
- Compare: EarthCam vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: innDex vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Sitemate
- Compare: Matterport vs Cupix
- Compare: mJob vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs Oculo
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Intenseye
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Raken
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Track3D
- Compare: Cintoo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Jobber vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Projul vs Knowify
- Compare: Constructable vs Procore AI
- Compare: HammerTech vs viAct
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Reconstruct
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Rhumbix
- Compare: busybusy vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Workyard vs Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime)
- Compare: BiltOn vs HammerTech
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs SkillSignal
- Compare: EarthCam vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Raken vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Doxel
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs Evercam
- Compare: Opusense vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Intenseye vs WakeCap
- Compare: Voxel vs HammerTech
- Compare: PlanRadar vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Riskcast vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Hover vs CompanyCam
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Projul
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Crewscope vs FYLD
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Visibuild
- Compare: Station 1 vs Sitemate
- Compare: Buildots vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: Intenseye vs HammerTech
- Compare: Matterport vs Reconstruct
- Compare: busybusy vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: MobiClocks vs Workyard
- Compare: Oculo vs Evercam
- Compare: SkillSignal vs innDex
- Compare: RDrive vs ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Track3D vs Cupix
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Track3D
- Compare: viAct vs Oracle Advisor for Safety
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Riskcast vs Workyard
- Compare: FieldPulse vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldPulse
- Compare: Jobber vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Cupix vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs innDex
- Compare: GoFormz vs Opusense
- Compare: ClockShark vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Novara Flex
- Compare: Alloovium vs Nyfty.ai
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs busybusy
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs innDex
- Compare: Riskcast vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: FieldPulse vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Jobber vs Projul
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Visibuild vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Visibuild
- Compare: Sitemate vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Station 1 vs FYLD
- Compare: Buildots vs Oculo
- Compare: Doxel vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Voxel
- Compare: HammerTech vs SkillSignal
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs BiltOn
- Compare: Crewscope vs Raken
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs SmartBarrel
- Compare: Arcoro Time vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Opusense vs FYLD
- Compare: Alloovium vs Sitemate
- Compare: Cintoo vs Cupix
- Compare: Roofr vs Jobber
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Workyard
- Compare: BiltOn vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Propeller vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Raken vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Raken vs Workyard
- Compare: Clearstory vs Raken
- Compare: ClockShark vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Doxel
- Compare: Novara Flex vs Sitemate