Raken vs Contractor Foreman
Two contractor apps that both keep daily logs, built around different centers. Raken is a field-first daily reporting and field management app, with time tracking, safety, RFIs, submittals and newly listed change orders, priced per user. Contractor Foreman is an all-in-one contractor PM suite whose daily logs sit next to scheduling, client portal, service tickets and progress invoicing, priced by plan with user caps. Partly like-for-like: both cover daily logs and crew records, but Raken goes deeper on field reporting and Contractor Foreman wider on office PM and billing. Desk research from vendor sites read Nov 2, 2026; no winner.
In short: Raken (Daily reporting & field management; vendor publishes prices) vs Contractor Foreman (All-in-one contractor PM with daily logs; vendor publishes prices). Facts last checked Nov 2, 2026. No winner declared; desk research from vendor sites.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Raken | Contractor Foreman |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Daily reporting & field management | All-in-one contractor PM with daily logs |
| AI role (our label) | AI features added to established product | AI features added to established product |
| What it does | Field-first web and mobile app for daily progress reports, time and production tracking, materials and equipment, safety, RFIs, submittals, change orders, forms and documents. Daily reports collect notes, photos, videos and voice-to-text entries that sync in real time into a shareable, branded PDF report with the day's weather; the Daily Reports page also lists collaborator reports that give subcontractors free access to file their own dailies, and reports segmented by supervisor, shift or location. The Time Tracking page lists time cards, a mobile time clock and kiosk mode, geofencing and GPS, custom payroll policies, unlimited cost codes and AI photo ID for flagging attempted time fraud. The app also covers resource scheduling, certifications and a labor map, material and equipment tracking, safety and quality checklists, observations, toolbox talks, incidents with OSHA submit, RFIs, digital forms and document storage. The navigation marks Change Orders, Resource Scheduling and API & MCP as new: the Change Orders page describes change orders with cost items linked to RFIs and submittals, a no-login guest mode where respondents approve, partially approve or reject, and a ball-in-court log; the API & MCP page describes a client-facing API and Raken MCP for connecting field data to AI agents such as Claude and ChatGPT. Heavy civil is listed under Who We Serve. Tagged AI features added to an established product on the strength of AI photo ID and the MCP connection; the homepage itself does not lead with AI, and the Daily Reports page no longer lists AI report summaries. App-store ratings and customer quotes are not used. | All-in-one construction management software for contractors, with daily logs that track crews, weather, deliveries and equipment. The Daily Logs feature records subs, visitors and crews on site, automatic daily weather with notes, material deliveries and usage and equipment activity, and updates related purchase orders when materials are marked delivered; photos and files added to a log are auto-filed to the project folder; custom fields and multiple templates control what is shared with clients or owners; logs stay with the project as a permanent history. Other modules include client portal, inspections, permits, punch lists, scheduling (Gantt, critical path, baselines), service tickets, work orders, to-dos, time cards that flow to payroll, and AIA-style G702/G703 progress invoicing with retainage tracking. The plans page lists a Takeoffs module where you upload plans, measure and "have a conversation with the built-in AI", with quantities connected to the estimate, and an AI Estimator marked Preview on the Pro and Unlimited plans, so it is tagged AI features added; however, the Takeoffs feature page FAQ says Takeoffs are currently in development, with sign-up for launch updates, so confirm availability with the vendor. Daily logs are described without AI. Integrations listed are QuickBooks Online, Zapier and Xero, which the FAQ says is coming Q4 2026 and the menu says is coming December 2026. The page's most-affordable claim and savings amounts are vendor wording and are not used. |
| Who it's for | Contractors' field crews, superintendents, and safety managers. | Small and mid-size general and specialty contractors who want PM, daily logs and client sharing in one subscription. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Per-user subscription in USD, billed annually, minimum 3 users. Basic $23/user/month ($69 a month at the 3-user minimum); Performance $59/user/month ($177 a month at 3 users; adds time tracking, production tracking, safety & quality, RFIs/forms/document storage, insights dashboards and dedicated onboarding). The rendered pricing page shows 5% off at 5 users and 10% off at 10 users; bulk discounts for larger teams through sales. | Published on the pricing page: unlimited projects and features with user caps by plan. Annual (shown per month): Basic $49 (1 user), Standard $105 (up to 3), Plus $166 (up to 8), Pro $221 (up to 15), Unlimited $332 (unlimited users). Monthly: Standard $139, Plus $199, Pro $279, Unlimited $399 (Basic annual only). 30-day free trial; the vendor lists a 100-day money-back guarantee on annual plans and 30-day on monthly. The Daily Logs page FAQ says pricing includes unlimited users with no per-user charges, which does not match the user caps on the plans page; the plans page figures are used. Online invoice payments run through Stripe (Visa, Mastercard and Discover 2.9% + $0.30, American Express 3.9% + $0.30, ACH 1% + $0.30 capped at $10 per transaction; Canada 2.9% + $0.30 with no ACH). |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Nov 2, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- What each sells (vendor wording): Raken describes a field-first web and mobile app for daily progress reports, time and production tracking, materials and equipment, safety, RFIs, submittals, change orders, forms and documents. Contractor Foreman describes all-in-one construction management software for contractors, with daily logs that track crews, weather, deliveries and equipment.
- Daily logs: Raken's Daily Reports page lists notes, photos, videos and voice-to-text entries that sync into a shareable, branded PDF with the day's weather, plus collaborator reports that give subcontractors free access to file their own dailies and reports segmented by supervisor, shift or location. Contractor Foreman's Daily Logs page lists subs, visitors and crews on site, automatic daily weather with notes, material deliveries and usage that update related purchase orders, equipment activity, photos auto-filed to the project folder, and custom fields and templates that control what clients or owners see.
- Beyond the log: Raken lists time cards with geofencing and GPS, resource scheduling, safety and quality checklists, toolbox talks, incidents with OSHA submit, RFIs and change orders with a no-login guest approval mode. Contractor Foreman lists client portal, inspections, permits, punch lists, Gantt scheduling with critical path and baselines, service tickets, work orders, time cards that flow to payroll and AIA-style G702/G703 progress invoicing with retainage.
- AI (vendor statements): Raken lists AI photo ID to flag attempted time fraud at clock-in and Raken MCP for connecting field data to AI agents such as Claude and ChatGPT. Contractor Foreman's plans page lists a Takeoffs module with a built-in AI conversation and an AI Estimator marked Preview, but its Takeoffs page FAQ says Takeoffs are in development; it describes daily logs without AI.
- Pricing (read Nov 2, 2026): Raken lists Basic at $23 and Performance at $59 per user per month in USD billed annually with a 3-user minimum; time tracking is on Performance. Contractor Foreman lists annual plans shown per month from Basic $49 (1 user) to Unlimited $332 (unlimited users), with monthly billing from $139, and a 30-day free trial. Contractor Foreman's Daily Logs FAQ mentions unlimited users with no per-user charges, which does not match its plans page; the plans page figures are used.
- Integrations: Raken's API & MCP page describes a client-facing API and the MCP connection. Contractor Foreman lists QuickBooks Online and Zapier, with Xero listed as coming.
- AI tags: we tag both Raken and Contractor Foreman as AI features added to an established product.
- Not used here: customer quotes, ratings, savings claims and most-affordable claims (vendor material). Facts for both tools come from vendor websites (desk research).
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Raken
No reviews yet. Used Raken? Yours would be the first.
Contractor Foreman
No reviews yet. Used Contractor Foreman? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- Whether Contractor Foreman's AI takeoff and estimator are live when you buy
- Whether Raken's change orders and API & MCP are included on your plan
- Which tool's daily log matches what your owner or DOT requires
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Cupix vs Doxel
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend
- Compare: EarthCam vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: innDex vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Sitemate
- Compare: Matterport vs Cupix
- Compare: mJob vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs Oculo
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Intenseye
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Raken
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Track3D
- Compare: Cintoo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Jobber vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Projul vs Knowify
- Compare: Constructable vs Procore AI
- Compare: HammerTech vs viAct
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Reconstruct
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Rhumbix
- Compare: busybusy vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Workyard vs Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime)
- Compare: BiltOn vs HammerTech
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs SkillSignal
- Compare: EarthCam vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Raken vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Doxel
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs Evercam
- Compare: Opusense vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Intenseye vs WakeCap
- Compare: Voxel vs HammerTech
- Compare: PlanRadar vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Riskcast vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Hover vs CompanyCam
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Projul
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Crewscope vs FYLD
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Visibuild
- Compare: Station 1 vs Sitemate
- Compare: Buildots vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: Intenseye vs HammerTech
- Compare: Matterport vs Reconstruct
- Compare: busybusy vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: MobiClocks vs Workyard
- Compare: Oculo vs Evercam
- Compare: SkillSignal vs innDex
- Compare: RDrive vs ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Track3D vs Cupix
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Track3D
- Compare: viAct vs Oracle Advisor for Safety
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Riskcast vs Workyard
- Compare: FieldPulse vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldPulse
- Compare: Jobber vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Cupix vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs innDex
- Compare: GoFormz vs Opusense
- Compare: ClockShark vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Novara Flex
- Compare: Alloovium vs Nyfty.ai
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs busybusy
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs innDex
- Compare: Riskcast vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: FieldPulse vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Jobber vs Projul
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Visibuild vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Visibuild
- Compare: Sitemate vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Station 1 vs FYLD
- Compare: Buildots vs Oculo
- Compare: Doxel vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Voxel
- Compare: HammerTech vs SkillSignal
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs BiltOn
- Compare: Crewscope vs Raken
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs SmartBarrel
- Compare: Arcoro Time vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Opusense vs FYLD
- Compare: Alloovium vs Sitemate
- Compare: Cintoo vs Cupix
- Compare: Roofr vs Jobber
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Workyard
- Compare: BiltOn vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Propeller vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Raken vs Workyard
- Compare: Clearstory vs Raken
- Compare: ClockShark vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Raken
- Compare: Oculo vs Doxel
- Compare: Novara Flex vs Sitemate