viAct vs Sensera Systems
Two jobsite camera AI options for safety. viAct is AI-first, scenario-based vision AI on site cameras with real-time alerts, plus wearables, IoT sensors, edge devices, lidar and drones in one safety platform. Sensera Systems sells its own solar-powered, cellular jobsite cameras with AI review for OSHA Focus Four hazards, security and progress reports. Neither publishes prices. Desk research from vendor sites read Nov 4, 2026; no winner.
In short: viAct (Safety (vision AI); no public prices (quote / sales)) vs Sensera Systems (Jobsite cameras & AI; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Nov 4, 2026. No winner declared; desk research from vendor sites.
Side by side
| Sheet row | viAct | Sensera Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Safety (vision AI) | Jobsite cameras & AI |
| AI role (our label) | AI-first | AI features added to established product |
| What it does | Scenario-based vision AI on site cameras for 24/7 monitoring, with real-time alerts. Modules listed: PPE, work at height, danger zones, confined spaces, area, behavioural, vehicle and fleet, housekeeping, ergonomics and environmental monitoring, plus a smart dashboard for progress monitoring. The navigation also lists viGENT (described as agentic AI), viWEAR wearables (smart watch, smart helmet), hardware (lidar, drone, hoisting, machinery and robotic units) and site-system products including permit to work, a 4S Smart Site Safety System, a Digital Works Supervision System (DWSS) and a Project Control Center; construction is listed among industries. The homepage says viAct unifies CCTV AI vision, smart wearables, IoT sensors, edge devices, lidar and drones in one workplace safety platform, describes plug-and-play integration and privacy by design, and states it is SOC 2 Type II attested and GDPR compliant with no facial recognition by default (vendor statements). Based in Hong Kong. Accident, fatality and manpower-cost percentages and customer quotes are vendor material not used here. | Solar-powered wireless jobsite cameras with AI review for OSHA Focus Four safety concerns, security detection and daily security reports; founded in 2014 in Golden, CO. The SiteCloud software page lists a morning brief, daily safety report, real-time fall hazard alerts, daily security report, weekly AI progress reports summarizing each area and the whole site, site hygiene updated every two hours, gate monitoring (company, vehicle type, plate and materials), material analysis for laydown yards and AI SiteCloud Search. The cameras page lists fixed-position, SiteWatch Pro security and PTZ cameras (32X optical zoom); the FAQ says the cameras are solar-powered and cellular-connected, need no site power or internet, run in about 30 minutes, carry at least an IP66 rating and keep uploaded images for ten years (vendor statements). The homepage lists SOC 2 certification and NDAA compliance (vendor statements) and Procore and Autodesk Forma integrations. Customer counts and industry statistics are not used. |
| Who it's for | Construction contractors and site safety leaders (also other industrial sites). | Contractors and owners. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | No public prices. The vendor site has no pricing or plans link and /pricing and /plans return not found. Calls to action are Schedule Demo, Request A Demo and Talk To Sales. Confirm pricing with the vendor. | No public prices: the vendor site has no pricing or plans link, /pricing and /plans return a not-found page, and the call to action is Request a Quote. Confirm pricing with the vendor. |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Nov 4, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Partly like-for-like (our reading): both turn jobsite camera feeds into safety alerts and reports. viAct is software-led vision AI that runs on site cameras and adds wearables, sensors and site-system products; Sensera is hardware-led, with its own cameras plus SiteCloud software for safety, security and progress. AI tags differ: viAct is AI-first, Sensera is AI features added to an established product.
- Safety detection (vendor statements): viAct lists PPE, work at height, danger zones, confined spaces, area, behavioural, vehicle and fleet, housekeeping, ergonomics and environmental monitoring, with 24/7 monitoring and real-time alerts. Sensera's SiteCloud lists a daily safety report and real-time fall hazard alerts, with AI review for OSHA Focus Four concerns.
- Security and progress: Sensera lists a morning brief, daily security report, gate monitoring (company, vehicle type, plate and materials), site hygiene updated every two hours, laydown-yard material analysis, weekly AI progress reports and AI SiteCloud Search. viAct lists a smart dashboard for progress monitoring and a Project Control Center.
- Cameras and hardware: Sensera lists fixed-position, SiteWatch Pro security and PTZ cameras (32X optical zoom) and says they are solar-powered and cellular, need no site power or internet, run in about 30 minutes, are rated at least IP66 and keep uploaded images for ten years. viAct describes plug-and-play integration and lists viWEAR wearables (smart watch, smart helmet) and lidar, drone, hoisting, machinery and robotic hardware.
- Beyond cameras: viAct's navigation lists viGENT (described as agentic AI), permit to work, a 4S Smart Site Safety System and a Digital Works Supervision System (DWSS). Sensera names Procore and Autodesk Forma integrations; viAct's homepage names no software integrations.
- Security and compliance (vendor statements): viAct says it is SOC 2 Type II attested and GDPR compliant with no facial recognition by default, and describes privacy by design. Sensera lists SOC 2 certification and NDAA compliance. viAct is based in Hong Kong; Sensera was founded in 2014 in Golden, CO.
- Pricing (read Nov 4, 2026): neither publishes prices. viAct routes to Schedule Demo, Request A Demo and Talk To Sales; Sensera's call to action is Request a Quote. See each tool page for detail.
- Not used here: viAct's accident, fatality and manpower-cost percentages, analyst recognition and customer quotes, and Sensera's customer counts and industry statistics (vendor material). Facts for both tools come from vendor websites (desk research).
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
viAct
No reviews yet. Used viAct? Yours would be the first.
Sensera Systems
No reviews yet. Used Sensera Systems? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- How many false alerts each raises on a busy site with moving equipment
- Whether viAct scenarios can run on Sensera or other rented jobsite cameras
- What each costs per camera or per site, including hardware and connectivity
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Cupix vs Doxel
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend
- Compare: EarthCam vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: innDex vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Sitemate
- Compare: Matterport vs Cupix
- Compare: mJob vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs Oculo
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Intenseye
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Raken
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Track3D
- Compare: Cintoo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Jobber vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Projul vs Knowify
- Compare: Constructable vs Procore AI
- Compare: HammerTech vs viAct
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Reconstruct
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Rhumbix
- Compare: busybusy vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Workyard vs Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime)
- Compare: BiltOn vs HammerTech
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs SkillSignal
- Compare: EarthCam vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Raken vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Doxel
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs Evercam
- Compare: Opusense vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Intenseye vs WakeCap
- Compare: Voxel vs HammerTech
- Compare: PlanRadar vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Riskcast vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Hover vs CompanyCam
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Projul
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Crewscope vs FYLD
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Visibuild
- Compare: Station 1 vs Sitemate
- Compare: Buildots vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: Intenseye vs HammerTech
- Compare: Matterport vs Reconstruct
- Compare: busybusy vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: MobiClocks vs Workyard
- Compare: Oculo vs Evercam
- Compare: SkillSignal vs innDex
- Compare: RDrive vs ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Track3D vs Cupix
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Track3D
- Compare: viAct vs Oracle Advisor for Safety
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Riskcast vs Workyard
- Compare: FieldPulse vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldPulse
- Compare: Jobber vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Cupix vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs innDex
- Compare: GoFormz vs Opusense
- Compare: ClockShark vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Novara Flex
- Compare: Alloovium vs Nyfty.ai
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs busybusy
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs innDex
- Compare: Riskcast vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: FieldPulse vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Jobber vs Projul
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Visibuild vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Visibuild
- Compare: Sitemate vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Station 1 vs FYLD
- Compare: Buildots vs Oculo
- Compare: Doxel vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Voxel
- Compare: HammerTech vs SkillSignal
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs BiltOn
- Compare: Crewscope vs Raken
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs SmartBarrel
- Compare: Arcoro Time vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Opusense vs FYLD
- Compare: Alloovium vs Sitemate
- Compare: Cintoo vs Cupix
- Compare: Roofr vs Jobber
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Workyard
- Compare: BiltOn vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Propeller vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Raken vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Raken vs Workyard
- Compare: ClockShark vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Raken
- Compare: Oculo vs Doxel
- Compare: Novara Flex vs Sitemate
- Compare: HammerTech vs Novara Flex
- Compare: Knowify vs FieldPulse
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs Novara Flex
- Compare: TraceAir vs Skydio
- Compare: Roofr vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Jobber vs JobTread
- Compare: FYLD vs Alloovium
- Compare: Station 1 vs Opusense