Buildots vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
Two ways to measure construction progress against the model and schedule, packaged differently. Buildots is an AI-first construction intelligence platform that compares what is built on site to the plan (even with an incomplete model), flags deviations and at-risk activities, and adds trade management, payment-application support, portfolio reporting and a workforce product, Buildots Field. Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting is a service in Hexagon Multivista's Analyze line that compares 360° photos with a federated NWD model and a P6 or Excel schedule to mark elements built or unbuilt, with expert analysts checking every update. Partly like-for-like (our reading): both report model-and-schedule-based progress; Buildots sells a platform with ongoing on-site support, while Hexagon sells a progress reporting service within a wider capture and analysis offering. Desk research from vendor sites read Nov 5, 2026; no winner.
In short: Buildots (Progress tracking; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting (Progress reporting service; no public prices (quote / sales)). Facts last checked Nov 5, 2026. No winner declared; desk research from vendor sites.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Buildots | Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Progress tracking | Progress reporting service |
| AI role (our label) | AI-first | AI features added to established product |
| What it does | Construction intelligence platform that compares what's built on site to the plan (even if the model is incomplete) and flags deviations and at-risk activities that could put the delivery date at risk. It adds trade/contractor management, workforce visibility, site documentation, payment-application support and portfolio reporting by connecting BIM, schedule, site and workforce data; the vendor says a local team helps set up on site. Products: Buildots (AI construction intelligence), Buildots Field (workforce intelligence, safety and logistics) and the Capture Services add-on for fully managed site captures. The Buildots Field page says it is powered by Genda, which Buildots says it acquired in October 2025, and describes QR-code worker enrolment, Bluetooth beacons (location only while workers are on site) and one app for hoist calls, delivery booking, access control, permits, safety orientations and hazard reports; it says a fully integrated Buildots Field app is on track for general availability in Q4 2026 (vendor statements). Project types listed include commercial, multifamily, healthcare, industrial, education, data centers and airports. Delay-reduction and other outcome figures and customer quotes are vendor claims not used here. | Compares 360° site photos with the 3D model and schedule to report progress by trade, floor or system. This progress reporting service from Hexagon Multivista uses automated model-to-photo comparison of 360° photos against a federated 3D model (NWD) and a project schedule (P6 or Excel), marking model elements built or unbuilt and reporting progress by trade, floor, or system, with email alerts when a report is ready. Hexagon says its technology detects progress automatically and expert analysts QA every update. Its FAQ says building progress reporting requires an NWD model, a P6 or Excel schedule, and 360° photos from approved apps such as Multivista or Hexagon GoCapture; drone and SLR photos are not supported. The FAQ gives two setup answers (up to 6-8 weeks, and up to eight weeks) and two turnaround answers (typically 48-72 hours after images are posted, and usually within 48 hours), so confirm both with Hexagon. The same page also advertises "agnostic data inputs" (360° photos, LiDAR scans or third-party tools, self-captured or Multivista-captured), which is broader than its FAQ; Hexagon's GoCapture app lets project teams self-capture 360° photos, 360° walks or 2D photos mapped to floor plans and BIM in its Analyze Hub. Lists compatibility with Autodesk ACC, Procore, Primavera P6 and Microsoft Project, up to 10 years of data hosting, and industries including healthcare, data centers and education. It sits in Hexagon Multivista's Analyze services alongside deviation analysis (which Hexagon describes as an AI-driven model-to-scan comparison) and UAV-based earthwork progress reporting. Separately, Hexagon announced on Oct 6, 2022 that it would integrate AVVIR's AI-powered technology into its construction portfolio; we did not find a Hexagon page naming AVVIR as the engine of this service. |
| Who it's for | Executives, owners, project teams, and CM services (construction phase rather than precon). | General contractors and owners; Hexagon also names project executives, quality teams, and schedulers. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | No public prices. The vendor site has no pricing or plans link, and /pricing returns not found; the call to action is Get a demo. Confirm pricing with the vendor. | Not publicly listed. The service page has no pricing link, and multivistaservices.hexagon.com/pricing returns a not-found page. Calls to action: Book a demo and Contact us. A dollar figure on the page is a customer testimonial claim, not a price. Confirm current pricing with the vendor. |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
|
Facts last checked: Nov 5, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Who it is for: Buildots names executives, owners, project teams and CM services, with project types including commercial, multifamily, healthcare, industrial, education, data centers and airports. Hexagon names general contractors and owners and lists healthcare, data centers and education as industries.
- Inputs and capture: Hexagon's FAQ says building progress reporting needs a federated 3D model in NWD format, a schedule in P6 or Excel, and 360° photos from approved apps such as Multivista or Hexagon GoCapture; drone and SLR photos are not supported. The same page also advertises agnostic data inputs (360° photos, LiDAR scans or third-party tools, self-captured or Multivista-captured), so confirm which inputs apply to your project. Buildots says it connects BIM, schedule, site and workforce data, gives a view of the whole project even if the model is incomplete, and offers a Capture Services add-on for fully managed site captures by Buildots.
- What you get: Hexagon describes 360° photo progress, model-element built status, side-by-side views, Schedule vs. Progress views by trade or floor, 3D and trade-level progress charts, email alerts when a report is ready, and up to 10 years of data hosting. Buildots lists progress reporting, deviation detection, delay risk mitigation, trade management, site documentation and payment applications, plus Buildots Field for site attendance, hoist calls, delivery booking and safety reports, which it says can be combined with progress data.
- Who checks the output and how long it takes: Hexagon says expert analysts QA every update; its FAQ gives setup of up to 6-8 weeks (and elsewhere up to eight weeks) and reports typically 48-72 hours after images are posted (and elsewhere usually within 48 hours), so confirm both. Buildots says a local team near every project helps set up on site and stays with leaders for the whole build; it does not state a report turnaround on the pages we read.
- Integrations and AI labels: Hexagon lists compatibility with Autodesk ACC, Procore, Primavera P6 and Microsoft Project and is tagged AI features added to established product on this site. Buildots is tagged AI-first and describes AI-powered construction intelligence.
- Pricing (read Nov 5, 2026): neither publishes prices. Buildots has no pricing page (/pricing returns not found) and the call to action is Get a demo. Hexagon's service page has no pricing link, /pricing returns not found, and the calls to action are Book a demo and Contact us. See each tool page for detail.
- Not used here: delay-reduction and savings figures, testimonials and customer quotes (vendor material). Facts for both tools come from vendor websites (desk research).
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Buildots
No reviews yet. Used Buildots? Yours would be the first.
Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
No reviews yet. Used Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- Whether you want a progress platform with on-site vendor support and a workforce add-on, or a progress reporting service that slots into photo documentation you may already buy from Multivista
- Whether your model and schedule meet each vendor's input requirements (Hexagon names NWD and P6 or Excel), and how each handles an incomplete or changing model
- Who captures the site, how often, and what that costs, since both offer vendor-run capture options
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Cupix vs Doxel
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend
- Compare: EarthCam vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: innDex vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Sitemate
- Compare: Matterport vs Cupix
- Compare: mJob vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs Oculo
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Intenseye
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Raken
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Track3D
- Compare: Cintoo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Jobber vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Projul vs Knowify
- Compare: Constructable vs Procore AI
- Compare: HammerTech vs viAct
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Reconstruct
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Rhumbix
- Compare: busybusy vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Workyard vs Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime)
- Compare: BiltOn vs HammerTech
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs SkillSignal
- Compare: EarthCam vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Raken vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Doxel
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs Evercam
- Compare: Opusense vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Intenseye vs WakeCap
- Compare: Voxel vs HammerTech
- Compare: PlanRadar vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Riskcast vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Hover vs CompanyCam
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Projul
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Crewscope vs FYLD
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Visibuild
- Compare: Station 1 vs Sitemate
- Compare: Buildots vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: Intenseye vs HammerTech
- Compare: Matterport vs Reconstruct
- Compare: busybusy vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: MobiClocks vs Workyard
- Compare: Oculo vs Evercam
- Compare: SkillSignal vs innDex
- Compare: RDrive vs ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Track3D vs Cupix
- Compare: Buildots vs nPlan
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Track3D
- Compare: viAct vs Oracle Advisor for Safety
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Riskcast vs Workyard
- Compare: FieldPulse vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldPulse
- Compare: Jobber vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Cupix vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs innDex
- Compare: GoFormz vs Opusense
- Compare: ClockShark vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Novara Flex
- Compare: Alloovium vs Nyfty.ai
- Compare: SmartPM vs Buildots
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs busybusy
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs innDex
- Compare: Riskcast vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: FieldPulse vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Jobber vs Projul
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Visibuild vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Visibuild
- Compare: Sitemate vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Station 1 vs FYLD
- Compare: Buildots vs Oculo
- Compare: Doxel vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Voxel
- Compare: HammerTech vs SkillSignal
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs BiltOn
- Compare: Crewscope vs Raken
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs SmartBarrel
- Compare: Arcoro Time vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Opusense vs FYLD
- Compare: Alloovium vs Sitemate
- Compare: Cintoo vs Cupix
- Compare: Roofr vs Jobber
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Workyard
- Compare: BiltOn vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Propeller vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Raken vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Raken vs Workyard
- Compare: ClockShark vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Raken
- Compare: Oculo vs Doxel
- Compare: Novara Flex vs Sitemate
- Compare: HammerTech vs Novara Flex
- Compare: Knowify vs FieldPulse
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs Novara Flex
- Compare: TraceAir vs Skydio
- Compare: Roofr vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Jobber vs JobTread
- Compare: FYLD vs Alloovium
- Compare: Station 1 vs Opusense
- Compare: viAct vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Sitemate
- Compare: Voxel vs Samsara
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Progress vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Roofr vs Projul
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Knowify
- Compare: Alloovium vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Cupix vs Evercam
- Compare: eSUB vs Raken
- Compare: TrueLook vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Visibuild vs Sitemate
- Compare: Cintoo vs Track3D
- Compare: Constructable vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Crewscope vs Alloovium