Cintoo vs Track3D
Two cloud platforms that take reality capture data and turn it into something teams can act on, with different emphasis. Cintoo is a scanner-agnostic reality capture data platform: upload large laser-scan datasets, convert point clouds to lightweight meshes with patented TurboMesh, and work in BIM, Twin or 360 editions with AI-powered classification, open SDKs/APIs and a VR experience. Track3D is an AI reality intelligence platform that unifies capture data and quantifies installed work across job activities, with VisualTrack, ProgressTrack and DeviationTrack (Coming Soon) and published per-square-foot progress pricing. Partly like-for-like (our reading): both sit on reality capture; Cintoo centers scan management, mesh streaming and digital-twin workflows, while Track3D centers percent-complete and production analytics. Desk research from vendor sites read Nov 5, 2026; no winner.
In short: Cintoo (Reality capture data platform; no public prices (quote / sales)) vs Track3D (Progress tracking; vendor publishes prices). Facts last checked Nov 5, 2026. No winner declared; desk research from vendor sites.
Side by side
| Sheet row | Cintoo | Track3D |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reality capture data platform | Progress tracking |
| AI role (our label) | AI features added to established product | AI-first |
| What it does | Cloud, scanner-agnostic platform to upload, process, view and share large 3D laser-scan datasets (sample projects list Leica, Faro, Z+F and Trimble scanners). Patented TurboMesh converts point clouds to lightweight meshes for streaming. Editions: BIM (scan-to-BIM, design on as-built), Twin (assets plus CAD/BIM and enterprise data) and 360 (lightweight 360 video); navigation also lists Cintoo Workspace. Lists AI-powered classification of scan data, open SDKs and APIs, a VR experience on the Cintoo Streaming SDK and Unreal Engine, and an unlimited model (unlimited users and web access). The solutions menu covers progress tracking, design-issue checks, quality and compliance, asset management, remote collaboration and brownfield risk. Vendor states ISO 27001, SOC 2 and GDPR compliance (vendor claims). User counts and customer quotes are vendor content and are not used. | AI reality intelligence platform that unifies reality capture data and quantifies installed work across job activities from each capture. The vendor says visuals are available in 30 minutes and progress data in as fast as 6 hours (conditions apply), with no BIM model required to start, and production analytics tied to cost codes. The site menu lists VisualTrack, ProgressTrack and DeviationTrack (marked Coming Soon), plus Procore, Autodesk Forma and Fieldwire integrations; the pricing page also lists Schedule Recovery (the pace needed to get back on track when the schedule slips). The homepage announces a new commercial model with visual documentation at no additional cost. Percentage results, time-saved figures and customer quotes are vendor content and are not used. |
| Who it's for | Reality capture, VDC, and geospatial teams at contractors, engineers, and owners (Arup quoted). | Owners, general contractors, and trade partners. |
| Pricing (as publicly stated) | Not publicly listed. The vendor site has no pricing or plans link in its navigation or footer; cintoo.com/pricing, /en/pricing and /plans return a not-found page. The site offers Request a Demo and Try it Free with a free 30-day trial, and describes an unlimited model (unlimited users and web access). Confirm pricing with the vendor. | Pricing page headline: "Pricing Rebuilt Around Progress, Not Pictures. At $0.15/sqft", with Talk to Sales. The vendor says every sq ft registered for Progress Intelligence unlocks 5X that in visual documentation coverage at no added cost, and lists unlimited users and no BIM required. Minimums, term and what counts as a registered sq ft are not stated. Vendor-listed; confirm current pricing with the vendor. |
| User reviews | No reviews yet. Read or write | No reviews yet. Read or write |
| Vendor links | ||
| Sources |
Facts last checked: Nov 5, 2026. Prices change; check the vendor page before relying on them.
Where the vendor descriptions differ
- Who it is for: Cintoo describes reality capture, VDC and geospatial teams at contractors, engineers and owners. Track3D names owners, general contractors and trade partners.
- Capture and inputs: Cintoo says it is agnostic across laser scanners and reality capture devices (sample projects list Leica, Faro, Z+F and Trimble) and also offers a 360 Edition for lightweight 360 video. Track3D says it unifies reality capture data and that no BIM model is required to start; the pages we read do not name a required camera or scanner list.
- What you get: Cintoo lists high-fidelity mesh visualization, scan-to-BIM and design on as-built (BIM Edition), asset visualization with CAD/BIM and enterprise data (Twin Edition), AI-powered classification, open SDKs and APIs, VR on its Streaming SDK and Unreal Engine, and an unlimited model (unlimited users and web access). Track3D lists visuals available in 30 minutes and progress data in as fast as 6 hours (conditions apply), production analytics tied to cost codes, Schedule Recovery on the pricing page, and Procore, Autodesk Forma and Fieldwire integrations; DeviationTrack is marked Coming Soon.
- AI labels: Cintoo is tagged AI features added to established product (AI-powered classification). Track3D is tagged AI-first.
- Pricing (read Nov 5, 2026): Cintoo publishes no prices (/pricing and /en/pricing not-found); Request a Demo and a free 30-day trial, with an unlimited-users marketing model. Track3D publishes $0.15/sqft for Progress Intelligence, with Talk to Sales, and says every registered sq ft unlocks 5X visual documentation coverage at no added cost (unlimited users, no BIM required; minimums and term not stated). See each tool page for detail.
- Not used here: user counts, time-saved and percentage results, testimonials and customer quotes (vendor material). Facts for both tools come from vendor websites (desk research).
Paraphrased from the sources listed above. Vendor claims are reported as claims.
What users say
The facts above come from vendor websites. Whether either tool is any good for your work is something only people who use them can say. These are member reviews, all ratings shown, never edited or removed for being negative.
Cintoo
No reviews yet. Used Cintoo? Yours would be the first.
Track3D
No reviews yet. Used Track3D? Yours would be the first.
Used either of these? Share your take
Good or bad, an honest review from an estimator, PM or super helps the next team more than another vendor demo. You post under a handle; your email is never shown.
Questions to ask in your review
- Whether you mainly need a scan and digital-twin workspace, or quantified progress and production analytics from each capture
- Which capture devices and file types each vendor supports for your workflow, and who runs capture on site
- What Cintoo costs after the trial, and what Track3D minimums and registered-sq-ft rules mean on your project size
- What did you use it for, on what kind of work and project size?
- How long did setup and training take, and who on your team did it?
- What does it cost you in practice, compared with what the sales call said?
How reviews work: review guidelines and methodology. All reviews: reviews hub.
Related
- Category hub: AI project management, field, progress & safety tools
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Buildots
- Compare: Doxel vs Buildots
- Compare: viAct vs Intenseye
- Compare: Raken vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Fieldwire vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Voxel vs Intenseye
- Compare: Track3D vs Buildots
- Compare: Cintoo vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: viAct vs Voxel
- Compare: WakeCap vs viAct
- Compare: OpenSpace vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Reconstruct vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Procore AI vs Autodesk Assistant
- Compare: Riskcast vs Raken
- Compare: Skydio vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Matterport vs Cintoo
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Track3D
- Compare: FieldEdge vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Jobber
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Service Fusion vs Workiz
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Housecall Pro vs Jobber
- Compare: Jobber vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs JobTread
- Compare: Buildertrend vs JobTread
- Compare: JobTread vs Projul
- Compare: Projul vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Visibuild
- Compare: Dalux Field vs Fieldwire
- Compare: RDrive vs Visibuild
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Sitemate vs Raken
- Compare: Rhumbix vs busybusy
- Compare: Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Compare: ClockShark vs Workyard
- Compare: Workyard vs busybusy
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs ClockShark
- Compare: FYLD vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs TrueLook
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs TrueLook
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs HammerTech
- Compare: Oculo vs Track3D
- Compare: Evercam vs TrueLook
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Provizual
- Compare: busybusy vs ClockShark
- Compare: busybusy vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Doxel vs Track3D
- Compare: Station 1 vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Extracts Pro
- Compare: Timescapes vs TrueLook
- Compare: Novara Flex vs BiltOn
- Compare: GoFormz vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs HammerTech
- Compare: SkillSignal vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: blade ai vs Argyle
- Compare: Constructable vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Opusense vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Sitemate (Storm) vs Crewscope
- Compare: Cupix vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Evercam vs EarthCam
- Compare: Alloovium vs Station 1
- Compare: Dalux Field vs RDrive
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Projul
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs BiltOn
- Compare: Novara Flex vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Alloovium vs Opusense
- Compare: Timescapes vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Breadcrumb
- Compare: Argyle vs Provizual
- Compare: FYLD vs Ontollo
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: GoFormz vs SiteMarker
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Knowify
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs Matterport
- Compare: Oculo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Autodesk Assistant vs Constructable
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs innDex
- Compare: JobTread vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: ArchiSnapper vs Sitemate
- Compare: EarthCam vs Timescapes
- Compare: PlanRadar vs RDrive
- Compare: Cupix vs Doxel
- Compare: Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Matterport vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Dalux Field vs PlanRadar
- Compare: busybusy vs Arcoro Time
- Compare: BiltOn vs innDex
- Compare: Cupix vs Oculo
- Compare: Opusense vs Raken
- Compare: Doxel vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Fieldwire vs Raken
- Compare: Cintoo vs Reconstruct
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Jobber
- Compare: Workiz vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: Buildertrend vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Visibuild vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Evercam vs Timescapes
- Compare: Station 1 vs Raken
- Compare: Evercam vs viAct
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista vs Track3D
- Compare: Voxel vs WakeCap
- Compare: Knowify vs JobTread
- Compare: TraceAir vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Buildertrend
- Compare: EarthCam vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: innDex vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Sitemate
- Compare: Matterport vs Cupix
- Compare: mJob vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs Oculo
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Intenseye
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SafetyClerk
- Compare: SiteMarker vs Raken
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Track3D
- Compare: Cintoo vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting vs OpenSpace
- Compare: FieldPulse vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Jobber vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Projul vs Knowify
- Compare: Constructable vs Procore AI
- Compare: HammerTech vs viAct
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Reconstruct
- Compare: HCSS HeavyJob vs Rhumbix
- Compare: busybusy vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Workyard vs Arcoro Time (formerly ExakTime)
- Compare: BiltOn vs HammerTech
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs SkillSignal
- Compare: EarthCam vs OpenSpace
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Raken vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Doxel
- Compare: Sensera Systems vs Evercam
- Compare: Opusense vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: Intenseye vs WakeCap
- Compare: Voxel vs HammerTech
- Compare: PlanRadar vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Riskcast vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Hover vs CompanyCam
- Compare: FieldEdge vs Housecall Pro
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Workiz
- Compare: Cornerstone PM vs Projul
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs PlanRadar
- Compare: Crewscope vs FYLD
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Visibuild
- Compare: Station 1 vs Sitemate
- Compare: Buildots vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: Intenseye vs HammerTech
- Compare: Matterport vs Reconstruct
- Compare: busybusy vs HCSS HeavyJob
- Compare: MobiClocks vs Workyard
- Compare: Oculo vs Evercam
- Compare: SkillSignal vs innDex
- Compare: RDrive vs ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Track3D vs Cupix
- Compare: OpenSpace vs Track3D
- Compare: viAct vs Oracle Advisor for Safety
- Compare: Reconstruct vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Riskcast vs Workyard
- Compare: FieldPulse vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Service Fusion
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldPulse
- Compare: Jobber vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Cupix vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs innDex
- Compare: GoFormz vs Opusense
- Compare: ClockShark vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Nyfty.ai vs Novara Flex
- Compare: Alloovium vs Nyfty.ai
- Compare: DroneDeploy vs Cupix
- Compare: Raken vs busybusy
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs innDex
- Compare: Riskcast vs busybusy
- Compare: Matterport vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: FieldPulse vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Jobber vs Projul
- Compare: Workiz vs FieldEdge
- Compare: Visibuild vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Closeout Pro vs Visibuild
- Compare: Sitemate vs Fieldwire
- Compare: Station 1 vs FYLD
- Compare: Buildots vs Oculo
- Compare: Doxel vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Oracle Advisor for Safety vs Voxel
- Compare: HammerTech vs SkillSignal
- Compare: PlanRadar vs Sitemate (Dashpivot + Storm)
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs BiltOn
- Compare: Crewscope vs Raken
- Compare: Deltek ArchiSnapper vs Dalux Field
- Compare: Arcoro Time (ExakTime) vs SmartBarrel
- Compare: Arcoro Time vs MobiClocks
- Compare: Opusense vs FYLD
- Compare: Alloovium vs Sitemate
- Compare: Cintoo vs Cupix
- Compare: Roofr vs Jobber
- Compare: Rhumbix vs Workyard
- Compare: BiltOn vs SkillSignal
- Compare: Propeller vs Reconstruct
- Compare: Raken vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Raken vs Workyard
- Compare: ClockShark vs Rhumbix
- Compare: Breadcrumb vs HammerTech
- Compare: GoFormz vs Raken
- Compare: Oculo vs Doxel
- Compare: Novara Flex vs Sitemate
- Compare: HammerTech vs Novara Flex
- Compare: Knowify vs FieldPulse
- Compare: SafetyClerk vs Novara Flex
- Compare: TraceAir vs Skydio
- Compare: Roofr vs ServiceTitan
- Compare: Jobber vs JobTread
- Compare: FYLD vs Alloovium
- Compare: Station 1 vs Opusense
- Compare: viAct vs Sensera Systems
- Compare: CompanyCam vs Sitemate
- Compare: Voxel vs Samsara
- Compare: Hexagon Multivista Progress vs DroneDeploy
- Compare: Roofr vs Projul
- Compare: ServiceTitan vs Knowify
- Compare: Alloovium vs Deltek ArchiSnapper
- Compare: Cupix vs Evercam
- Compare: eSUB vs Raken
- Compare: TrueLook vs CompanyCam
- Compare: Visibuild vs Sitemate
- Compare: Buildots vs Hexagon Multivista Building Progress Reporting
- Compare: Constructable vs Contractor Foreman
- Compare: Crewscope vs Alloovium